請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39065
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪淑彬(Shwu-Bin Horng) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shiau-Min Dai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 戴孝閔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T17:00:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-02-04 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-02-04 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-02-02 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Avidov, Z., M. J. Berlinger, and S. W. Appelbaum. 1965. Physiological aspects of host specificity in the Bruchidae: III. Effect of curvature and surface area on oviposition of Callosobruchus chinensis L. Anim. Behav. 13: 178-180.
Baaren, J. van, and G. Boivin. 1998. Learning affects host discrimination behavior in a parasitoid wasp. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 42: 9-16. Barron, A. B. 2001. The life and death of Hopkins’ host-selection principle. J. Insect Behav. 14: 725-737. Barron, A. B., and S. A. Corbet. 1999. Preimaginal conditioning in Drosophila revisited. Anim. Behav. 58: 621-628. Barron, A. B., and S. A. Corbet. 2000. Behavioural induction in Drosophila: timing and specificity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 94: 159-171.. Bjorksten, T. A., and A. A. Hoffmann. 1998. Plant cues influence searching behaviour and parasitism in the egg parasitoid Trichogramma nr. brassicae. Ecol. Entomol. 23: 355-362. Breed, M. D., E. A. Leger, A. N. Pearce, and Y. J. Wang. 1998. Comb wax effects on the ontogeny of honey bee nestmate recognition. Anim. Behav. 55: 13-20. Caubet, Y., and P. Jaisson. 1991. A post-eclosion early learning involved in host recognition by Dinarmus basalis Rondani (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Anim. Behav. 42: 977-980. Charnov, E. L., L. R. Los-den Hartogh, W. T. Jones, and J. van den Assem. 1981. Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature 289: 27-33. Cheng, I. C., R. L. Yang, and S. B. Horng. 2003. Interaction between host preference and offspring survivorship of Callosobruchus machlatus (Fab.). Formosan Entomol. 23: 291-303 (in Chinese). Chiu, Y. J., and F. J. Messina. 1994. Effect of experience on host preference in Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): variability among populations. J. Insect Behav. 7: 503.515. Cooley, S. S., R. J. Prokopy, P. T. McDonald, and T. T. Y. Wong. 1986. Learning in oviposition site selection by Ceratitis capitata flies Entomol. Exp. Appl. 40: 47-51. Cope, J. M., and C. W. Fox. 2003. Oviposition decisions in the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): effects of seed size on superparasitism. J. Stored Prod. Res. 39: 355-365. Corbet, S. A. 1985. Insect chemosensory responses: a chemical legacy hypothesis. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 143-153. Cunningham, J. P., M. F. A. Jallow, D. J. Wright, and M. P. Zalucki. 1998. Learning in host selection in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Anim. Behav. 55: 227-234. Dethier, V. G. 1954. Evolution of feeding preferences in phytophagous insects. Evolution 8: 33-54. Edde, A. P., and C. I. Amatobi. 2000. Relative resistance of some cowpea varieties to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Sustain. Agric. 17: 67-77. Edde, P. A., C. I. Amatobi. 2003. Seed coat has no value in protecting cowpea seed against attack by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J. Stored Prod. Res. 39: 1-10. van Emden, H. F., B. Sponagl, E. Wagner, T. Baker, S. Ganguly, and S. Douloumpaka. 1996. Hopkins’ ‘host selection principle’, another nail in its coffin. Physiol. Entomol. 21: 325-328. Fox, C. W., and H. Dingle. 1994. Dietary mediation of maternal age effects on offspring performance in a bean weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Funct. Ecol. 8:600-606. Fox, C. W., and T. A. Mousseau. 1995. Determinants of clutch size and seed preference in a seed beetle, Stator beali (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Environ. Entomol. 24: 1557-1561. Gokhale, V. G., H. Honda, and I. Yamamoto. 1990. Role of physical and chemical stimuli of legume host seeds in comparative ovipositional behaviour of Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) and C. chinensis (Linn.) (Cloeoptera: Bruchidae) pp. 45-51. In: K. Fujii, M. R. Gatehouse, C. D. Johnson, R. Mitchell, and T. Yoshida, eds. Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology and Coevolution. Kluwer Academic, London, England Dordrecht, Country. Hoffmann, A. A. 1988. Early adult experience in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 34: 197-204. Hoffmeister, T. S., R. F. Lachlan, and B. D. Roitberg. 1999. Do larger fruits provide a partial refuge for rose-hip flies against parasitoids? J. Insect Behav. 12: 451-460. Hopkins, A. D. 1917. A discussion of H.G. Hewitt’s paper on ‘Insect Behaviour’. J. Econ. Entomol. 10: 92-93. Horng, S. B. 1997. Larval competition and egg-laying decisions by the bean weevil, Callocobruchus maculatus. Anim. Behav. 53: 1-12. Hu, J. M., M. Lavin, M. F. Wojciechowski, and M. J. Sanderson. 2000. Phylogenetic systematic of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast trnK/matK sequences and its implications for evolutionaty patterns in Papilonoideae. Am. J. Bot. 87: 418-430. Hu, T. 1989. Effects of gamma radiation on the cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.)). Ph. D. dissertation. National Taiwan University, 127 pp (in Chinese). Hu, W. T., Y. C. Lan, and S. B. Horng. 1995. Effects of bean size on larval competition and oviposition preference of Callosobruchus maculatus. Chin. J. Entomol. 15: 321-332 (in Chinese). Huang, C. C. 2001. Effects of larval competition and host deprivation on plasticity in life history strategy of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). MSc Thesis. National Taiwan University, 67 pp (in Chinese). Iloba, B. N. 1985. The cowpea seed testa and its influence of an environment in Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Nigeria J. Plant Prot. 9: 11-22. Jaenike, J. 1983. Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia 58: 320-325. Jaenike, J. 1988. Effects of early adult experience on host selection in insects: some experimental and theoretical results. J. Insect Behav. 1: 3-15. Jaisson, P. 1980. Environmental preference induced experimentally in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Nature 286: 388-389. Kester, K. M., and P. Barbosa. 1991. Postemergence learning in the insect parasitoid, Cotesia congregata (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Insect Behav. 4: 727-742. Lale, N. E. S., and M. S. Makoshi. 2000. Role of chemical characteristics of the seed coat in the resistance of selected cowpea varieties to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Nigeria. Int. J. Pest Manag. 46: 97-102. Landolt, P. J., and O. Molina. 1996. Host-finding by cabbage lopper moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): learning of host odor upon contact with host foliage. J. Insect Behav. 9: 899-908. Lin, H. C. 1993. The effects of oviposition behavior on offspring competition in Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). MSc thesis. National Taiwan University, 58pp (in Chinese). Lin, J. Y. 2004. Oviposition behavior and its impact on interspecific competition in Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) and C. maculatus (F.). Ph. D. dissertation. National Taiwan University, 145 pp (in Chinese). Manly, B. F. J., P. Miller, and L. M. Cool. 1972. Analysis of a selective predation experiment. Am. Nat. 106: 719-736. Manning, A. 1967. Pre-imaginal conditioning in Drosophila. Nature 216: 338-340. Mark, G. A. 1982. Induced oviposition preference, periodic environments, and demographic cycles in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 32: 155-160. Messina, F. J. 1991. Life-history variation in a seed beetle: adult egg-laying vs. larval competitive ability. Oecologia 85: 447-455. Mitchell, R. 1975. The evolution of oviposition tactics in the bean weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecology 56: 696-702. Mitchell, R. 1990. Behavioral ecology of Callosoruchus maculatus. pp. 317-330. In: K. Fujii, M. R. Gatehouse, C. D. Johnson, R. Mitchell, and T. Yoshida, eds. Bruchids and Legumes: Economics, Ecology, and Coevolution. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands. Mitchell, R., and C. Thanthianga. 1990. Are the oviposition traits of the South India strain of Callosobruchus maculatus maintained by natural selection? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57: 143-150. Møller, H., R. H. Smith, and R. M. Sibly. 1989a. Evolutionary demography of a bruchid beetle. I. Quantitative genetical analysis of the female life history. Funct. Ecol. 3: 673-681. Møller, H., R. H. Smith, and R. M. Sibly. 1989b. Evolutionary demography of a bruchid beetle. II. Physiological manipulations. Funct. Ecol. 3: 683-691. Nwanze, K. F., E. Horber, and C. W. Pitts. 1975. Evidence for oviposition preference of Callosobruchus maculatus for cowpea varieties. Environ. Entomol. 4: 409-412. Papaj, D. R. 1986. Interpopulation differences in host preference and the evolution of learning in the butterfly, Battus philenor. Evolution 40: 518-530. Phillips, W. M. 1977. Modification of feeding ‘preference’ in the flea beetle Haltica lythri (Coleoptera Chrysomelidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 21: 71-80. Pietrewicz, A. T., and J. B. Richards. 1985. Learning to forage: an ecological perspective. pp. 99-117. In: T. D. Johnston, and A. T. Pietrewicz, eds. Issues in the ecological study of learning. Lawrence Erlbaum, Lodon. Ray, S. 1999. Survival of olfactory memory through metamorphosis in the fly Musca domestica. Neurosci. Lett. 259: 37-40. Rietdorf, K., and J. L. M. Steidle. 2002. Was Hopkins right? Influence of larval and early adult experience on the olfactory response in the granary weevil Sitophilus granaries (Coleoptera, Curculionidae). Physiol. Entomol. 27: 223-227. Rojas, J. C., and T. D. Wyatt. 1999. The role of pre- and post-imaginal experience in the host-finding and oviposition behaviour of the cabbage moth. Physiol. Entomol. 24: 83-89. SAS Institute. 1990. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Version 6, 4th edition. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. Schoonhoven, L. M., T. Jermy, and J. J. van Loon. 1998. Insect–plant biology: from physiology to evolution. pp.195-225. In: L. M. Schoonhoven, T. Jermy, and J. J. van Loon, eds. Host-plant selection: why insect do not behave normally. Chapman and Hall, London. Shiau, Y. S., L. Y. L. Lai, and S. B. Horng. 1994. Effects of oviposition behavior on host preference of Callosobruchus maculatus. Chin. J. Entomol. 14: 245-253 (in Chinese). Smith, M. A., and Cornell, H. V. 1979. Hopkins host-selection in Nasonia vitripennis and its implications for sympatric speciation. Anim. Behav. 27: 365-370. Southgate, B. J. 1979. Biology of the Bruchidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24: 449-473. Szentesi, A., and T. Jermy. 1990. The role of experience in host plant choice by phytophagous insects. pp. 39-74. In: E. A. Bernays, eds. Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. II CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. Technau, G., and M. Heisenberg. 1982. Neural reorganisation during metamotphosis of the corpora pendunculata in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 295: 405-407. Thanthianga, C., and R. Mitchell. 1987. Vibration mediate prudent resource exploitation by competing larvae of the Bruchid beans weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 44: 15-21. Thanthianga, C., and R. Michell. 1990. The fecundity and oviposition behavior of south Indian strain Callosobruchus machlatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 57: 133-142. Thrope, W. H. 1930. Biological races in insects and allied groups. Biol. Rev. 5: 177-212. Truman, J. W. 1990. Metamorphosis of the CNS of Drosophila. J. Neurobiol. 21: 1072-1084. Tissot, M., N. Gendre, A. Hawken, K. F. Störtkuhl, and R. F. Stoker. 1997. Larval chemosensory projections and invasion of adult afferents in the antennal lobe of Drosophila. J. Neurobiol. 32:281-297. Tissot, M., and R. F. Stocker. 2000. Metamorphosis in Drosophila and other insects: the fate of neurons throughout the stages. Progr. Neurobiol. 62: 89-111. Tully, T., V. Cambiazo, and L. Kruse. 1994. Memory through metamorphosis in normal and mutant Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 14: 68-74. Vet, L. E. M., W. J. Lewis, and R. T. Cardé. 1995. Parasitoid foraging and learning. pp. 65-101. In: R. T. Cardé, eds. Chemical Ecology of Insects 2. Chapman and Hall, New York. Visser, M. E. 1994. The importance of being large: the relationship between size and fitness of the parasitoid Aphaereta minuta (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 963-978. Wiklund, C. 1973. Host plant suitability and the mechanism of host selection in larvae of Papilio machaon. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 16: 232-242. Wilson, K. 1988. Egg laying decision by the bean weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. Ecol. Entomol. 13: 107-118. Wilson, K., and L. Hill. 1989. Factors affecting egg maturation in the bean weevil Callosobruchus maculatus. Physiol. Entomol. 14: 115-126. Yang, R. L., and S. B. Horng. 2002. Host size discrimination and oviposition behavior of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Formosan Entomol. 22: 343-357 (in Chinese). | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/39065 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 豆象為內食性昆蟲,其成蟲出豆前均在豆中生活,有足夠機會獲取寄主特性的資訊,進而可能影響成蟲之寄主選擇,本研究首先以飼養於不同寄主之四紋豆象探討成蟲前經驗對其寄主偏好之作用。紅豆或綠豆飼養之四紋豆象,以不同寄主豆進行非自由選擇產卵偏好試驗時,顯示其對各種寄主之接受度並無顯著差異﹔若同時供應不同寄主進行自由選擇產卵偏好時,則四紋豆象顯著偏好紅豆或黑豆,但以不同寄主飼養或羽化自不同環境的四紋豆象對不同寄主之偏好程度並無差異,顯示四紋豆象之幼蟲期或成蟲早期寄主經驗不會影響成蟲之寄主偏好。因此,進一步以轉換寄主方式測試成蟲之寄主經驗對寄主偏好的作用,及成蟲經驗持續之時間。在紅豆寄主上產過卵的四紋豆象移到綠豆寄主時,其產卵數會顯著降低﹔但單獨經歷綠豆寄主之四紋豆象於再次接觸綠豆寄主時則不會在綠豆上有抑制產卵的現象;而在綠豆上產卵後再遭遇紅豆時,其產卵數則顯著增加。因此成蟲時期所經歷的寄主經驗則會對之後的寄主偏好產生影響。本文首次報導成蟲於紅豆上所學習到的成蟲經驗至少能持續兩個半小時。此外,試驗發現寄主比例與寄主大小也會影響寄主偏好。挑選大顆綠豆與小顆紅豆進行自由選擇產卵試驗時,四紋豆象在綠豆上的產卵比例顯著高於提供正常紅豆與綠豆自由選擇產卵試驗者,但四紋豆象仍舊顯著偏好在紅豆上產卵,顯示寄主種類是影響偏好較重要的因子。若將紅豆種皮去除時,四紋豆象對紅豆的偏好會顯著降低,因此推測紅豆種皮上有產卵刺激物質,促使四紋豆象增加對紅豆的寄主偏好。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The seed beetle, Callosoburcus maculatus (F.) is an endophagous insect. The beetle lived in the seed before adult emergence, the larva or the adult thus has enough opportunity to obtain the information of host traits, and it may influence the host preference of the adult. In this study, adults emerged from various hosts were used to test whether larval or pre-adult experience affect host preference of the adult. The results showed that there is no significant difference on the host acceptance by seed beetles that reared on adzuki bean or mung bean, when no-choice tests of host acceptance on adzuki bean, mung bean and black soybean were conducted. But adults exhibited significant difference of host preference, when free choice tests of host preference on different seeds were studied. However, the host preference has no significant difference between adults that reared on adzuki bean and mung bean or emerged from adzuki and mung bean powder, these results indicate that the larval or pre-adult host experience does not influence the adult host preference. Whereas, adult host experience did affects her host preference. Therefore, host transfers were used to test the effect and the duration of adult experience on host preference of the adult. The number of eggs laid on host drastically decreased when adults transferred from adzuki bean to mung bean, but the adult does not decrease her number of eggs laid on mung bean when transfer from mung bean. If the adult was transferred from mung bean to adzuki bean, the number of eggs laid significantly increased. In this study, we first found also that the effect of host experience on adzuki bean could last 2.5 hours. Besides, we provide evidence to support that the proportion of host and the size of host would affect host preference of the adult. When big mung bean and small adzuki bean were provided simultaneously to make a free choice test of host preference, adults laid more eggs on big mung bean compare to the test with normal size of adzuki bean and mung bean. But the proportion of eggs on small adzuki bean was still significantly higher than that on big mung bean. It shows that the host species is a more important factor that affects host preference. Adults decreased the preference of adzuki bean after removing the seed coat, suggested that there is oviposition stimuli on seed coat of adzuki bean that raise the host preference of adzuki bean. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T17:00:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91632013-1.pdf: 428277 bytes, checksum: 096b8e69fe65a8affbd10a68b03c4af5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 英文摘要.....................................................................................................I
中文摘要..................................................................................................III 目錄...........................................................................................................V 圖次.........................................................................................................VII 壹、緒言......................................................................................................1 貳、往昔研究..............................................................................................3 一、成蟲前經驗對寄主偏好的影響..................................................3 二、四紋豆象的一般生活史..............................................................5 三、四紋豆象雌蟲之產卵選擇..........................................................6 參、材料與方法..........................................................................................8 一、實驗蟲源及飼養方法..................................................................8 二、幼蟲及成蟲早期經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響..........8 (一)、幼蟲寄主經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響...................8 (二)、成蟲早期經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響....................9 三、成蟲經驗對四紋豆象寄主接受度的影響................................10 (一)、成蟲產卵經驗對寄主接受度之影響..............................10 (二)、成蟲經驗影響之持續時間..............................................11 四、影響產卵偏好的因子................................................................11 (一)、寄主比例對產卵偏好之影響..........................................11 (二)、寄主大小對產卵偏好之影響..........................................12 (三)、寄主種皮對產卵偏好之影響..........................................13 (四)、種皮與寄主大小對偏好的影響......................................13 肆、結果....................................................................................................15 一、幼蟲及成蟲早期經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響........15 (一)、幼蟲寄主經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響..................15 (二)、成蟲早期經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響..................16 二、成蟲經驗對四紋豆象寄主接受度的影響................................25 (一)、成蟲經驗對寄主接受度之影響......................................25 (二)、成蟲經驗影響之持續時間..............................................26 三、影響寄主偏好的因子................................................................34 (一)、寄主比例對產卵偏好之影響..........................................34 (二)、寄主大小對產卵偏好之影響..........................................34 (三)、寄主種皮對產卵偏好之影響..........................................34 (四)、種皮與寄主大小對偏好的影響......................................35 伍、討論....................................................................................................44 一、幼蟲及成蟲早期經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好的影響........44 二、成蟲經驗對四紋豆象寄主接受度的影響................................47 三、影響寄主偏好的因子:寄主比例、大小與種皮對產卵偏 好的影響..................................................................................50 陸、引用文獻............................................................................................55 柒、誌謝....................................................................................................61 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 寄主經驗對四紋豆象寄主偏好之作用及機制 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Effects of Experience on Host Preference of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) and its mechanisms | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃紹毅,李後晶,寇融,黃振聲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 四紋豆象,寄主偏好,寄主經驗, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Host preference,Experience,Callosobruchus maculatus, | en |
dc.relation.page | 60 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-02-02 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 418.24 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。