Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38154
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張唯勤(Wei-Chin Chang)
dc.contributor.authorWee-Peng Gowen
dc.contributor.author吳瑋蘋zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T16:27:08Z-
dc.date.available2005-07-21
dc.date.copyright2005-07-21
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-07-14
dc.identifier.citation李哖. 1990. 蘭之胚培養. 中國園藝 36:223-244.
李哖. 1992. 臺灣原生蘭在園藝上之研究. 臺灣生物資源調查及資訊管理研習會論文集 (彭鏡毅 編). pp 303-317. 中央研究院植物所, 台北.
李哖. 1995. 蘭科植物. 臺灣農家要覽 農作篇(二). pp 666-684. 豐年社, 台北市.
李志仁. 1996. 蝴蝶蘭. 園藝科技術語. pp 490. 農業中心資訊科學叢書 (2). 農業科學資料服務中心. 台北.
位國慶. 1991. 臺灣蝴蝶蘭病毒之發生與防治研究. 臺灣花卉病蟲害研討會專刊. pp 135-146.
位國慶. 1994. 臺灣蝴蝶蘭真菌與細菌性之發生與防治研究. 中華植物保護學會特刊新二號, 中華植物保護學會編印, pp 119-131.
林友三. 1978. 蝴蝶蘭 (Phalaenopsis) 有性繁殖之探討. 臺東師專學報 6:605-562.
林讚標. 1988. 台灣蘭科植物 2. 南天書局有限公司, 台北. 355pp.
胡適宜. 1990. 被子植物胚胎學. 曉園出版社有限公司, 台北, pp 275-287.
黃學林、李筱菊. 2000. 植物體細胞胚胎發生. 科學農業 48:120-127.
涂美智、李哖. 1986. 培養基成分對蝴蝶蘭白花雜交種無菌播種之影響. 中國園藝 32:280.
涂美智、李哖. 1987. 蝴蝶蘭授粉適期與果莢成熟度對種子發芽之影響. 中國園藝 33:190-200.
許圳塗. 1996. 體胚形成. 園藝科技術語. pp 566. 農業中心資訊科學叢書 (2). 農業科學資料服務中心. 台北.
郭慧蘭. 2002. 文心蘭與蝴蝶蘭葉片培養之體胚發生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 49pp.
賴思良. 2001. 霍山石斛對視網膜病變及免疫調節作用的研究. 生物藥學研究所碩士論文, 國立陽明大學, 台北.
鄭芳宜. 2003. 蝴蝶及文心蘭基因轉殖之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 89pp.
謝永祥. 1995. 應用花粉管轉殖法於蝴蝶蘭基因轉殖之研究. 中國園藝 41:309-324.
關淑卿, 李哖. 1989. 蝴蝶蘭原球體增殖之探討. 中國園藝 35:295-296.
鍾曉航. 2004. 石斛蘭之體胚發生與植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 54pp.
Arditti, J., R. Ernst. (eds.) 1993. Micropropagation of Orchids. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 682pp.
Belarmino M.M., M. Mii. 2000. Agrobaterium-mediatd transformation of a Phalaenopsis orchid. Plant Cell Rep. 19:435-442.
Burner, D. M., M. P. Grisham. 1995. Induction and stability of phenotypic variation in sugarcane as affected by propagation procedure. Crop Sci. 35:875-880.
Chai M.L., C.J. Xu, K.K. Senthil, J.Y. Kim, D.H. Kim. 2002. Stable transformation of protocorm-like bodies in Phalaenopsis orchid mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Sci. Hortic. 96:213-224.
Chang, C., W. C. Chang. 1998. Plant regeneration from callus culture of Cymbidium ensifolium var. misericors. Plant Cell Rep. 17:251-255.
Chang C, Y. C. Chen, Y. H. Hsu, J. T. Wu, C. C. Hu, W. C. Chang, N. S. Lin. 2005. Transgenic resistance to Cymbidium mosaic virus in Dendrobium expressing the viral capsid protein gene. Transgenic Res. 14: 41-46.
Chen, J.T., Chang, C., W.C. Chang. 1999. Direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’ and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 143-149.
Chen, Y. C., Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2000. A reliable protocol for plant regeneration from callus of Phalaenopsis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 36:420-423.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2000. Plant regeneration via embryo and shoot bud formation from flower-stalk explants of Oncidium Sweet Sugar. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62:95-100.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. 2001. Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regul. 34: 229-232.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2002. Effects of tissue culture conditions and explant characteristics on direct somatic embryogenesis in Oncidium 'Grower Ramsey'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:41-44.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2003a. Effects of GA3, ancymidol, cycocel and paclobutrazol on direct somatic embryogenesis of Oncidium in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 72:105-108.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. 2003b. 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid enhanced direct somatic embryogenesis from Oncidium leaf cultures. Biol. Plant. 46:455-458.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu (Orchidaceae). Biol. Plant. (in press).
Chen Y., C. Piluek. 1995. Effects of thidiazuron and N6-benzylaminopurine on shoot regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 16׃99-101.
Etienne H., B. Bertrand. 2003. Somaclonal variation in Coffea arabica: effects of genotype and embryogenic cell suspension age on frequency and phenotype of variants. Tree Physiol. 23:419-426.
Ernst, R. 1994. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 39: 273-275.
Ishii Y., T. Takamura, M. Goi, M. Tanaka. 1998. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 17:446-450.
Kerbauy, G. B. 1984. Plant regeneration of Oncidium varicosum (orchidaceae) by means of root tip culture. Plant Cell Rep. 3:27-29.
Knudson, L. 1922. Nonsymbiotic germination of orchid seeds. Bot. Gaz. 73:1-15.
Liao L.J., I. C. Pan, Y. L. Chan, Y. H. Hsu, W. H. Chen, M. T. Chan. 2004. Transgene silencing in Phalaenopsis expressing the coat protein of Cymbidium mosaic virus is a manifestation of RNA-mediated resistance. Mol. Breeding. 13: 229-242.
Lin Y. H., C. Chang, W. C. Chang. 2000. Plant regeneration from callus culture of a Paphiopedilum hybrid. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62:21-25.
Su V., B.D. Hsu. 2003. Cloning and expression of a putative cytochrome P450 gene that influences the colour of Phalaenopsis flowers. Biotech. Lett. 25:1933-1939.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1977. Clonal propagation of Phalaenopsis by leaf tissue culture. Sci. Hortic. 8 ׃ 169-178.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1978. Factors affecting the growth of in vitro cultured lateral buds from Phalaenopsis flower stalks. Sci. Hortic. 8 ׃ 169-178.
Tokuhara K., M. Mii. 1993. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 13:7-11.
Tokuhara K., M. Mii. 2001. Induction of embryogenic callus and cell suspension culture from shoot tips excised from flower stalk buds of Phalaenopsis (Orchidaceae). In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 37:457-461.
Zimmerman, J. L. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5:1411-1423.
黃學林、李筱菊. 2000. 植物體細胞胚胎發生. 科學農業 48:120-127.
郭慧蘭. 2002. 文心蘭與蝴蝶蘭葉片培養之體胚發生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 49pp.
Arditti, J., R. Ernst. (eds.) 1993. Micropropagation of Orchids. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 682pp.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu (Orchidaceae). Biol. Plant. (in press).
Chen Y., C. Piluek. 1995. Effects of thidiazuron and N6-benzylaminopurine on shoot regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 16׃99-101.
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics. 11:1-42.
Ernst, R. 1994. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 39: 273-275.
Ishii Y., T. Takamura, M. Goi, M. Tanaka. 1998. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 17:446-450.
Kerbauy, G. B. 1984. Plant regeneration of Oncidium varicosum (orchidaceae) by means of root tip culture. Plant Cell Rep. 3:27-29.
Lin, Y. H., C. Chang, W. C. Chang. 2000. Plant regeneration from callus culture of a Paphiopedilum hybrid. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62:21-25.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1977. Clonal propagation of Phalaenopsis by leaf tissue culture. Sci. Hortic. 8׃169-178.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1978. Factors affecting the growth of in vitro cultured lateral buds from Phalaenopsis flower stalks. Sci. Hortic. 8׃169-178.
Takana, M. 1992. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis spp. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-268.
Tokuhara K., M. Mii. 1993. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 13:7-11.
Zimmerman, J. L. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5:1411-1423.
郭慧蘭. 2002. 文心蘭與蝴蝶蘭葉片培養之體胚發生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 49pp.
鍾曉航. 2004. 石斛蘭之體胚發生與植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 61pp.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang 2002. Effects of tissue culture conditions and explant characteristics on direct somatic embryogenesis in Oncidium 'Grower Ramsey'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:41-44.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu (Orchidaceae). Biol. Plant. (in press).
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-42.
Huang L. C. Y. L. Lee, B. L. Huang, C. Kuo, and J. F. Shaw. 2002. High polyphenol oxidase activity and low titratable acidity in browning bamboo tissue culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 38:358-365.
Ishii Y., T. Takamura, M. Goi, M. Tanaka. 1998. Callus induction and somatic embryogenesis of Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 17:446-450.
Park, S. Y., H. N. Murthy, K. Y. Paek. 2000. Mass multiplication of protocorm-like bodies using bioreactor system and subsequent plant regeneration in Phalaenopsis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 63:67-72.
Park, S. Y., H. N. Murthy, K. Y. Paek. 2002. Rapid propagation of Phalaenopsis from floral stalk-derived leaves. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 38:168-172.
Tanaka, M. 1992. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis spp. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-268.
吳依凡. 2002. 文心蘭癒傷組織之誘導及植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 119pp.
洪寶瑩. 2004. 芭菲爾鞋蘭、文心蘭、軛瓣蘭及堇蜘蘭之微體繁殖. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 119pp.
高景輝. 1989. 植物荷爾蒙. pp 586. 華香園出版社, 台北市.
鍾曉航. 2004. 石斛蘭之體胚發生與植株再生. 國立台灣大學園藝所碩士論文, 54pp.
Arditti, J., R. Ernst. (eds.) 1993. Micropropagation of Orchids. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 682pp.
Bajaj, S., M. V. Rajam. 1996. Polyamine accumulation and near loss of morphogenesis in long-term callus cultures of rice. Restoration of plant regeneration by manipulation of cellular polyamine levels. Plant Physiol. 112: 1343–1348.
Biddinton, N. L., R. A. Sutherland, H. T. Robinson. 1988. Silver nitrate increase embryo production in anther culture of brussel sprouts. Ann. Bot. 62:181-185.
Cameron, A. C., C. A. L. Fenton, Y. Yu, D. O. Adams, S. F. Yang. 1979. Increased production of ethylene by plant tissue treated with 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid. HortScience. 14:178-180.
Chen, J.T., Chang, C., W.C. Chang. 1999. Direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’ and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Rep. 19: 143-149.
Chen, Y. C., Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2000. A reliable protocol for plant regeneration from callus of Phalaenopsis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 36:420-423.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2000. Plant regeneration via embryo and shoot bud formation from flower-stalk explants of Oncidium Sweet Sugar. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 62:95-100.
Chen, J.T., Chang, W.C. 2001. Effects of auxins and cytokinins on direct somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of Oncidium ‘Gower Ramsey’. Plant Growth Regul. 34: 229-232.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang 2002. Effects of tissue culture conditions and explant characteristics on direct somatic embryogenesis in Oncidium 'Grower Ramsey'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:41-44.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang. 2003a. Effects of GA3, ancymidol, cycocel and paclobutrazol on direct somatic embryogenesis of Oncidium in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 72:105-108.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. 2003b. 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid enhanced direct somatic embryogenesis from Oncidium leaf cultures. Biol. Plant. 46:455-458.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu (Orchidaceae). Biol. Plant. (in press).
Chen Y., C. Piluek. 1995. Effects of thidiazuron and N6-benzylaminopurine on shoot regeneration of Phalaenopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 16׃99-101.
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics. 11:1-42.
Ernst, R. 1994. Effects of thidiazuron on in vitro propagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis (Orchidaceae). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 39: 273-275.
Hutchinson M. J., S. KrishnaRaj, P. K. Sazena. 1997. Inhibitory effect of GA3 on the development of thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis in geranium (Pelargonium×hortorum Bailey) hypocotyls cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 16:435-438.
Kerbauy, G. B. 1984. Plant regeneration of Oncidium varicosum (Orchidaceae) by means of root tip culture. Plant Cell Rep. 3:27-29.
Kerbauy, G. B. 1991. In vitro conversion of Cattleya root tip cells into protocorm-like bodies. J. Plant Physiol. 138:248-251.
Li B. C., D. J. Wolyn. 1995. The effects of ancymidol, abscisic acid, uniconazole and paclobutrazol on somatic embryogenesis of asparagus. Plant Cell Rep. 14:427-432.
Li B. C., D. J. Wolyn. 1996. Abscisic acid and ancymidol promote conversion of somatic embryos to plantlets and secondary embryogenesis in Asparagus officinalis L. In Vitro/Plant 32:223-226.
Montague, M. J., J. W. Koppenbrink, E. G. Jaworski. 1978. Polyamine metabolism in embryogenic cells of Daucus carota [carrot]. I. Changes in intracellular content and rates of synthesis. Plant Physiol. 62:430-433.
Mok M. C., D. W. S. Mok, D. J. Armstrong, K. Shudo, Y. Isogai, T. Okamoto. 1982. Cytokinin activity of N-phenyl-N’-(1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-yl)-urea (thidiazuron). Phytochemistry. 21:1509-1511.
Purnhauser, L., P. Medgyesy, M. Czakó, P. J. Dix, L. Márton. 1987. Stimulation of shoot regeneration in Triticum aestivum and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia Viv. tissue cultures using the ethylene inhibitor AgNO3. Plant Cell Rep. 6:1-4.
Songstad, D. D., D. R. Duncan, J. M. Widholm. 1988. Effect of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid, silver nitrate and norbornadiene on plant regeneration from maize callus culture. Plant Cell Rep. 7:262-265.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1977. Clonal propagation of Phalaenopsis by leaf tissue culture. Sci. Hortic. 8 ׃ 169-178.
Takana, M., Y. Sakanishi. 1978. Factors affecting the growth of in vitro cultured lateral buds from Phalaenopsis flower stalks. Sci. Hortic. 8 ׃ 169-178.
Takana, M. 1992. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis spp. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-268.
Tokuhara K., M. Mii. 1993. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis and Doritaenopsis by culturing shoot tips of flower stalk buds. Plant Cell Rep. 13:7-11.
Yadav, J. S., M. V. Rajam. 1998. Temporal regulation of somatic embryogenesis by adjusting cellular polyamine content in eggplant. Plant Physiol. 116: 617–625.
Zimmerman, J. L. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 5:1411-1423.
Anagnostakis S. L. 1974. Haploid plants from anthers of tobacco – enchancement with charcoal. Planta. 115:281-283.
Chen, J. T., W. C. Chang 2002. Effects of tissue culture conditions and explant characteristics on direct somatic embryogenesis in Oncidium 'Grower Ramsey'. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 69:41-44.
Chen, J.T., W.C. Chang. Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis var. formosa Shimadzu (Orchidaceae). Biol. Plant. (in press).
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics. 11:1-42.
Ernst, R. 1974. The use of activated charcoal in asymbiotic seedling culture of Paphiopedilum. Am. Orchid Soc. Bull. 43:35-38.
Fridborg G., M. Pedersen, L. Landstrom, T. Eriksson. 1978. The effect of activated charcoal on tissue culture:adsorption of metabolites inhibiting morphogenesis. Physiol. Plant. 43:104-106.
Huang L. C. Y. L. Lee, B. L. Huang, C. Kuo, J. F. Shaw. 2002. High polyphenol oxidase activity and low titratable acidity in browning bamboo tissue culture. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 38:358-365.
Lakshmi Sita G. 1986. Progress towards the in vitro clonal propagation of Eucalyptus grandis. In:L. A. Withers and P. G. Alderson (eds.), Plant Tissue Culture and its Agricultural Applications. Butterworths, London, pp. 159-165.
Murashige T., F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15:495–497.
Park S. Y., H. N. Murthy, K. Y. Peak. 2002. Rapid propagation of Phalaenopsis from floral stalk-derived leaves. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol.-Plant. 38:168-172.
Pedroso M.C., M. S. Pais. 1995. Factors controlling somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 43: 147–154.
Tanaka, M, Kumura M., Goi M., 1988. Optimal conditions for shoot production from Phalaenopsis flower-stalk cuttings cultured in vitro. Sci. Horti. 35: 117-126.
Takana, M. 1992. Micropropagation of Phalaenopsis spp. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 20, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-268.
Wallin A., M. Welander. 1985. Improved yield of apple leaf protolast from in vitro cultured shoots by using very young leaves and adding L-methionine to shoot medium. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult. 5: 69-72.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/38154-
dc.description.abstractPhalaenopsis amabilis 及 Phalaenopsis Nebula 約 1 cm 的幼葉培植體,置於含 3 mg/l TDZ 之1/2MS培養基,黑暗培養一個月後,不經癒傷組織即可直接於葉培植體的基部切口、葉片邊緣、葉尖或葉培植體的向軸面形成體胚 (somatic embryos)。葉培植體培養45天時,置換培養基將可提高每個培植體之平均體胚數,培養60天後,可形成多量之體胚。含 0.5 mg/l BA 培養基可顯著提高兩個月大的體胚存活率,且可獲得生長成正常之小植株。本結果顯示,由於蝴蝶蘭葉片可直接產生體胚,之後形成具形態雙極性的小植株,此植株再生系統應可應用於未來進行之基因轉殖等研究。
蝴蝶蘭 (Phalaenopsis amabilis 及 Phalaenopsis Nebula) 幼葉培植體,置於含 3 mg/l TDZ 之1/2MS培養基,其向軸面及背軸面皆會產生體胚,但仍以向軸面朝上擺放之體胚發生率較朝下擺放者高。光會抑制葉培植體形成體胚,且使葉培植體褐化比率提高。因此,葉培植體於黑暗下以向軸面朝上方式擺放較有利於直接體胚之發生。
Phalaenopsis amabilis 及 Phalaenopsis Nebula 之 1 cm葉培植體培養於五種 cutokinin (2iP, kinetin, BA, TDZ 及 zeatin) 的1/2MS培養基,皆促進葉培植體之體胚發生,而體胚主要發生於葉基切口及葉向軸面,若葉培植體未添加植物生長調節劑,將無體胚形成。Phalaenopsis amabilis 最好的處理是含 3 mg/l BA 的培養基,為80%,3 mg/l TDZ 次之,為65%。然而, 3 mg/l TDZ 之體胚數較高。Phalaenopsis Nebula在 3 mg/l TDZ 的體胚發生率最高,為65%。此外,20 μM ACC 有促進 Phalaenopsis amabilis 葉培植體體胚發生的效果,體胚發生率為35%。外施 auxin、GA3、ancymidol、polyamines、AgNO3 及 CoCl2 在體胚誘導上並無促進效果。
蝴蝶蘭 (Phalaenopsis amabilis) 幼葉培植體的體胚發生率及體胚數目受到培養基成份的影響。葉培植體較適於培養在1/2 MS 之基礎培養基。不含蔗糖的培養基無體胚形成且培植體易褐化。20 g/l 蔗糖就可滿足體胚發生之需求。培養基添加 170 mg/l NaH2PO4 及 0.25 g/l PVP 有利於葉培植體之體胚發生,活性碳則抑制體胚之形成。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractExplants taken from 1 cm young leaves of Phalaenopsis amabilis and Phalaenopsis Nebula formed somatic embryos directly from wound surfaces, leaf tips, adaxial sides and edges of leaf explants without an intervening callus after one month of culture on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 3 mg/l TDZ in darkness. Average of number somatic embryos per explant was promoted when subculture in 45 days of culture and produced large number of somatic embryos after 60 days of culture. The results show that enhanced the percentage of somatic embryos survival and develop into plantlets from two-month old embryos when cultured on a medium supplemented with 0.5-1 mg/l BA. The directly somatic embryogenesis of leaf explants in Phalaenopsis is successful for plant regeneration and this protocol could be useful for further genetic transformation in this orchid.
Young leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis and Phalaenopsis Nebula directly formed somatic embryos from both side of leaf explants. In addition, explants placed adaxial-side-up orientation on culture medium had significant higher percentage of embryogenesis than the abaxial-side-up orientation. Light regime inhibited direct embryo formation from leaf explants, and had higher percentage of browning than in darkness. In conclusion, adaxial-side-up orientation and culturing under darkness were more suitable for embryo induction from Phalaenopsis leaf explants.
Explants taken from 1 cm leaves of Phalaenopsis amabilis and Phalaenopsis Nebula promoted the direct somatic embryogenesis from the wound surfaces and adaxial side of leaf explants on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with all five cytokinins (2iP, kinetin, BA, TDZ and zeatin). There was no any embryos formed on a hormone-free medium for leaf explants. The best response of Phalaenopsis amabilis was 80% and 65% of embryogenesis on medium supplemented with 3 mg/l BA and 3 mg/l TDZ respectively. However, 3 mg/l TDZ became the embryo higher in numbers. The highest percentage of embryogenesis in Phalaenopsis Nebula was 65% with 3 mg/l TDZ. In addition, the percentage of embryo formation was 35% on medium supplemented with 20 μM ACC. The presence of auxin, GA3, ancymidol, polyamines, AgNO3 and CoCl2 had no inductive effect on embryo formation.
Both of the percentage of embryogenesis explants and the number of embryos per explant from young leaf explants of Phalaenopsis amabilis were affected by medium composition. Leaf explants was more suitable on 1/2 MS basal medium. There was no embryogenic response and explants necrosed on medium without sucrose, and should be supplement 20 g/l sucrose for the requirement on embryogenesis. The presence of 170 mg/l NaH2PO4 and 0.25 g/l PVP promoted the somatic embryogenesis on leaf explants. Besides, active charcoal inhibited the embryo formation on leaf explants.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T16:27:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-R92628127-1.pdf: 1178215 bytes, checksum: 3e735749bbae4ecac294e50bdb246bea (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
頁次
1. 前言 ………………………………………………………… 1

2. 緒論 ………………………………………………………… 3
2.1. 蝴蝶蘭之植物學特性 ………………………………… 3
2.2. 蝴蝶蘭試管內繁殖途徑 ……………………… 4
2.3 影響蘭科植物體胚發生之因子 ……………………… 5
2.4 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 6

3. 蝴蝶蘭葉培植體之直接體胚發生 ……………………… 10
3.1. 前言 ……………………………………………… 10
3.2. 材料與方法 ………………………………… 10
3.3. 結果 ……………………………………………… 12
3.4. 討論 ……………………………………………… 14
3.5. 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… 15
3.6. 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… 16
3.7. 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 16

4. 品種、光、培植體部位及擺放方向對
蝴蝶蘭葉培植體直接體胚發生之影響……………………………44
4.1. 前言 ……………………………………………… 44
4.2. 材料與方法 ………………………………… 44
4.3. 結果 ……………………………………………… 44
4.4. 討論 ……………………………………………… 46
4.5. 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… 47
4.6. 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… 47
4.7. 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 47

5. 植物生長調節劑對蝴蝶蘭葉培植體直接體胚發生之影響 ………………………………………………………… 56
5.1. 前言 ……………………………………………… 56
5.2. 材料與方法 ………………………………… 56
5.3. 結果 ……………………………………………… 58
5.4. 討論 ……………………………………………… 59
5.5. 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… 61
5.6. 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… 61
5.7. 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 61

6. 培養基成份對蝴蝶蘭葉培植體直接體胚發生之影響 ………………………………………………………… 67
6.1. 前人研究 ……………………………………………… 67
6.2. 材料與方法 ………………………………… 67
6.3. 結果 ……………………………………………… 68
6.4. 討論 ……………………………………………… 69
6.5. 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… 70
6.6. 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… 70
6.7. 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 71

7. 結論 ……………………………………………… 78

8. 附錄 ……………………………………………… 79
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject體胚zh_TW
dc.subject蘭科植物zh_TW
dc.subject葉片zh_TW
dc.subject組織培養zh_TW
dc.subjecttissue cultureen
dc.subjectOrchidaceaeen
dc.subjectsomatic embryoen
dc.subjectleafen
dc.title探討蝴蝶蘭葉培植體直接體胚發生之影響因子zh_TW
dc.titleFactors affecting direct somatic embroygenesis of Phalaenopsis leaf explantsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林納生(Na-Sheng Lin),許圳塗(Chou-Tou Shii)
dc.subject.keyword蘭科植物,體胚,葉片,組織培養,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordOrchidaceae,somatic embryo,leaf,tissue culture,en
dc.relation.page79
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2005-07-15
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.15 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved