請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37961
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王淑芬 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ka-Kit Wong | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王嘉杰 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:53:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-08-20 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-10-07 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-21 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Tesh KM, Dunn JS, Evans JH. The abdominal muscles and vertebral stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1987;12:501-8.
2. Hukins DWL, Aspden RM, Hickey DS. Thoracolumbar fascia can increase the efficiency of the erector spinae muscles. Clin Biomech 1990;5:30-4. 3. Vleeming A, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, Stoeckart R, van Wingerden JP, Snijders CJ. The posterior layer of the thoracolumbar fascia. Its function in load transfer from spine to legs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:753-8. 4. Barker PJ, Briggs CA. Attachments of the posterior layer of lumbar fascia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999;24:1757-64. 5. Barker PJ, Briggs CA, Bogeski G. Tensile transmission across the lumbar fasciae in unembalmed cadavers: effects of tension to various muscular attachments. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:129-38. 6. Barker PJ, Guggenheimer KT, Grkovic I, Briggs CA, Jones DC, Thomas CD et al. Effects of tensioning the lumbar fasciae on segmental stiffness during flexion and extension: Young Investigator Award winner. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:397-405. 7. Bogduk N, Macintosh JE. The applied anatomy of the thoracolumbar fascia. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1984;9:164-70. 8. Tesh KM. The abdominal muscle and vertebral stability [dissertation]. Scotland (Glasgow): Scotland Univ.; 1986. 9. Snijders CJ, Vleeming A, Stoeckart R. Transfer of lumbosacral load to iliac bones and legs. Part 1: Biomechanics of self-bracing of the sacroiliac joints and its significance for treatment and exercise. Clin Biomech 1993;8:285-94. 10. Gracovetsky S, Farfan HF, Lamy C. A mathematical model of the lumbar spine using an optimized system to control muscles and ligaments. Orthop Clin North Am 1977;8:135-53. 11. Proske U, Morgan DL. Tendon stiffness: methods of measurement and significance for the control of movement. A review. J Biomech 1987;20:75-82. 12. Kubo K, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Influence of elastic properties of tendon structures on jump performance in humans. J Appl Physiol 1999;87:2090-6. 13. Bojsen-Moller J, Magnusson SP, Rasmussen LR, Kjaer M, Aagaard P. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinous structures. J Appl Physiol 2005;99:986-94. 14. Panjabi MM, White AA. Materials Under Loads. In: Panjabi MM, White AA, editors. Biomechanics in the Musculoskeletal System. 1 ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 2000:65-101. 15. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Influence of static stretching on viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J Appl Physiol 2001;90:520-7. 16. Yahia LH, Pigeon P, DesRosiers EA. Viscoelastic properties of the human lumbodorsal fascia. J Biomed Eng 1993;15:425-9. 17. Smith CW, Young IS, Kearney JN. Mechanical properties of tendons: changes with sterilization and preservation. J Biomech Eng 1996;118:56-61. 18. Adams MA, Green TP. Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus. I. The contribution of fibre-matrix interactions to tensile stiffness and strength. Eur Spine J 1993;2:203-8. 19. Fukashiro S, Itoh M, Ichinose Y, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Ultrasonography gives directly but noninvasively elastic characteristic of human tendon in vivo. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1995;71:555-7. 20. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Gender differences in the viscoelastic properties of tendon structures. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003;88:520-6. 21. Maganaris CN, Paul JP. In vivo human tendon mechanical properties. J Physiol 1999;521 Pt 1:307-13. 22. Magnusson SP, Aagaard P, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Kjaer M. Load-displacement properties of the human triceps surae aponeurosis in vivo. J Physiol 2001;531:277-88. 23. Danto MI, Woo SL. The mechanical properties of skeletally mature rabbit anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon over a range of strain rates. J Orthop Res 1993;11:58-67. 24. Ng BH, Chou SM, Lim BH, Chong A. Strain rate effect on the failure properties of tendons. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 2004;218:203-6. 25. Barnes MF. The basic science of myofascia release: morphological change in connective tissue. J Bodyw Mov Ther 1997;1:231-8. 26. Threlkeld AJ. The effects of manual therapy on connective tissue. Phys Ther 1992;72:893-902. 27. Bell J. Massage therapy helps to increase range of motion, decrease pain and assist in healing a client with low back pain and sciatica symptoms. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12:281-9. 28. Hanten WP, Chandler SD. Effects of myofascial release leg pull and sagittal plane isometric contract-relax techniques on passive straight-leg raise angle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994;20:138-44. 29. Kain J, Martorello L, Swanson E, Sego S. Comparison of an indirect tri-planar myofascial release (MFR) technique and a hot pack for increasing range of motion. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2011;15:63-7. 30. LeBauer A, Brtalik R, Stowe K. The effect of myofascial release (MFR) on an adult with idiopathic scoliosis. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12:356-63. 31. Renan-Ordine R, Alburquerque-Sendin F, de Souza DP, Cleland JA, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. Effectiveness of myofascial trigger point manual therapy combined with a self-stretching protocol for the management of plantar heel pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011;41:43-50. 32. Hislop HJ, Montgomery J. Testing the muscles of the upper extremity. In: Hislop HJ, Montgomery J, editors. Daniels and Worthingham's Muscle Testing: Techniques of Manual Examination. 7 ed. U.S.A.: Elsevier Science; 2002:61-177. 33. Carr D, Gilbertson L, Frymoyer J, Krag M, Pope M. Lumbar paraspinal compartment syndrome. A case report with physiologic and anatomic studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1985;10:816-20. 34. Mooney V, Pozos R, Vleeming A, Gulick J, Swenski D. Exercise treatment for sacroiliac pain. Orthopedics 2001;24:29-32. 35. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Fukunaga T. Effects of resistance and stretching training programmes on the viscoelastic properties of human tendon structures in vivo. J Physiol 2002;538:219-26. 36. Kubo K, Kanehisa H, Kawakami Y, Fukunaga T. Influences of repetitive muscle contractions with different modes on tendon elasticity in vivo. J Appl Physiol 2001;91:277-82. 37. Jhu JL, Chai HM, Jan MH, Wang CL, Shau YW, Wang SF. Reliability and Relationship Between 2 Measurements of Transversus Abdominis Dimension Taken During an Abdominal Drawing-in Maneuver Using a Novel Approach of Ultrasound Imaging. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010;40:826-32. 38. Morse CI, Degens H, Seynnes OR, Maganaris CN, Jones DA. The acute effect of stretching on the passive stiffness of the human gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit. J Physiol 2008;586:97-106. 39. Kay AD, Blazevich AJ. Moderate-duration static stretch reduces active and passive plantar flexor moment but not Achilles tendon stiffness or active muscle length. J Appl Physiol 2009;106:1249-56. 40. Rigby BJ, Hirai N, Spikes JD, Eyring H. The Mechanical Properties of Rat Tail Tendon. J Gen Physiol 1959;43:265-83. 41. Viidik A. Simultaneous mechanical and light microscopic studies of collagen fibers. Z Anat Entwicklungsgesch 1972;136:204-12. 42. Olson MW, Li L, Solomonow M. Interaction of viscoelastic tissue compliance with lumbar muscles during passive cyclic flexion-extension. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2009;19:30-8. 43. Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P, Gleim GW, McHugh MP, Kjaer M. Viscoelastic response to repeated static stretching in the human hamstring muscle. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1995;5:342-7. 44. Wang XT, Ker RF, Alexander RM. Fatigue rupture of wallaby tail tendons. J Exp Biol 1995;198:847-52. 45. Nakamura M, Ikezoe T, Takeno Y, Ichihashi N. Acute and prolonged effect of static stretching on the passive stiffness of the human gastrocnemius muscle tendon unit in vivo. J Orthop Res 2011. 46. Cramer JT, Beck TW, Housh TJ, Massey LL, Marek SM, Danglemeier S et al. Acute effects of static stretching on characteristics of the isokinetic angle - torque relationship, surface electromyography, and mechanomyography. J Sports Sci 2007;25:687-98. 47. Fowles JR, Sale DG, MacDougall JD. Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantarflexors. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:1179-88. 48. Rosenbaum D, Hennig EM. The influence of stretching and warm-up exercises on Achilles tendon reflex activity. J Sports Sci 1995;13:481-90. 49. Woo SL, Matthews JV, Akeson WH, Amiel D, Convery FR. Connective tissue response to immobility. Correlative study of biomechanical and biochemical measurements of normal and immobilized rabbit knees. Arthritis Rheum 1975;18:257-64. 50. Williams PE, Goldspink G. Connective tissue changes in immobilised muscle. J Anat 1984;138 ( Pt 2):343-50. 51. Perry SM, McIlhenny SE, Hoffman MC, Soslowsky LJ. Inflammatory and angiogenic mRNA levels are altered in a supraspinatus tendon overuse animal model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:79S-83S. 52. Ettema AM, Amadio PC, Zhao C, Wold LE, An KN. A histological and immunohistochemical study of the subsynovial connective tissue in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86-A:1458-66. 53. Carpenter JE, Flanagan CL, Thomopoulos S, Yian EH, Soslowsky LJ. The effects of overuse combined with intrinsic or extrinsic alterations in an animal model of rotator cuff tendinosis. Am J Sports Med 1998;26:801-7. 54. Bednar DA, Orr FW, Simon GT. Observations on the pathomorphology of the thoracolumbar fascia in chronic mechanical back pain. A microscopic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995;20:1161-4. 55. Langevin HM, Stevens-Tuttle D, Fox JR, Badger GJ, Bouffard NA, Krag MH et al. Ultrasound evidence of altered lumbar connective tissue structure in human subjects with chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009;10:151. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37961 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 背景:後層胸腰筋膜於脊椎系統中所扮演的生物力學角色越來越備受關注。此筋膜張力之上升被認為可以控制脊椎節間動作及為薦髂關節提供額外的穩定。因此筋膜的特性便成為了解後層胸腰筋膜功能的重要參數。另外,肌筋膜放鬆術是一種徒手治療技術主要用於受限之筋膜或者肌肉使其回復正常之長度及張力。至目前為止,尚未有針對肌筋膜放鬆術對後層胸腰筋膜筋膜特性(剛性指標和遲滯現象指標)、筋膜變形及力量影響之研究。
目的:本實驗的目的為:一)量化肌筋膜放鬆術對健康男性後層胸腰筋膜筋膜特性、筋膜變形及力量之立即影響;二)評估造成剛性指標改變之可能因素。 方法:本實驗將徵召健康無下背痛及有固定運動之男性受試者。在俯姿下請受試者漸進地進行手臂下壓動作直到最大出力然後漸進放鬆,並同時記錄後層胸腰筋膜之變形與動作之力量以計算剛性指標、遲滯現象指標及變形速度。利用單因子重覆測量共變數分析(One-way repeated measures ANCOVA),在控制變形速度後比較肌筋膜放鬆術前、後,剛性指標或遲滯現象指標之差異。利用二因子重覆測量變異數分析(two-way repeated measures ANOVA)比較50%和100%最大出力時筋膜變形於肌筋膜放鬆術前、後的差異以及比較50%和100%最大出力時力量於肌筋膜放鬆術前、後之差異。若任何交互作用達顯著水平,將進行事後分析並以Bonferroni方式作調整。Pearson相關係數用於評估肌筋膜放鬆術前、後剛性指標比值(〖剛性指標〗_後/〖剛性指標〗_前 ×100%)與力量比值(〖∆力量差異(50%和100%)〗_後/〖∆力量差異(50%和100%)〗_前 ×100%)的相關性以及剛性指標比值與筋膜變形差異(50%和100%最大出力時筋膜變形之差異)之變化量(〖∆變形差異〗_後-〖∆變形差異〗_前)的相關性。若任何參數之分佈不符合常態分佈則使用相對應之無母數分析。顯著水平值設定在0.05。 結果:共十位健康男性參與本試驗(年齡: 22.8±2.0歲、身高: 1.77±0.05公尺、重量: 66.6±6.1 公斤及身體質量指數: 21.3±1.5)。主要發現為在肌筋膜放鬆術後剛性指標有明顯下降,另外,50%和100%最大出力時筋膜變形之差異會上升,但力量和遲滯現象指標則無明顯之改變。其次,剛性指標比值與肌筋膜放鬆術前、後筋膜變形差異之變化量呈高度負相關(r=-0.77),與力量比值呈一般正相關(r=0.38)。 結論:肌筋膜放鬆術後,健康男性後層胸腰筋膜剛性指標會下降但沒有改變其黏彈特性。未來之研究可以探討此剛性指標之下降是否來自於肌筋膜放鬆術對平衡結締組織之立即適應和(或)增加肌肉-筋膜節點於多層結構的結締組織中之滑動。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Background: There was increased interest in the biomechanical roles of the posterior thoracolumbar fascia (PLF) in the spinal system. Tensioning the PLF had been proposed to control the spinal segments and provide sacroiliac stability. Therefore, fascial properties became the important variables for interpreting function of the PLF. Myofascial release was one of the manual techniques aiming to restore the normal length and tension of restricted soft tissues. However, no study focused on quantifying the effects of myofascial release on fascial properties, deformation of the PLF and force output at present. Purposes: The purposes of this study were 1) to quantify the immediate effects of myofascial release on fascial properties, deformation of the PLF and force output in healthy male individuals and 2) to evaluate the possible factors related to changes in stiffness index of the PLF after myofascial release. Methods: Individuals who had no history of low back pain and regularly took part in exercises were recruited. Deformation of the PLF and force output during task were recorded simultaneously when participants performed ramped “press up” (isolated arm depression with elbow extension) up to maximal voluntary contraction (loading) following by ramped relaxation (unloading) in prone. Data of deformation of the PLF and force output were used to calculate 1) stiffness index, 2) hysteresis index and 3) deformation rate of the PLF represented by 1) the slope of the regression line of the loading curve above 50% MVC, 2) the percentage of the area within the loading-unloading curve to the area under the loading curve and 3) the slopes of the regression lines of deformation-time data above 50% MVC, from 0% to 100% MVC during loading and from 100% to 0% MVC during unloading, respectively. Separated one-way repeated measures ANCOVA were conducted to compare differences in the stiffness index or hysteresis index of the PLF before and after myofascial release using corresponding deformation rate of the PLF as covariate. Separated two-way repeated measures ANOVA were used to compare deformation of the PLF or force output with MVC (50%, 100% MVC) and release (before, after) as repeated factors. Post hoc analysis with Bonferonni adjustment was conducted if any interaction was significant. Separated Pearson correlation coefficient were used to analyze the relationship between the ratio of stiffness index (〖Stiffness index〗_after/〖Stiffness index〗_before ×100%) and 1) the ratio of △ force output (〖△ force output〗_after/〖△ force output〗_before ×100%) or 2) the difference in △ deformation (between 50% and 100% MVC) of the PLF before and after myofascial release (〖△deformation〗_( after)-〖△ deformation〗_before). Corresponding nonparametric tests were used if distribution of any outcome variable was deviated from normal. The alpha level was set at 0.05. Results: Ten healthy male were recruited for this study. Their age, height, weight and BMI were 22.8±2.0 years old, 1.77±0.05 m, 66.6±6.1 kg and 21.3±1.5, respectively. After myofascial release, the primary findings included a decrease in stiffness index, a greater difference in deformation between 50% and 100% MVC (△deformation) but no significant changes in force output and hysteresis index. Secondly, the ratio of stiffness index had good negative correlation with the difference in △deformation (r=-0.77) and fair positive correlation with the ratio in △force output (r=0.38). Conclusion: After myofascial release, stiffness index of the PLF decreased without change in viscoelasticity in healthy male participants. Further studies could investigate this decrease in stiffness index of the PLF is attributed to effects of myofascial release on whether immediate adaption of parallel connective tissues and/or potential enhance sliding of the muscle-fascia complex among multi-layer connective structures. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:53:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R97428016-1.pdf: 1391069 bytes, checksum: 28de31e4e1873f828d659ec5ba50d70c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 i
誌謝 ii 摘要 iv Abstract vi Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purposes 4 1.3 Research questions 4 1.4 Hypotheses 5 1.5 Glossaries 6 1.6 Research significance 8 Chapter 2 Literature Review 9 2.1 The posterior thoracolumbar fascia was suitable for tensile transmission from muscles to vertebrae according to its extensive attachments with limb and trunk muscles. 9 2.2 The primary biomechanical roles of the PLF were segment control of the spine and sacroiliac stabilization. 11 2.3 The biomechanical roles of the PLF might be depended on its fascial properties. 14 2.4 Effects of Myofascial release on soft tissues. 16 Chapter 3 Research Methods 17 3.1 Participants 17 3.2 Equipment 17 3.3 Procedure 18 3.4 Data reduction 22 3.5 Statistical analysis 23 Chapter 4 Results 25 4.1 Difference in fascial properties, deformation of the PLF and force output during press up before and after myofascial release 25 4.2 Possible factors related to change in fascial properties of the PLF after myofascial release 28 Chapter 5 Discussion 29 5.1 Change in fascial properties, deformation of the PLF and force output during press up after myofascial release 29 5.2 Clinical implication 33 5.3 Limitation 34 Chapter 6 Conclusion 35 Reference 36 Table 45 Figure 55 Appendices 66 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 健康男性後層胸腰筋膜於肌筋膜放鬆術後之機械變形-動態超音波研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Mechanical Deformation of Posterior Thoracolumbar Fascia after Myofascial Release in Healthy Male Participants - A Study of Dynamic Ultrasound | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王崇禮,邵耀華,柴惠敏,陳譽仁 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 超音波,胸腰筋膜,闊背肌,肌筋膜放鬆術, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Ultrasonography,Thoracolumbar fascia,Latissimus dorsi,Myofascial release, | en |
dc.relation.page | 82 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-22 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 物理治療學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 物理治療學系所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.36 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。