Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 動物科學技術學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36956
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林美峰(Mei-Fong Lin)
dc.contributor.authorSow-Ling Angen
dc.contributor.author洪淑玲zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T08:24:44Z-
dc.date.available2005-07-26
dc.date.copyright2005-07-26
dc.date.issued2005
dc.date.submitted2005-07-16
dc.identifier.citation王敏男。1989。台灣山羌之生物學研究-分佈現況及性別與年齡的辨
別。碩士論文。國立師範大學生物學所。台北。
白火成。1995。家畜解剖生理。三民書局印行。台北。
吳志仁。1990。動物園台灣山羌行為的研究。碩士論文。國立師範大
學生物學所。台北。
吳春利。2001。畜牧學實習(飼料分析)。合記圖書出版社。台北。
吳應寧。1976。各品種牛瘤胃內纖毛蟲叢之調查。碩士論文。國立台
灣大學獸醫學所。台北。
李登元。1995。乳牛學。台灣商務印書館。台北。
林俊義、林良恭。1983。台灣哺乳類的動物地理初探。省立博物館科
學年刊。26:53-62。
洪燕琦。1994。飼糧澱粉與蛋白質之分解速率組合對台灣山羊瘤胃
微生物的影響。碩士論文。國立台灣大學畜產學研究所。台北。
馬春祥、楊錫坤。1996。養鹿學。華香園出版社。台北。
郭欽賢。1994。家畜組織學。國立編譯館。台北。
陳怡君。1997。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之食性、棲地利用與活動習性。
內政部85年度研究報告。玉山國家公園管理處。南投。
陳怡君。2003。瓦拉米地區台灣山羌之活動習性。博士論文。國立
師範大學生物學所。台北。
陳慧娟、陳寶忠、王光平。1990。台灣七種本土中、大型哺乳動物之
繁殖及成長生物學研究:台灣獼猴(Macaca cyclopis)與台灣山
羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)成長資料初步研究。79年生態
研究第014號。行政院農委會。台北。
陳擎霞。1990。宜蘭縣舊金洋地區台灣山羌棲息地之選擇及其植被分
析。79年生態研究第015號。行政院農委會。台北。
楊价民。1997。瘤胃生態系統與反芻動物對養分的利用。藝軒圖書出
版社。台北。
董光中。1989。台灣地區牛羊鹿瘤胃纖毛蟲分類與形態學之觀察。碩
士論文。國立中興大學獸醫學所。台中。
賴景陽。1986。世界哺乳動物名典。台灣省立博物館。台北。
Aagnes, T. H., W. Sørmo, and S. D. Mathiesen. 1995.
Ruminal microbial digestion in free-living, in captive
lichen-fed, and in starved reindeer (Rangifer tarandus
tarandus) in winter. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61:583-591.
Abe, M., T. Iriki, N. Tobe, and H. Shibui. 1981.
Sequestration of holotrich protozoa in the reticulo-rumen
of cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 41:758-765.
Abou Akkada, A. R., and T. H. Blackburn. 1963. Some
observations on the nitrogen metabolism of rumen
proteolytic bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 31:461-469.
Anthony, R. G. and N. S. Smith. 1974. Comparison of rumen
and fecal analysis to describe deer diets. J. Wildl.
Manage. 38:535-540.
Arman, P., R. N. B. Kay, E. D. Goodall, and G. A. M.
Sharman. 1974. The composition and yield of milk from
captive red deer(Cervus elaphus L.). J. Reprod. Fert.
37:67-84.
Beharka, A. A., T. G. Nagaraja, J. L. Morrill, G. A.
Kennedy, and R. D. Klemm. 1998. Effects of form of the
diet on anatomical, microbial, and fermentative
development of the rumen of neonatal calves. J. Dairy
Sci. 81:1946-1955.
Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1961. An improved
nonselective culture medium for ruminal bacteria and its
use in determining diurnal variation in numbers of
bacteria in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1446-1456.
Bryant, M. P. and I. M. Robinson. 1968. Effects of diet,
time after feeding, and position sampled on numbers of
viable bacteria in the bovine rumen. J. Dairy Sci.
51:1446-1456.
Chapman, N. G., M. Furlong, and S. Harris. 1997.
Reproductive strategies and the influence of date of
birth on growth and sexual development of an aseasonally-
breeding ungulate: Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi).
J. Zool. Lond. 241:551-570.
Christiansen, W. C., W. Woods, and W. Burroughs. 1964.
Ration characteristics influencing rumen protozoal
populations. J. Anim. Sci. 23:984-988.
Cooker, B. A., C. J. Sniffen, W. H. Hoover, and L. L.
Johnson. 1978. Solvents for soluble nitrogen measurements
in feed stuffs. J. Dairy Sci. 61:437-447.
Craig, W. M., G. A. Broderick, and D.B. Ricker. 1987.
Quantitation of microorganisms associated with the
particulate phase of ruminal ingesta. J. Nutr. 117:56-62.
Dearth, R. N., B. A. Dehority, and E. L. Potter. 1974.
Rumen microbial numbers in lamb as affected by level of
feed intake and dietary diethylstilestrol. J. Anim. Sci.
38:991-996。
Dehority, B. A. 2003. Rumen Microbiology. Nottingham
University Press. U.K.
Di Giancamillo, A., G. Bosi, S. Arrighi, G. Savoini, and C.
Domeneghini. 2003. The influence of different fibrous
supplements in the diet on ruminal histology and
histometry in veal calves. Histol. Histopathol. 18:727-
733.
Dönmez, N., M. A. Karslı, A. Çınar, T. Aksu, and E.
Baytok. 2003. The effects of different silage additives
on rumen protozoan number and volatile fatty acid
concentration in sheep fed corn silage. Small Ruminant
Res. 48:227-231.
Erwin, E. S., G. J. Marco, and E. M. Emery. 1961. Volatile
fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas
chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44:1768-1771.
Forsyth, D. M. and K. W. Fraser. 1999. Seasonal changes in
the rumen morphology of Himalayan tahr(Hemitragus
jemlahicus)in the Two Thumb Range, South Island, New
Zealand. J. Zool. Lond. 249:241-248.
Froetschel, M. A., A. C. Martin, H. E. Amos, and J. J.
Evans. 1990. Effects of zinc sulfate concentration and
feeding frequency of ruminal protozoal numbers,
fermentation patterns and amino acid passage in steers.
J. Anim. Sci. 68:2874-2884.
Ghorbani, G. R., D. P. Morgavi, K. A. Beauchemin, and J. A.
Z. Leedle. 2002. Effects of bacterial direct-fed
microbials on ruminal fermentation, blood variables, and
the microbial populations of feedlot cattle. J. Anim.
Sci. 80:1977-1985.
Goering, H. K. and P. J. van Soest. 1970. Forage Fiber
Analysis. Agric. Handbook No.379, Agric. Rev. Serv., US
Dep. Agric., Washington, DC.
Hofmann, R. R. 1985. Digestive physiology of the deer-their
morphophysiological specialization and adaptation. pp.
393-407. in: P. F. Fennessy and K. R. Drew ed. Biology of
Deer Production. The Royal Society of New Zealand . N. Z.
Hofmann, R. R. 1988. Anatomy of the gastro-intestinal
tract. pp. 14-43. in: D. C. Church ed. The Ruminant
Animal Digestive Physiology and Nutrition. Prentice Hall.
Englewood Cliffs, N. J.
Hungate, R.E. 1966. The Rumen and Its Microbes. Academic
Press. N.Y.
Jackson, J. E., D. I. Chapman, and O. Dansie. 1977. A note
on the food of Muntjac deer (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Zool.
Lond. 183:546-548.
Kozaki, M., R. Oura, and J. Sekine. 1991. Studies on
digestion physiology of herbivorous feral animals. II.
The comparison of intake of total digestible nutrients
among diverse sizes of ruminant and monogastrric animals.
J. Fac. Agric. Tottori Univ. 27:61-68.
Leedle, J. A. Z. and R. B. Hespell. 1980. Differential
carbohydrate media and anaerobic replica plating
techniques in delineating carbohydrate - utilizing
subgroups in rumen bacterial populations. Appl. Environ.
Microbial. 39:709-719
Long, J. L. 2003. Introduced mammals to the world. pp. 394-
395.CSIRO publishing. Australia.
Martinka, C. J. 1968. Habitat relationships of white-tailed
and mule deer in Northern Montana. J. Wildl. Manage.
32:558-565.
McCullough, D. R., K. C. J. Pei, and Y. Wang. 2000. Home
range, activity patterns, and habitat relations of
Reeves’ muntjacs in Taiwan. J. Wildl. Manage. 64:430-
441.
McDonald, P., R. A. Edwards, J. F. D. Greenhalgh, and C. A.
Morgan. 2002. Animal Nutrition, 6th ed. Ashford Colour
Press Ltd., Gosport.
McGavin, M. D. and J. L. Morrill. 1976. Scanning electron
microscopy of ruminal papillae in calves fed various
amounts and forms of roughage. Am. J. Vet. Res. 37:497-
508.
Murphy, M. R., P. E. Drone, JR., and S. T. Woodford. 1985.
Factors stimulating migration of holotrich protozoa into
the rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 49:1329-1331.
Nowak, R. M. 1999. Walker’s Mammals of The World. 6th ed.,
vol. 2. The Johns Hopkins Press. Baltimore and London.
Ogimoto, K. and S. Imai. 1981. Atlas of Rumen Microbiology.
Japan Scientific Societies Press. Tokyo.
Oh, J. H., I. D. Hume, and D. T. Torell. 1972. Development
of microbial activity in the alimentary tract of lambs.
J. Anim. Sci. 35:450-459.
Pearson, H. A. 1965. Rumen organisms in white-tailed deer
from South Texas. J. Wildl. Manage. 29:493-496.
Pearson, H. A. 1969. Rumen microbial ecology in mule
deer. Appl. Microbiol. 17:819-824.
Pei, K. 1994. Reproductive biology of male Formosan
Reeves’ muntjac (Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). J. Zool.
Lond. 233:293-306.
Pei, K. 1996. Post-natal growth of the Formosan Reeves’
muntjac Muntiacus reevesi micrurus. Zool. Stud. 35:111-
117.
Rabinowitz, A., T. Myint, S. T. Khaing, and S. Rabinowitz.
1999. Description of the leaf deer (Muntiacus
putaoensis), a new species of muntjac from northern
Myanmar. J. Zool. Lond. 249:427-435.
Sadleir, R. M. F. S. 1982. Reproduction of female cervids.
pp. 123-144. in: C. M. Wemmer ed. Biology and management
of the cervidae. Smithsonian Institution Press. London.
Sahu, N. P. and D. N. Kamra. 2002. Microbial eco-system of
the gastro-intestinal tract of wild herbivorous animals.
J. Appl. Anim. Res. 21:207-230.
Sander, E. G., R. G. Warner, H. N. Harrison, and J. K.
Loosli. 1959. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate
and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa
in the young calf. J. Dairy Sci. 42:1600-1605.
SAS Institute, Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User’s guide. Release
6.03 ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Schaller, G. B. and E. S. Vrba. 1996. Description of the
giant muntjac (Megamuntiacus vuquangensis) in Laos. J.
Mammal. 77:675-683.
Schurg, W. A, D. L. Frei, P. R. Cheeke, and D. W. Holtan.
1977. Utilization of whole corn plant pellets by horses
and rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 45:1317-1321.
Sheng, H., and H. Lu. 1980. Current studies on the rare
Chinese black muntjac. J. Nat. Hist. 14:803-807.
Trautmann, A., and J. Fiebiger. 1957. Fundamentals of The
Histology of Domestic Animals. A Division of Cornell
University Press. N.Y.
Van Keulen, J., and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid-
insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant
digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44:282-287.
van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson, and B. A. Lenis. 1991.
Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and
nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal
nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
Veira, D. M. 1986. The role of ciliate protozoa in
nutrition of the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci. 63:1547-1560.
Wardrop, I. D. and J. B. Coombe. 1960. The post-natal
growth of the visceral organs of the lamb. J. Agri. Sci.
54:140-143.
Williams, A. G. and G. S. Coleman. 1988. The rumen
protozoa. pp. 77-128. in:P. N. Hobson. ed. The Rumen
Microbial Ecosystem. Elsevier Applied Science. London.
Yahner, R. H. 1980. Activity patterns of captive Reeve’s
muntjacs (Muntiacus reevesi). J. Mamm. 61:368-371.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36956-
dc.description.abstract本研究目的為探討圈養台灣山羌(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus)之瘤胃生態及飼糧消化率,並比較圈養與野生山羌胃腸道之異同與瘤胃乳突於組織學上之差異,藉以瞭解圈養對動物之消化生理及利用狀態之影響。試驗I個別飼養之雌山羌於餵飼後四小時以胃管抽取胃液,記錄攝食量並分析胃液,分析項目包括胃液酸鹼值及揮發性脂肪酸濃度以及體外瘤胃細菌之培養與原蟲計數。試驗II測量圈養山羌與野生山羌之消化道長度和觀察胃腸道之特徵並截取瘤胃乳突進行組織切片。試驗III進行圈養山羌飼糧消化率測定並分析瘤胃內容物與皺胃內容物之營養成分,藉以探討山羌於圈養環境或野外地區其食性之差異。
圈養山羌之胃液酸鹼值介於6.1∼6.8,且胃液中乙酸、丙酸與丁酸濃度偏低。每毫升胃液其菌數約0.03∼120.33 x 107,而總菌、纖維素分解菌與澱粉分解菌數目之間呈正相關(r >0.9)。周身纖毛原蟲佔總原蟲數30%以下,而局部纖毛原蟲則大於70%。圈養山羌瘤胃乳突為線性形狀,野生山羌其乳突為扁平舌狀,此為顯著差異處,而圈養山羌之小腸有較長之趨勢。山羌對於粗蛋白質(CP)、中洗纖維(NDF)與無氮萃取物(NFE)之消化率表現最佳,乙醚萃取物(EE)與灰分(Ash)則較差。再者,圈養與野生山羌其瘤胃內容物之CP、NDF、NFE與酸洗纖維(ADF)含量均相當,唯圈養山羌之EE有較高趨勢。
本研究結果顯示,試驗中圈養山羌所給飼之飼糧可使胃液酸鹼值維持在正常範圍,唯瘤胃中細菌數較一般畜養之反芻動物低,此導致揮發性脂肪酸之濃度亦降低,而小體型局部纖毛原蟲則為主要原蟲種別。山羌之腸道長度為體長之13.9∼15.1倍,此與“精緻性”攝食之反芻動物相似。圈養與野生山羌之瘤胃乳突形態具明顯差異,此與飼糧刺激乳突發育之影響具相關性。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to investigate the rumen ecology and feed digestion in Formosan Reeves’ muntjac(Muntiacus reevesi micrurus). We also observed the effect of captive environment on animal digestive physiology by comparing the characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and tissue samples of ruminal papillae between captive and wild muntjac.
In experiment I, the rumen fluid of female muntjacs was taken through a stomach tube at 4 hours after feeding for further analysis. The items analyzed include pH value, concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA), counts of rumen bacteria and protozoa. In experiment II, we measured the length of intestinal tract of muntjac and observed gastrointestinal characteristics of it which was dissected; a portion of ruminal papillae was cut off for tissue sample. In Experiment III, we analyzed the feed digestibility ration of captive muntjac and compositions of nutrients in captive muntjac rumen and abomasum content which are correlated to muntjac feeding type and living environment.
Results reveal that the pH value of rumen fluids of captive muntjac ranges between 6.1∼6.8 and the concentration of VFA is lower than that of the domestic animal. The rumen bacteria count is between 0.03∼120.33 x 107 colony counts / ml rumen fluids. There is positive correlation among the quantity of total bacteria, cellulolytic bacteria and amylolytic bacteria. The percentage of Isotrichidae’s quantity among all protozoa is lower than 30%, whereas the quantity of Ophryoscolecidae is greater than 70%.
The morphology of ruminal papillae between captive muntjac and wild muntjac showed distinct difference and the length of small intestinal tract tends to be longer than that of the wild. The muntjac had better digestibility on crude protein (CP), acid-detergent fiber (NDF) and nitrogen free extract (NFE). The CP, NDF, NFE and acid-detergent fiber of rumen content between captive and wild muntjac were similar whereas EE was higher in captive muntjac.
In conclusion, the pH value of rumen fluid was within normal ranges, and the quantity of rumen bacteria is lower than that of the domestic ruminants, resulting in lower concentration of VFA in captive muntjac. Furthermore, study indicates that small Ophryoscolecidae is the major protozoa species in the rumen. The ratio of intestinal length to body length is approximately 13.9∼15.1 which is similar to concentrate selector. Finally, the morphology of ruminal papillae showed significant difference between captive and wild muntjac which could be related to the diets that stimulate the growth of papillae.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:24:44Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-94-R92626009-1.pdf: 671716 bytes, checksum: 7414b992c5a14d96e55dd0b1d6fccabb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2005
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
頁次
目錄…………………………………………………………. ……….. I
表次…………………………………………………………………... II
圖次…………………………………………………………………...III
誌謝……………………….…………………………………………...IV
壹、中文摘要………....….……………………………………………1
貳、緒言……...……………………………………………………....3
參、文獻檢討…...…………………………………………………....5
一、 台灣山羌之生物學研究
二、 飼糧消化率、瘤胃內容物之鑑定與鹿科動物乳之組成
三、 瘤胃生態
肆、材料與方法…...………………………………………………...34
伍、結果與討論…...………………………………………………...47一、 餵飼後瘤胃生態之變化
二、 台灣山羌之生長體重與胃腸道特徵
三、 飼糧消化率與胃內容物分析
陸、結論………....…………………………………………………..88柒、參考文獻....……………………………………………………..89
捌、英文摘要……....………………………………………………..94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣山羌胃腸道特徵與瘤胃生態之研究zh_TW
dc.titleStudy on the characteristics of gastrointestinal tract and rumen ecology of Formosan Reeves' muntjacen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear93-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor王翰聰(Han-Tsung Wang)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee徐濟泰(Jih-Tay Hsu),王穎(Ying-Wang)
dc.subject.keyword台灣山羌,胃腸道,瘤胃生態,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordgastrointestinal tract,rumen ecology,en
dc.relation.page95
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2005-07-19
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept畜產學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:動物科學技術學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-94-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
655.97 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved