請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3841
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yen-Ting Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳彥廷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-13T08:37:25Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-02 | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-13T08:37:25Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2016-08-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-07-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分
1. 丁榮轟,2006,〈我國犯罪矯正機構實施空中大學矯正教育對出獄人生活適應之 研究〉,《犯罪學期刊》,9(1):73-112。 2. 方文宗,2013,〈以特別預防觀點論假釋制度〉,《東海大學法學研究》,39:181-217 3. 李森畑、許書瑜,2010,〈國內外矯正機關收容人技能訓練制度之比較研究〉,《98年度法務研究選輯》,台北:法務部,頁603-645。 4. 林桂碧、羅秀華,2007,〈雇主僱用更生受保護人意願評估研究暨政策建議〉,行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局委託研究報告。 5. 法務部編印,《法務部統計年報》,台北:法務部。 6. 周愫嫻,2005,〈更生人就業權、雇主雇用權與社會安全的平衡〉,《中央警察大學犯罪防治學報》,6:55-92。 7. 周愫嫻、侯崇文、曹光文 ,2014,《法務部「更生人就業狀況調查」成果報告書》,台北:法務部。 8. 周震歐,1997,〈我國更生保護事業之展望〉,《犯罪學期刊》,3:1-11。 9. 陳玉書,2013,〈再犯特性與風險因子之研究:以成年假釋人為例〉,《刑事政 策與犯罪研究論文集》,16:1-26。 10. 陳玉書、簡惠霠,2005,〈再犯預測之研究:以成年受保護管束者為例〉,《刑事政策犯罪研論文集》,6:1-29。 11. 張聖照,2007,《假釋受刑人再犯預測研究》,桃園:中央警察大學犯罪防治研 究所博士班論文。 12. 楊士隆,1999,〈受刑人累(再)犯問題與舒緩對策〉,「2000年<當前犯罪防治問題與對策>研討會」,嘉義:國立中正大學犯罪防治研究所。 13. 曹光文,2015,〈我國成年更生人監獄職訓、就業與社會復歸之趨勢分析〉,《犯罪、刑罰與矯正研究》,6(1):91-112。 14. 鍾志宏、黃永順,2009,〈假釋制度比較與探討〉,《犯罪學期刊》,12(1):107-141。 15. 嚴健彰,2005,〈出獄人生涯發展之社會適應與就業問題初探〉,《諮商與輔導》,29:11-15。 西文部分 16. Anderson, D. A. 1999. “The Aggregate Burden of Crime.” The Journal of Law and Economics 42(2): 611-642. 17. Anderson, D. B., R. E. Schumacker, & S. L. Anderson. 1991. “Releasee Characteristics and Parole Success.” Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 17(1-2): 133-145. 18. Boshier, R., & D. Johnson. 1974. “Does Conviction affect Employment Opportunities. Brit. J. Criminology 14: 264-268. 19. Burris, D., G. Forest, M. Elbert, P. Doherty, & M. Baerga. 2004. “The Correlation Between Employment, Education, and Recidivism.” News and Views.Washington, DC: U.S. Office of Pretrial and Probation Services. Administrative Division of the United States Courts. 20. Cronin, J. 2011. “The Path to Successful Reentry: The Relationship Between Correctional Education, Employment and Recidivism.” Report:15-2011. Retrieved [June, 23th, 2016], from University of Missouri Columbia, Institute of Public Policy Web site: http://ipp.missouri.edu. 21. Duwe, G. 2013. What works with Minnesota prisoners: A summary of the effects of correctional programming on recidivism, employment, and cost avoidance. St. Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Corrections. 22. Evans, R. Jr. 1968. “The Labor Market and Parole Success.” The Journal of Human Resources 3(2): 201-212. 23. Harlow, C. W. 2003. Education and Correctional Populations. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC. 24. Henson, P. 1990. Employment-The Key to Keeping People out of Prison. Canberra, Australia: Aust. Inst. of Criminology. 25. Holzer, H. J., S. Raphael, & M. A. Stoll. 2003. “Employment Barriers Facing Ex-Offenders.” The Urban Institute Reentry Roundtable Discussion Paper: New York: New York University Law School 1-23. 26. Jung, H. 2011. “Increase in the Length of Incarceration and the Subsequent Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from Men Released from Illinois State Prisons.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 30(3): 499–533. 27. Karpowitz, D., & M. Kenner. 1995. “Education as Crime Prevention: The Case for Reinstating Pell Grant Eligibility for the Incarcerated.” Evaluation, 1-8. 28. Nagin, D., & J. Waldfogel. 1998. “The Effect of Conviction on Income Through the Life Cycle.” International Review of Law and Economics 18(1): 25-40. 29. Nally, J. M., S. Lockwood, T. Ho, & K. Knutson. 2014. “Post-Release Recidivism and Employment among Different Types of Released Offenders: A 5-Year follow-up Study in the United States.” International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences 9(1): 16-34. 30. Needels, K. E. 1996. “Go Directly to Jail and Do Not Collect? A Long-Term Study of Recidivism, Employment, and Earnings Patterns among Prison Releasees.” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 33(4): 471-496. 31. Nuttall, J., L. Hollmen, & E. M. Staley. 2003. “The Effect of Earning a GED on Recidivism Rates.” Journal of Correctional Education 54(3): 90-94. 32. Rakis, J. 2005. “Improving the Employment Rates of Ex-Prisoners Under Parole.” Federal Probation Journal 69(1): 7-12. 33. Rex, S. 1999. “Desistance from Offending: Experiences of Probation.” The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 38(4): 366-383. 34. Rossi, P. H., R. A. Berk, & K. J. Lenihan. 1980. Money, Work, and Crime: Ex-perimental Evidence. New York: Academic Press. 35. Saylor, W. G., & G. G. Gaes. 1997. “Training Inmates through Industrial Work Participation and Vocational and Apprenticeship Instruction. Corrections Management Quarterly 1(2): 32-43. 36. Schumacker, R. E., D. B. Anderson, & S. L. Anderson. 1990. “Vocational And Academic Indicators of Parole Success.” Journal of Correctional Education 41(1): 8-13. 37. Stanton, J. M. 1966. “Is It Safe to Parole Inmates without Jobs?” Crime & Delinquency 12(2): 147-150. 38. Taylor, J. M. 1993. “Pell Grants for Prisoners.” The Nation 25: 88-91. 39. Uggen, C., S. Wakefield, & B. Western. 2005. “Work and Family Perspectives on Reentry.” Prisoner Reentry and Crime in America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 209-243. 40. Social Exclusion Unit. 2002. Reducing re-offending by ex-prisoners. London: Social Exclusion Unit, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 41. Visher, C. A., S. A. Debus-Sherrill, & J. Yahner. 2011. “Employment After Prison: A Longitudinal Study of Former Prisoners.” Justice Quarterly 28(5): 698-718. 42. Waldfogel, J. 1994. “The Effect of Criminal Conviction on Income and the Trust “ Reposed in the workmen””. Journal of Human Resources 29(1): 62-81. 43. Western, B. 2002. “The Impact of Incarceration on Wage Mobility and Inequality.” American Sociological Review 67(4): 526-546. 44. Western, B., J. R. Kling, & D. F. Weiman. 2001. “The Labor Market Consequences of Incarceration.” Crime & Delinquency 47(3): 410-427. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/3841 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 許多研究指出更生人在出獄後若無穩定就業,是影響其再犯的重要因素。而透過監獄技訓可以讓更生人在獄中學得一技之長,培養就業能力,厚植更生人的人力資本,使其在出獄後能順利穩定就業,進而減少再犯與社會成本。然而長期以來我國政府或是社會,對於獄政資源關注程度不足,監獄技訓向來缺乏深入的成效評估以及相關議題探討。因此我國監獄技訓方案是否能夠幫助更生人出獄後就業,以及當前監獄技訓運作是否具有效益,又可能面臨哪些問題?顯然從各角度而言,對於我國監獄技訓方案之了解探討是相當重要的。
本研究透過量化分析與質化訪談方式,深入了解當前我國監獄技訓對於假釋出獄更生人就業之影響,以及我國監獄技訓之實務效益與困境。本研究量化部分透過蒐集台北地檢所保護管束之假釋出獄更生人資料,分析監獄技訓是否與可量化之就業指標具相關性。質化部分透過深入訪談矯正署作業技訓科、監所作業科、觀護人與假釋出獄更生人,深入了解當前監獄技訓方案對就業之影響與執行情況。研究發現當前我國監獄技訓可以對假釋出獄更生人出獄後就業產生正面影響,幫助更生人在獄中先習得基礎能力,並培養勤勞的習性、正向的工作態度以及解決問題的能力。監獄技訓之實務效益,包含能提供受訓者一定程度專業的訓練,並提供更生人自我肯定的成長過程,進而培養更生人之人力資本。實務之運作限制為監獄技訓名額不足、監獄技訓證照檢定班數量短少、監獄技訓缺乏開班彈性等問題。在政策建議上,研究者提出增加矯正與觀護機關的資源分配、修改相關監所法令,增加技訓彈性、全面思考與評估技訓種類之必要性、建立跨部會之技訓平台、持續增加正向求職態度與技巧養成、改善更生人出獄後之就業機制和限制等政策方向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Many studies indicate that employment situation of ex-offenders or parolees is a key recidivism factors. Ex-offender or parolees can acquire job skills via participating the vocational training program in prison, the program can also cultivate human capital of ex-offender. With this training program, ex-offender or parolees can successfully find a stable job after release from prison. Employment of ex-offender or parolees can reduce recidivism and social cost. However, the government of Taiwan and our society don’t take this issue seriously. There is few evaluation and studies of such program in Taiwan. Consequently, it is important to recognize the effectiveness and predicament of the vocational training program in prison in Taiwan.
This study used quantitative and qualitative methods that focus on the impacts of the vocational training program in prison on employment of parolees and the effectiveness and predicament of this vocational training program. We used chi-square distribution to test the correlation between the vocational training program in prison and quantifiable indexes of employment. Moreover, we interviewed the stakeholders of vocational training program in prison to further investigate the impact of the vocational training program in prison on employment of parolees. We also looked into execution of the vocational training program in prison by interviews. The results indicate that the vocational training program in prison can make a positive impact on employment of parolees. It helps parolees acquire basic working ability and cultivate a positive attitude towards employment. This program can provide professional training and self-affirmation of parolees. The predicaments of the program are lack of quota and elasticity of courses. To solve these problems, we suggest that the government should pay more attention to this issue and invest more resources on improving the quality of professional training program. To go a step further, government can build a communication platform in order to improve cooperation between different sectors. We also suggest that government should modify the laws to increase elasticity of executing the training program. Furthermore, the government should eliminate employment barriers that ex-offenders or parolees might face after returning to society. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-13T08:37:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-105-R03343011-1.pdf: 7750541 bytes, checksum: fd25a8102cceac4c95065b65f14b2f65 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員會審定書.........................................I 謝辭...................................................II 中文摘要...............................................III 英文摘要................................................V 第一章 緒論.............................................1 第一節 研究背景與動機..................................1 第二節 研究問題與目的..................................3 第二章 文獻探討.........................................5 第一節 假釋出獄更生人出獄就業和再犯之關係研究.............5 第二節 影響更生人就業情況之因素.........................7 第三節 本章小結.......................................13 第三章 研究設計與方法....................................15 第一節 研究途徑與架構..................................15 第二節 研究過程.......................................18 第四章 我國監獄技訓與假釋制度............................25 第一節 我國監獄技訓方案之現況..........................25 第二節 我國假釋制度介紹................................36 第五章 研究結果........................................41 第一節 量化研究結果...................................41 第二節 質化研究結果....................................49 第六章 結論與建議........................................83 第一節 研究結果總結....................................83 第二節 政策建議.......................................87 第三節 研究限制.......................................94 第四節 研究貢獻與未來研究方向...........................94 參考文獻................................................97 附錄..................................................101 附錄一、訪談大綱.....................................101 附錄二、法務部所屬矯正機關辦理收容人技能訓練實施要點......105 附錄三、監獄技訓相關文件..............................107 表圖目次 表 3-1 政府單位深度訪談受訪者名單........................21 表 3-2 假釋出獄更生人深度訪談受訪者名單....................21 表 4-1 105年度全國監所技訓證照檢定班開設類別與班次..........32 表 4-2 105年度全國監所技訓短期班開設類別與數量.............33 表 4-3 全國所有矯正機關證照檢定班近六年相關資訊............35 表 4-4 全國所有矯正機關技訓短期班近六年相關資訊............35 表 4-5 全國矯正機關技訓班收容人受訓人數與受訓比例..........35 表 4-6 全國監所技訓班受訓者出獄後的就業率及相關比率........36 表 4-7 我國近十年提報假釋總人數與假釋總核准比率............38 表 4-8我國近十年假釋出獄人數與監獄撤銷假釋人數..............39 表 5-1個人特性與家庭狀況.................................41 表 5-2 教育程度........................................42 表 5-3 出獄年度和服刑長度................................43 表 5-4 犯罪類別和服刑監獄................................43 表 5-5 監獄內訓.........................................44 表 5-6 就業情況.........................................45 表 5-7 就業時間比例水平 * 是否參加監獄技訓................47 表 5-8 最高薪資水準 * 是否參加監獄技訓....................47 表 5-9 求職時間狀況 * 是否參加監獄技訓....................48 圖 3-1研究架構流程......................................17 圖 4-1監獄技訓運作流程...................................26 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 監獄技訓方案對假釋出獄更生人就業影響之研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Impacts of Prison Vocational Training Program on Parolees’ Employment | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 104-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 丁榮轟,許凱翔 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 就業與再犯,更生人就業,更生人假釋復歸社會,監獄技訓,就業輔導, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Employment and recidivism,Employment of ex-offenders,Parole success,Prison vocational training program,Employment counseling, | en |
dc.relation.page | 109 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU201601402 | |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 公共事務研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-105-1.pdf | 7.57 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。