請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36922
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 蘇喜 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yi-Shuoh Tseng | en |
dc.contributor.author | 曾異碩 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:22:53Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2005-08-03 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-03 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-19 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 壹、國外參考文獻
1. Adrich, &.Whetten. 1981.”Organizational Sets, Action Sets and Networks: Making the Most of Simplicity.” Nystrom, P. and Starbuck W (eds.), Handbook of Organizational design.Vol.1, London: Oxford University Press. 2. Amderson, J.C. and Narus, J.A. 1990. “A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Finn Working Partnership.” Journal of Marketing 54(January): 42-58. 3. Auf der Heide E: disaster Response: Principles of Preparation and Coordination. St. Louis, MO, CV Mosby, 1989, 11830 Westline Industrial Drive, St Louis 4. Barry Turner, Man Made Disasters, London: Wykenham, 1978. 5. Bolland JM, Wilson JV, There faces of integrative coordination: a model on inter-organizational relations in community-based health and human services. Health service research 1994;29;3;341-66 6. Brass, D. J., & Burkhardt, M. E. 1992. Centrality and Power in Organization. In Noria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.) Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press, 191-215. 7. Burt, R.S. A Structural Theory of Interlocking Corporate Directactors.Social Networks 1. 1979 8. Burt, Ronald S. Toward a Structural Theory of Action : Network Models of Social Structure, Perception, and Action. New York : Academic Press. 1982 9. Caro Denis HJ Towards integrated crisis support of regional emergency networks. Health Care Manage Rev 1999;24;4;7-19 10. Chavez CW, Binder B. A hospital as victim and responder: the Sepulveda VA Medical Center and the Northridge earthquake. J Emerg Med 1996 Jul-Aug;14(4):445-54 11. Collis, D.J. 1991.”A Resource-base Analysis of Global Competition: The Case of the Bearings.” Strategic Management Journal 12: 49-68. 12. Cross, R.,& Prusak, L 2002. The people that make organizations stop — or go. Harvard Business Review 80(6), 104-112. 13. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell W.W. 1983.”The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review, 48(April):147-160. 14. Dolling, M.J., Golden, P.A., and Saxton, T. 1997.”The Effect of Reputation on the Decision to Joint Venture.” Strategic Management Journal 18(2): 127-140. 15. Dosi, G., Teece, D., and Winter, S.1990.”Toward a Theory of Corporate Coherence.” Mimeo March. 16. Drucker, P.F. 1994.”Managing the Non-Profit Organization: Principles and Practices.”余配珊譯,非營利機構的經營之道,遠流初版。 17. Emerson, Richard. 1962. “Power-Dependence Relations.” American Sociological Review, 27: 31-41. 18. Forrest, J.E. 1990.”Strategic Alliances between Large and Small Research Intensive Organization in the Biotechnology Industry.”Journal of Samal Business Review July:37-45. 19. Freeman L C 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1, 215-239. 20. Galaskiewicz, J. 1979. Exchange Networks and Community Politics. New York Academic Press. 21. Ganesan, S. 1994.” Determinants of Long-term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships.” Journal of Market 3(4): 199-207. 22. Geringer, J.M. 1988. “Parterner Selection Criteria for Developed Country Joint Venture.” Business Quarterly Summer: 55-62. 23. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78. 24. Green, B.L. Assessment levels of psychological impairment following disaster:consideration of actual and methodological dimensions. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 170,1982, 544-552 25. Gunby P. Nearly two millennia later, under the volcano military stresses disaster prearedness. JAMA, 1994, 8:577-9 26. Hall, R. 1992.” The Strategic Analysis of Intangible Resources.” Strategic Management Journal 13: 135-144. 27. Hanneman, R. A. 2001. Introduction to Social Network Methods: Department of Sociology. University of California, Riverside. 28. Hanneman, Robert A. 1998. Introduction to Social Network Methods. University of California, Riverside. Available at http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/ 29. Harrigan, K.R. 1988.”Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy.” Strategic Management Journal 9: 141-158. 30. Howard, S.Z., Thomas, A.D.:“Hospital alliance: Cooperative strategy in competitiveenvironment”. Health Care Manage Rev. 15(2): 21-30, 1990 31. Hutt, M.D., Stafford, E.R., Walker, B.A., and Reingen, P.H. 2000,”Case Study: Defining the Social Network of a Strategic Alliance.” Sloan Management Review Winter: 51-62. 32. Ibarra, H. 1993. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement : Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471-501. 33. Ibarra, H. 1993. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-87. 34. Kanter, R.M. 1994. “Cooperative Advantage: The Art of Alliances.” Harvard Business Review Jul/Aug: 96-108. 35. Katz, D. and Kahn, R. L 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. Wiley. 36. Killing, J.P.”Understanding Alliances: The Role of Task and Organizational Complexity.” In Contractor, F.J. and Lorange, P.(ed), Cooperative Strategies in International Business. Lexington: D.C. Health and Company, 1988. 37. Kollock, P. 1994.”The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust,” American Journal of Sociology,100:313-345. 38. Kumar, N., Scheer, L.K., and Steenkamp, J.E.M. 1995.”The Effects of Perceived Interdependence on Dealer Attitudes.” Jouanal of Marketing Research 32(Auguest): 348-56. 39. Laumann, Edward O., and Knoke, D.1987. Organization State: Social Change in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 40. Lee, U.O.,Lee, J., and Bobe, B. 1993.” Technological Cooperation between European and Korean Small Firms: The Patterns and Success Factors of Contracts.” International Journal of Technological Management No.6-8: 764-781. 41. Lei, D., Slocum, J.W., and Pitts, R.A. 1997. “Building Cooperative Advantage: Managing Strategic Alliances to Promote Organizational Learning.”Journal of World Business 32(3): 203-233. 42. Levine, S. and White, P.E. 1961.”Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly,33(3),345-369. 43. Levinthal,D.A.and Fichman,M. 1988.”Dynamics of interorganizational attachments: Auditor-client relationships.” Administrative Science Quarterly,33(3),345-369. 44. Marsden, Peter V. and Friedkin, Noah E.. 1990. “Network Studies of Social Influence.” Sociological Methods & Research 22(1): 127-151. 45. Mead, M. 1976. Cooperation and Competition among Primitive People. Boston:Beacon. 46. Milward HB, Proven KG. Measuring network structure Public administration 1998;76;687 47. Mitchell J.C,”Network, norms, and institutions”, Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction,pp.15~36,1973. 48. Moreno, J. 1934. Who Shall Survive? New York: Beacon Press. 49. Palmer,Donald,Roger Friedland, and Jitendra Singh. 1986.”The ties that bind: organizational and class bases of stability in a corporate interlock network.” American Sociological Review,51:781-96. 50. Pan America. Health Organization, Disaster Mitigation guidelines for hospital and other health care facilities in the Caribbean. 1992, P27-P35 51. Parkhe, A. 1993. ”Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation.” Academy of Management Journal 36(4): 794-829. 52. Pfeffer, Jeffrey & Leblebici, H. 1973.”Exective recruitment and the development of interfirm organizations.” Administrative Science Quarterly,18:449-461. 53. Rakich, J. S., Longest, B. B. & Kurt Darr, J.D. Managing Health Services Organizations, 1992. 54. Saunders CE. Multicasuality incidents & disasters current emergency diagnosis & treatment 4th ed, 1992; 868-87 55. Scott, John. 2000. Social Network Analysis: A Handbook. Sage . 56. Smith, J.B. and Barclay, D.W. 1997. “The Effects of Organizational Differences and Trust on the Effectiveness of Selling Partner Relationships.” Journal of Marketing 61 (January): 3-21. 57. Smith, K.G, Carroll, S.J., and Ashford, S.J. 1995.”Intra-and Inter-organizational Cooperation: Toward a Research Agenda.”Academy of Management Journal 38(1):7-23. 58. Teece, D. 1986.” Profiting from Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy.” Research Policy 15:285-305. 59. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social Network Analysis:Method and Applications, New York : Cambridge University Press. 60. Williamson, E.O. 1975.Market and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press. 61. Williamson, O.E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press. 貳、國內參考文獻 1. 方至民、曾志弘(1997)「形成條件對中外合資企業譏笑之影響」。中山管理評論,5(2): 537-552。 2. 王正璞(1993)企業策略聯盟之管理作為與績效關係之研究---以共同研發聯盟為例。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 3. 王立敏、李建賢(1996):「災難醫學之簡介」,中華民國急救加護醫學會雜誌,7卷,4期,頁151-158,12月。 4. 王立敏、胡勝川(1999):急診醫學 「災難醫學」,金名出版社。 5. 丘昌泰(2000):災難管理學---地震篇,台北,元照出版公司。 6. 司徒達賢(1999):非營利組織的經營管理,天下遠見出版。 7. 石富元(2001):醫院內災難及緊急事故的應變體系,行政院衛生署九十年度科技研究發展計畫DOH90-TD-1049。 8. 吳青松(1991)「本國產業策略聯盟結構與績效評估」。產業科技研究發展研討會論文集,中國生產力中心。 9. 吳思華(1996)策略九說---策略思考的本質。麥田出版,初版。 10. 吳誌雄(1992)策略聯盟型式、目標及夥伴評估準則對譏笑之影響---以台灣電子資訊業為例。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 11. 李大衛(1992)策略聯盟廠商屬性與成功評價關連探討---以我國第一代筆記型電腦策略聯盟為例。交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 12. 李美嫺(1998)信任因素對連鎖加盟績效之影響。中興大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 13. 林志豪(1998)產業環境、廠商能力對策略聯盟特性與績效關係之研究---以我國汽車零組件廠商為例。銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 14. 林玲君(1991)策略聯盟形成因素與績效之研究。台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 15. 林曉蕾(2000):組織合作關係特質與成效滿意之相關性研究---以台灣醫院醫事人力支援合作案為例,國立台灣大學醫療機構管理研究所碩士論文。 16. 邱瑜瑾(1998):台中市非營利組織資源網路連結分析―社會網路取向,87年國科會專題研究計畫NSC87-2412-H-126-001。 17. 柯丁萍(1994)策略聯盟夥伴選擇決定因素之研究。台大國際企業研究所碩士論文。 18. 張正隆:2000/9/18,「為重建把脈 健康促進、身心重建」座談會,聯合報。 19. 張苙雲(1998):醫療與社會-醫療社會學的探索,第一版,台北市:巨流圖書公司。 20. 張瑜芳(1998)合作動機與合作夥伴選擇的決定性因素----以社會福利機構為例之個案研究。逢甲大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 21. 許志光(1996)共同研發聯盟之信任機制與承諾類型對聯盟績效關係之研究。中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 22. 許國敏(1993):「中小醫院的營運管理-生存危機之因應策略」,醫院,第27卷第5期,p.64-73。 23. 陳俊彰(2003)。從網頁中發掘教師知識分佈圖。中山大學資訊管理學系。 24. 陳義清(1998)國際策略聯盟資源組合類型影響因素之研究。暨南大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文。 25. 彭朱如(1998)醫療產業中跨組織合作關係類型與管理機制之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。 26. 彭朱如、王維元、張錦文(1998):「醫院對外合作策略與績效評估」,醫院,第.31卷第2期,p.32-44。 27. 黃志明(1992)我國國際策略聯盟盟友選擇準則之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 28. 黃志明(1992)我國國際策略聯盟盟友選擇準則之研究。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 29. 楊長春(1998)策略聯盟夥伴間行為、信任與聯盟績效相關之研究。淡江大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。 30. 楊雪華、陳端容、李蘭、柯姍如(2002)。台北市某高中一年級學生的班級人際網絡位置與吸煙行為的關係。台灣公共衛生雜誌,21(3),164-172。 31. 詹啟賢(1998):「眼光要看遠,腳步要走穩-談21世紀的健保制度」。台灣醫界,第41卷第1期,p.1。 32. 熊瑞梅(1995)。社會網絡的資料蒐集、測量及分析。在章英華、傅仰止與瞿海源編著,社會調查與分析:社會科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一。台北市:中央研究院民族學研究所。 33. 趙鋼(1998):「災難事故危機管理」,研考報導,民國八十七年七月,第43卷,頁52-53。 34. 劉宜君(2003)。政策知識管理與社會網絡—政府部門政策知識網絡之初探。在財團法人國家政策研究基金會編,國政研究報告(憲政(研)092-008號)。台北市:編者。 35. 蔡勇美,郭文雄(1987):都市社會學,巨流圖書公司。 36. 蔡博文(1993)組織間的合作利益管理方式。政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 37. 蕭惠如(2003):警急事故下物件導向決策支援系統之建立,私立逢甲大學交通工程與管理學系碩士班碩士論文。 38. 聯合報第九版,1999.6.3。 39. 聯合報第八版,2001.9.19。 40. 羅家德、張紳震(2002)。社會資本與關係網絡--資訊化組織與科層組織之比較。在清華大學社會學研究所。 41. 羅家德、葉冠伶、輝偉昇(2003)。從社會網絡的觀點看組織的知識管理—以組織團隊的角度分析。在實踐大學資訊管理學系編,2003電子商務與數位生活研討會論文集(頁2005-2023)。台北:編者。 42. 蘇喜、石崇良(2004):災難時醫學中心緊急疏散傷病患與醫療後送模式之建立與探討,行政院衛生署九十二年度科技研究發展計畫DOH92-TD-1068。 參、網頁部分 1. 衛生署全球資訊網,http://www.doh.gov.tw/law/3/law-0511-4.htm 2. 災難的定義與分級標準,http://dmat.mc.ntu.edu.tw/disaster_medicine/disaster_define.htm 3. Butt, Carter T.(2002). Tools For Social Network Analysis. Available at http://www.legba.hss.cmu.edu/R.stuff 4. Hanneman, Robert, A.(1998). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Available at http://wizard.ucr.edu/~rhannema/networks/nettext.pdf 5. Connections. Simon Fraser University Burnaby, B.C. Canada. Available at http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/indexConnect.html 6. Freeman, Linton C. Social Network. Elsevier Science B.V. Available at http://www.elsevier.com/homepage/sae/son/ 7. Journal of Social Structure. Carnegie Mellon University. Available at http://www2.heinz.cmu.edu/project/INSNA/joss/index1.html 8. 國際社會網絡學會:International Network for Social Network Analysis.(INSNA)Available at http://www.sfu.ca/~insna/index.html 9. Freeman, Linton C.Visualizing Social Networks. Available at http://zeeb.library.cmu.edu:7850/JoSS/article.html | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36922 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究之研究目的為:1)瞭解北市醫院之平時合作關係網絡,並輔以矩陣與圖形呈現其組成結構;2)探討影響醫院在發生內部災難時選擇合作對象之因素。
本研究以台北市通過等級評鑑之47家醫院為資料收集對象,以郵寄問卷與電訪訪談兩種方式進行。回收45家醫院問卷,回收率95.74%。 本研究之分析單位為醫院遭遇情境災難事件所選擇之合作對象,從三個側面評估合作傾向1)跨行政區域;2)跨醫院層級;3)合作經驗。從三個面向評估影響合作傾向的原因:1)「內部環境因素」,以評鑑等級、權屬別、病床數、災難經歷和防災訓練頻率為測量指標;2)「情境決策因素」,以醫院求援之考量題目問卷進行因素分析得三因子,資源豐富取向、關係信任取向和地理距離取向為測量指標;3)「外部網絡因素」,以核心性程度為測量指標。 研究結果顯示,在醫院發生內部災難時之合作傾向部分,多數的醫院當需求援時其對象醫院以所在相鄰地區、不同層級醫院、且半數以上在近一年來曾有過有合作經驗為主。 針對研究假說考驗的結果發現,內部環境因素、情境決策因素、外部網絡因素皆會影響醫院發生內部災難時之合作傾向。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study has two purposes: (1) use matrix and graph to demonstrate the peacetime cooperative relationship network of Taipei hospitals; (2) find the key factors which influence hospitals’ decision to choose the cooperative one when facing internal emergency.
The study subjects are 47 hospitals accredited as medical centers, regional hospitals, district hospitals, and psychiatric hospitals located in Taipei. The administrators of those hospitals are interviewed by mailed, structured questionnaire which was developed by the researcher. A telephone interview was also conducted to remind them to send back the questionnaires. In the end, there were 45 hospitals sending back and the response rate was 95.74%. This study analyzes the hospital’s cooperative tendency from three perspectives: 1) across administrative area; 2) across hospital accreditation; 3) hospitals’ cooperative experience. The study also found out the influential factors which affect the cooperative tendency from three perspectives: 1) internal environment factor—using accreditation level, ownership, beds of hospitals, disaster experiences and frequency of emergency simulation training as measure indicators; 2) situation decision factor—using resource oriented, trust oriented, and distance oriented as measure indicators where were from the questionnaires; 3) external network factor—using “degree centrality” as the indicator. The result showed that when facing internal emergency and decide which hospital to cooperate with, most hospitals would take its distance, accreditation and whether they have cooperative experiences before into consideration. The study concluded that internal environment factors, situation decision factors and external network factors influence hospitals’ cooperative tendency when facing internal emergency. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:22:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91843010-1.pdf: 871030 bytes, checksum: 23c3345392baaf1ea1c50209ac4b580c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 Ⅰ
中文摘要 Ⅲ 英文摘要 Ⅳ 目錄 Ⅴ 表目錄 Ⅶ 圖目錄 Ⅷ 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究之重要性 5 第二章 文獻探討 6 第一節 災難研究之相關概述 6 第二節 醫院合作機制 13 第三節 社會網絡之相關研究 22 第四節 組織間合作關係之評估 35 第三章 研究材料與方法 37 第一節 研究設計及架構 37 第二節 研究假設 38 第三節 研究變項及定義 39 第四節 研究工具與材料 42 第五節 研究對象 43 第六節 資料分析方法 44 第四章 研究結果 45 第一節 樣本回收情形 45 第二節 樣本基本特性之描述性分析 46 第三節 各構面之因素分析 56 第四節 雙變量分析 58 第五節 多變量分析 65 第五章 討論 71 第一節 研究結果之討論 71 第二節 研究限制 75 第六章 結論與建議 76 第一節 結論 76 第二節 建議 77 參考文獻 79 壹、國外參考文獻 79 貳、國內參考文獻 84 參、網頁部分 87 附錄一 本研究問卷 88 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 探討醫院對於發生內部災難時可能選擇合作對象之影響因素---以台北市醫院為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | On the factors that influence hospitals to develop partnership when facing internal emergency --- taking Taipei hospitals as subjects | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳端容,張永源 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 內部災難,醫院合作,社會網絡, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | internal emergency,hospital cooperation,social network, | en |
dc.relation.page | 91 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-19 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 醫療機構管理研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 健康政策與管理研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 850.62 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。