請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39120完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷庚玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gwei-Bau Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林貴寶 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:03:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-02-28 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-17 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-01-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 參考文獻
李美枝（1998）。中國人親子關係的內涵與功能：以大學生為例。親子關係與孝道，「本土心理學研究」，9， 頁3-52。 林文瑛、王震武（1995）。中國父母的教養觀：嚴教觀或打罵觀？「本土心理學研究」，3，頁2-92。 梁珪瑜 （1996）。「父母說負向言語之動機及影響：父母與國中生之觀點的差異比較」。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。 莊耀嘉、楊國樞（1997）。角色規範的認知結構。「本土心理學研究」，7，頁282-338。 曾慧芸（2002）。「負向言語對國中小學生自我效能、自我喜愛及關係品質之影響」。國立台灣大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。 曾慧芸、雷庚玲（2005）。學業失敗情境中負向言語對兒童自我效能及關係品質之影響來源：施話角色抑或話語內容？ 黃光國（1995）。知識與行動：中華文化傳統的社會心理詮釋。台北：巨流。 黃光國、楊宜憓（1999）。華人的關係主義與情緒經驗：台灣大學生的案例。論文於述說、記憶與歷史：以「情與文化」為核心的論述之學術研討會發表，台北，台灣。 雷庚玲、梁珪瑜、湯志安、王素華、楊文玫、李琦媛、周婉湘、楊佳雯、宋佩芳（2004）。「父母說負向言語之分類架構及本土盛行率」。 雷庚玲、楊文玫、李綺媛（1994）。中國父母的言語傷害：一、驗証現象是否存在。「中國心理學會年會」。台北，台灣。 楊佳雯（2000）。「父母說負向言語、孩子覺知父母態度與孩子自尊之關係」。國立臺灣大學心理學研究所未發表之碩士論文。 楊國樞（1992）。中國人的蛻變。頁373-418。台北：桂冠。 Barnett, B,. & Parker, G. (1998). The parentified child : Early competence or childhood deprivation? Child Psychology & Psychiatry Review, 3, 146-155. Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monopraohs, 75, 43-88. Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 608-616. Bloch, A. L., Shear, M., Markowitz, J. C., Leon, A. C., & Perry, J. (1993). An empirical study of defense mechanisms in dysthymia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 150 , 1194-1198. Bloom-Feshbach J.（1981）. Historical perspectives on the father’s role. Lamb, M. E.(Ed.)(1997). The role of the father in child development. M. E., Lamb,(Ed). (1997). New York, NY, US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Cabrera, N. J., Tamis-LeMonda, C. S., Bradley, R. H., Hofferth, S., & Lamb, M. E. (2000) Fatherhood in the twenty-first century. Child Development, 71, 127-136. Cassidy, J., Parke, R. D., Butkovsky, L.,& Braungart, J. M. (1992). Family-peer connections: The roles of emotional expressiveness within the family and children's understanding of emotions. Child Development, 63, 603-618. Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style: Understanding Chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65, 1111-1119. Chou, W. H., Lay, K. L., & Yang, C. W. (2001). Differential vulnerability to parental verbal abuse in different domains of actual family conflicts. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Minneaspolis, Minnesota, USA. Dornbusch, S., Ritter, P., Leiderman, P., Robert, D., & Fraleigh, M. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58, 1244-1257. Davis, E. P., Snidman, N., Wadhwa, P. D., Glynn, L. M., Schetter, C. D., & Sandman, C. A. (2004). Prenatal Maternal Anxiety and Depression Predict Negative Behavioral Reactivity in Infancy. Infancy , l 6(3), 319-331. Dunn, J., & Brown, J.(1994) Affect expression in the family, children's understanding of emotions, and their interactions with others. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 40, 120-137. Dunsmore, J. C., Halberstadt, A. G. (1997). How does family emotional expressiveness affect children's schemas? In K. C., Barrett.(Ed). (1997). The communication of emotion: Current research from diverse perspectives. New directions for child development, 77. (pp. 45-68). San Francisco, CA, US: Jossey-Bass. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Schaller, M., & Miller, P. (1991). Personality and socialization correlates of vicarious emotional responding. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 61, 459-470. Eisenberg, N., Gershoff, E. T., Fabes, R. A., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A. J., Losoya, S. H., Guthrie, I. K., & Murphy, B. C.(2001). Mother's emotional expressivity and children's behavior problems and social competence: Mediation through children's regulation. Developmental Psychology., 37, 475-490. Fung, H.(1999). Becoming a moral child: The socialization of shame among young Chinese children. Ethos, 279, 180-209. Feldman, R., & Eidelman, A. I. (2004). Parent-Infant Synchrony and the Social-Emotional Development of Triplets. Developmental Psychology ,40, 1133-1147. Gilligan, C. & Attanucci, J. (1994). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Puka, Bill (Ed). (1994). Caring voices and women's moral frames: Gilligan's view. Moral development: A compendium, 6 . (pp. 123-137). New York, NY, US: Garland Publishing. Halberstadt, A. G. (1986). Family socialization of emotional expression and nonverbal communication styles and skills. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51, 827-836. Halberstadt, A. G., Cassidy, J., Stifter, C. A., Parke, R. D., & Fox , F. (1995). Self-expressiveness within the family context: Psychometric support for a new measure. Psychological Assessment, 7 , 93-103. Hoglend, P., & Perry, J.(1998). Defensive functioning predicts improvement in major depressive episodes. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 186, 238-243. Jellen, L. K., McCarroll, J. B. & Thayer, L. E. (2001). Child emotional maltreatment: a 2-year study of US Army cases. Child Abuse & Neglect, 25(5), 623-639. Johnson J. Cohen P. Smailes E. M. Skodol A.E. Brown J. & Oldham J.M.(2001) Childhood Verbal Abuse and Risk for Personality Disorders During adolescence and Early Adulthood. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 42, 16-23. Josselson, R. (1994). Identity and relatedness in the life cycle. In Bosma, H. A., Graafsma, T. L. G., Grotevant, H. D., & de Levita, D. J.(Eds). Identity and development : An interdisciplinary approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Laporte, L.,& Guttman, H..(1996). Traumatic childhood experiences as risk factors for borderline and other personality disorders .Journal of Personality Disorders, 10 , 247-259. Lay, K.-L., & Tseng, H.-Y. (2005). The effect of incremental comment during school failure on self-liking. Lay, K.-L., Wang, S.-H., Soong, P., & Yang, W.-M.（1997）. Verbal abuse in Chinese Families: Its prevalence and consequences. Paper presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Washington, D.C., USA. Ney, P. G. (1987). Does verbal abuse leave deeper scars: A study of children and parents. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 32, 371-378. Ney, P. G., Moore, C., McPhee, J. & Trought, P. (1986). Child abuse: A study of the child's perspective. Child Abuse & Neglect, Vol. 10, 511-518. Patterson, G. R. (1988). Family process: Loops, levels, and linkages. In B. Niall, C., Avshlom, D., Gera;dine, & Moorehouse, Martha (Eds.) (1988). Persona in context: Developmental process. Human development in cultural and historical contexts series, pp. 114-151. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY. Pleck, E. H.,& Pleck, J. H. (1997) Fatherhood ideals in the United States: Historical dimensions. In M. E., Lamb (Ed), The role of the father in child development, (pp. 33-48 (3rd ed.)). New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Rosenberg, M. J. (1965). When dissonance fails: on eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 28-42. Shek, D. T.（2000）. Differences between fathers and mothers in the treatment of, and relationship with, their teenage children: Perceptions of Chinese adolescents. Adolescence, 35: 135-146. Slote, W. H.(1998). Psychocultural .dynamics within the Confucian family. In W. H., Slote & G. A., De Vos (Eds.). (1998) Confucianism and the family.(pp. 37-52). Albany, N.Y. : State University of New York Press. Smetana, J G. (1988). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Deveopment, 59, 321-335. Smetana, J. G. & Asquith, P. (1994). Adolescents’ and parents’ conceptions of parental authority and personal autonomy. Child Development, 65, 1147-1162. Solomon, C. R., & Serres, F. (1999). Effects of parental verbal aggression on children’s self-esteem and school marks. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23(4), 339-351. Steiberg, L., Dornbusch, S. & Brown, B. B. (1992). Ethnic difference in adolescent achievement : An ecological perspectives. American Psychologist, 47, 723-729. Tafarodi, R.W. & Swann, W. B. (1995). Self-liking & self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: initial validation of a measure. Journal of personality assessment, 65 ,322-342. Yang, C. W. & Lay, K. L.(2001). Perception of Parental Attitude as a Buffer for the Impact of Verbal Abuse on Self-esteem. The 2001 Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39120 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 父母在子女學業失敗情境中時常以負向言語進行管教，這些負向言語對於子女的自我喜愛感、自我效能感與親子關係品質都會造成影響。本研究欲探父母親的家庭情緒表達風格形成的角色關係（關係假設）、負向言語內容（內容假設）與角色關係和言語交互作用（關係話語交互作用假設）是否會影響這些負向言語對於子女自我喜愛感、自我效能感與親子關係品質和子女對於父母親負向言語的情緒感受以及想法、回應的方式。本研究共有107位大學生（男生38人、女生69人）、296位高中生（男生128位、女生168位）與216位國中生（男生109為、女生107位）全程參與本研究。所有受試者第一階段皆須填寫家庭情緒表達問卷（Family Expressiveness Questionnaire），以受試者父母親在家庭情緒表達問卷的分數進行篩選分組，篩選後繼續參與第二階段的受試者，則填寫「學業失敗假想事件之負向言語反應問卷」。每位受試者皆須閱讀五個音樂學業失敗引發父母不同負向言語的故事，回答對於假想故事情境與父母言語回饋感受。本研究共有四個獨變項，包含三著受試者間變項：父母的家庭情緒表達風格（負向支配、負向退讓、正向）、年齡（大學組、高中組、國中組）和性別。一個受試者內變項：父母的言語回饋類型（人身攻擊話語、關係取向話語、溫和勸說話語），八個依變項：負向支配情緒、負向退讓情緒、負向支配反應、負向退讓反應、正向反應和自我喜愛感、自我效能感與親子關係品質受影響的程度。以變異數分析方法進行分析，檢驗關係效果、話語效果與關係話語交互作用效果。本研究結果除再次支持「內容假設」外，也支持過去未發現角色差異所引發的「關係效果」和「關係話語交互作用」。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The effect of harsh verbal discipline on children’s self-esteem and adult-child relationship has already been documented. It is not yet clear whether the negative effect of harsh verbal discipline is due to the specific role of the discipliners, the specific content of verbal disciplines, or the interaction effect of both discipliners and content. Thus, three hypotheses, the Relationship Hypothesis, the Content Hypothesis, and the Content-Relationship Interaction Hypothesis were evaluated in the present study. One hundred and seven undergraduate students, 296 senior high students, and 216 junior high students participated in the study. Subjects’ parental FEQ scores were gathered through Family Expressiveness Questionnaire. Then the subjects reported their reactions to hypothetical stories of school failure and 3 kinds of parental verbal disciplines. The results supported the three Hypothesis. The degree of being angry is significantly higher when hearing the negative disciplines from Negative Dominant parents than from Negative Submissive or Positive parents. The degree of self-competence and self-liking decreased significantly more upon hearing “relationship-threatening” than all other verbal disciplines. The person-focus criticism verbal disciplines of Negative Dominant parents induce the most negative dominant emotion and reactions, and the relationship-threatening verbal disciplines of Negative Submissive and Positive parents induce the most negative submissive emotions and reactions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:03:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90227015-1.pdf: 794852 bytes, checksum: d14bd9c8532c8b6ad6eac01686485076 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
第一章 緒論--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 家庭負向言語的本土背景-----------------------------------------------------------------1 負向言語與心理虐待-----------------------------------------------------------------------2 負向言語對自尊及親子關係的影響-----------------------------------------------------5 父母角色差異—權威性與親近性--------------------------------------------------------8 父母的傳統角色抑或特定家庭關係才會引發負向言語的不同效果？-----------9 由家庭情緒表達風格所衍生出之親子關係類型-------------------------------------12 負向言語對子女情緒及因應行為的影響----------------------------------------------16 子女年齡與性別在家庭負向言語效果中所扮演的角色----------------------------17 第二章 研究方法-------------------------------------------------------------------------------21 受試者----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------21 測量工具-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------24 分析策略-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------31 第三章 研究結果-------------------------------------------------------------------------------37 各種情緒表達風格的父母說負向言語的可能性-------------------------------------37 情緒表達方格與內容的效果-------------------------------------------------------------38 分析一：父親組分析----------------------------------------------------------------------40 討論一----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------71 分析二：母親組分析----------------------------------------------------------------------75 討論二----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------97 第四章 綜合討論------------------------------------------------------------------------------100 表達類型假設------------------------------------------------------------------------------100 表達類型話語內容交互作用假設------------------------------------------------------102 話語的效果---------------------------------------------------------------------------------105 年齡與角色交互作用的父母差異------------------------------------------------------106 年齡與畫與內容的交互作用------------------------------------------------------------107 研究限制------------------------------------------------------------------------------------109 未來的研究方向---------------------------------------------------------------------------110 參考文獻------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------111 附錄------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------117 附錄一 致學校說明文(高中版)-------------------------------------------------------------- 117 附錄二 家庭情緒表達問卷（父親版）--------------------------------------------------------120 附錄三 學業失敗假想事件之負向言語反應問卷---------------------------------------------122 附錄四 基本資料表------------------------------------------------------------------------------143 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 家庭情緒表達模式 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 負向言語 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親子關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | family expressiveness | en |
| dc.subject | parent-child relationship | en |
| dc.subject | verbal discipline | en |
| dc.title | 家庭情緒表達風格與青少年學業失敗後對父母負向言語反應特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Family Expressiveness of parents and the characteristics of adolescents' reactions toward parents' verbal disciplines after academic failure | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 朱瑞玲,林維能,林以正 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 親子關係,家庭情緒表達模式,負向言語, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | parent-child relationship,verbal discipline,family expressiveness, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 121 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-01-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 776.22 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。