請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36993
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李吉仁 | |
dc.contributor.author | SHIH-MIN LO | en |
dc.contributor.author | 駱世民 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T15:17:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2013-07-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Abernathy, W. and J. Utterback (1978) ‘Patterns of industrial innovation’, Technology Review 80(7): 40-47.
Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. (1987) ‘Innovation, market structure, and firm size’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 69(4): 567-574. Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. (1988) ‘Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis’, The American Economic Review 78(4): 678-690. Acs, Z. J., and Audretsch, D. B. (1991) ‘Innovation and size at the firm level’, Southern Economic Journal 57(3): 739-744. Afuah, A. (2000) ‘How much do your co-opetitors’ capabilities matter in the face of technological change?’, Strategic Management Journal 21: 387-404. Afuah, A. (2001) ‘Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change?’, Academy of Management Journal 44(6): 1211-1228. Akerlof, G. (1970) ‘The market for lemons: Quality uncertainty and market mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488-500. Alvarez, S. and J. Barney (2004) ‘Organizing rent generation and appropriation: Toward a theory of the entrepreneurial firm’, Journal of Business Venturing 19: 621-635. Alvarez, S. and L. Busenitz (2001) ‘The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory’, Journal of Management 27: 755-775. Amsden, A. (1991) ‘Diffusion of development: The late-industrializing model and Greater East Asia’, American Economic Review 81(2): 282-286. Anderson, P. and M. Tushman (1990) ‘Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(4): 604-633. Anderson, P. and M. Tushman (1991) ‘Managing through cycles of technological change’, Research Technology Management 34(3): 26-31. Andrews, K. (1971) The Concept of Corporate Strategy, Homewood, Ill.: Dow Jones-Irwin. Argyris, C. and D. Schon (1978) Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Arvanitis, S. (1997) ‘The impact of firm size on innovative activity – An empirical analysis based on Swiss firm data’, Small Business Economics 9: 473-490. Audretsch, D. (2001) ‘Research issues relating to structure, competition and performance of small technology-based firms’, Small Business Economics 16: 37-51. Audretsch, D. and M. Keilbach (2004a) ‘Does entrepreneurship capital matter’, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Fall: 419-429. Audretsch, D. and M. Keilbach (2004b) ‘Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance’, Regional Studies 38(8): 949-959. Audretsch, D. and E. Lehmann (2004) ‘Financing high-tech growth: The role of banks and venture capitalists’, Schmalenbach Business Review 56: 340-357. Baily, M. N. and Lawrence, R. Z. (2001) ‘Do we have a new E-conomy?’, The American Economic Review 91(2): 308-312. Baldwin, W. L. and Childs, G. L. (1969) ‘The fast second and rivalry in research and development’, Southern Economic Journal 36(1): 18-24. Baldwin, W. L. and Scott, J. T. (1987) Market Structure and Technological Change, Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers. Barney, J. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantages’, Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120. Baumol, W. (1993) ‘Formal entrepreneurship theory in economics: Existence and bounds’, Journal of Business Venturing 8: 197-210. Baumol, W. (2002) ‘Towards microeconomics of innovation: Growth engine hallmark of market economics’, Atlantic Economic Journal 32(1): 1-12. Baumol, W. (2004) ‘Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth machine’, Small Business Economics 23: 9-21. Bhattacharya, S. and Ritter, J. (1983) ‘Innovation and communication: Signaling with partial disclosure’, Review of Economic Studies 52: 331-346. Bougheas, S. (2004) ‘Internal vs. external financing of R&D’, Small Business Economics 22: 11-17. Bougheas, S., Gorg, H. and Strobl, E. (2003) ‘Is R&D financially constrained? Theory and evidence from Irish manufacturing’, Review of Industrial Organization 22: 159-174. Brandenburger A. and B. Nalebuff (1996) Co-opetition. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday. Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., and Malerba, F. (2003) ‘Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification’, Research Policy 32: 69-87. Carpenter, M, W. Lazonick and M. O’Sullivan (2003) ‘The Stock market and innovative capabilities in the new economy: The optical networking industry’, Industrial and Corporate Change 12 (5): 963-1034. Carpenter, R. E. and Petersen, B. C. (2002a) ‘Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing’, The Economic Journal 112: F54-F72. Carpenter, R. E. and Petersen, B. C. (2002b) ‘Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance?’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2):298-309. Casson, M. (1982/2003) The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory, 2nd ed. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. Cockburn, I, R. Henderson and S. Stern (2000) ‘Untangling the origins of competitive advantage’, Strategic Management Journal 21: 1123-1145. Cohen, W. M. and Klepper, S. (1992) ‘The anatomy of industry R&D intensity distributions’, The American Economic Review 82(4): 773-799. Cohen, W. M. and Klepper, S. (1996) ‘A reprise of size and R&D’, The Economic Journal 106: 925-951. Cohen, W. M. and Levin, R. C. (1989) ‘Empirical studies of innovation and market structure’ in R. Schmalensee and R. D. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Cohen, W. M., Levin, R.C., and Mowery, D. C. (1987) ‘Firm size and R&D intensity: A re-examination’, The Journal of Industrial Economics 35(4): 543-565. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1989) ‘Innovation and learning: The two sides of R&D’, The Economic Journal 99: 569-596. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990) ‘Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152. Cyert, R. and J. March (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. (2nd Ed., 1992). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc. Dosi, G. (1982) ‘Technological paradigms and technological trajectories’, Research Policy 11: 147-162. Dosi, G. (1988) ‘Sources, procedures, and microeconomic sources of innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature 26: 1120-1171. Dierickx I. and K. Cool (1989) ‘Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage’, Management Science 35: 1504-1511. Dijk, B. V., Hertog, R. D., Menkveld, B. and Thurik, R. (1997) ‘Some new evidence on the determinants of large- and small- firm innovation’, Small Business Economics 9: 335-343. Eisenhardt, K. and J. Martin (2000) ‘Dynamic capabilities: What are they?’ Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 1105-1121. European Commission (2003) The new SME definition – User guide and model declaration. Enterprise and Industry Publications. Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard and B. Petersen (1988), ‘Financial constraints and corporate investment’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1: 141-195. Galbraith, J. K. (1952) American Capitalism: the Concept of Countervailing Power, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Gavetti, G. and D. Levinthal (2005) ‘The strategy field from the perspective of Management Science: Divergent strands and possible integration’, Management Science 50(10): 1309-1318. Gemba, K. and F. Kodama (2001) ‘Diversification dynamics of the Japan industry’, Research Policy 30: 1165-1184. Gort, M. and S. Klepper (1982) ‘Time paths in the diffusion of product innovations’, The Economic Journal 92: 630-653. Gompers, P. and J. Lerner (2001) ‘The venture capital revolution’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 (2): 145-168. Grant, R. (1996) ‘Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 17 (Winter Special Issue): 109-122. Granstrand, O., P. Patel and K. Pavitt (1997) ‘Multi-technology corporations: Why they have “distributed” rather than “distinctive core” competences’, California Management Review 39(4): 8-25. Griffiths, W. E., Hill, R. C. and Judge, G. 1993. Learning and Practicing Econometrics, Singapore: John Willey & Sons, Inc. Griliches, Z. 1984. (ed.) R&D, patents, and productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Hall, B. and R. H. Ziedonis (2001) ‘The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the US semiconductor industry, 1979-1995’, RAND Journal of Economics 32: 101-128. Hall, B. H. (2002) ‘The financing of research and development’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18(1): 35-51. Harris, M. and A. Raviv (1991) ‘The theory of capital structure’, The Journal of Finance 46(1): 297-355. Helfat, C. (1997) ‘Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D’, Strategic Management Journal 18(5): 339-360. Helfat, C. (2000) ‘Guest editor’s introduction to the special issue: The evolution of firm capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 21(10-11): 955-960. Helfat, C. and M. Peteraf (2003) ‘The dynamic resource-based view: Capabilities lifecycles’, Strategic Management Journal 24: 997-1010. Himmelberg, C. P. and Petersen, B. C. (1994) ‘R&D and internal finance: a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 76:38-51. Hoskisson, R., M. Hitt, M. Johnson and D. Moesel (1993) ‘Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy’, Strategic Management Journal 14(3): 213-235. Hubbard, R. (1998) ‘Capital market imperfections and investment’, Journal of Economic Literature 36:193-225. Jacquemin, A. and C. Berry (1979) ‘Entropy measure of diversification and corporate growth’, The Journal of Industrial Economics 27(4): 359-369. Jang, S., S. Lo, and W. Chang (2008) ‘How do latecomers catch up with forerunners? Analysis of patents and patent citations in the field of flat panel display technologies’, Scientometrics (forthcoming). Jensen, M. and W. Meckling (1976) ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure’, Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360. Kamien, M. I., and Schwartz, N. L. (1975) ‘Market structure and innovation: A survey’, Journal of Economic Literature 13(1):1-37. Kamien, M. and N. Schwartz (1982) Market Structure and Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Kennedy, P. (1998) A Guide to Econometrics, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Kleinknecht, A. (1987) ‘Measuring R&D in small firms: How much are we missing?’, Journal of Industrial Economics 36: 253-256. Kleinknecht, A. (1989) ‘Firm size and innovation’, Small Business Economics 1(3): 215-222. Kogut, B. and U. Zander (1992) ‘Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology’, Organization Science 3(3): 383-397. Kortum, S., and Lerner, J. (2000) ‘Assessing the contribution of venture capital to innovation’, RAND Journal of Economics 31(4): 674-692. Learned, E., C. Christensen, K. Andrews and W. Guth (1965) Business Policy: Text and Cases, Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin. Leibenstein, H. (1966) ‘Allocative efficiency vs. “X-inefficiency”’, The American Economic Review 56(3): 392-415. Leonard-Barton, D. (1992) ‘Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development’, Strategic Management Journal 13(Special Issue): 111-125. Levin, R., W. Cohen and D. Mowery (1985) ‘R&D appropriability, opportunity, and market structure: New evidence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses’, American Economic Review 75 (2): 20-24. Levin, R., A. Klevorick, R. Nelson and S. Winter (1987) ‘Appropriating the returns from industrial R&D’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, pp: 783-820. Lewellen, W., J. Halloran and H. Lanser (2000) Financial Management: An Introduction to Principles and Practice. South-Western College Publishing, Cincinnati, OH. Lippman, S. and R. Rumelt. (1982) ‘Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition’, Bell Journal of Economics 13(Autumn): 418-438. Maksimovic, V., and Pichler, P. (2001) ‘Technological innovation and initial public offerings’, The Review of Financial Studies 14(2): 459-494. Miller, D. (2006) ‘Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance’, Strategic Management Journal 27: 601-619. Mills, D. E., and Schulmamm, L. (1985) ‘Industry structure with fluctuating demand’, The American Economic Review 75(4): 758-767. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1992) Economics, Organization and Management. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ. Modigliani, F. and M. Miller (1958) ‘The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment’, American Economic Review 48: 261-297. Montgomery C. and B. Wernerfelt (1988) ‘Diversification, Ricardiant rents and Tobin’s q’, Rand Journal of Economics 19: 623-632. Myers, S. (1984) ‘The capital structure puzzle’, Journal of Finance 39: 575-592. Myers, S. (2001) ‘Capital structure’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 15(2): 81-102. Myers, S. and N. Majluf (1984) ‘Corporate financing and investment decisions when Firms have information that investors do not have’, Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187-221. Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Nelson, R. (1991) ‘Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?’ Strategic Management Journal 12(Special Issue): 61-74. Newbert, S. (2007) ‘Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm : An assessment and suggestions for future research’, Strategic Management Journal 28 : 121-146. Pagano, M., Panetta, F., and Zingales, L. (1998) ‘Why do companies go public? An empirical analysis’, The Journal of Finance, 53(1): 27-63. Patel P. and K. Pavitt (1997) ‘The technological competencies of the world’s largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety’, Research Policy 26:141-156. Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Innovation: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy 13(6): 343-373. Penrose, E. (1959) The Growth of the Firm. Wiley: New York. Porter, M. (1980) Competitive Strategy, New York: Free Press. Porter, M. (1985) Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press. Priem, R. and J. Butler (2001) ‘Is the resource-based ‘view’ a useful perspective for strategic management research?’, Academy of Management Review 26(1): 22-40. Prahalad, C. and G. Hamel (1990) ‘The core competencies of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review 68(3): 79-93. Rajan, R. and L. Zingales (2001) ‘The influence of the financial revolution on the nature of firms’, American Economic Review 91(2): 206-211. Ravenscraft, D., and Scherer, F. (1982) ‘The lag structure of returns to research and development’, Applied Economics 14(6): 603-620. Reinganum, J. (1983) ‘Uncertain innovation and the persistence of monopoly’, The American Economic Review 73(4):741-748. Ritter, J. (1991) ‘The long-run performance of initial public offerings’, The Journal of Finance 46: 3-27. Ritter, J. and Welch, I. (2002) ‘A review of IPO activity, pricing, and allocations’, The Journal of Finance 57(4): 1795-1828. Rothaermel, F. (2001a) ‘Complementary assets, strategic alliances, and the incumbent’s advantage: An empirical study of industry and firm effects in the biopharmaceutical industry’, Research Policy 30: 1235-1251. Rothaermel, F. (2001b) ‘Incumbent’s advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation’, Strategic Management Journal 22: 687-699. Rothaermel, F. and C. Hill (2005) ‘Technological discontinuities and complementary assets: A longitudinal study of industry and firm performance’, Organization Science 16(1): 52-70. Rothwell, R., (1989) ‘Small firms, innovation and industrial change’, Small Business Economics 1(1): 51-64. Rumelt, R. (1974) Strategy, Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Division of Research, Harvard Business School. Rumelt, R. (1982) ‘Diversification strategy and profitability’, Strategic Management Journal, 3(4): 359-369. Rumelt, R. (1984) ‘Towards a strategic theory of the firm’, in Competitive Strategic Management, Lamb R (ed). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ: 556-570. Rumelt, R., D. Schendel and D. Teece (1994) Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Saloner, G. (1991) ‘Modeling, game theory, and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal 12 (8): 119-136. Sanchez, R. and A. Heene (1997) ‘Reinventing strategic management: New theory and practice for competence-based competition’, European Management Journal, 15(3): 303-317. Saxenian, A. and J. Hsu (2001) ‘The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading’, Industrial and Corporate Change 10(4): 893-920. Scherer, F. M. (1980) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd ed. Chicago: Rand McNally. Schmalensee, R. (1982) ‘Product differentiation advantages of pioneering brands’, The American Economic Review 72(3): 349-365. Schoonhoven, C. B., Eisenhardt, K., and Lyman, K. (1990) ‘Speeding product to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 177-207. Schumpeter, J. (1934/1986) The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Schumpeter, J. (1942/1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row. Small and Medium Enterprise Administration (2005) Standards for Identifying Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. www.moeasmea.gov.tw Stieglitz, N. and K. Heine (2007) ‘Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 28: 1-15. Suzuki, J. and F. Kodama (2004) ‘Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms’, Research Policy 33: 531-549. Teece, D. (1986) ‘Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy’, Research Policy 15(6): 285-305. Teece D. and G. Pisano (1994) ‘The dynamic capabilities of firms: An introduction’, Industrial and Corporate Change 3(3): 537-556. Teece D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1997) ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509-533. Teece D. (2007) ‘Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance’, Strategic Management Journal, 28 (13): 1319-1350. Tirole, J. (1988) The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Tripsas, M. (1997) ‘Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry’, Strategic Management Journal 18(Summer Special Issue): 119-142. Tushman M. and P. Anderson (1986) ‘Technological discontinuities and organizational environments’, Administrative Science Quarterly 31: 439-465. U.S. Small Business Administration (2006) Table of Small Business Size Standards – Matched to North American Industry Classification System Codes. www.sba.gov/size Venkataraman, S. (1997) ‘The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective’, in J. Katz & R. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence, and Growth, 3: 119-138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘A resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5 (2): 171-180. Winter, S. (1984) ‘Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5: 287-320. Winter, S. (2003) ‘Understanding dynamic capabilities’, Strategic Management Journal 24: 991-995. Zollo M. and S. Winter (2002) ‘Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities’, Organization Science 13 (3): 339-351. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36993 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著技術變遷越來越頻繁,市場區隔越來越模糊,傳統上把廠商視為產品或事業組合已不再合宜,取而代之的是-以廠商所擁有的資源與能力、知識或常規,藉此建立與保持競爭優勢的新觀點,或泛指能耐基礎理論的策略新思維。因此,對新創廠商而言,想要探索新機會、開發一系列的新產品及確保從創新中獲取利潤,對其技術能耐、互補資源與學習作一妥善安排,絕對是不可或缺。其中,技術能耐的發展,就成為探討廠商行為與績效的關鍵因素。然而,現有策略管理或創新經濟學,針對技術能耐發展這方面的理論研究並不多,實證研究也相當欠缺。為了對新創廠商在其興業成長過程中的技術能耐發展,能有更細緻的闡述與推論,本論文提出一個新的理論構念-技術組合結構,與兩個可操作化的獨特面向-技術深化、與技術廣化,以描述技術能耐發展,探討廠商競爭優勢的根源,並期望藉此釐清資源基礎相關理論,以及企業多角化等相關議題在實證研究上的模稜兩可之處。所謂技術深化,指的是廠商技術能耐相對於其他競爭者,在所涉及技術領域裡所成就的深度,通常任何一個產品的完成,所涉及的是一組技術而非僅一種技術。而技術廣化,則是指廠商技術能耐所涉及的技術領域多寡與分散度,可分為朝技術上下游進入的垂直式廣化、技術替代互補的水平式廣化、或者是完全不相關的技術廣化。在本論文第一部分的研究推論與實證發現,在其他條件不變的情況下,新創廠商在技術能耐發展所仰賴的研發投入,受可靈活運用的財務資源多寡與彈性,特別是初次公開發行,有顯著正向的影響;透過多種計量模型與替換衡量變數的不同估計,結果依然非常一致。並且,此影響遠較傳統熊彼德假說所認為,廠商規模大小或市場集中度對研發投入的影響來得大很多。另一方面,在本論文第二部份的研究推論與實證發現,在其他條件不變的情況下,當新創廠商前一期的技術深化程度越高、本期的研發強度越高、或本期距離初次公開發行年度越晚,本期的技術廣化程度就會越大。這意謂著當新創廠商的既有技術能耐具有一定深度或優勢之後,後續的研發投入與財務資源會鼓勵並有利於技術多角化。特別是,廠商的技術組合結構在初次公開發行之後,呈現一種「分散式集中」的型態,技術深化程度趨於飽和,而技術廣化程度則持續地逐漸升高。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With market boundaries changing increasingly quickly and technological changes emerging frequently, the strategy of an entrepreneurial firm in building and sustaining its competitive advantage is no longer adequately viewed from a portfolio of business but better considered as a dynamic configuration of resources, capabilities, competences, knowledge, or routines. An appropriate arrangement of technological competences, complementary resources, and learning is required for the entrepreneurial firm in pursuit of new opportunities, supporting a sequence of products or multiple products simultaneously, and appropriating return from innovations. Reviewing existing theory to consider how a firm’s competences evolve and interact with complementary resources and learning, I propose a new construct of technology portfolio structure (TPS) with two distinct dimensions in terms of technology deepening (TD) and technology widening (TW) for explicating the entrepreneurial firm’s technological competence development in a subtle way. These two measures – TD and TW demonstrate the achievement and involvement of an entrepreneurial firm in a variety of technological fields in order to untangle the sources of sustained competitive advantages and help clarify the empirical assessment of the RBV-related theory and corporate diversification. Robust evidence using panel data from a variety of econometric models in Research #1 shows the significant, positive contribution of financial resource on R&D, leaving traditional Schumpeterian hypothesis of firm size on innovation far less influential. Empirical finding from Research #2 confirms my conjecture of the positive impact on the entrepreneurial firm’s TW by its lagged TD, R&D Intensity, and Initial Public Offering (IPO). A “dispersed concentration” of the entrepreneurial firm’s TPS – stable TD and high TW posterior to its IPO is also observed. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T15:17:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-D93724007-1.pdf: 663586 bytes, checksum: 92b2f321c6c3ef1b4bbbde47b96a3b78 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 1. INTRODUCTION 1
1.1. Research Motivation 1 1.2. Research Questions 5 1.3. Potential Contribution 9 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 11 2.1. Entrepreneurship and Innovation: The Keys to the Growth of New Ventures 11 2.2. Entrepreneurial Financing: The Complementary Resource to Innovations 17 2.3. Initial Public Offering: To Relax New Ventures’ Financial Constraints 22 2.4. Schumpeterian Hypotheses: Firm Size on Technological Innovation 26 2.5. Technological Regimes: The Sectoral Pattern of Innovation 30 3. RESEARCH #1 – IPO and R&D 35 3.1. Overview 35 3.2. Hypotheses 37 3.3. Model Specification 44 3.4. Panel Data 49 3.5. Results 55 3.6. Discussion 63 4. RESEARCH #2 – Technology Portfolio Structure 65 4.1. Overview 65 4.2. Hypotheses 70 4.3. Methods 74 4.4. Model Specification 79 4.5. Research Context: Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) 82 4.6. Data 90 4.7. Results 94 5. CONCLUSION 100 REFERENCES 106 FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURE 1: IPO AND R&D 8 FIGURE 2: HOW TPS EVOLVES 8 FIGURE 3: SOURCES OF FINANCING 22 FIGURE 4: HYPOTHESES ON R&D 44 TABLE 1: GENERAL INFORMATION OF THE PANEL 52 TABLE 2: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS OF FIRM DISTRIBUTION IN THE YEAR OF IPO 53 TABLE 3: CORRELATIONS 54 TABLE 4: ESTIMATES FROM THE FIXED-EFFECT MODEL (1) 59 TABLE 5: ESTIMATES FROM THE FIXED-EFFECT MODEL (2) 60 TABLE 6: ESTIMATES FROM THE FIXED-EFFECT MODEL (3) 61 TABLE 7: ESTIMATES FROM THE FE, RE, AR(1), AND TOBIT MODEL (3) 62 FIGURE 5: HYPOTHESES ON TECHNOLOGY WIDENING 74 TABLE 8: FPD TECHNOLOGIES AND KEYWORDS 84 TABLE 9: USPC AND IPC CLASSES OF TFT-LCD TECHNOLOGY 85 TABLE 10: SHARE OF FPD PATENTS GRANTED, BY REGION, 1976-2005 89 FIGURE 6: SAMPLE SELECTION PROCESS 92 TABLE 11: LCD COMPANY PROFILE (ALL 60 LCD FIRMS) 92 TABLE 12: NUMBER OF PATENTS (31 PATENTING FIRMS) 93 TABLE 13: DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS AT THE YEAR OF IPO (TOP 27 PATENTING FIRMS) 93 TABLE 14: CORRELATIONS 98 TABLE 15: TECHNOLOGY PORTFOLIO STRUCTURE (TPS) PRIOR AND POSTERIOR TO IPO 98 TABLE 16: ESTIMATES FOR THE DETERMINANTS OF TECHNOLOGY WIDENING (TW) 99 TABLE 17: ESTIMATES FOR R&D INTENSITY 99 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 財務資源配置,技術能耐發展與興業成長 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Financial Resource, Technological Competence Development, and Entrepreneurial Growth | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 湯明哲,鄭秀玲,邱奕嘉,林舒柔 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 技術深化,技術廣化,初次公開發行,研發,能耐, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Deepening,Widening,IPO,R&D,Competence, | en |
dc.relation.page | 116 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國際企業學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-97-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 648.03 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。