請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39331
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳端容 博士(Duan-Rung Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | Kao-Jung Chang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 張國榮 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:26:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-01-28 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-01-28 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參 考 文 獻
中文部分 1. 朱明譯 (1993) ˙美國陸軍傳統價值觀的社會性鴻溝˙國防譯粹月刊,20 (10),73-83。 2. 李美銀 (2003) ˙妥瑞症患童父母親職壓力、因應方式、及其相關因素之探討˙國立台灣大學醫學院護理學研究所碩士論文。 3. 孫敏華、許如亨 (2001)˙軍事心理學心˙心理出版社,3。 4. 孫敏華 (2001) ˙役男壓力來源、因應方式與軍中適應關係之研究˙中華心理衛生學刊,13(4),1-31。 5. 秦淳、劉紹興 (1995) ˙某醫學中心護理人員工作壓力與生活壓力之關係˙中華職業醫學雜誌,2 (3), 110-119。 6. 陸洛 (1997)˙工作壓力之歷程:理論與研究的對話˙中華心理衛生學刊,10(4),19-54。 7. 國民健康局 (2003) ˙民國九十一年台灣地區國民健康促進知識、態度與行為調查˙3-774。 8. 黃俊傑 (1991) ˙台北市青少年生活意識與價值觀變遷之研究˙輔仁學誌-法、管理學院之部,23,1-88。 9. 葉英堃 (1995)˙生活事件、社會支持與精神疾病˙中華精神醫學,9(3),177-185。 10. 蔡文佩、李選、盧成皆 (1996)˙入伍新兵壓力感受與其身心困擾之探討˙長庚護理,7(3),57-68。 11. 蔡文佩、余莉莉、郭重雄 (2002) ˙軍校學生壓力感受與其身心反應之探討˙慈濟護理雜誌,1(2),36-45。 12. 龍育民 (2000)˙論工作壓力與情緒管理之重要性˙國防醫學雜誌,15(10),86-95。 英文部分 1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fourth edition, 1400K Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005. 2. Avison, W.R., Turner, R.J. (1988). Stressful life events and depressive symptoms: Disaggregating the effects of acute stressors and chronic strains. J Health Soc Behav, 29, 253-64. 3. Berenbaum, H., Connelly, J. (1993). The effect of stress on hedonic capacity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(3), 474-481. 4. Brown, G. W., Harris, T. O., & Peto, J. (1973). Life events and psychiatric disorders. Part2: nature of causal link. Psychological Medicine 3, 159-176. 5. Brown, G. W., & Harris, T. (1978). The social origins of depression. Tavistock Publication: London. 6. C., Messer, S. C., Ormam, D.T. (2002). Mental disorders among U.S. military personnel in the 1990s: association with high levels of health care utilization and early military attrition. 7. Charlton, P. F. C., Thompson, J.A. (1996). Ways of coping with psychological distress after trauma. Br J Clin Psychol, 35, 517-530。 8. Cheng, T. A. (1989). Psychosocial stress and minor psychiatric morbidity: a community study in Taiwan. Journal of Affective Disorders, 17, 137-152. 9. Cheng, A. T. (1995). Mental illness and suicide: a cases-control stud in east Taiwan. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 52, 594-603. 10. Cigrang, J. A., Carbone, E. G., Todd, S., Fiedler, E. (2003). Mental health attrition from air force basic military training. Mil Med, 168(11), 904-910. 11. Cooper (Eds), Stress research, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1-20. 12. Eisenberg, L. (1997). Psychiatry and health in low-income populations. Comprehension Psychiatry, 38, 69-73. 13. Hasida, B. Z. (2003). Happy adolescents: The link between subjective well-being, internal resources, and parental factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(2), 67-79. 14. Hoge, C. W., Lesikar, S. E., Guevara, R., Lange, J., Brundage, J. F., Engel, C. Tobin, D. L., Holroyd, K. A., Reynolds, R. V. (1984). User’s manual for the coping strategies inventory. Columbus, OH: Ohio State Universioty Press. 15. Holmas, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1976). The development and implication of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 1, 213-218. 16. Homes, T. H., & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. 17. Holroyd, K. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Stress, coping and somatic adaptation. In L. Goldberger & Breznitz (Eds.), Handbood of stress (pp. 21-35). New York: The Free Press. 18. Kaplan, H. I., Sadock, B. J. (1998). Mood disorder In: Kaplan and Sadock’s Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences, Clinical Psychiatry. 8th eds, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins,524-80. 19. Keller, M. B., Lavori, P. W., Lewis, C. E., & Klerman, G. L.(1983). Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20. Lee, Y., Yang, M. J., Lai, T. J., Chiu. N. M., & Chau, T. T. (2000). Development of the Taiwanese depression questionnaire. Chang Gung Medical Journal, 23, 688-94. 21. Mark, C. (2003). Military life hard on mental health : prevalence of depression among Canadian soldiers particularly high. Medical Post. Toronto, 39, Iss34, 4. 22. Mayseless, O., Wiseman, H., & Hai, I. (1998). Adolescents’relationships with father, mother , and same-gender friend. J Adolesc. Res, 13, 101-123. 23. Myer, J. K., Lindenthal J. J., Pepper, M. P. (1971). Life events and psychiatric impairment. J Nerv Ment Dis, 152, 147-157. 24. Neiderhiser, J. M., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E. M. (1996). Genetically informative designs for distinguishing developmental pathways during adolescence: Responsible and antisocial behavior. Dev. Psychopathol. 8: 779-791. 25. Okulate, G. T. (2001). Suicide attempts in a Nigerian military setting. East Afr Med J, 78(9), 493-496. 26. Paykel, E. S., Myer, J. K., Dienelt, M. N., Klerman, G. L., Lindenthal, J. J., & Pepper, M. P.(1969). Life events and depression: a controlled study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 21,753-760. 27. Paykel, E. S. (1974). Recent life events and clinical depression. In: Gunderson EKE. Rahe RH eds. Life stress and illness. Springfingfield, IL: Charles C Thomas, 134-163. 28. Perlin, L. I. (1983). Role strain and personal stress. In: Laplan HB ed. Trends in theory and researdn. N.Y.: Academic Press, 3-32. 29. Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1984). Social development. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ. 30. Phelan, J. et al., (1991). Work stress, family stress and depression in professional and managerial employee. Psychological Medicine, 21, 999-1012. 31. Ross, C. E., Mirowski, J. (1979). A comparison of life event weighting schemes: Changes, undersirability, and effect proportional indices. J Health Soc Behav, 20, 166-177. 32. Samaille, E., Servan, D., Playe, J. M., Coulot, D., Goudemand, M., Parquet, P. J. (1993). Life events and military service. Encephale, 19(6), 615-618. 33. Selye, H. (1983). The stress concept: Past, present, and future. In C. L. Predictors of relapse in major depressive disorder. JAMA, 250, 3299-3304. 34. Solano, L., Battisti, M., Coda, R., Stanisci, S. (1993). Effects of some psychosocial variables on different disease manifestations in 112 cadets: a longitudinal study. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37(6), 621-636. 35. Tekbas, O. F., Ceylan, S., Hamzaoglu, O., Hasde, M. (2003). An investigation of the prevalence of depressive symptoms in newly recruited young adult men in Turkey. Psychiatry Res, 119(1-2), 155-162. 36. Tennant, C., & Andrews, G. (1977). A scale to measure the cause of life events. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 11, 163-167. 37. Thompson, K. C., & Hendrie, H. C. (1972). Enviromental stress in primary depressive illness. Archives of General Psychiatry, 26, 130-132. 38. Traolach, B., Paul, B., Christopher, T., & Jane, H. (1985). The list of threatening experiences: a subset of 12 life event categories with considerable long-term contextual threat. Psychological Medicine, 15, 189-194. 39. Turner, R. J., & Lloyd, D. A. (1995). Lifetime traumas and mental health: the significance of cumulative adversity. J Health Social Behavior, 36(4), 360-376. 40. Vinokur, A., Selzer, M. L. (1975). Desirable vs undesirable life events: Their relationship to stress and mental distress. J Person Soc Psychol, 32, 329-337. 41. Vitaliano, P. P., DeWolfe, D. J., Maiuro, R. D., Russo, J., & Katon, W. (1990). Appraised changeability of stressor as a modifier of the relationship between coping and depression: A test of the hypothesis of fit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 585-592. 42. Williams, R. A., Hagerty, B. M., Yousha, S. M., Hoyle, K. S., Oe, H. (2002). Factors associated with depression in navy recruits. J Clin Psychol, 58(4), 323-337. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39331 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:
近年來役男憂鬱症問題經常被社會大眾討論,其中以「重度憂鬱症」問題為最為嚴重;但過去多年以來,一直缺乏有關役男「重度憂鬱症」之研究,所以無法對問題是作適當之解釋,或提供完整有效的防範措施。 因此本研究嘗試從役男個人、家庭、及部隊等三個方向進行探討,希望能找出造成役男「重度憂鬱症」之危險因素,並提出相關預防措施,以減少服役後疾病的發生。 方法: 研究樣本分為「重度憂鬱症」及「非重度憂鬱症」役男兩組,其中「重度憂鬱症」役男來自國軍北投醫院、三軍總醫院、及國軍松山醫院之住院患者,而「非重度憂鬱症」役男則來自台北地區三個營區;樣本選擇採立意取樣方式,調查時間自民國九十三年五月至九十三年八月止。 研究工具包括個人背景調查、家庭背景調查、服役背景調查、役男壓力源量表、及役男因應量表等;其中役男壓力量表包括軍中勤務壓力、軍中生活壓力、軍中階級壓力、家庭擔心壓力、家庭變故壓力、個人感情壓力、及個人前途壓力等七項分量表;役男因應量表則包括積極想法因應、積極活動因應、積極調適因應、及消極因應等四項分量表。 研究過程為比較「重度憂鬱症」役男與「非重度憂鬱症」役男之個人背景、家庭背景、服役背景、軍中勤務壓力、軍中生活壓力、軍中階級壓力、家庭擔心壓力、家庭變故壓力、個人感情壓力、及個人前途壓力、積極想法因應、積極活動因應、積極調適因應、及消極因應等變項是否具有顯著性差異;並進一步探討上述變項與「重度憂鬱症」發生之相關性;最後建立迴歸模式,用以預測「重度憂鬱症」發生的可能性。 使用統計工具為SPSS (10.0)版,統計方法包括使用Factor analysis分析量表的效度,用Reliability analysis-scale分析量表的信度,用Descriptive statistics對「重度憂鬱症」役男與「非重度憂鬱症」役男作描述性分析,用Chi-square test及t-test對「重度憂鬱症」役男與「非重度憂鬱症」役男作差異性分析,用logistic regression 探討各變項與「重度憂鬱症」發生之相關性,並建立迴歸模式。 結果: 對「重度憂鬱症」役男發出182份問卷,回收174份,回收率為95.6%,扣除填答不全之問卷後,有效問卷共155份;對「非重度憂鬱症」役男發出265份問卷,回收256份,回收率為96.6%,扣除填答不全之問卷後,有效問卷共247份。 研究樣本結果發現,「重度憂鬱症」役男相較於「非重度憂鬱症」役男之主要差異特徵為,(1)無業者較多、(2)與家人互動少者較多、(3)有個人精神疾病史者較多、(4)父母婚姻不完整者較多、(5)父親管教方式為嚴格且缺乏溝通者較多、(6)母親管教方式為嚴格且缺乏溝通者較多、(7)家庭年收入低者較多、(8)有家人有精神疾病史者較多、(9)下部隊時間三個月內者較多、(10)對軍中勤務壓力感受較大、(11)對軍中生活壓力感受較大(12)對軍中階級壓力感受較大(13)對家庭擔心壓力感受較大、(14)對家庭變故壓力感受較大、(15)對個人感情壓力感受較大、(16)對個人前途壓力感受較大、(17) 積極想法因應較少、(18) 積極活動因應較少、(19) 積極調適因應較少、(20)消極因應較多。 預測「重度憂鬱症」發生之顯著因素包括(1)過去工作狀況、(2)個人精神病史、(3)父親管教態度、(4)家人精神病史、(5)軍中階級壓力、(6)家庭擔心壓力、(7)積極調適因應、(8)消極因應等八項,其所建立之模式對「重度憂鬱症」發生之整體正確預測率為88.9%。 結論: 「重度憂鬱症」役男與「非重度憂鬱症」役男在個人背景、家庭背景、服役背景、壓力源、及因應方式上會有所差異;結果證實「重度憂鬱症」發生的確會受到個人、家庭、及軍中等多重因素影響。因此為了減少「重度憂鬱症」的發生,役男個人、父母、及長官皆有責任,彼此應共同努力合作,注意發病原因及疾病特徵,方能達到防治效果。 關鍵字:役男、重度憂鬱症、壓力源、因應方式 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Object
Depression among enlist men in national service is a widely discussed issue by general public recently. The most serious form of depression is major depression. However, in the past years, there were few researches focusing on this issue. Therefore, no proper explanation was given, nor effective preventive measures were suggested on this issue. This study attempts to approach this issue from the perspectives of individual, family, and military, and hopes to find out risk factors for Major depression among enlist men in national service, and to suggest preventive measures, in order to decrease morbidity after recruitment into military. Method The sample of this study was conducted in two different groups: soldiers with major depression, and soldiers without major depression. Soldiers with major depression were sampling from hospital inpatients from Armed Forces Beitou Hospital, Tri Service General Hospital and Armed Forces Songshan Hospital. The soldiers without major depression were sampling from three military bases in Taipei. Samples were selected by purposive sampling. The survey was conducted from May 2004 to August 2004. Various data was collected from each individual recruited into this study, including general personal background, family background, military service background, stressor inventory for enlist men, coping skill inventory for enlist men. There were seven factors in the stress inventory: “military duty, military lifestyle, military hierarchy, family concern, family event, personal affection, and personal future stress”; there were four factors in the coping skill inventory : “positive thinking, positive action, positive accommodation, and negative coping”. General personal background, family background, military background, stress caused by 7 different factors including military duty, military lifestyle, military hierarchy, family concern, family event, personal affection, personal future, and 4 coping styles including positive thinking, positive action, positive accommodation, and negative coping, all were compared to decide if there was significant difference between enlist men of major depression group and non-major depression group. Moreover, correlation of above items and presence of major depression was investigated. Finally, a regression model was developed to predict probability of occurrence of major depression. SPSS (10.0) was used for statistic analysis in this study. The statistic methods included: using factor analysis to determine the validity of inventories, using reliability analysis-scale to determine the reliability of inventories, using descriptive statistics to perform the descriptive analysis of major depression group and non-major depression group, using chi-square test and t-test to perform the differential analysis between major depression group and non-major depression group, and using logistic regression to explore the correlation between all variables mentioned in above paragraph and the occurrence of major depression in order to develop the regression model. Result 182 questionnaires were distributed to the group of enlist men with major depression, and 174 of them were returned. The return rate was 95.6%. Excluding the incomplete ones, there were 155 effective questionnaires. 265 questionnaires were distributed to the non-major depression group, and 256 were returned. The return rate was 96.6%. Excluding incomplete ones, there were 274 effective questionnaires. After analysis of complete questionnaires of both sets, the major depression group of enlist men have following characteristics compared to the non-major depression group: 1. most of them being unemployed before recruitment, 2. less interaction with family members, 3. more psychiatric history, 4. most of their parents marriage status being incomplete, 5. harsher discipline and less proper communication from father, 6. harsher discipline and less proper communication from mother, 7. less family revenue, 8. more psychiatric history among family members, 9. most just being placed at current base in the past three months, 10. perceiving more stress from military duty, 11. perceiving more stress from military lifestyle, 12. perceiving more stress from military hierarchy, 13. perceiving more stress from family concern, 14. perceiving more stress from family event, 15. perceiving more stress from personal affection, 16.perceuving more stress from personal future, 17.less positive thinking for coping, 18, less positive action for coping, 19. less positive accommodation for coping, 20. more negative coping. The logistic regression model developed in order to predict occurrence of major depression utilizing the following eight factors: past vocational function, personal psychiatric history, discipline attitude of father, psychiatric history in family members, stress caused by military hierarchy, stress caused by family concern, positive accommodation for coping, and negative coping. The predictive accuracy is 88.9%. Conclusion Enlist men with major depression and non-major depression soldiers showed significant differences in the aspects of personal background, family background, military background, stressors, and coping; occurrence of major depression was affected by personal, familial, military factors. Therefore, in order to reduce the incidence of major depression, the individual, the parents and the superior officers all share the responsibility of noticing possible symptoms cooperatively to prevent major depression effectively. Key words: solider, major depression, stressor, coping skill | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:26:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-P91843005-1.pdf: 712035 bytes, checksum: 4e75a88c56826447cc0b0d297f5afcb9 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論
第一節 背景與問……………………………………………… 1 第二節 研究動………………………………………………… 4 第三節 研究目的……………………………………………… 5 第二章 歷史沿革 第一節 國軍心理衛生發展…………………………………… 6 第二節 國軍精神醫療發展…………………………………… 7 第三章 文獻查證 第一節 名詞界定……………………………………………… 8 第二節 役男憂鬱症的嚴重性…………………………………12 第三節 影響役男憂鬱症的因素………………………………13 第四章 研究架構與假設……………………………………………18 第五章 研究方法 第一節 研究設計………………………………………………19 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………20 第三節 研究工具………………………………………………21 第四節 資料蒐集過程…………………………………………24 第五節 資料統計分析…………………………………………25 第六章 研究結果 第一節 樣本回收狀況…………………………………………26 第二節 各量表的信度檢定……………………………………27 第三節 役男之基本資料………………………………………30 第四節 役男個人背景比較……………………………………32 第五節 役男家庭背景比較……………………………………34 第六節 役男服役背景比較……………………………………39 第七節 役男壓力源比較………………………………………40 第八節 役男因應方式比較……………………………………52 第九節 影響役男「重鬱症」之因素…………………………59 第七章 討論 第一節 「重鬱症」與「非重鬱症」役男之比較討論………66 第二節 役男「重鬱症」發生之因素討論……………………77 第三節 役男「重鬱症」發生之預測模式……………………79 第八章 結論與建議 第一節 結論……………………………………………………80 第二節 建議……………………………………………………82 第三節 研究限制………………………………………………86 參考資料 中文部分…………………………………………………………87 英文部分…………………………………………………………89 附錄 附錄一 研究問卷……………………………………………… 95 附錄二 役男壓力源及因應方式量表同意書…………………100 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 役男重度憂鬱症之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Study for Major Depression during the Military Service | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 萬芳榮 博士,楊銘欽 博士 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 因應方式,役男,壓力源,重度憂鬱症, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | coping skill,stressor,solider,major depression, | en |
dc.relation.page | 100 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 695.35 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。