請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36617
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德 | |
dc.contributor.author | Fu-Siang Syu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 許富翔 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:08:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-20 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. 我國燃料燃燒CO2排放統計與分析,經濟部能源局,2010。
2. 能源統計月報,經濟部能源局,2010。http://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/opengovinfo/Plan/all/energy_mthreport/main/default.htm 3. Biomass combustion and co-firing- Overview, IEA Bioenergy Task 32. http://www.ieabcc.nl/publications/t32.pdf 4. 林俊義,國內生質能源之發展,行政院農業委員會農業試驗所。 5. 垃圾焚化廠轉型生質能源中心可行性評估規劃專案工作計畫,環保署,EPA-97-H101-02-121,2008。 6. 農業統計年報,行政院農委會,2009。 7. Kadam, K. L., Forrest, L. H. and Jacobson, W. A. (2000) Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource: collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects. Biomass and Bioenergy 18(5), 369-389. 8. Frombo, F., Minciardi, R., Robba, M., Rosso, F. and Sacile, R. (2009) Planning woody biomass logistics for energy production: A strategic decision model. Biomass and Bioenergy 33(3), 372-383. 9. 「推動生質柴油及稻稈生質能處理策略分析及成本效益評估」專案工作計畫,環保署,EPA-93-FA11-03-A171,2005。 10. 98 年臺中縣農業廢棄物露天燃燒改善策略評估計畫,台中縣環保局,2009。 11. Deng, J., Wang, G.-J., Kuang, J.-H., Zhang, Y.-L., and Luo, Y.-H. (2009) Pretreatment of agricultural residues for co-gasification via torrefaction. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 86(2), 331-337. 12. Bergman, P. C. A., Boersma, A. R., Zwart, R. W. R. and Kiel, J. H. A. (2005) Torrefaction for biomass co-firing in existing coal-fired power stations 'BIOCOAL'. ECN-C-05-013, Energy research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN). 13. Zanzi, R., Ferro, D. T., Torres, A., Soler, P. B., Björnbom, E. (2002) BIOMASS TORREFACTION. 6th Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Combustion and Energy Utilization, Kuala Lumpur. 14. Pentananunt, R., Rahman, A. N. M. M. and Bhattacharya, S. C. (1990) Upgrading of biomass by means of torrefaction. Energy 15(12), 1175-1179. 15. Chen, W.-H. and Kuo, P.-C. (2011) Torrefaction and co-torrefaction characterization of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin as well as torrefaction of some basic constituents in biomass. Energy, In Press, Corrected Proof. 16. Felfli, F. F., Luengo, C. A., Suárez, J. A. and Beatón, P. A. (2005) Wood briquette torrefaction. Energy for Sustainable Development 9(3), 19-22. 17. Prins, M. J., Ptasinski, K. J. and Janssen, F. J. J. G. (2006) More efficient biomass gasification via torrefaction. Energy 31(15), 3458-3470. 18. Pimchuai, A., Dutta, A. and Basu, P. (2010) Torrefaction of Agriculture Residue To Enhance Combustible Properties. Energy & Fuels 24(9), 4638-4645. 19. Phanphanich, M. and Mani, S. (2011) Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresource Technology 102(2), 1246-1253. 20. Bridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Williams, A. and Waldron, D. J. (2010) An investigation of the grindability of two torrefied energy crops. Fuel 89(12), 3911-3918. 21. A new process for Torrefied wood manufacturing. (2002) General Bioenergy, Inc. 22. 林法勤,農林廢棄物焙燒技術,生質廢棄物轉製再生燃料技術交流研討會,台北市,2011。 23. Girard, P. and Shah, N. (1991) Recent developments on torrefied wood- an alternative to charcoal for reducing deforestation. Charcoal Production and pyrolysis technologies, REUR technical Series No. 20. 24. Sadaka, S. and Negi, S. (2009) Improvements of Biomass Physical and Thermochemical Characteristics via Torrefaction Process. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 28(03), 427-434. 25. BIOS Bioenergiesysteme GmbH, Graz University of Technology. http://www.ieabcc.nl/database/biobank.html 26. Phyllis, database for biomass and waste, Energy research Centre of the Netherlands, ECN. http://www.ecn.nl/phyllis/ 27. Bridgeman, T. G., Jones, J. M., Shield, I. and Williams, P. T. (2008) Torrefaction of reed canary grass, wheat straw and willow to enhance solid fuel qualities and combustion properties. Fuel 87(6), 844-856. 28. Prins, M. J., Ptasinski, K. J. and Janssen, F. J. J. G. (2006) Torrefaction of wood: Part 2. Analysis of products. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 77(1), 35-40. 29. 江玄政、黃國恭、黃雪娟,ISO 14000系列生命週期評估技術與應用手冊,經濟部工業局,2001。 30. 楊英賢,“生命週期評估與不確定性分析應用於火力電廠與燃料選擇”,博士論文,國立成功大學環境工程研究所,台南市,2008。 31. Lautier, A., Rosenbaum, R. K., Margni, M., Bare, J., Roy, P.-O. and Deschênes, L. (2010) Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. Science of The Total Environment 409(1), 33-42. 32. Bare, J., Hofstetter, P., Pennington, D. and Udo de Haes, H. (2000) Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 5(6), 319-326. 33. Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G. and Rosenbaum, R. (2003) IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8(6), 324-330. 34. Tilman, D., Socolow, R., Foley, J. A., Hill, J., Larson, E., Lynd, L., Pacala, S., Reilly, J., Searchinger, T., Somerville, C. and Williams, R. (2009) Beneficial Biofuels—The Food, Energy, and Environment Trilemma. Science 325(5938), 270-271. 35. Cherubini, F. and Ulgiati, S. (2010) Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study. Applied Energy 87(1), 47-57. 36. Sebastián, F., Royo, J. and Gómez, M. (2010) Cofiring versus biomass-fired power plants: GHG (Greenhouse Gases) emissions savings comparison by means of LCA (Life Cycle Assessment) methodology. Energy, In Press, Corrected Proof. 37. Lu, W. and Zhang, T. Z. (2010) Life-Cycle Implications of Using Crop Residues for Various Energy Demands in China. Environmental Science & Technology 44(10), 4026-4032. 38. Cherubini, F., Bird, N. D., Cowie, A., Jungmeier, G., Schlamadinger, B. and Woess-Gallasch, S. (2009) Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53(8), 434-447. 39. Mendoza, A., Ruijven, T. V., Vad, K. and Wardenaar, T. (2008) The Allocation Problem in Bio-Electricity Chains. Industrial Ecology, Leiden University, Netherlands. 40. 農業廢棄物(稻桿)集運方式及成本調查專案研究計畫,環保署,EPA-97-H103-02-141,2008。 41. 李昆洲,“生質物供應後勤之成本與碳排放分析”,碩士論文,國立台灣大學環境工程研究所,台北市,2010。 42. 李涵茵,燃煤電廠煤炭供需狀況及煤炭卸、儲、運能力之規劃,台灣綜合研究院,2008。 43. 測量世界港口間距離. http://www.searates.com/cn/reference/portdistance/ 44. 經濟部能源局,效率參數及溫室氣體減量標準,2010。http://verity.erl.itri.org.tw/aero/default2.aspx?sid=57 45. Gräbner, M., Morstein, O. v., Rappold, D., Günster, W., Beysel, G. and Meyer, B. (2010) Constructability study on a German reference IGCC power plant with and without CO2-capture for hard coal and lignite. Energy Conversion and Management 51(11), 2179-2187. 46. McIlveen-Wright, D. R., Huang, Y., Rezvani, S., Mondol, J. D., Redpath, D., Anderson, M., Hewitt, N. J. and Williams, B. C. (2011) A Techno-economic assessment of the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions through the use of biomass co-combustion. Fuel 90(1), 11-18. 47. 張琇蘭,“台灣北部地區水稻田土壤之甲烷釋出及影響釋出因子探討”,博士論文,國立台灣大學農業化學系,台北市,1995。 48. Yang, S.-S., Lai, C.-M., Chang, H.-L., Chang, E.-H. and Wei, C.-B. (2009) Estimation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from paddy fields in Taiwan. Renewable Energy 34(8), 1916-1922. 49. 潘瀅如,“台灣地區稻米生產之生命週期評估”,碩士論文,國立臺北大學自然資源與環境管理研究所,新北市,2008。 50. 陳榮五、邱禮弘、陳鴻堂、賴文龍、蔡宜峰、白桂芳,作物合理化施肥理念,行政院農業委員會臺中區農業改良場,2008。 51. Huang, Y. F., Kuan, W. H., Lo, S. L. and Lin, C. F. (2008) Total recovery of resources and energy from rice straw using microwave-induced pyrolysis. Bioresource Technology 99(17), 8252-8258. 52. Wihersaari, M. (2005) Greenhouse gas emissions from final harvest fuel chip production in Finland. Biomass and Bioenergy 28(5), 435-443. 53. Arias, B., Pevida, C., Fermoso, J., Plaza, M. G., Rubiera, F. and Pis, J. J. (2008) Influence of torrefaction on the grindability and reactivity of woody biomass. Fuel Processing Technology 89(2), 169-175. 54. Svoboda, K., Pohorelý, M., Hartman, M. and Martinec, J. (2009) Pretreatment and feeding of biomass for pressurized entrained flow gasification. Fuel Processing Technology 90(5), 629-635. 55. Saha, B. (2003) Hemicellulose bioconversion. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 30(5), 279-291. 56. Maski, D., Darr, M. and Anex, R. (2010) Torrefaction of cellulosic biomass upgrading - Energy and cost model. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers Annual International Meeting, Pittsburgh, PA, pp 4443-4460. 57. Bronsema, N. R. (2010) Moisture Movement and Mould Management in Straw Bale Walls for a Cold Climate Waterloo. Waterloo University, Ontario, Canada, 2010. 58. Lee, H. G., Yeh, T. F., Wang, C. B., Chu, K. S. and Lin, C. L. (2004) System Design of Ultra-Low Emission Catalytic Combustor. JOURNAL OF C.C.I.T. 32(2). 59. Caputo, A. C., Palumbo, M., Pelagagge, P. M. and Scacchia, F. (2005) Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass and Bioenergy 28(1), 35-51. 60. Uslu, A., Faaij, A. P. C. and Bergman, P. C. A. (2008) Pre-treatment technologies, and their effect on international bioenergy supply chain logistics. Techno-economic evaluation of torrefaction, fast pyrolysis and pelletisation. Energy 33(8), 1206-1223. 61. Hammerschlag, R. (2006) Ethanol's Energy Return on Investment: A Survey of the Literature 1990−Present. Environmental Science & Technology 40(6), 1744-1750. 62. 台電企劃處,台灣電力公司99年年報,台灣電力公司,第11頁,2010。 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36617 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 目前政府相關單位計畫配合焚化廠屆齡除役期程,將其逐步轉型為生質能源中心,處理生質垃圾及農業廢棄物,以提高國內再生能源比例。而稻稈為我國數量最多的農業生質廢棄物,但其高含水率、低熱值等特性易影響熱化學轉換(燃燒、氣化)效率,致目前在利用率偏低。採用焙燒前處理技術能改善生質物燃燒特性,並減少生質物體積及增加可磨性。故本研究以生命週期評估方法分析國內生質能源中心以焙燒前處理技術產製稻稈生質炭,並應用於混燒發電之環境衝擊與效益。使用生命週期評估軟體SimaPro 7.2對生質能供應鏈各階段的投入產出進行盤查分析後,再經 IMPACT 2002+評估模式量化其潛在衝擊。而環境效益部份則是建立我國目前的進口燃煤發電供應鏈做為參考比較系統,評估生質能供應鏈的衝擊減量或增量效果。結果顯示生質電能供應鏈在水域生態毒性、陸域生態毒性、全球暖化及非再生能源使用四個衝擊類別具有衝擊減量的正面效益,並隨生質炭混燒比增加而減量程度越高,但在致癌性、非致癌性、土地利用、游離輻射、臭氧層耗竭、可吸入性有機物/無機物、土壤酸化、水體酸化、水體優養化及礦物資源等類別則造成更高的衝擊;在溫室氣體減量部份,生質炭混燒發電一度的減碳量隨混燒比上升而增加,最高發電一度可減量0.61 kg CO2-eq (完全使用生質炭),而每公斤稻稈產製生質炭用做混燒發電之減碳量約為0.49 kg CO2-eq。稻稈產製生質炭混燒發電雖具有減少非再生能源消耗及溫室氣體排放的效益,但可能會造成更高的水體優養化(額外肥料使用所致)、游離輻射等其他環境衝擊,故決策者必須權衡環境衝擊,以評估稻稈生質電能在環境面之可行性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | According to the target of increasing proportion of renewable energy and CO2 reduction, Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration draft a promotion plan of the transformations from expired incinerators to bio-energy centers which utilize bio-waste as feedstock. Base on the estimations in this study, crop residue such as rice straw is produced in abundance on Taiwan. However, the high moisture content and low heating value of rice straw affect its biomass utilization efficiency. Furthermore, poor grindability of rice straw decreases rates of co-milling with coal at coal-fired power plants. Torrefaction is a thermal pretreatment technology which improves the properties of biomass in order to deal with the above problems. This study focuses on production chains which utilize torrefied biomass (biocoal) derived from rice straw for co-firing in power plant. The production chains are investigated using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach, which takes into account all the input and output flows occurring along the production chain. Investigation was carried out using a SimaPro 7.2 LCA software and adopting the IMPACT 2002+ methodology for evaluation of potential environmental impact. Environmental impact reductions were also evaluated by comparing with fossil reference system generating electricity with combustion of imported hardcoal. The comparative results show that the bioelectricity production chain had impact reductions in impact categories of aquatic ecotoxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, global warming and non-renewable energy use. Moreover, results indicated that the bioelectricity had higher impact reduction with increasing in biocoal replace ratio. On the other hand, the bioelectricity production chain had higher impact potential than reference system in carcinogens, non-carcinogens, ionizing radiations, ozone layer depletion, respiratory organics, terrestrial acidification, aquatic acidification, aquatic eutrophication, respiratory inorganics, land occupation and mineral extraction. Concerning GHG emission savings, the possible saving of biocoal co-firing increased with increasing in biocoal replace ratio, and had a maximum of 0.61 kg CO2 eq/kWh (100% replace with biocoal). Also, the GHG saving was 0.49 kg CO2-eq per kg of rice straw which was used for generating bioelectricity. Based on the results, the bioelectricity production chain has environmental benefits in GHG savings and non-renewable energy consumption, but cause higher impact in other impact categories than fossil system. Therefore, policy makers should comprehensively consider various impacts in order to determine the feasibility of developing bioenergy in aspect of environment. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:08:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98541207-1.pdf: 6831010 bytes, checksum: 65451a4df889be2c781b4cb0a3af404d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 I
Abstract II 圖目錄 VI 表目錄 VIII 第一章 緒論 1 1-1 研究動機與目的 1 1-2 研究流程與論文架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2-1 國內稻稈產量估計與處理現況 5 2-2 焙燒前處理技術 8 2-2-1 焙燒機制介紹 9 2-2-2 焙燒產物之組成與性質 11 2-2-3 焙燒製程介紹 13 2-2-4 焙燒技術現況與影響 16 2-2-5 焙燒處理技術應用於稻稈之研究 17 2-3 生命週期評估 22 2-3-1 方法介紹 22 2-3-2 評估模式介紹 26 2-3-3 生命週期評估於農業廢棄物生質能供應鏈之應用 29 第三章 研究方法 31 3-1 生命週期評估方法 31 3-1-1 目標與範疇界定 31 3-1-2 盤查分析 40 3-2 稻稈焙燒製程模擬 45 3-2-1 製程相關參數 45 3-2-2 製程相關設定 47 3-2-3 製程建立及模擬 50 第四章 結果與討論 56 4-1 生命週期評估 56 4-1-1 產製稻稈生質炭之評估結果 56 4-1-2 生質炭混燒發電之評估結果 70 4-1-3 敏感度分析 79 4-2 稻稈焙燒製程模擬 94 4-2-1 自熱操作 94 4-2-2 製程質量產率與能源效率 95 4-2-3 製程廢棄物排放 97 第五章 結論與建議 99 參考文獻 102 附錄 A 108 附錄 B 133 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 稻稈焙燒產製生質煤炭之生命週期評估 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Life cycle assessment of producing biocoal from rice straw via torrefaction | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 駱尚廉,胡景堯 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 稻稈,焙燒,生命週期評估,混燒發電, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Rice straw,Torrefaction,Life cycle assessment,Co-firing, | en |
dc.relation.page | 135 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-20 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 6.67 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。