請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3927完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉德銘(Der-Ming Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ming-Chung Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉明宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:38:42Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2017-02-08 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:38:42Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2017-02-08 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2016-11-17 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王才義. 1995. 孤挺花. 臺灣農家要覽. 農作物篇(二). 財團法人豐年社出版. 台北市. 臺灣.
李金龍. 1987. 園藝作物花粉活力測定與貯藏之研究. 科學農業 5:347-356. 阮明淑. 2000. 金花石蒜及相關種遺傳歧異性分析及核型重塑之研究. 國立臺灣大學園藝學系博士論文. 林功濤、李鳳宜. 2000. 北京小菊品種選育及遺傳規律探討. 中國花卉科技20年. 科學出版社. 北京. 中國. 林秉詩. 2000. 溫度對岩桐屬生長之影響及雜交後裔性狀表現. 國立臺灣大學園藝學系碩士論文. 邱年永、張光雄. 1995. 原色台灣藥用植物圖鑑. 第四冊. 南天書局出版. 台北市.臺灣. p. 273. 徐炳聲、林巾箴、俞志洲、黃少甫. 1986. 從花粉的生活力和雜交後的結實評價石蒜屬內的種間關係. 遺傳學報 13:369-376. 財政部關稅總局. 2016. 24 Aug 2016. <https://portal.sw.nat.gov.tw/APGA/GA01>. 張元聰、王裕權. 2006. 單重瓣連鎖遺傳在紫羅蘭育種上之應用. 植物種苗 8:1-15. 張瑩、李辛雷、田敏、陳勝. 2010. 大花蕙蘭鮮花香氣成分的研究. 武漢植物學研究 28:381-384. 郭孟樺. 2012. 夏蓳與毛葉蝴蝶草種間雜交胚之胚拯救與多倍體化. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系碩士論文. 陳錦木. 2013. 重瓣日日春之花芽形態、花形遺傳及育種. 國立臺灣大學園藝暨景觀學系博士論文. 程金水、劉青林. 2000. 園林植物遺傳育種學. 中國林業出版社. 北京. 中國. 黃敏展. 1996. 亞熱帶花卉學總論. 國立中興大學園藝系. 臺中. 臺灣. 黃增泉. 1993. 植物分類學. 南天書局有限公司. 臺北. 臺灣. 楊恭毅. 1984. 楊氏園藝植物大名典. 第四冊. 中國花卉雜誌社. 台北市. 臺灣. 農產品交易行情網. 2016. 24 Aug 2016. <http://amis.afa.gov.tw/l-asp/top-v.asp>. 農糧署植物品種權公告查詢系統. 2016. 24 Aug 2016. <http://newplant.afa.gov.tw/>. 趙印泉、劉青林. 2009. 重瓣花的形成機理及遺傳特性研究進展. 西北植物學報4:832-841. 蔡宛育. 2014. 蝴蝶蘭香氣化合物分析之研究. 中國醫藥大學藥用化妝品學系碩士論文. 蕭郁芸. 2008. 大葉蝴蝶蘭(Phalaenopsis bellina)香味生合成及其相關基因之研究. 成功大學生命科學系博士論文 Almouslem, A.B. and R.A.E. Tilney-Bassett. 1989. The inheritance of flower doubleness and nectar spur in Pelargonium ×hortorum Bailey. Euphytica 41:23-29. Angenent, G.C. and L. Colombo. 1996. Molecular control of ovule development. Trends Plant Sci. 1:228-232. Arroyo, S. 1982. The chromosome of Hippeastrum, Amaryllis and Phycella (Amaryllidaceae). Kew Bull. 37:211-216. Ballard, W.R. 1918. Notes on geranium breeding. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 15:62-65. Barone, A., A.D. Giudice, and N.Q. Ng. 1992. Barrier to interspecific hybridization between Vigna unguiculata and Vigna vexillata. Sex. Plant Reprod. 5:195-200. Bell, W.D. 1973. New potentials in amaryllis breeding. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 86:462-466. Bell, W.D. 1977. Double flowered amaryllis. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 90:121-122. Blom, T. 1980. Rose research in Veinland, Canada. Bull. Roses Inc. June:45-46. Brandham, P.E. and P.S. Bhandol. 1997. Chromosomal relationships between the genera Amaryllis and Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae). Kew Bull. 52:973-980. Brewbaker, J.L. and B.H. Kwack. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. Amer. J. Bot. 50:859-865. Bryan, J. and M. Griffiths. 1995. Manual of bulbs. Timber Press, Portland, Or., U.S.A. Buitink, J., O. Leprince, M.A. Hemminga, and F.A. Hoekstra. 2000. Effect of moisture and temperature on the aging kinetics of pollen: Interpretation based on cytoplasmic mobility. Plant Cell Environ. 23:967-974. Chen, C.M., T.Y. Wei, and D.M. Yeh. 2012. Morphology and inheritance of double floweredness in Catharanthus roseus. HortScience 47:1679-1681. Choi, E.G. and H.B. Park. 1998. Plant regeneration from immature embryo and bulb scale tissue of Hippeastrum hybridum. Kor. J. Plant Tiss.Cult. 25:27-31. Chung, M.C. and H.K. Wu. 1987. Karyotype analysis of IR36 and two trisomic lines of rice. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 28:289-304. Coble, C.J. and W.T. Schapaugh, Jr. 1990. Nutrient culture medium components affecting plant recovery from immature embryos of three Glycine genotypes and an interspecific hybrids grown in vitro. Euphytica 50:127-133. Coen, E.S. and E.M. Meyerowitz. 1991. The war of whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower development. Nature 353:31-37. Cothran, C.D. 1979. Yellow-flowered and other amaryllis hybrids. Plant Life 35:61-65. Cothran, C.D. 1980. The request for a large yellow-flowering hybrid of amaryllis. Plant Life 36:19-23. Craig, R. 1963. The inheritance of several characters in the geranium, Pelargonium hortorum Baily. Penn. State Univ., State College, Penn., U.S.A., PhD. Diss. Crane, M.B. and J.C. Lawrence. 1947. The genetics of garden plants. MacMillan, London, U.K. Cross, R.H., S.A.B. McKay, A.G. McHughen and P.C. Bonham-Smith. 2003. Heat-stress effects on reproduction and seed set in Linum usitatissimun L. (flax). Plant Cell Environ. 26:1013-1020. De Jeu, M.J. and E. Jacobsen. 1995. Early postfertilization ovule culture in Alstroemeria L. and barriers to interspecific hybridization. Euphytica 86:15-23. Deme, J.W. 1978. Breeding double amaryllis. Plant Life 34:102-103. Ditta, G., A. Pinyopich, P. Robles, S. Pelaz, and M.F. Yanofsky. 2004. The SEP4 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana functions in floral organ and meristem identity. Curr. Biol. 14:1935-1940. Dolezel, J., J. Greilhuber, and J. Suda. 2007. Estimation of nuclear DNA content in plants using flow cytometry. Nat. Protoc. 2:2233-2244. Dpooležel, J., P. Binarová, and S. Lcretti. 1989. Analysis of nuclear DNA content in plant cells by flow cytometry. Biol. Plant. 31:113-120. Eyster, W.H. and D. Burpee. 1936. Inheritance of doubleness in the flowers of the nasturtium. J. Hered. 27:51-60. Golubeva, E.A. and A.S. Krotov. 1975. Flora of cultivated plants. Vol. 3. Grout Crops. Leningrad, Kolos. p. 90-93. Griesbach, R.J. 2005. Biochemistry and genetics of flower color, p. 89-99. In: J. Janick (ed.). Plant breeding reviews. Vol. 25. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, U.K. Heursel, J. and F. Garretsen. 1989. Inheritance of corolla size, number of stamens and plants with petaloid stamens in evergreen azaleas (Rhododendron obtusa). Plant Breeding 103:304-309. Honda, K., H. Watanabe, and K. Tsutsui. 2002. Cryopreservation of Delphinium pollen at -30℃. Euphytica 126:315-320. Horn, W. 2002. Breeding methods and breeding research, p. 47-83. In: A. Vainstein (ed.). Breeding for ornamental: Classical and molecular approaches. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. Hsiao, Y.Y., M.F. Jeng, W.C. Tsai, Y.C. Chuang, C.Y. Li, T.S. Wu, C.S. Kuoh, W.H. Chen, and H.H. Chen. 2008. A novel homodimeric geranyl diphosphate synthase from the orchid Phalaenopsis bellina lacking a DD(X)2-4D motif. Plant J. 55:719-733. Huang, C.W., H. Okubo, and S. Uemoto. 1990. Importance of two scales in propagation Hippeastrum hybridum by twin scaling. Scientia Hort. 42:141-149. Imai, Y. 1938. The genes for double flowers in the commercial varieties of the perpetual carnation. Jpn. J. Genet. 14:63-65. Irish, V.F., and E.M. Kramer. 1998. Genetic and molecular analysis of angiosperm flower development. Adv. Bot. Res. 28:197-230. Ishizaka, H. 2008. Interspecific hybridization by embryo rescue in the genus Cyclamen. Plant Biotechnol. 25:511-519. Jack, T. 2001. Relearning our ABCs: New twists on an old model. Trends Plant Sci. 6:310-316. Kaicker, U.S. and H.P. Singh. 1979. Role of mutation breeding in amaryllis. Plant Life 35:66-73. Kakani, V.G., P.V.V. Prasad, P.Q. Craufurd, and T.R. Wheeler. 2002. Response of in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes to temperature. Plant Cell Environ. 25:1651-1661. Khaleel, T.F., S. Haven, and T. Gilg. 1991. Karyomorphology of Amaryllis hybrids. Cytologia 56:31-41. Kikuchi, S., H. Tanaka, and H. Tsujimoto. 2007. Pollen tube growth in cross combination between Torenia fournieri and fourteen related species. Breed. Sci. 57:117-122. Knudsen, J.T., R. Eriksson, J. Gershenzon, and B. Ståhl. 2006. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 72:1-120. Kobayashi, N., D. Mizuta, and A. Nakatsuka. 2008. Attaining inter-subgeneric hybrids in fragrant azalea breeding and the inheritance of organelle DNA. Euphytica 159:67-72. Krotov, A.S. and E.T. Golubeva. 1973. Cytological studies on an interspecific hybrid Fagopyrum tataricum × F. cymosum. Proc. Appl. Bot. Genet. Breeding 51:256-260. Latapie, W. and H. Latapie. 1982. Breeding hybrid amaryllis – a rewarding experience. Plant Life 38:15-18. Latapie, W.R. 1980. Suggested standards for judging double Amaryllis. Plant Life 36:41. Liu, M.C. and D.M. Yeh. 2015. ‘T.S.S. No.1-Pink Pearl’: A double-flowered and fragrant amaryllis cultivar. HortScience 50:1588-1590. Lu, C. and M.P. Bridgen. 1996. Effects of genotype, culture medium and embryo developmental stage on the in vitro responses from ovule cultures of interspecific hybrids of Alstroemeria. Plant Sci. 116:205-212. McCann, J. J. 1937. New double hybrid amaryllis. Herbertia 15:69. McCann, J.J. 1937. New double hybrid amaryllis. Herbertia 4:185-186. McCann, J.J. 1950. McCann double amaryllis. Plant Life 6:107-108. Meerow, A.W. 1988. New trends in amaryllis (Hippeastrum) breeding. Proc. Flo. State Hort. Soc. 101:285-288. Meerow, A.W. 2000. Breeding amaryllis, p. 174-195. In: D.J. Callaway and M.B. Callaway (eds.). Breeding ornamental plants. Timber Press, Portland, Or., U.S.A. Meerow, A.W. 2009. Tilting at windmills: 20 years of Hippeastrum breeding. Israel J. Plant Sci. 57:303-313. Naranjo, C.A. and L. Poggio. 1988. A comparison of karyotype, Ag-NOR bands and DNA contents in Amaryllis and Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae). Kew Bull. 42:317-325. Ning, G.G., X.P. Shi, H.R. Hu, Y. Yan, and M.Z. Bao. 2009. Development of a range of polyploidy line in Petunia hybrid and relationship of ploidy with single-/double-flower trait. HortScience 44:250-255. Noack, R. 1962. Plasmatische Vererbung in der Gattung Begonia. Z. Botanik 50:52-59. Nugent, P.E. and R.J. Snyder. 1967. The inheritance of floret doubleness, floret center color, and plant habit in Pelargonium hortorum Bailey. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 91:680-690. Ockenga, S. 2002. Amaryllis. Clarkson Potter, New York, U.S.A. Okubo, H. 1993. Hippeastrum (Amaryllis), p. 321-334. In: A. de Hertogh and M. Le Nard (eds.). The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier, The Netherlands. Patanakanog, S. 1999. Varietal improvement of Hippeastrum spp. Kasetsart Univ., Bangkok, Thailand, PhD Diss. Pelaz, S., G.S. Ditta, E. Baumann, E. Wisman, and M.F. Yanofsky. 2000. B and C floral organ identity functions require SEPALLATA MADS-box genes. Nature 405:200-203. Poggio, L., G. González, and C.A. Naranjo. 2007. Chromosome studies in Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae): Variation in genome size. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 155:171-178. Poggio, L., M.F. Realini, M.F. Fourastié, A.M. García, and G.E. González. 2014. Genome downsizing and karyotype constancy in diploid and polyploidy congeners: A model of genome size variation. AoB Plants 6:plu029. (online) Poggio, L., G. González, and C.A. Naranjo. 2007. Chromosome studies in Hippeastrum (Amaryllidaceae): Variation in genome size. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 155:171-178. Read, V.M. 2000. Development of an in ovule embryo culture procedure for Hydrangea. J. Environ. Hort. 18:34-39. Read, V.M. 2004. Hippeastrum the gardener’s amaryllis. Timber Press, Portland, Or., U.S.A. Reed, S. 2004. Embryo rescue, p. 235-239. In: R.N. Trigiano and D.J. Gray (eds.). Plant development and biotechnology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, U.S.A. Rees, A.R. 1985. Ornamental bulbous plants, p. 59-267. In: A.H. Halevy (ed.). Handbook of flowering. Vol. 1. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, U.S.A. Reynolds, J. and J. Tampion 1983. Double flowers: A scientific study. Scientific and Academic Editions, New York, U.S.A. Rousi, A. 1968. Cytoplasmic inheritance in Aquilegia vulgaris. Hereditas 60:223-232. Royal Horticultural Society. 2007. The Royal Horticultural Society’s colour chart. Sato, S., M.M. Peet, and J.F. Thomas. 2002. Determining critical pre- and post-anthesis periods and physiological processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. J. Expt. Bot. 53:1187-1195. Saxe, H., M.G.R. Cannel, O. Johnsen, M.G. Ryan, and G. Vourlitis. 2001. Tree and forest functioning in response to global warming. New Phytol. 149:369-400. Scovel, G., H. Ben-Meir, M. Ovadis, H. Itzhaki, and A. Vainstein. 1998. RAPD and RFLP markers tightly linked to the locus controlling carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus) flower type. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96:117-122. Sharma, D.R., R. Kaur, and K. Kumar. 1996. Embryo rescue in plants – A review. Euphytica 89:325-337. Shields, J.E. 1979. The ancestors of the amaryllis. Amaryllis Bull. 1:2-6. Shivanna, K.R. and B.M. Johri. 1985. The angiosperm pollen structure and function. Wiley Eastern, New Delhi, India. Shivanna, K.R. and N.S. Rangaswamy. 1992. Pollen biology. Springer-Verlag, Germany. Stanley, R.G. and H.F. Linkskens. 1974. Pollen: Biology, biochemistry, management. Springer, New York, U.S.A. Stewart, J.M. 1981. In vitro fertilization and embryo rescue. Environ. Expt. Bot. 21:301-315. Stone, J.L., J.D. Thomson, and S.J. Dent. 1995. Assessment of pollen viability in hand- pollination experiments: A review. Amer. J. Bot. 82:1186-1197. Sukno, S., J. Ruso, C.C. Jan, J.M. Melero-Vara, and J.M. Fernandez-Martinez. 1999. Interspecific hybridization between sunflower and wild perennial Helianthus species via embryo rescue. Euphytica 106:69-78. Tanaka, Y., N. Sasaki, and A. Ohmiya. 2008. Plant pigments for coloration: Anthocyanins, betalains and carotenoids. Plant J. 54:733-749. Theiβen, G. 2001. Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4:75-85. Theiβen, G. and H. Saedler. 2001. Floral quartets. Nature 409:469-471. Traub, H.P. 1934. The Nehrling hybrid amaryllis. Yrbk. Amer. Amaryllis Soc. 1:61. Traub, H.P. 1958. The amaryllis manual. MacMillan, New York, U.S.A. Wang, Y.Q., R. Melzer, and G. Theissen. 2011. A double-flowered variety of lesser periwinkle (Vinca minor fl. pl.) that has persisted in the wild for more than 160 years. Ann. Bot. 107:1445-1452. Weaver, M.L. and H. Timm. 1988. Influence of temperature and water status on pollen viability in bean. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 113:13-15. Weinbaum, S.A., D.E. Parfitt, and V.S. Polito. 1984. Differential cold sensitivity of pollen grain germination in two Prunus species. Euphytica 33:419-426. Williams, E.G., B.R. Knox, and J.L. Rouse. 1982. Pollination sub-systems distinguished by pollen tube arrest after incompatible interspecific crosses in Rhododendron (Ericaceae). J. Cell Sci. 53:255-277. Williams, M. 1980. Self-sterility in Hippeastrum (Amaryllis) species. Amaryllis Bull. 1:20. Young, L.W., R.W. Wilen, and PC. Bonham-Smith. 2004. High temperature stress of Brassica napus during flowering reduces micro- and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production. J. Expt. Bot. 55:485-495. Zahn, L.M., J. Leebens-Mack, C.W. DePamphilis, H. Ma, and G. Theissen. 2005. To B or not to B a flower: The role of DEFICIENS and GLOBOSA orthologs in the evolution of the angiosperms. J. Hered. 96:225-240. Zainol, R. and D.P. Stimart. 2001. A monogenic recessive gene, fw, conditions flower doubling in Nicotiana alata. HortScience 36:128-130. Zainol, R., D.P. Stimart, and R.F. Evert. 1998. Anatomical analysis of double-flower morphogenesis in a Nicotiana alata mutant. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 123:967-972. Zhang, Y., X.I. Li, Y. Wang, M. Tian, and M.H. Fan. 2011. Changes of aroma components in Oncidium Sharry Baby in different florescence and flower parts. Scientia Agr. Sinica 44:110-117. Ziv, M., R. Kanterovitz, and A.H. Halevy. 1973. Vegetative propagation of Alstroemeria in vitro. Scientia Hort.1:271-277. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3927 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 孤挺花可供盆植、切花或景觀應用,市場需重瓣具香氣品種。本論文收集41個單瓣品種與33個重瓣品種,進行品種性狀、重瓣特性及花粉發芽之研究。結果顯示單瓣品種花之器官由外而內依序分別為萼片、花瓣、雄蕊和雌蕊,共四輪。重瓣品種之花器數目及排列,大致可分為二大類,類型一為花朵器官排列仍為四輪,基本輪數不變,僅雌、雄蕊瓣化程度差異;類型二為花器官輪數增加,各增加一輪雌、雄蕊,增加之雌或雄蕊瓣化、部分瓣化或無瓣化。其中類型一又可依雌雄蕊瓣化程度細分成三群,類型二增加輪數後所有雌雄蕊又因瓣化程度差異可細分為五群。
以根尖染色體之壓片觀察,探討孤挺花商業品種之染色體數與倍體數,結果顯示Montevedio、Papillio Butterfly及Estella等品種染色體為2n = 22條,為二倍體;Gervase、Fortune及Blossom Peacock等品種之染色體為2n = 44條,為四倍體。測量19個商業品種之DNA含量,其中6個二倍體品種之染色體DNA含量在38.72 - 49.47 pg,13個四倍體品種之染色體DNA含量在71.35 - 94.04 pg。 由六個重瓣孤挺花品種之不同類型花藥取下花粉,以含10%蔗糖B&K培養基、於28oC培養2小時,結果顯示正常花藥、畸形花藥及雄蕊瓣化殘存花藥之花粉皆可發芽。除 ‘Splash’瓣化花藥產生之花粉發芽率較低外,其他五個參試重瓣孤挺花之花粉發芽率皆大於50%。 ‘Blossom Peacock’正常花藥之花粉發芽適溫在25-35oC,各類型花藥產生之花粉皆在培養後2小時達最大發芽率,約78%-91%。‘Blossom Peacock’三種類型花藥產生之花粉與單瓣‘Design’雜交,結果顯示授粉30天後皆可收穫種子,花粉來源對每果實種子數及種子發芽率無顯著影響。 觀察65個雜交組合之後代,共3936植株,嘗試以雜交一代之後裔單瓣與重瓣株數,進行重瓣遺傳之推論。以一雙基因顯性表現重瓣並受隱性修飾基因調節之模式評估後代是否符合假說,結果有45組雜交組合後代分離比符合1重瓣: 3單瓣(χ2 = 0.00-7.68),16組雜交組合後代分離比符合3重瓣: 5單瓣(χ2 = 0.04-7.48),1組雜交組合後代分離比符合1重瓣:1單瓣(χ2 = 0.00)。 為選育出具香氣的孤挺花新品種,以香氣濃郁之孤挺花二倍體品種與具香氣之四倍體品種進行雜交育種。於授粉後7、10、14天採收各雜交組合果莢,取胚珠培養於1/4MS培養基鹽類濃度並添加15 g·L-1 sucrose,結果顯示以授粉後14天採收者萌芽率較高。以二倍體‘Estella’為種子親與 四倍體‘Trendsetter’雜交之胚珠萌芽率少於18.2%,以四倍體品種為種子親之雜交胚珠萌芽率顯著較高。以‘Estella’與四倍體‘Faro’、‘Trendsetter’及‘Christmas Star’雜交,獲得14株雜交後裔,以流式細胞儀分析基因組含量,結果顯示12株雜交後裔為三倍體,2株雜交後裔為四倍體。以氣象層析儀-質譜儀分析雜交後裔單株花朵香氣化學成分,後裔同時具有兩親本之香氣成分。 為選育出花莖長、紅色、重瓣且具香氣之孤挺花新品種,以單瓣‘San Remo’與重瓣‘Blossom Peacock’為親本進行雜交,選拔出重瓣‘種苗1號-粉珍珠’;為選育出紅色、重瓣且具香氣之孤挺花盆花新品種,以單瓣‘Design’與重瓣‘Blossom Peacock’為親本進行雜交,選拔出重瓣‘種苗2號-紅豔’,並已獲得植物品種權。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Amaryllis (Hippeastrum hybridum Hort.) is used in many areas for potted or cut flowers and landscaping. Double-flowered and fragrant cultivars are desirable. We collected 41 single- and 35 double-flowered cultivars for morphological observation. Flowers of single-flowered amaryllis consist of three sepals, three petals, six stamens, and one tri-carpel-united pistil from outer towards inner. Double-flowered cultivars could be classified into two major types. Flowers of type I double-flowered cultivars consist of four organ whorls and further three sub-types could be divided based on degree of petalization. Flowers of type II cultivars had additional whorls of stamen and carpel, and five sub-types could be divided based on degree of petalization.
Mitotic metaphase chromosomes were prepared from root tips. Results show that 2n=22 chromosomes for ‘Montevedio’, ‘Papillio Butterfly’, and ‘Estella’, while 2n=44 for ‘Gervase’, ‘Fortune’, and ‘Blossome Peacock’. Flow cytometric comparison of ploidy in 19 cultivars, revealed that 6 cultivars were diploid and had DNA contents of 38.72-49.47, as compared to 13 cultivars were tetraploid, with DNA contents of 71.35-94.94 pg. Pollen from normal, defected, and tepalized anthers of six amaryllis cultivars were incubated in B&K medium containing 10% sucrose at 28oC for 2 h. Pollen all germinated, with 50% or higher germination rate, except for tepalized anthers of ‘Splash’. Optimum temperatures for pollen from normal anthers of ‘Blossom Peacock’ ranged from 25 to 35oC. Pollen from three types of anthers in ‘Blossom Peacock’ germinated at 2 h after culture, with 78%-91% germination. Pollen source did not alter fruit set number of hybrid seeds per fruit, and seed germination rate when placed the pollen onto the stigma of ‘Design’. A total of 3936 progenies were created from 65 cross combinations and from the number of single-flowered and double-flowered progenies tried to deduce the inheritance of double-flowered. A model consists of two dominant genes expressed in the heterozygous or homozygous state causing double-flowered phenotype and modified by a recessive locus was proposed. Progenies of 45 cross combination segregated into 1 double : 3 single ratio (χ2 = 0.00-7.68), 16 cross combinations segregated into 3 double : 5 single (χ2 = 0.04-7.48) and 1 cross combination segregated into 1 double : 1 single (χ2 = 0). Since progeny of two fragrant parents are usually fragrant, we selected diploid and tetraploid parents cultivars both have fragrant flowers. The hybrid ovules were collected and cultured in 1/4MS with 15 g·L-1 sucrose medium. The ovules at 14 days after pollination (DAP) had higher germination than those at 7 or 10 DAP. Ovule germination was lower than 18.2% in diploid than tetraploid cultivars as seed parents. Fourteen hybrid progenies were obtained after crossing diploid ‘Estella’ and tetraploid ‘Faro’, ‘Trendsetter’, and ‘Christmas Star’. Flow cytometry revealed that 12 progenies were triploids, and 2 were tetraploids. GC-MS analysis showed that hybrid individuals had fragrant compounds of both parents. Single-flowered ‘San Remo’ was used as seed parent and crossed with double-flowered ‘Blossom Peacock’. A red double-flowered progeny was selected for cut flowers and named as ‘T.S.S. No.1-Pink Pearl’. Single-flowered ‘Design’ was used as seed parent and crossed with ‘Blossom Peacock’. A red double-flowered progeny was selected for potted plants and named as ‘T.S.S. No.2- Red Splendor’. Both cultivars have been granted with plant breeder’s right. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:38:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-D00628006-1.pdf: 6948755 bytes, checksum: ff21c9a2ec968b29916302efc2b4ab7a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………………………. i
誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………. ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………………. iii Abstract……………………………………………………………………………….. v 目錄(Contents) ………………………………………………………………………. vii 圖目錄(Contents of Figures) ………………………………………………………… ix 表目錄(Contents of Tables) ………………………………………………………….. xi 第一章 前言…………………………………………………………………………. 1 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 3 第二章 前人研究……………………………………………………………………. 7 一、孤挺花之育種歷史……………………………………………………….. 7 二、孤挺花重瓣品種………………………………………………………….. 8 三、重瓣花之起源…………………………………………………………….. 9 四、重瓣花遺傳特性………………………………………………………….. 10 五、重瓣花之分類…………………………………………………………….. 12 六、各國重瓣孤挺花育種歷史……………………………………………….. 13 七、孤挺花三倍體育種……………………………………………………….. 15 八、孤挺花香氣育種………………………………………………………….. 16 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….. 18 第三章 孤挺花品種之花器觀察及倍體性分析…………………………………… 23 摘要…………………………………………………………………………….. 23 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. 23 前言……………………………………………………………………………... 24 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….. 27 試驗一、孤挺花品種之花朵性狀調查………………………………….. 27 試驗二、重瓣孤挺花品種之花器排列分類…………………………….. 28 試驗三、孤挺花品種染色體之觀察與測定…………………………….. 28 試驗四、流式細胞儀測定孤挺花倍體性與染色體DNA含量………… 29 結果……………………………………………………………………………... 30 討論…………………………………………………………………………….. 32 參考文獻……………………………………………………………………….. 59 第四章 重瓣孤挺花之花藥類型、花粉發芽與結實率……………………………. 63 摘要……………………………………………………………………………... 63 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. 63 前言……………………………………………………………………………... 64 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….. 65 試驗一、溫度對孤挺花‘Blossom Peacock’花粉發芽之影響………….. 65 試驗二、花粉來源與培養時間對孤挺花‘Blossom Peacock’花粉發芽之影響 65 試驗三、六個重瓣孤挺花品種之花藥類型與產生之花粉發芽比較…. 66 試驗四、孤挺花‘Blossom Peacock’不同花藥之花粉與‘Design’雜交之稔實率 66 結果……………………………………………………………………………... 67 討論……………………………………………………………………………... 68 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 81 第五章 孤挺花重瓣性狀之遺傳……………………………………………………. 83 摘要……………………………………………………………………………... 83 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. 83 前言……………………………………………………………………………... 84 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….. 85 結果與討論……………………………………………………………………... 85 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 90 第六章 重瓣具香氣之孤挺花品種選育……………………………………………. 93 摘要……………………………………………………………………………... 93 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. 94 前言……………………………………………………………………………... 95 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….. 95 結果……………………………………………………………………………... 97 討論……………………………………………………………………………... 98 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 106 第七章 應用胚珠培養獲得具香氣之孤挺花雜交後代…………………………... 109 摘要……………………………………………………………………………... 109 Abstract…………………………………………………………………………. 109 前言……………………………………………………………………………... 110 材料與方法…………………………………………………………………….. 111 試驗一、四倍體與二倍體孤挺花商業品種雜交之後裔數量………….. 111 試驗二、不同雜交組合之胚珠發芽比較……………………………….. 112 試驗三、培養基蔗糖濃度對孤挺花雜交組合胚珠培養之影響……….. 113 試驗四、培養基蔗糖濃度、授粉天數與雜交組合對孤挺花雜交胚珠培養之影響……………………………………………………….. 113 試驗五、孤挺花香氣三倍體新品系育成與性狀調查………………….. 114 結果……………………………………………………………………………... 115 討論……………………………………………………………………………... 118 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 143 第八章 綜合討論與結論………….……………………………………………........ 145 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 150 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 流式細胞儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 瓣化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 畸形花藥 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 顯性遺傳 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 氣象層析-質譜儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | defected anthers | en |
| dc.subject | gas chromatography-mass spectrometry | en |
| dc.subject | flow cytometry | en |
| dc.subject | dominant inheritance | en |
| dc.subject | petalization | en |
| dc.title | 重瓣及香氣孤挺花品種之選育 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Breeding and selection for double-flowered and fragrant Hippeastrum cultivars | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 105-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 朱玉(Yu Chu),張正(Chen Chang),楊雯如(Wen-Ju Yang),黃光亮(Kuang-Liang Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 畸形花藥,顯性遺傳,流式細胞儀,氣象層析-質譜儀,瓣化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | defected anthers,dominant inheritance,flow cytometry,gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,petalization, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 151 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201603750 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2016-11-18 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝暨景觀學系 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-105-1.pdf | 6.79 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
