請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37777完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林以正(Yi-Cheng Lin) | |
| dc.contributor.author | I-Fen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳依芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:43:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-07-11 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-11 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-03 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 余德慧（1991）。中國社會的人際苦痛及其分析。見高尚仁、楊中芳（主編）：「中國人、中國心－－人格與社會篇」，頁291-362。台北：遠流。
利翠珊（1995）。夫妻互動歷程之探討：以台北地區年輕夫妻為例的一項初探性研究。「本土心理學研究」，4，260-321。 利翠珊（2006）。華人婚姻韌性的形成與變化：概念釐清與理論建構。「本土心理學研究」，25，101-140。 李怡真（2002）。「愛情關係中的情緒表達衝突」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 李敏龍、楊國樞（1998）。中國人的忍：概念分析與實徵研究。「本土心理學研究」，10，3-68。 沙蓮香（1989）。「中國民族性（一）」。北京：中國人民大學出版社。 肖崇好（2005a）。自我監控理論評價。「心理科學」，28，1010-1013。 肖崇好（2005b）。自我監控概念的重構。「心理科學進展」，13，186-193。 林以正、黃金蘭、李怡真（2008，投稿中）。進退之間的拿捏：由忍的情境變異性探討華人自主與和諧的辯證關係。 張思嘉（2001）。婚姻早期的適應過程：新婚夫妻之質性研究。「本土心理學研究」，16，91-133。 陸洛（1998）。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。「國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學」，8，115-137。 黃囇莉（1999）。「人際和諧與衝突：本土化的理論與研究」。台北：桂冠。 黃囇莉（2002）。孰可忍？孰不可忍？從現代化的「批判」到本土化的「堅忍」之間。見葉啟政（主編）：「現代化到本土化」，頁111-135。台北：遠流。 黃囇莉、鄭琬蓉、黃光國（2008）。邁向發聲之路：上下關係中「忍」的歷程與自我之轉化。「本土心理學研究」，29，3-76。 楊中芳（1991）。試論中國人的「自己」：理論與研究方向。見楊中芳、高尚仁（主編）：「中國人、中國心－人格與社會篇」，頁93-145。台北：遠流。 鄧傳忠（2008）。「中庸思維對拿捏行為與心理適應的調節效果」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Andersen, P. A., & Guerrero, L. K. (1998). Principles of communication and emotion in social interaction. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 49-96). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Batson, C., & Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107-122. Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wilhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion, 3, 48-67. Butler, E. A., Lee, T. L., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Emotion regulation and culture: Are the social consequences of emotion suppression culture-specific? Emotion, 17, 30-48. Choi, I., Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (1999). Causal attribution across cultures: Variation and universality. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 47-63. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71-75. Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 377-389. Funder, D. C., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1983). Delay of gratification: Some longitudinal personality correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1198–1213. Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530-555. Gold, D. B., & Wegner, D. M. (1995). Origins of ruminative thought: Trauma, incompleteness, nondisclosure, and suppression. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1245-1261. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1993). Emotional suppression: physiology, self-report, and expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 970-986. Gross, J. J., & Levenson, R. W. (1997). Hiding feelings: The acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 95-103. Hayes, S. C., Wilson, K. G., Gifford, E. V., Follette, V. M., & Strosahl, K. (1996). Experiential avoidance and behavioral disorders: A functional dimensional approach to diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1152-1168. Ho, D. Y. (1981). Traditional patterns of socialization in Chinese society. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 23, 81-95. Hwang, K. K. (1977). The dynamic process of coping with interpersonal conflicts in Chinese society. Proceeding of the National Science Council, 2, 198-208. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions:The attribution process in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 219-266. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution in social psychology. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 15, 192-238. Lazarus, R. S., & Lazarus, B. N. (1994). Passion and reason: Making sense of our emotions. New York: Oxford University Press. McCullough, M. E., Emmons, R. A., & Tsang, J. (2002). The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 112-127. McFarland, C., & Buehler, R. (1997). Negative affective states and the motivated retrieval of positive life events: The role of affect acknowledgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 200-214. Metzger, T. A. (1981). Selfhood and authority in Neo-Confucian political culture. In A. Kleinman & T. Y. Lin (Eds.), Normal and Abnormal Behavior in Chinese Culture (pp. 7-24). Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company. Morris, M. W., & Peng, K. (1994). Culture and cause: American and Chinese attributions for social and physical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 949-971. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291-310. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5, 164-172. Pennebaker, J. W., Hughes, C. F., & O'Heeron, R. C. (1987). The psychophysiology of confession: Linking inhibitory and psychosomatic processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 781-793. Ring, K., & Wallston, K. (1968). A test to measure performance styles in interpersonal relations. Psychological Reports, 22, 147-154. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowtiz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 174-221). New York: Academic Press. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R., & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 5-37. Sabatelli, R. M., & Rubin, M. (1986). Nonverbal expressiveness and physical attractiveness as mediators of interpersonal perceptions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10, 120-133. Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6, 461-464. Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. Wu, C., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1259-1268. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37777 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 就文化獨特性而言，「忍」無疑是華人文化中相當特殊且普遍的一種情緒調控概念。既然忍受到華人高度重視，且廣泛運用於日常生活中，那麼其運用情況應對華人心理適應具有關鍵之影響。過去有關忍的研究，大多著重在忍之概念性意涵的描述，或是針對一段長時間忍歷程進行質性訪談，鮮少有研究針對忍的運用情形與個體心理適應之關聯進行實徵檢驗。本研究目的在探討個體運用忍之情緒調控策略型態以及其對心理適應的影響。從單一策略運用頻率與適應指標之相關分析顯示，個體採「轉移式忍」與「隱忍式忍」個別策略的頻率越高，對其心理適應越不利。針對忍與不忍運用情況進行的集群分析結果則指出，能交互運用「直接表達」策略與「同理式忍」策略者，會具有最佳的心理適應。但僅就五種忍之調控策略的運用型態進行集群分析則顯示，傾向採「同理式忍」與「修養式忍」策略的「同理修養型」，又比傾向採「隱忍式忍」與「轉移式忍」策略的「隱忍轉移型」有較佳的適應情況。以上結果顯示，除了從單一的忍之調控策略運用情況，可以瞭解其對個體心理適應的影響外，藉由觀察個體綜合運用多種情緒調控策略的組型，將可以為各策略有關之心理適應意涵提供更精細的說明。此外，本研究也指出華人對忍的看法並非採單一價值判斷，因為個體除了要展現收放自如的忍之拿捏行為外，在選擇運用忍的同時，也要能妥當運用足以提供正面影響的忍之情緒調控策略，如此才是最有利於心理適應的情緒處理模式。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | For Chinese, forbearance has been considered as a common and valued emotional coping tactics in interpersonal conflicts. Since it is so important and has been generally applied in daily lives, forbearance must be crucial in psychological adjustment. However, previous studies merely focused on either basic concept of forbearance or qualitative analysis of various forbearance experiences. This study probed the relations between the transforming strategies in forbearance and psychological adjustment. Simple correlations showed the more people used Avoidable and Suppressed strategies, the less likely they could maintain satisfactory psychological state. Besides, considering the interplay of adopting forbearance or not, the results indicated that Self-Handing Style, as expressing appropriate behavior in different situations, would reach the best psychological adjustment. Furthermore, another cluster results, which focused on the pattern of different strategies in forbearance per se, illustrated the trend towards adopting Empathetic and Cultivated strategies, in contrast the trend towards adopting Suppressed and Avoidable strategies, would bring about better adaptive status. This study pointed out that in addition to explore the simple correlation of different tactics respectively, the profile of adopting different strategies would exhibit more information about adaptive meaning in forbearance. To sum up, Chinese consider forbearance as a multi-element concept. In order to promote psychological adjustment, people should not only perform self-handing behaviors, but also show the tendency to adopt positive tactics as being in forbearance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:43:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95227111-1.pdf: 1335950 bytes, checksum: c9827ea8cd5ab233b9741e64070fda36 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 緒論 1
忍的基本概念 2 忍的相關研究 2 忍的情緒調控策略 7 忍的適應性意涵 14 研究方法 16 研究樣本 16 研究工具 16 研究結果 20 適應量表之描述統計與相關結果 20 情緒因應策略之描述統計與相關結果 20 情緒因應策略之集群分析結果 22 綜合討論 28 個別情緒因應策略之相關結果探討 28 情緒因應策略之分群結果探討 29 策略測量之檢討 31 情緒調控策略之窮盡性探討 32 忍之拿捏行為 33 東西方情緒調控之對照 34 未來研究方向 36 參考文獻 38 表 43 圖 46 附錄 47 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 集群分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 心理適應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 忍 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 拿捏 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 情緒調控策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | forbearance (endurance) | en |
| dc.subject | cluster analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Self-Handing behavior | en |
| dc.subject | emotion regulation strategies | en |
| dc.subject | psychological adjustment | en |
| dc.title | 忍的情緒調控策略及其對心理適應之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Emotion Regulation Strategies in Forbearance and
the Influence on Psychological Adjustment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 利翠珊(Tsui-Shan Li),黃?莉(Li-Li Huang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 心理適應,忍,拿捏,情緒調控策略,集群分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | psychological adjustment,forbearance (endurance),emotion regulation strategies,Self-Handing behavior,cluster analysis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 53 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-04 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.3 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。