請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36952完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳英璋(Yin-Chang Wu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-I Hu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 胡欣怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:24:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-16 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文部分：
林怡慧（2001）。「九二一震災後災區青少年之創傷後身心反應：性別差異及創傷暴露程度之效果分析」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。 林耀盛（2003）。書寫創傷：探究「九二一震災」受創者的心理社會療癒經驗。「本土心理學研究」，19，3-64。 林耀盛與吳英璋（2004）。雙重變奏曲：探究「九二一」地震「失親家毀」受創者之心理經驗現象。「中華心理衛生學刊」，17（2），1-44。台北：中華心理衛生協會。 徐宗國（1996）。紮根理論研究法：淵源、原則、技術、與涵義。見胡幼慧（主編）：「質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例」，頁47- 97。台北：巨流。 陳淑惠、林耀盛、洪福建、及曾旭民（2000）。九二一震災受創者社會心理反應之分析—兼論「變」與「不變」間的心理社會文化意涵。「社會文化學報」，10，35-60。 雷庚玲（2000）。Erikson之心理社會階段理論於921震災後兒童心理復健之應用。「中華心理衛生學刊」，12（4），93-128。 蕭仁釗、吳英璋、林耀盛、及姜忠信（2001）。「臨床心理學的心理重建應用」。中國心理學會第40屆年會（嘉義中正大學）的口頭報告論文。 Papalia, D. E., Olds, S. W., & Feldman, R. D.(2001）。「人類發展—成人心理學」（張慧芝譯）。台北：桂冠。 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.（1990/1997）。「質性研究概論」（徐宗國譯）。台北：巨流。 Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.（1998/2001）。「質性研究入門：紮根理論研究方法」（吳芝儀與廖梅花譯）。嘉義市：濤石。 英文部分： Abraido-Lanza, A. F., Guier, C., & Colon, R. M. (1998). Psychological thriving among Latinas with chronic illness. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 405-424. Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. New York: Guilford. Armeli, S., Gunthert, K. C., & Cohen, L. H. (2001). Stressor appraisals, coping, and post-event outcomes: The dimensionality and antecedents of stress-related growth. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 366-395. American Psychiatruc Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. Basile, K. C., Arias, I., Desai, S., & Thompson, M. P. (2004). The differential association of intimate partner physical, sexual, psychological, and stalking violence and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a nationally representative sample of women. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(5), 413-421. Becker, H. S. (1977). Sociological work: Method and substance. Oxford, England: Transaction Books. Bellizzi, K. M. (2003). Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences. US: Educational Publishing Foundation. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Cadell, S., Regehr, C., & Hemsworth, D. (2003). Factors contributing to posttraumatic growth: a proposed structural equation model. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(3) , 279-287. Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G..(2000). Early posttraumatic interventions: Facilitating possibilities for growth. In J. M. Violanti & D. Paton (Eds.), Posttraumatic stress intervention: Challenges, issues, and perspectives (pp. 135-152). Springfield, IL, US: Charles C. Thomas Publisher. Carr, V. J., Lewin, T. J., Webster, R. A., Hazell, P. L., Kenardy, J. A. & Carter G. L. (1995). Psychosocial sequelae of the 1989 Newcastle earthquake: I. Community disaster experiences and psychological morbidity 6 months post-disaster. Psychological Medicine, 25, 539-555. Cohen, L. H., Hettler, T. R., & Pane, N. (1997). Assessment of posttraumatic growth. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 23-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Davis, C. G. (2001). The tormented and the transformed: understanding responses to loss and trauma. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss (pp. 137-155). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(2), 561-574. Davis, C. G., Wortman, C. B., Lehman, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2000). Searching for meaning in loss: Are clinical assumptions correct? Death Studies, 24(6), 497-540. Denzin, N. K. (1995). Symbolic interactionism. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. V. Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp.43-58). London: Sage. Deutsch, H. (1937). Absence of grief. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 6, 12-22. Evers, A. W. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., van Lankveld, W., Jongen, P. L. H., Jacobs, J. W. G., & Bijlsma, J. W. J. (2001). Beyond unfavourable thinking: The illness cognition questionnaire for chronic diseases. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 1026-1036. Elliott, D. M., Mok, D. S., & Briere, J.(2004). Adult sexual assault: Prevalence, symptomatology, and sex differences in the general population. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(3), 203-212. Foa, E. B., & Meadows, E. A. (1998). Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder. In R. Yehuda. (Ed.), Psychological trauma (pp. 449-480). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Furman, E. (1974). A child’s parent dies: Studies in childhood bereavement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldino. Gliner, J. A. (1994). Reviewing qualitative research: Proposed criteria for fairness and rigor. Occupational Therapy Journal of Reseach, 14(2), 78-90. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications. Habermas, J. (1968). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon. Hager, D. L. (1992). Chaos and growth. Psychotherapy, 29, 378-384. Hagman, G. (2001). Beyond decathexis: Toward a new psychoanalytic understanding and treatment of mourning. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction & the experience of loss (pp. 1-31). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Herman, J. L. (1992a). Complex PTSD: A syndrome in survivors of prolonged and repeated trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5(3), 377-391. Herman, J. L. (1992b). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror. New York: Basic. Herman, J. L. (1997). Trauma and recovery: The aftermath of violence from domestic abuse to political terror (2nd ed.). New York: Basic. Horowitz, M. J. (1997). Stress response syndromes: PTSD, grief, and adjustment disorder. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. Horowitz, M. J. (1999). Introduction. In M. J. Horowitz (Ed.), Essential papers on posttraumatic stress disorder (pp. 1-17). New York: New York University Press. Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York: The Free Press. Joseph, S., Williams, R., & Yule, W. (1993). Changes in outlook following disaster: The preliminary development of a measure to assess positive and negative responses. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6(2), 271-279. Lerner, M. J., & Gignac, M. A. (1992). Is it coping or is it growth? A cognitive-affective model of contentment in the elderly. In M. Leo & F. Sigrun-Heide (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 321-337). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Linley, P. A., & Joseph S. (2004). Positive change following trauma and adversity: A review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(1), 11-22. Maercker, A., & Langner, R. (2001). Posttraumatic personal growth: Validation of German versions of 2 questionnaires. Diagnostica, 47(3), 153-162. Mahoney, M. J. (1982). Psychotherapy and human change processes. In J. H. Harvey & M. M. Parks (Eds.), Psychotherapy research and behavior change (pp. 77-122). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. McMillen, J. C., & Fisher, R. H. (1998). The perceived benefit scales: Measureing perceived positive life changes after negative events. Social Work Research, 22, 173-187. Milam, J. E., Ritt-Olson, A., & Unger, J. B.(2004). Posttraumatic growth among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(2), 192-204. Miller, W. R., & C'deBaca, J. (1994). Quantum change: Toward a psychology of transformation. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 253-281). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association. Mitchell, S. (1993). Hope and dread in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books. Montada, L., Filipp, S., & Lerner, M. J. (1992). Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood. Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Morse, J. M. (1991). Strategies for sampling. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue (pp. 127-145). Thousand Oaks, CA, US: Sage Publications. Nerken, I. R. (1993). Grief and the reflective self: Toward a clearer model of loss resolution and growth. Death Studies, 17, 1-26. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1999). Coping with loss. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. O'Leary, V. E., Alday, C. S., & Ickovics, J. R. (1998). Models of life change and posttraumatic growth. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 127-152). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. O'Leary, V. E., & Ickovics, J. R. (1995). Resilience and thriving in response to challenge: An opportunity for a paradigm shift in women’s health. Women’s Health: Research on Gender, Behavior, and Policy, 1, 121-142. Park, C. L. (1997). Implications of posttraumatic growth for individuals. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 153-178). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Park, C. L., Cohen, L. H., & Murch, R. (1996). Assessment and prediciton of stress-related growth. Journal of Personality, 64, 71-105. Parkes, C. M., & Weiss, R. S. (1983). Recovery form bereavement. New York: Basic Books. Polatinsky, S., & Esprey, Y. (2000). An assessment of gender differences in the perception of benefit resulting from the loss of a child. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13(4), 709-718. Pollock, G. (1989). The mourning-liberation process. Madison, CT: International University Press. Powell, S., Rosner, R., Butollo, W., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G.. (2003). Posttraumatic growth after war: A study with former refugees and displaced people in Sarajevo. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 71-83. Pynoos, R. S., Steinberg, A. M., & Geonjian, A. (1996). Traumatic stress in children and adolescence recent developments and current controversis. In van der Kolk, A. Bessel, & A. C. McFarlane (Eds.), Traumatic stress: The effects of overwhelming experience on mind, body, and society (pp. 331-358). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Reynolds, L. T., & Herman-Kinney, N. J. (2003). Handbook of symbolic interactionism. Walnut Creek, CA, US: AltaMira Press. Schaefer, J. A., & Moos, R. H. (1992). Life crises and personal growth. In B. N. Carpenter (Ed.), Personal coping: Theory, research, and application (pp. 149-170). Westport, CT, US: Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Sears, S. R., Stanton, A. L., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2003). The yellow brick road and the emerald City: Benefit finding, positive reappraisal coping and posttraumatic growth in women with early-stage breast cancer. Health Psychology, 22(5), 487-497. Shedler, J., & Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131. Sheikh, A. I. (2004). Posttraumatic growth in the context of heart disease. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 11(4), 265-273. Stein, M.B., Walker, J.R., Hazen, A. L., & Forde, D. R. (1997). Full and partial posttraumatic stress disorder: findings from a community survey. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154(11), 1114-1119. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK:University of Cambridge Press. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In N.K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (pp.158-183). California: Sage. Taylor, S. E. (1989). Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193-210. Taylor, S. E., Kemeny, M., Aspinwall, L., Schneider, S., Rodriguez, R., & Herbert, M. (1992). Optimism, coping, psychological distress, and high-risk sexual behavior among men at risk for AIDS. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 460-473. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1995). Trauma and transformation: Growing in the aftermath of suffering. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1997). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual issues. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Tennen, H., & Affleck, G. (1997). Personality and transformation in the face of adversity. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive changes in the aftermath of crisis (pp. 65-98). Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Terr, L. C. (1985). Psychic trauma in children and adolescents. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 8(4), 815-835. Wilson, H. S., & Hutchinson, S. A. (1996). Methodologic mistakes in grounded theory. Nursing Research, 45(2), 122-124. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36952 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究目的為探討人們在經受重大創傷後，可能有什麼樣的創傷後成長內涵的呈現；成長發生的可能中介變項或關鍵機制為何，與嘗試比較本土文化浸潤下的成長內涵和國外實徵研究結果的異同。針對九二一地震後復原情狀相對良好的五位受創者進行「開放式焦點訪談」，並以「紮根理論研究法」進行敘說資料的命名/標定、比較、與歸整。研究結果發現，創傷後成長的內涵可以「自我」、「人我」、與「世界」三大向度，交錯於「信念」、「情緒」、「行為」、與「人格」等不同面向，分層描述。「自我」向度裡，有「自我感重建」等六大成長類別；「人我」向度裡，有「同理心增加」與「重要關係轉變」等五大成長類別；「世界」向度裡，則有「基本幻覺破滅」、「存在意義：事件意義與存活意義的建構」、「把握當下，積極行動」等八大成長類別。其中，具本土文化意涵的部分，特別呈顯於某些成長類別的細節內涵中。此外，本研究亦對創傷後成長歷程進行歸整，自實徵資料衍生出「自我效能提升」策略、「把握當下，積極行動」的不同條件、以及「意義建構」的簡單歷程。最終，研究者嘗試以一假設性關係的描繪，整合數個創傷後成長發生的重要概念，而有「發掘或創造自我存活價值」、「肯定事件受苦價值」、與「建構事件理由」等可能為成長關鍵機制的概念的產出。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study investigated the structure and important processes of posttraumatic growth (PTG), and the unique cultural aspects of PTG in Taiwan. Taking into considerations of some limits and methodological problems of the structured questionnaire or the semi-structured interview for PTG, which is relatively a new research issue at least in Taiwan , this study used the “open-ended interview” and the “grounded theory methodology” to collect and analyze narrative data for survivors of different extents of damages from Taiwan chi-chi earthquake . The results were to make up a framework of classification of PTG, inductively reason some potentially crucial psychological constructs and intermediate processes, and find some cultural-bound contents of PTG. Finally, a relational assumption between important categories and constructs of PTG was proposed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:24:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R90227006-1.pdf: 934842 bytes, checksum: 6bc9427a3ec5597ff6b401757e1b2073 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論………………………………………………………1
第一節 創傷後成長的內涵………………………………………1 第二節 創傷後成長的機制………………………………………14 第二章 方法學問題與本研究目的、方法及樣本組成…………31 第一節 方法學上的問題與工具發展……………………………31 第二節 本研究嘗試解決與未能解決的方法學問題……………39 第三節 研究目的、方法與樣本組成……………………………41 第四節 紮根理論研究法簡介……………………………………44 第三章 研究結果…………………………………………………59 第一節 資料分析程序……………………………………………59 第二節 研究結果…………………………………………………59 第四章 綜合討論…………………………………………………107 第一節 本研究結果與其它理論模型或實徵結果的異與同……107 第二節 本研究的可能貢獻與限制………………………………111 第三節 未來研究方向……………………………………………115 參考文獻…………………………………………………………117 附錄………………………………………………………………125 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 創傷後成長的內涵與機制初探：以九二一震災為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Contents and Processes of Posttraumatic Growth with the adult survivors of the 921 Earthquake | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳淑惠(Sue-Huei Chen),周碧瑟(Pesus Chou) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 創傷後成長,紮根理論研究法,九二一地震,自我感重建,意義建構,心理創傷,質性研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | PTG,posttraumatic growth,adversarial growth,psychological trauma,grounded theory methodology,qualitative study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 127 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-19 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 912.93 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。