請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37347
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳為堅(Wei J. Chen) | |
dc.contributor.author | I-Chin Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林宜瑾 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:25:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-08-08 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-08-08 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-18 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Kandel D. Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use. Science 1975;190(4217):912.
2. Kulin HE, Muller J. The Biological Aspects of Puberty. Pediatrics in Review 1996;17(3):75. 3. Alsaker FD. Annotation: The Impact of Puberty. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 1996;37(3):249-258. 4. Jernigan DH. Global Status Report: Alcohol and Young People. Geneva: World Health Organization 2001. 5. Duncan SC, Alpert A, Duncan TE, Hops H. Adolescent alcohol use development and young adult outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1997;49(1):39-48. 6. Hill KG, White HR, Chung IJ, Hawkins JD, Catalano RF. Early Adult Outcomes of Adolescent Binge Drinking: Person-and Variable-Centered Analyses of Binge Drinking Trajectories. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2000;24(6):892. 7. Bauman A, Phongsavan P. Epidemiology of substance use in adolescence: prevalence, trends and policy implications. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999;55(3):187-207. 8. Banken JA. Drug Abuse Trends among Youth in the United States. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2004;1025(1 Current Status of Drug Dependence/Abuse Studies: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Drugs of Abuse and Neurotoxicity):465-471. 9. Chen CY, Chen WC, Lew-Ting CY, Lee CM, Yen CF, Chen DR, et al. Employment experience in relation to alcohol, tobacco, and betel nut use among youth in Taiwan. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006;84(3):273-280. 10. Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 1992;112(1):64-105. 11. Swadi H. Individual risk factors for adolescent substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999;55(3):209-224. 12. Merlo J. Multilevel analytical approaches in social epidemiology: measures of health variation compared with traditional measures of association. British Medical Journal 2003;57(8):550. 13. Diez-Roux AV. Multilevel Analysis in Public Health Research. Annual Reviews in Public Health 2000;21(1):171-192. 14. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research. Social Science & Medicine 1998;46(1):97-117. 15. Diez-Roux AV. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. In: American Public Health Association; 1998. p. 216-222. 16. McLaughlin RJ, Baer PE, Burnside MA, Pokorny AD. Psychosocial correlates of alcohol use at two age levels during adolescence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1985;46(3):212-8. 17. Barnes GM, Welte JW. Patterns and predictors of alcohol use among 7-12th grade students in New York State. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1986;47(1):53-62. 18. Sieving RE, Perry CL, Williams CL. Do friendships change behaviors, or do behaviors change friendships? Examining paths of influence in young adolescents' alcohol use. Journal of Adolescent Health 2000;26(1):27-35. 19. Wilks J, Callan VJ, Austin DA. Parent, Peer and Personal Determinants of Adolescent Drinking. Addiction 1989;84(6):619-630. 20. Mason WA, Windle M. Family, religious, school and peer influences on adolescent alcohol use: a longitudinal study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2001;62(1):44-53. 21. Curran PJ, Stice E, Chassin L. The relation between adolescent alcohol use and peer alcohol use: A longitudinal random coefficients model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1997;65(1):130-140. 22. D'Amico EJ, McCarthy DM. Escalation and initiation of younger adolescents' substance use: the impact of perceived peer use. Journal of Adolescent Health 2006;39(4):481-7. 23. Kuntsche E, Jordan MD. Adolescent alcohol and cannabis use in relation to peer and school factors Results of multilevel analyses. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2006;84(2):167-174. 24. Johansen A, Rasmussen S, Madsen M. Health behaviour among adolescents in Denmark: Influence of school class and individual risk factors. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 2006;34(1):32-40. 25. Hoffmann JP. Extracurricular Activities, Athletic Participation, and Adolescent Alcohol Use: Gender-Differentiated and School-Contextual Effects. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 2006;47(3):275-90. 26. Dent CW, Grube JW, Biglan A. Community level alcohol availability and enforcement of possession laws as predictors of youth drinking. Preventive Medicine 2005;40(3):355-362. 27. Forster JL, Murray DM, Wolfson M, Wagenaar AC. Commercial Availability of Alcohol to Young People: Results of Alcohol Purchase Attempts. Preventive Medicine 1995;24(4):342-347. 28. Wagenaar AC, Toomey TL, Murray DM, Short BJ, Wolfson M, Jones-Webb R. Sources of alcohol for underage drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1996;57(3):325-33. 29. Paschall MJ, Grube JW, Black C, Flewelling RL, Ringwalt CL, Biglan A. Alcohol Outlet Characteristics and Alcohol Sales to Youth: Results of Alcohol Purchase Surveys in 45 Oregon Communities. Prevention Science 2007;8(2):153-159. 30. Scribner R, Mason K, Theall K, Simonsen N, Schneider SK, Towvim LG, et al. The contextual role of alcohol outlet density in college drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 2008;69(1):112-20. 31. Scribner RA, Cohen DA, Fisher W. Evidence of a Structural Effect for Alcohol Outlet Density: A Multilevel Analysis. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2000;24(2):188. 32. Kuntsche EN, Kuendig H. Do school surroundings matter? Alcohol outlet density, perception of adolescent drinking in public, and adolescent alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors 2005;30(1):151-158. 33. Gallup JL, Sachs JD, Mellinger AD. Geography and Economic Development. International Regional Science Review 1999;22(2):179. 34. Carpenter C. Did Ontario's Zero Tolerance & Graduated Licensing Law Reduce Youth Drunk Driving? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2006;25(1):13. 35. Treno AJ, Grube JW, Martin SE. Alcohol Availability as a Predictor of Youth Drinking and Driving: A Hierarchical Analysis of Survey and Archival Data. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2003;27(5):835. 36. Klepp KI, Perry CL, Jacobs DR, Jr. Etiology of drinking and driving among adolescents: implications for primary prevention. Health Education & Behavior 1991;18(4):415-27. 37. Liu CY, Hung YT, Chuang YL, Chen YJ, Weng WS, Liu JS, et al. Incorporating Development Stratification of Taiwan Townships into Sampling Design of Large Scale Health Interview Survey. Journal of Health Management 2006;4(1):1-22. 38. Lee ES, Forthofer RN. Analyzing Complex Survey Data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). 2005. 39. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. British Medical Journal 2006;60(4):290. 40. Larsen K, Merlo J. Appropriate Assessment of Neighborhood Effects on Individual Health: Integrating Random and Fixed Effects in Multilevel Logistic Regression. American Journal of Epidemiology 2005;161(1):81. 41. Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Rastam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. British Medical Journal 2005;59(9):729. 42. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yang M, Plewis I, Healy M, et al. A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: Institute of Education 2000;286. 43. Donovan JE, Molina BSG. Children's Introduction to Alcohol Use: Sips and Tastes. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 2008;32(1):108-119. 44. Iannotti RJ, Bush PJ. Perceived vs. actual friends' use of alcohol, cigarettes, marijuana, and cocaine: Which has the most influence? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 1992;21(3):375-389. 45. Rai AA, Stanton B, Wu Y, Li X, Galbraith J, Cottrell L, et al. Relative influences of perceived parental monitoring and perceived peer involvement on adolescent risk behaviors: an analysis of six cross-sectional data sets. Journal of Adolescent Health 2003;33(2):108-118. 46. Aas H, Klepp KI. Adolescents'alcohol use related to perceived norms. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 1992;33(4):315-25. 47. Bauman KE, Ennett ST. Peer influence on adolescent drug use. The American Psychologist 1994;49(9):820-2. 48. Kandel DB. Homophily, Selection, and Socialization in Adolescent Friendships. American Journal of Sociology 1978;84(2):427. 49. Petraitis J, Flay BR, Miller TQ. Reviewing theories of adolescent substance use: Organizing pieces in the puzzle. Psychological Bulletin 1995;117(1):67-86. 50. Feldman L, Harvey B, Holowaty P, Shortt L. Alcohol use beliefs and behaviors among high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health 1999;24(1):48-58. 51. Ferguson SA, Williams AF. Awareness of zero tolerance laws in three states. Journal of Safety Research 2002;33(3):293-299. 52. Needle R, McCubbin H, Wilson M, Reineck R, Lazar A, Mederer H. Interpersonal influences in adolescent drug use--the role of older siblings, parents, and peers. International Journal of the Addictions 1986;21(7):739-66. 53. Browne WJ. MCMC estimation in MLwiN. London: Institute of Education, University of London 2002. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/37347 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目的:在多層次的架構下,探討學區特性對於青少年酒精使用之影響;同時探究學區特性是否能夠解釋青少年飲酒的學區差異。
方法:在2004至2006年,利用多階段隨機群集抽樣的方式選取148個學區、53,597名全國代表性之學校青少年。青少年之酒精使用經驗、社會人口學特性、偏差行為的資訊皆以自我陳報問卷來蒐集。接著利用多層次羅吉斯迴歸分析的統計方式探討學區特性(察知同學酒精使用盛行率、便利商店密度、酒後駕車盛行率)與青少年酒精使用的相關性。 結果:察知同學酒精使用盛行率、便利商店密度、酒後駕車盛行率皆與青少年酒精使用顯著相關。高風險學區青少年相較於低風險學區青少年的酒精使用風險平均增加1.45倍。儘管個人變項可解釋將近70%的學區殘差異質性,此三種區域變項只能進一步地解釋10.20%至12.24%的學區變異。 結論:位在較高察知同學酒精使用盛行率、較高便利商店密度、較高酒後駕車盛行率之學區的青少年有較高的酒精使用勝算。然而,察知同學酒精使用盛行率、便利商店密度、酒後駕車盛行率可解釋的學區變異相對地較有限。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To examine the effects of school-districts' characteristics on adolescent alcohol use and whether the characteristics of school-districts can explain the school-district differences on adolescent alcohol use under the multilevel framework.
Methods: In 2004-2006, a nationally representative sample of 53,597 school-attending adolescents from 148 school-districts was selected using multistage, random, cluster sampling. Information on adolescents' alcohol use experiences, sociodemographic characteristics, and delinquent behaviors was collected through the self-administered questionnaire. Relations of three school-district characteristics (prevalence of perceived classmate' alcohol use, density of convenience stores, and prevalence of drinking and driving) to adolescent alcohol use were examined by means of multilevel logistic regression analysis. Results: Prevalence of perceived classmates' alcohol use, density of convenience stores, and prevalence of drinking and driving were significantly associated with current alcohol use among adolescents. The odds on current alcohol use would increase 1.45 times on average for adolescents in school-districts of higher risks comparing to the ones in school-districts with lower risks. While nearly 70% of residual heterogeneity among school-districts could be explained by the individual-level variables, only 10.20% to 12.24% of school-district variances were further explained by the three area-level variables. Conclusions: Adolescents whose schools located in townships with higher prevalence of perceived classmates' alcohol use, higher density of convenience stores, or higher prevalence of drinking and driving had higher odds of using alcohol. Yet, prevalence of perceived classmates' alcohol use, density of convenience stores, and prevalence of drinking and driving explained relatively limited school-district differences on adolescent alcohol use. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:25:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R95842021-1.pdf: 540072 bytes, checksum: 68169a28b32d87a93aa71b2a6d6bbe21 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgement ………………………………………………………………………I
Abstract (in Chinese)…………………………………………………………………II Abstract ………………………………………………………………………………III Contents ……………………………………………………………………………IV List of tables and figures ……………………………………………………………V Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………1 Methods ………………………………………………………………………………4 Sampling and data collection ……………………………………………………4 Individual-level variables …………………………………………………………5 Area-level variables ………………………………………………………………5 Statistical analysis …………………………………………………………………6 Results …………………………………………………………………………………11 Discussion ……………………………………………………………………………14 References ……………………………………………………………………………18 Appendices ……………………………………………………………………………30 I. Administration rate of the paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaire …30 II. Polychoric correlations of individual characteristics among sampled youth, the three-year National Survey of Illegal Drug Use among Adolescents in Taiwan, 2004-2006 ………………………………………………………………………31 Questionnaire (2004) ……………………………………………………………32 Questionnaire (2005) ……………………………………………………………35 Questionnaire (2006) ……………………………………………………………38 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 三年全國青少年調查的學區特性與飲酒相關性之多層次分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Multilevel analyses on the relations of school district's characteristics to alcohol drinking in a 3-year national survey of adolescents | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳娟瑜(Chuan-Yu Chen),陳端容(Duan-Rung Chen),黃俊豪 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 青少年,酒精使用,多層次分析,學區, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | adolescent,alcohol use,multilevel analysis,school-district, | en |
dc.relation.page | 40 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-21 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 527.41 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。