請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36560完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳秀熙(Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | "Lisa, Li-Chen Hsieh" | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 謝麗貞 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T08:05:35Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-08-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-21 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Latham J, Davis BD: The Socioeconomic impact of chronic pain. Disability Rehabilbitation.1994, 16:39.
2. Spitzer W, LeBlanc F, Dupuis M. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Spine. 1987, 12:S1– S59. 3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Classification and epidemiology of headache. [Review] Clinical Cornerstone, Bronx, New York. 1999, 1:1-10 pp. 4. WHO. Acupuncture: review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials; May, 2001. 5. Rosen M. Clinical Standards Advisory Group. Back Pain. London: HMSO; 1994. 6. van Tulder MW, Koes BW, Bouter LM. A cost-of-illness study of back pain in the Netherlands. Pain. 1995, 62:233– 40. 7. Anderson G. The epidemiology of spinal disorders. In: Frymoyer J, editor. The adult spine: principles and practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997, pp. 93–141. 8. Nachemson A, Waddell G, Norlund A. Epidemiology of neck and low back pain. In: Nachemson A, Jonsson E, editors. Neck and back pain: the scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. First ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, William & Wilkins. 2000, p. 165–87. 9. Mark DB. Economic analysis: methods and endpoints. In: Califf RM, Mark DB, Wagegner G, eds. Acute coronary care. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby-Year Book. 1995, 167 -82. 10. Robinson, Ray. Economic Evaluation and Health care: Cost-Benefit Analysis. BMJ, 307(6909). 1993, 924-926. 11. Merskey H, Bogduk N: Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain terms, 2nd ed. IASP Press, Seattle. 1994, p 212. 12. Melzack, R., The McGill Pain Questionnaire：major properties and scoring methods. Pain. 1975, 275-299. 13. Melzack, R., The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, Pain, 1987, 191-197. 14. Melzack, R. and Torgerson, W.S., On the Language of Pain. Anesthesiology. 1971, 34. 15. Turk, D.C. and Okifuji, A., Assessment of patients’ reporting of pain: an integrated perspective [Pain]. The Lancet. 1999, 1784-1788. 16. Huskisson, E.C., Measurement of Pain. The Lancet. 1974, 127-131. 17. Jenson, M.P., Karoly, P. and Braver, S., The Measurement of Clinical Pain Intensity: A Comparison of Six Methods. Pain. 1986, 117-126. 18. Chapman, C.R., Casey, K.L., Dubner, R., Foley, K.M., Gracely, R.H. and Reading, A.E., Pain Measurement: an Overview. Pain. 1985, 1-31. 19. Dalton, J.A. and Faye, M., A Call for standardizing the clinical rating of pain intensity using 0 to 10 rating scales. Cancer Nursing. 1998, 46-49. 20. Holroyd, K.A., Talbot, F., Holm, J.E., Pingel, J.D., Lake, A.E. and Saper, J.R., Assessing the dimension of pain: a multitrait-multimethod evaluation of seven measures. Pain. 1996, 259-265. 21. Escalante, A., Lichtenstain, M.J., Lawrence, V.A., Roberson, M. and Hazuda, H.P., Where does it hurt? Stability of recording of pain location using the McGill Pain Map, Journal of Rheumatology. 1996, 1788-1793. 22. Klepac, R.K., Dowling, J. and Hauge, G., Sensitivity of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to Intensity and Quality of Laboratory pain, Pain, 1981, 199-207. 23. Zakrezewska, J.M., Chaudhry, Z., Nurimikko, T.J., Patton, D.W. and Mullens, E.L., Lamotrigine (Lamictal) in refractory trigeminal neuralgia: results from a double-blind placebo controlled crossover trial, Pain, 1997, 223-230. 24. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine, 1998, 23:2003-13. 25. Wei LY. Acupuncture Science and Technique. Taiwan Chung Hwa Publications, Taipei. 1986, pp. 202-209. 26. Lee, DH. Qi Shiee Luenn. Chih Yuan Publications, Taipei. 1996, pp. 51-94. 27. Kapichuk T. The web that has no weaver. New York: Congdon and Weed, 1983. 28. Maciocia G. Foundations of Chinese medicine. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1989. 29. Dai HM. Chinese Medicine. Chi Yeh Publications, Taipei. 1986, pp.52-72. 30. Kawashima K. The Acupuncture Anatomy. Wu Lin Publications, Taipei. 1992, pp. 303-309. 31. Villaire M. NIH consensus conference confirms acupuncture’s efficacy. Alternative Therapy. Health Med. 1998, 4:21-30. 32. National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Acupuncture. 1997, November 3-5. 33. Mills SY. Regulation in complementary and alternative medicine. BMJ. 2001, 322: 158-160. 34. WHO: Acupuncture: Review and Analysis of Reports on Controlled Clinical Trials. 2001, May. 35. Hsieh, LC. The Study on the Effectiveness of Qigong Therapy via Acu-points and the Finding of the New Effect of Points and Their Possibility of the Use of Instruments. Conference on Engineering Technology and Applications to Chinese and Western Medicine. 1998, 231-5. 36. Reid, V.J., Ethnicity, interpersonal factors and pain expression: Implications for physician patient interaction, Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University, 1992, pp. Dissertation Abstracts International. 53, DA922505. 37. Bureau, F., Luu, M. and Doubrere, J.F., Comparative study of the validity of four French McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) versions. Pain. 1992, 50:59-65. 38. Burckhardt, C.S. and Bjelle, A., A Swedish version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Scand J Rheumatol. 1994, 23:77-81. 39. Drewes, A.M., Helweg, L.S., Petersen, P., Brennum, J., Andreasen, A. Poulsen, L.H., McGill Pain Questionnaire translated into Danish: experimental and clinical findings. Clinical journal of pain. 1993, 9:80-87. 40. Escalante, A., Lichtenstein, M.J., Rios, N. and Hazuda, H.P., Measuring chronic rheumatic pain in Mexican Americans: cross-cultural adaptation of the McGill Pain Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996, 49:1389-99. 41. Georgoudis, G., Watson, P.J. and Oldham, J.A., The development and validation of a Greek version of the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Eur J Pain. 2000, 4:275-81. 42. Pimenta, C.A.T., M.J, Proposal to adapt the McGill Pain Questionnaire into Portuguese. Revista Da Escola de Enfermagem Da USP. 1996, 30:473-483. 43. Stein, C. and Mendl, G., The German counterpart to McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1988, 32:251-5. 44. Strand, L.I. and Ljunggren, A.E., Different approximations of the McGill Pain Questionnaire in the Norwegian language: a discussion of content validity. J Adv Nurs. 1997, 26:772-9. 45. Strand, L.I. and Wisnes, A.R., The development of a Norwegian pain questionnaire. Pain. 1991, 46:61-6. 46. van der Kloot, W.A., Oostendorp, R.A., van der Meij, J. and van den Heuvel, J., [The Dutch version of the McGill pain questionnaire: a reliable pain questionnaire]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995, 139:669-73. 47. Vanderiek, K., Adriaensen, H., Carton, H. Vertommen, H., The McGill Pain Questionnaire constructed for the Dutch language. Preliminary data concerning reliability and validity. Pain. 1987, 30:395-408. 48. Berry, D.L., Wilkie, D.J., Huang, H.Y. and Blumenstein, B.A., Cancer pain and common pain: a comparison of patient-reported intensities. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999, 26:721-6. 49. Ferrell, B.A., Stein, W.M. and Beck, J.C., The Geriatric Pain Measure: validity, reliability and factor analysis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000, 48:1669-73. 50. Haefner, H.K., Khoshnevisan, M.H., Bachman, J.E., Flowe-Valencia, H.D., Green, C.R. and Reed, B.D. Use of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to compare women with vulva pain, pelvic pain and headaches. Journal of Reproductive Medicine. 2000, 45:665-671. 51. Kiss, I., Muller, H. and Abel, M, The McGill Pain Questionnaire--German version. A study on cancer pain. Pain. 1987, 29:195-206. 52. Marques, A.P., Rhoden, L., de Oliveira Siqueira, J. Joao, S.M., Pain evaluation of patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain, Revista do Hospital das Clinicas; Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo. 2001, pp. (56)5-10. 53. Mongini, F., Italiano, M., Raviola, F. and Mossolov, A., The McGill Pain Questionnaire in patients with TMJ pain and with facial pain as a somatoform disorder, Cranio. 2000, 18:249-56. 54. Newton, J.T. and Buck, D.J., Anxiety and pain measures in dentistry: a guide to their quality and application, J Am Dent Assoc. 2000, 131:1449-57. 55. Wessel, J. The reliability and validity of pain threshold measurements in osteoarthritis of the knee, Scand J Rheumatol. 1995, 24:238-42. 56. Chung, J.W., Wong, T.K. and Yang, J.C., A preliminary report on the Chinese Cancer Pain Assessment Tool (CCPAT): reliability and validity, Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2001, 39:33-40. 57. De Souza, L.H. and Frank, A.O., Subjective pain experience of people with chronic back pain, Physiother Res Int. 2000, 5:207-19. 58. Radvila, A., Adler, R.H., Galeazzi, R.L. and Vorkauf, H., The development of a German language (Berne) pain questionnaire and its application in a situation causing acute pain, Pain. 1987, 28:185-95. 59. Kim, H.S., Schwartz-Barcott, D., Holter, I.M. and Lorensen, M., Developing a translation of the McGill pain questionnaire for cross-cultural comparison: an example from Norway, J Adv Nurs. 1995, 21:421-6. 60. Marques AP, Rhoden L, de Oliveira Siqueira J, Joao SM. Pain evaluation of patients with fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and low back pain. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2001, 56:5-10 61. Turk DC, Okifuji A. Assessment of patients' reporting of pain: an integrated perspective. Lancet. 1999, 353:1784-8. 62. Liu JS, Wen TS, Su WL. Prevalence of Low Back Pain among Chinese Air-force Pilot. Journal of Chinese Aviation medical Association 1999, 12:77-83. 63. Mah C. Low Back Pain and Associated Factors among Nursing Staff in A Medical Center. Institute of Nursing, National Defense Medical College. 2001, Master Thesis. 64. Yao CC. Subjective Experience and On-site Intervention of Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Camera Journalists. Institute of Industrial Engineering and Management, Chung Hwa University. 2001, Master Thesis. 65. Chu IM. An analysis of acute low back pain medical utilization. Institute of Medical Practices Management, Chinese Medical College. 2001, Master Thesis. 66. Hsieh LL, Kuo CH, Yen MF, Chen TH. A randomized controlled clinical trial for low back pain treated by acupressure and physical therapy. Preventive Medicine. 2004, 39:168-76. 67. Leung AS, Lam TH, Hedley AJ, Twomey LT. Use of a subjective health measure on Chinese low back pain patients in Hong Kong. Spine. 1999, 24:961-6. 68. Malanga GA, Nadler SF. Non-operative treatment of low back pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999, 74:1135-48. 69. Eisenberg DM, Davis RB, Ettner SL, et al. Trends in alternative medicine use in the United States, 1990-1997: results of a follow-up national survey. JAMA. 1998, 280:1569-75. 70. Ernst E. Prevalence of use of complementary/alternative medicine: a systematic review. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2000, 78(2). 71. WHO. Traditional Medicine Growing Needs and Potential, 2002. 72. Acupuncture (NIH). National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: November, 1997. 73. Ernst E, White, AR. Acupuncture for low back pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 1998, 158:2235-41. 74. Ernst E. Massage therapy for low back pain: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999, 17:65-9. 75. NIH Consensus Conference. Acupuncture. Jama 1998, 280:1518-24. 76. van Tulder MW, Cherkin DC, Berman B, Lao L, Koes BW. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the management of acute and chronic low back pain. A systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine.1999, 24:1113-23. 77. Hansen DT, Mior S, Mootz RD in Yeomans SG: The Clinical Application of Outcomes Assessment, Stamford Connecticut, Appleton & Lange, 2000. 78. Jenson MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The Measurement of Clinical Pain Intensity: A Comparison of Six Methods, Pain, 1986, 27:117-126. 79. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983, Sep; 17(1):45-56. 80. Deyo RA. Contemporary Conservative Care for Painful Spinal Disorders. American Board of Vocational Experts Fall Conference 2000. 81. Suzukamo Y. et al. Validation of the Japanese version of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire. Journal of Orthopadaedic Science. 2003, 8(4): 543-8. 82. Coste J. Le Parc JM. Berge E. Delecoeuillerie G. Paolaggi JB. French validation of a disability rating scale for the evaluation of low back pain. Revue du Rhumatisme. Edition Francaise. 1993, 60(5):335-41. 83. Flynn TW. Fritz JM. Wainner RS. Whitman JM. The audible pop is not necessary for successful spinal high-velocity thrust manipulation in individuals with low back pain. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2003, 84:1057-60. 84. Barrick WT. et al. Anterior lumbar fusion improves discogenic pain at levels of prior posterolateral fusion. Spine. 2000, 25:853-7 85. Palit M. et al. Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain. Spine. 1999, 24:2224-8. 86. Yeomans SG: The Clinical Application of Outcomes Assessment, Stamford Connecticut, Appleton & Lange, 2000. 87. Ehrlich GE, Khaltaev NG. Low back pain initiative. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1999. 88. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA. Classification and epidemiology of headache. [Review] Clinical Cornerstone. 1999, 1:1-10. 89. Rowland LP. Merritt’s Textbook of Neurology. Williams & Wilkins, Waverly Company, 1995. 90. Sebit. Tension headache in a primary health care, East African Medical Journal. 1996, 73(7):463-4. 91. Schwartz BS, Stewart WF, Simon MS, Lipton RB. A population-based study of the epidemiology of tension-type headache. JAMA. 1998, 279:381-383. 92. Rasmussen BK, Lipton RB. Epidemiology of f tension-type headache. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen p, Welch KMA, eds. The Headaches. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2000, 545-550 93. Liao YG. The prevalence Rate and clinical presentation of Migraine and Tension-Type Headache. Institute of Public Health, Kaoshiung Medical Colledge.1997, Master Thesis. 94. Jensen R, Sandrini G. Symptomatology of Chronic tension-type headache. In: Olesen J, Tfelt-Hansen p, Welch KMA, eds. The Headaches. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: 2000, 627-634. 95. Schoenen J, Wang W. Tension-type headache. In: Goadsby PJ, Silbersten SD, eds. Headache. Boston, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1997, 177-200. 96. Holroyd K, Stensland M, Lipchik G, Hill K, O’Donnell f, Cordingley G. Psychosocial Correlates and impact of chronic tension-type headaches. Headache. 2000, 40:3-16. 97. Olesen JC, for the Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias, and facial pain. Cephalalgia. 1988, 8 (suppl 7):1-96. 98. Bogaards et al. Treatment of recurrent tension headache: a meta-analytic review. Clinical Journal of Pain. 1994, 10(3):174-90. 99. Saper JR. Winner PK. Lake AE 3rd. An open-label dose-titration study of the efficacy and tolerability of tizanidine hydrochloride tables in the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache. Headache. 2001, 41:357-68. 100. Spira PJ. Beran Rg. Australian Gabapentin Chronic Daily Headache Group. Gabapentin in the prophylaxis of chronic daily headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Neurology. 2003, 61:1753-9. 101. Friedel HA. Fitton A. Flupirtine. A review of its pharmacological properties, and therapeutic in pain states. [Review]. 1993, Drugs.45:548-69. 102. Ludin. Tension-type headache diagnosis and therapy. German Therapeutische Umschau. 1997, 54(2):59-63. 103. Atkinson D. A single dose placebo-controlled study to assess the effectiveness of adding a muscle relaxant to a compound analgesic in the treatment of tension headache. Journal of international Medical Research. 1979, 7:560-3. 104. Ahonen E et al., Acupuncture and physiotherapy in the treatment of myogenic headache patients: pain relief and EMG activity. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy. 1983, 5:571-576. 105. Chen XS et al., Observation of penetrating acupuncture treatment of migraine in 45 cases. Shanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 1997, 13(6):32-33. 106. Dowson DI et al., The effects of acupuncture versus placebo in the treatment of headache. Pain. 1985, 21:35-42. 107. Kubiena G et al., Acupuncture treatment of migraine, Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Akunpunktur. 1992, 35(6):140-148. 108. Liu AS et al., Three Scalp Needles in the treatment of migraine, New Traditional Chinese Medicine. 1997, 29(4) 25-26. 109. Loh L et al., Acupuncture versus medical treatment for migraine and muscle tension headaches, Journal of Neurology. Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 1984, 47:333-337. 110. Tavola T et al., Traditional Chinese acupuncture in the treatment of tension-type headache: a controlled study. Pain.1992, 48:325-32,. 111. Vincent CA, A controlled trial of the treatment of migraine by acupuncture Clinical Journal of Pain. 1989, 5:305-312. 112. Weinschutz T et al., Neuroregulatory action of acupuncture in headache patients. 1994, 37(5):106-117. 113. Xu Z et al., Treatment of migraine by qi-manipulating acupuncture. Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and moxibustion. 1993, 12(3):97-100. 114. Karst M. Reinhard M. Thum P. Wiese B. Rollnik J. Fink M. Needle acupuncture in tension-type headache: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2001, 21:637-42. 115. Irnich D. Winklmeier S. Beyer A. Peter k. Electric stimulation acupuncture in peripheral neuropathic pain syndromes. Clinical pilot study on analgesic effectiveness. Schmerz. 2002, 16:114-20. 116. Fanke A. Gebauer S. Fanke K Brockow T. Acupuncture massage vs. Swedish massage and individual exercise vs. group exercise in low back pain sufferers – a randomized controlled clinical trial in a 2x2 factorial design. Forschende Komplementarmedizin und Klassische Naturheilkunde. 2000,7:286-93. 117. D’Andrea G.. Perini F. Granella F. Cananzi A. Sergi A. Efficacy of transdermal clonidine in short-term treatment of cluster headache: a pilot study. Cephalalgia. 1995, 15:430-3. 118. Detsky AS, Naglie IG. A clinician’s guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 1990. 113: 147 – 54. 119. Hawksworth C. Willingness to pay for “better” day surgery drugs. J One Day Surg. 1996/1997, 6:3-4. 120. O’Brien BJ, Novosel s, Torrance G, Streiner D. Assessing the economic value of a new antidepressant: a willingness-to-pay approach. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995, 8:34-35 121. Appel LJ, Steinberg EP, Powe NR. Risk reduction from low osmolality contrast media: what do patients think it is worth? Med Care. 1990, 28:324-37. 122. Johannesson M, Jonsson B. Economic evaluation in health care: is there a role for cost benefit analysis? Health Policy. 1991, 17:1-23. 123. Sloan FA, Viscusi WK, Chesson HW, et al Alternative approaches to valuing intangible health losses: the evidence for multiple sclerosis. J Health Econ. 1998, 17:475-97. 124. Kleinman l, McIntosh E, Ryan M, Schmier J, Crawley J, Locke GR, de Lissovoy G. Willingness to Pay for Complete Symptom Relief of Gastroesphageal Reflex Disease. Archives Internal Medicine. 2002, 162:1361-1366. 125. Kartman B, Andersson Johannesson M. Willingness to pay for reduction in Angina Pectoris Attacks Med Decis Making. 1996, 16:248-53. 126. Thompson MS. Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 1986, 76:392-6. 127. Miedzybrodzka z, Semper J, Shakely P. Stepwise or couple antenatal carrier screening for cystic fibrosis: women’s preferences and willingness to pay. J Med Genet. 1995, 32: 282-3. 128. Bala MV, Mauskopf JA, Wood LL. Willingness to pay as a measure of health benefits. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999, 15:9-18. 129. McIntosh E, Donaldson D, Ryan M. Recent advances in the methods of cost-benefit analysis in health care. Pharmacoeconomics. 1999, 15:357-367. 130. Ryan M. Measuring benefits in health care: the role of discrete-choice conjoint analysis. Paper presented at: International Health Economics Association; June 1999, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. 131. Morrison GC, Gyldmark M. Appraising the use of contigent valuation. Health Economics. 1992, 1:233-43. 132. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed Reg. 1993, 58:4601-14) 133. National Health Insurance Enforcement Bylaw, Feb., 2004, Chapter 4. 134. Randall a, Ives BC, Eastman C. Bidding games for evaluation for aesthetic environmental improvements. J Environ Econ Manage. 1974, 1:132-49. 135. Boyle KJ, Bishop RC, Welsh MP. Starting point bias in contingent valuation bidding games. Land Econ. 1985, 61:188-94. 136. Stalhammar N-O. An Empirical Note on Willingness to Pay and Starting-point Bias. Medical decision Making. 1996, 16:242-47. 137. Dong H, Kouyate B, Snow R, Mugisha f, Sauerborn R. Gender’s effects on willingness-to-pay for community-based insurance in Burkina Faso. Health Policy. 2003, 64(2):153-62. 138. Taylor SJ, Armour CL. Acceptability of willingness to pay techniques to consumere. Health Expectations. 2002, 5(4):341-56. 139. Vickers AJ. Statistical Reanalysis of Four Recent Randomized Trials of Acupuncture for Pain Using Analysis of Covariance. Clinical Journal of Pain. 20:319-323, 2004. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/36560 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 疼痛是基層醫療最常見的症狀，也是人們最常遭受到的苦難。人們除利用醫藥物治療外，也尋求氣功穴道治療法以解除疼痛。特以實證醫學研究方法評估氣功穴道治療法在解除疼痛症候群上的療效。研究包括參部份:第一、疼痛及治療結果的評量工具。將國際通用標準的疼痛問卷及下背痛標準治療結果評估工具翻譯成中文，經信、效度之檢驗及臨床試驗，證明其對台灣民眾疼痛上的評估具有適用性。第二、利用該中文問卷，以實證醫學研究方法，復健治療為對照，比較氣功穴道治療在解除下背痛的療效；及以肌肉鬆弛劑加上止痛藥物為對照，比較氣功穴道治療在解除頭痛上的療效。結果顯示氣功穴道治療法在解除下背痛和頭痛上，為具統計上顯著差異的有效治療方法。第三、以經濟評估方法，復健治療為對照，估計醫療成本，分析氣功穴道治療法的相對成本比、相對成本效率比。以意願償付法，探討接受另類治療的族群對減輕不同程度的下背痛時，所意願償付的最高金額為利益，分析氣功穴道治療法的相對成本利益比。經濟評估結果顯示氣功穴道治療法，具較為有利的成本效率比和成本利益比。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Pain is the major complaint in the primary medical care clinics and is the most commonly reported health problem that a large part of general population suffers from. Aside from occidental medications, people look for acupressure to alleviate the discomfort. Our study, aiming to investigate efficacy of acupressure in pain syndromes, includes three parts. Part 1: Standard pain outcome measures. Chinese versions of international standard pain measuring tools for low back pain are developed with proofs of reliability, validity, and adequacy and ability in distinguishing pain intensity and characters in Taiwanese people; Part 2: Studies to investigate the efficacy of acupressure in relieving pains in low back compared with that of physical therapy and in head with that of muscle relaxant in adding to analgesic medication are conducted by evidence-based medicine study designs. The results reveal that acupressure is a statistically significant efficacious pain relieving modality; and Part 3: Economic evaluations on acupressure, compared with physical therapy, are performed by cost estimates, cost-effectiveness analyses and cost-benefit analyses. While analyzing the cost-benefit, the “willingness to pay” approach is adopted for different percentage reductions for low back pain from a population who seek acupressure for pain relieving. Results show that acupressure is of lower costs and with cost effective and beneficial in pain syndromes. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T08:05:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-D91842008-1.pdf: 8316928 bytes, checksum: c8003af15d38351451b42f15a0f525f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | INTRODUCTION 1
PAIN AND PAIN MEASURES 6 ACUPRESSURE 11 1 PART ONE PAIN OUTCOME MEASURING TOOLS 16 1.1 Chinese Version of Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 16 1.1.1 Permission 17 1.1.2 Translation 17 1.1.3 Method for Reliability and Validity Verification 18 1.1.4 Statistical Analysis Methods 19 1.1.5 Results of the Reliability and Validity ofthe Chinese Versions 20 1.1.6 Clinical Trail 20 1.1.6.1 Study Design and Participants 21 1.1.6.2 Outcome Measures 22 1.1.6.3 Interventions 23 1.1.6.4 Statistical Analysis Methods 23 1.1.6.5 Results of the Clinical Trial 24 1.1.7 Discussions 25 1.2 Chinese Version of Standard Outcome Measures 30 1.2.1 Permission 32 1.1.2 Translation 32 1.1.3 Method for Reliability and Validity Verification 33 1.1.4 Statistical Analysis Methods 34 1.1.5 Results of the Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Versions 34 1.1.6 Discussions 35 1.3 Pain Measurement for Headache 38 2 PART TWO EFFICACY INVESTIGATION BY EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE STUDY DESIGNS 39 2.1 Clinical Trials for Low Back Pain 39 2.1.1 The Pilot Clinical Trial for Low Back Pain 41 2.1.1.1 Materials and Methods 41 2.1.1.1.1 Study Design 41 2.1.1.1.2 Patient Selection Criteria 42 2.1.1.1.3 Randomization and Blinding Procedures 44 2.1.1.1.4 Interventions 45 2.1.1.1.5 Outcome Measures 45 2.1.1.2 Sample Sizes 46 2.1.1.3 Statistical Analysis Methods 47 2.1.1.4 Results of the Pilot Clinical Trial 48 2.1.1.5 Discussions 50 2.1.2 The Main Clinical Trial for Low Back Pain 55 2.1.2.1 Materials and Methods 55 2.1.2.1.1 Study Design 55 2.1.2.1.2 Patient Selection Criteria 57 2.1.2.1.3 Randomization and Blinding Procedures 58 2.1.2.1.4 Interventions 59 2.1.2.1.5 Outcome Measures 60 2.1.2.2 Sample Size Estimates 61 2.1.2.2.1 Sample Size Calculation based on Data from Pilot Trial 61 2.1.2.2.2 Sample Size Determination 62 2.1.2.3 Statistical Analysis Methods 62 2.1.2.4 Results of the Main Clinical Trial 63 2.1.2.5 Discussions 69 2.2 The Clinical Trial for Headache 76 2.2.1 Materials and Methods 78 2.2.1.1 Study Design 78 2.2.1.2 Patient Selection Criteria 79 2.2.1.3 Randomization and Blinding Procedures 80 2.2.1.4 Interventions 82 2.2.1.5 Outcome Measures 82 2.2.2 Sample Size Estimates 84 2.2.3 Statistical Analysis Methods 84 2.2.4 Results of Clinical Trial 85 2.2.5 Discussions 87 3 PART THREE ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS 94 3.1 Economic Evaluation Methods 94 3.2 Diagram of the Costs and Consequences for Economic Evaluation 97 3.3 Cost Estimates 98 3.3.1 Materials and Methods 99 3.3.2 Results of the Cost Estimates 100 3.3.3 Discussions 102 3.4 Willingness To Pay for Low Back Pain 104 3.4.1 Materials and Method 104 3.4.1.1 Hypothetical Scenario 104 3.4.1.2 Population Definition 105 3.4.1.3 Bid Amounts Determination 106 3.4.1.4 Random Assignments 106 3.4.1.5 Interviews and Data Collections 107 3.4.1.6 Questionnaires 108 3.4.2 Statistical Analysis Methods 108 3.4.3 Results of Willingness To Pay for Low Back Pain 110 3.4.4 Explanatory Variables to Willingness To Pay for Low Back Pain 112 3.4.5 Discussions 113 3.5 Calculation for the Economic Evaluation on Low Back Pain 119 3.5.1 Related cost ratio 119 3.5.2 Cost effectiveness analyses 120 3.5.3 Cost benefit analyses 123 3.6 Discussions 126 OVERALL DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION 129 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 135 LIST OF FIGURES 138 LIST OF TABLES 139 LIST OF APPENDICES 143 REFERENCES 146 FIGURES 164 TABLES 168 APPENDICES 229 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 氣功穴道治療在疼痛症候群上的實證醫學研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Evidence-Based Study on Acupressure in Pain Syndromes | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 簡國龍(Kuo-Liong Chien) | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林瑞雄,張淑惠,薛亞聖,劉宏輝,楊俊毓 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 疼痛症候群,氣功穴道治療,評估工具,實證醫學研究,經濟評估, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pain syndromes,Acupressure,measuring tool,evidence-based medicine study design,economic evaluations,willingness to pay, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 269 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-21 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 流行病學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 流行病學與預防醫學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 8.12 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。