請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38489
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 張慧羽(Hwei-yu Chang) | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-ta Tai | en |
dc.contributor.author | 戴佑達 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T16:35:07Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-07-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Carson, H. L. 1985. Genetic variation in a courtship related male character in Drosophila silvestris from a single Hawaiian locality. Evolution 36: 678-686.
Chang, H., and F. J. Ayala. 1989. On the origin of incipient reproductive isolation: the case of Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta. Evolution 43: 1610-1624. Coyne, J. A., and B. Charlesworth. 1997. Genetics of a pheromonal difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. Genetics 145: 1015-1030. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1998. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 353: 287-305. Coyne, J. A., A. P. Crittenden, and K. Mah. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265: 1461-1464. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London. Droney, D. C. 1992. Sexual selection in a lekking Hawaiian Drosophila: the roles of male competition and female choice in male mating success. Anim. Behav. 44: 1007-1020. Duda, O. 1924. Betrag Zur Systematik der Drosophiliden unter besonderer Beucksichfigung der palaarktischen u. orientalischen Arten (Diptera). Arch. Naturgesch. 90 (A3): 172-234. Duda, O. 1940. Revision der afrikanischen Drosophiliden (Diptera). II. Ann. Mus. Nat. Hung. 33: 19-53. Endler, J. A., and A. E. Houde. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reiculata. Evolution 49: 456-468. Ewing, A. W. 1961. Body size and courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 9: 93-99. Greenspan, R. J. and J. F. Ferveur. 2000. Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34: 205-232. Harini, B. P., and N. B. Ramachandra. 2003. Evolutionary experimentation through hybridization under laboratory condition in Drosophila: evidence for recombinational speciation. BMC Evol. Biol. 3. 20. Hegde, S. N., and M. S. Krishna. 1997. Size-assortative mating in Drosophila malerkotliana. Anim. Behav. 54: 419-426. Hoffmann, A. A. 1987. A laboratory study of male territoriality in the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Anim. Behav. 35: 807-818. Hoikkala, A., and P. Welbergen. 1995. Signals and responses of females and males in successful and unsuccessful courtships of three Hawaiian lek-mating Drosophila species. Anim. Behav. 50: 177-190. Hollocher, H., C.-T. Ting, F. Pollack, and C.-I. Wu. 1997. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila melanogaster: variation in mating preference and correlation between sexes. Evolution 51: 1175-1181. Kaneshiro, K. Y. 1976. Ethological isolation and phylogeny in planitibia subgroup of Hawaiian Drosophila. Evolution 30: 740-745. Kaneshiro, K. Y. 1980. Sexual isolation, speciation and the direction of evolution. Evolution 34: 437-444. Kitagawa, O., K. Wakahama, Y. Fuyama, Y. Shimada, E. Takanashi, M. Hatsumi, M. Uwabo, and Y. Mita. 1982. Genetic studies on the Drosophila nasuta subgroup, with notes on distribution and morphology. Jpn. J. Genet. 57: 113-141. Koepfer, H. R. 1991. Asymmetrical mating patterns between geographic strains of Drosophila mercatorum: a test of the Kaneshiro hypothesis. Evolution 45: 455-458. Kyriacou, C. P., and J. C. Hall. 1980. Circadian rhythm mutations in Drosophila melanogaster affect short-term fluctuations in the male’s courtship song. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 6729-6733. Lamb, C. G. 1914. Diptera: Heteroneuridae, Ortalidae, Typetidae, Sepsidae, Micropezidae, Drosophilidae, Geomyzidae, Milichiidae of the Seychelles. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond. 16: 307-372. Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia Univ. Press, Cambridge. Meera, R. P., and H. A. Ranganath. 1991. Karyotype differentiation among members of the immigrans species group of Drosophila. Genetica 83: 145-152. Moodie, G. E. E. 1982. Why asymmetric mating preference may not show the direction of evolution. Evolution 36: 1096-1097. Nirmala, S. S., and N. B. Krishnamurthy. 1972. Drosophila n. albomicana – a race of Drosophila nasuta. Dros. Inf. Serv. 49: 60. Parsons, P. A. 1977. Lek behaviour in three species of the subgenus Hirtodrosophila of Australian Drosophila. Nature 265: 48. Partridge, L., and M. Farquhar. 1981. Sexual activity reduces life span of male fruitflies. Nature 294: 580-582 Partridge, L., and M. Farquhar. 1983. Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila malanogaster) is related to their size. Anim. Behav. 31: 871-877. Partridge, L., A. Ewing, and A. Chandler. 1987. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster: the role of male and female behavior. Anim. Behav. 35: 555-562. Ranganath, H. A., M. R. Rajasekarasetty, and N. B. Krishnamurthy. 1974. Evolutionary status of Indian Drosophila nasuta. Ind. J. Hered. 6: 16-25. Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: What have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637–1653. Ruiz, A., and M. Santos. 1989. Mating probability, body size and inversion polymorphism in colonizing population of Drosophila buzzatti. pp. 96-113, In: A. Fontdevila ed., Evolutionary Biology of Transient Unstable Populations. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. Rundle H. D. 2003 Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Evolution 57: 2557-2565. Ryan, M. J., and W. Wilczynski. 1988. Coevolution of sender and receiver: effects on local mate preference in cricket frogs. Science 240: 1786-1788. Ryan, M. J., and W. Wilczynski. 1991. Evolution of intraspecific variation in the advertisement call of a cricket frog (Acris crepitans). Bio. J. Linn. Soc. 44: 249-271. Santos, M., A. Ruiz, A. Barbadilla, J. E. Quezada-Diaz, E. Hasson, and A. Fontdevila. 1988. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XIV. Larger flies mate more often in nature. Heredity 61: 255-262. Santos, M., A. Ruiz, J. E. Quezada-Diaz, A. Barbadilla, and A. Fontdevila. 1992. The evolutionary history of Drosophila buzzatii. XX. Positive phenotypic covariance between field adult fitness components and body size. J. Evol. Biol. 5: 403-422. Sokoloff, A. 1966. Morphological variation in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Evolution 20: 49-71. Sokolowski, M. B. 2001. Drosophila: genetics meets behavior. Nat. Rev. 3: 879-893. Spieth, H. T. 1968. The evolutionary implications of sexual behavior in Drosophila. Evol. Biol. 2: 157-191. Spieth, H. T. 1974. Courtship behaviors in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19. 385-405. Steel, R. H., and L. Partridge. 1988. A courtship advantage for small males in Drosophila subobscura. Anim. Behav. 36: 1190-1197. Tregenza, T., V. L. Pritchard, and R. K. Butlin. 2000. The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution 54: 1687-1698. Wasserman, M., and H. R. Koepfer. 1980. Does asymmetrical mating preference show the direction of evolution? Evolution 34: 1116-1126. Watanabe, T. K., and M. Kawanishi. 1979. Mating preference and the direction of evolution in Drosophila. Science 205: 906-907. Wilson, F. D., M. R. Wheeler, M Harget, and M. Kambysellis. 1969. Cytogenetic relations in the Drosophila nasuta subgroup of the immigrans group of species. Univ. Texas Publ. Stud. Genet. 6918: 207-253. Wu, C.-I., and M. F. Palopoli. 1994. Genetics of post-mating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28: 283-308. Wu, C.-I., and C.-T. Ting. 2004. Gene and speciation. Nat. Rev. 5: 114-122. Young, J. R., W. J. Hupp, J. W. Bradbury, and C. E. Braun. 1994. Phenotypic divergence of secondary sexual traits among sage grouse, Centrocercus urophasianus, populations. Anim. Behav. 47: 1353-1362. Yu, Y. C., F.-J. Lin, and H. Chang. 1997. Karyotype polymorphism in hybrid populations of Drosophila nasuta and D. albomicans. Zool. Stud. 35: 251-259. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38489 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 一個生物學上相當重要的議題,就是在演化的過程中原始的族群是如何分化成現在的不同物種?紅果蠅 (Drosophila albomicans, 2n = 6) 與輝顏果蠅 (D. nasuta, 2n = 8),在形態上是無法區分的同胞種 (sibling species),卻有不同的核型 (karyotpe)。在實驗室中可以交配產生可孕後代並且可培養數百代,但在自然界中卻從未看過混雜的核型。因此推測可能在這兩個物種之間存在著某種隔離機制。而本實驗將重點放於行為所造成的交尾前生殖隔離,利用了各種族群箱交尾選擇實驗,以多重選擇 (multiple choice)、雌性選擇 (female choice)、無選擇 (no choice) 三種不同類型的交尾實驗為主要的方法來探討可能的機制。實驗結果顯示了體型大不是造成交尾成功的主要因素。繼而比較無選擇和雌性選擇交尾實驗,其差異代表雄性之間有交互影響。無選擇交尾實驗排除了雄性之間的互相影響,顯示紅果蠅雌蟲偏好同種,而輝顏果蠅的雌蟲沒有顯著的交尾偏好性,讓我們有機會去探討兩個關於不對稱生殖隔離的假說。又因為符合 Watanabe & Kawanishi 所提出的假說,進一步推論物種分化之初有基因交流的可能性。最後,根據紅果蠅雄蟲有較強的 lek 行為和它特殊的染色體構造,提出假說:紅果蠅雄蟲的性染色體上具有較多的雄性特殊表現基因。並以雜合消去法 (suppressive subtractive hybridization) 建立一批轉殖菌株提供未來驗證此假說的材料。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | One of the most important issues in biology is: “How evolutionary process creates divergent groups known as species?” Drosophila albomicans (2n = 6) and D. nasuta (2n = 8) are sibling species with indistinguishable morphology but distinct karyotypes. Although these two species can easily produce viable and fertile hybrids in laboratory, no hybrids have ever been found in nature. Thus, we suggest that there may exist reproductive isolation between them. In this study, we focused on behavior isolation of premating mechanisms, and performed three kinds of mating choice experiments (i.e., multiple, female, and no choice). Size was ruled out as an important factor for mating success. The difference between no choice experiment and female choice revealed male-male interaction. If male-male interaction was excluded, what left is significant female choice of D. albomicans for conspecific males, but D. nasuta females mate randomly. This asymmetric female choice which fits Watanabe & Kawanishi’s hypothesis infers divergence of the ancestral population with gene flow. Due to strong lek behavior (i.e., stronger lunge) and the unique karyotype in D. albomicans male, we proposed that the neo-Y chromosome of D. albomicans may harbor more male specific genes to cause the difference. Clones of the male specific genes in these two species have been generated by suppressive subtractive hybridization. Further study is needed to verify this hypothesis. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:35:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92632013-1.pdf: 2725189 bytes, checksum: e266e190010366fcef0f933a310e5337 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要
英文摘要 目 錄…………..…………..……………………………..………….…………. i 表 次………..……………...…………………………………..……………… ii 圖 次………………..…………………….…………………………………… iii 壹、 緒言……………………………………………………..………….……. 1 貳、 材料與方法…………………………………………….……………..…. 5 品系來源和飼養…………………………………….…..………………. 5 品系的再確認……………………………………….……………....…... 5 族群箱交尾實驗……………………………………….………….…...... 6 翅長的測量方法……………………………………….………….…...... 7 Lek 行為的數量化…………………………………………….….……... 8 參、 結果………………...……………………...………….………….…….... 9 肆、 討論……………………………..………..……………………….….… 16 伍、 參考文獻…………………………………….………………….……… 23 陸、 誌謝…………………………………….…..…………...…...…………. 28 柒、 附錄…………………………………………………………………….. 29 表次 表一、紅果蠅”雌性選擇”交尾實驗中有交尾及沒交尾的成蟲的平均翅長……. 9 表二、輝顏果蠅”雌性選擇”交尾實驗中有交尾及沒交尾的成蟲的平均翅長... 10 表三、比較雌性選擇實驗的交尾對數和由無選擇交尾實驗結果計算出的 期望值…………………………………………………………………… 11 表四、比較多重選擇交尾實驗的結果和無選擇交尾實驗計算出的期望值 …………………………………………………………………………... 12 表五、另外三個紅果蠅品系多重交尾實驗的成功交尾對數和將 # 254.29 品系的結果按重複數計算出的期望值做比較..……............................... 12 圖次 圖一、解剖顯微鏡底下的果蠅右翅………….………………………………... 8 圖二、兩種 “無選擇” 交尾實驗 (輝顏果蠅、紅果蠅同種交尾配對) 九十 分鐘內每十分鐘的累積交尾對數…………………………….…...……..13 圖三、兩種 “無選擇” 交尾實驗 (輝顏果蠅同種的配對、輝顏果蠅雌蟲和 紅果蠅雄蟲的配對) 九十分鐘內每十分鐘的累積交尾對數…........……14 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 紅果蠅和輝顏果蠅的不對稱生殖隔離 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The asymmetrical reproductive isolation of
Drosophila albomicans and D. nasuta | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 于宏燦,方淑,洪淑彬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 紅果蠅,輝顏果蠅,種化,雜合消去法, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Drosophila albomicans,D. nasuta,speciation,suppressive subtractive hybridization, | en |
dc.relation.page | 41 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-08 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.66 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。