請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35894完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江伯倫 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Fan-Chi Hsu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 徐凡祺 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T07:47:56Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-08-04 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-08-04 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Cookson W. The alliance of genes and environment in asthma and allergy. Nature. 1999; 402:Supple:B5-B11.
2.Stein RT, Sherrill D, Morgan WJ, Holberg CJ, Halonen M, Taussig LM, Wright AL, Martinez FD. Respiratory syncytial virus in early life and risk of wheeze and allergy by age 13 years. Lancet. 1999; 354:541-545. 3.Halonen M, Stem DA, Lohman C, Wright AL, Brown MA, Martinez FD. Two subphenotyoes of childhood asthma that differ in maternal and paternal influences on asthma risk. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999; 160:564-570. 4.Mosmann TR, Coffman RL. Th1 and Th2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu Rev Immunol. 1989; 7:145-173. 5.Will-Karp M, Santeliz J, Karp CL. The germless allergic disease: revisiting the hygiene hypothesis. Nature Rev Immunol. 2001; 1:69-75. 6.Akbari O, Freeman GJ, Meyer EH, Greenfiled EA, Chang TT, Sharpe AH, Berry G, DeKruyff RH, Umetsu DT. Antigen-specific regulatory T cells develop via the ICOS-ICOS-ligand pathway and inhibit allergen-induced airway hyperreactivity. Nature Med. 2002; 8:1024-1032. 7.Cohn L, Elias JA, Chupp GL. Asthma: mechanism of disease persistence and progression. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004; 22:789-815. 8.Boushey HA. Bronchial hyperreactivity to sulfur dioxide: physiologic and political implications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1982; 69:335–38. 9.Lambrecht BN, Hammd H. Taking our breath away: dendritic cells in the pathogenesis of asthma. Nature Rev Immunol. 2003; 3:994-1003. 10.Wardlaw AJ, Dunnette S, Gleich GJ, Collins JV, Kay AB. Eosinophils and mast cells in brochoalveolar lavage in subjects with mild asthma: relationship to bronchial hyperreactivity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988; 137:62-69. 11.Wenzel SE, Fowler AA, Schwartz LB. Activation of pulmonary mast cells by bronchoalveolar allergen challenge in vivo release of histamine and tryptase in atopic subjects with and without asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988; 137:1002-1008. 12.Murry JJ, Tonnel AB, Brash AR, Roberts LT 2nd, Gosset P, Workman R, Capron A, Oates JA. Release of prostaglandin D2 into human airway during acute antigen challenge. New Engl J Med. 1986; 315:800-804. 13.Mackay IR, Rosen FS. Advances in immunology: allergy and allergic diseases. New Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 30-37. 14.Rothenberg ME. Eosinophilia. New Engl J Med. 1998; 338:1592–600. 15.Norman PS, Ohman JL Jr, Long AA, et al. Treatment of cat allergy with T-cell reactive peptides. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996; 154:1623-1628. 16.Krieg AM, Wagner H. Causing a commotion in the blood: immunotherapy progress from bacteria to bacterial DNA. Immunol Today. 2000; 21:521-526. 17.MacGlashan DW Jr, Brochner BS, Adelman DC, et al. Down-regulation of FcRI expression on human basophils during in vivo treatment of atopic patients with anti-IgE antibody. J Immunol. 1997; 158:1438-1445. 18.Kuehr J, Brauburger J, Zielen S, Schauer U, Kamin W, Von Berg A, et al. Efficacy of combination treatment with anti-IgE plus specific immunotherapy in polysensitized children and adolescents with seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002; 109:274-280. 19.Heath H, Qin S, Rao P, et al. Chemokine receptor usage by human eosinophils: the importance of CCR3 demonstrated using an antagonistic monoclonal antibody. J Clin Invest. 1997; 99:178-184. 20.Frew AJ. Immunotherapy of allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111:S712-719. 21.Di Rienzo V, Macrcucci F, Puccinelli P, Parmini S, Frati F, Sensi L, Canonica GW, Passalacua G. Long-lasting effects of sublingual immunotherapy in children with asthma due to house dust mite: a 10-years prospective study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003; 33:206-210. 22.Giovane AL, Bardare M, Passalacua G, Ruffoni S, Scordamaglia A, Ghezzi E, Canonica GW. A three-year double-blind placebo-controlled study with specific oral immunotherapy to Dermatophagoides: evidence of safety and efficacy in paediatric patients. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994; 24:53-59. 23.Canonica GW, Passalacqua G. Noninjection routes for immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111:437-439. 24.Stobel S and Mowat AM. Immune response to dietary antigen: oral tolerance. Immunol Today. 1998; 19:173-181. 25.Chase MW. Inhibition of experimental drug allergy by prior feeding of the sensitizing agent. Proc Soc Exp Biol. 1946; 61:257-259. 26.Mowat AM. Anatomical basis of tolerance and immunity to intestinal antigens. Nature Rev Immunol. 2003; 3:331-341. 27.Mitchison NA. Induction of immunological paralysis in two zones of dosage. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1964; 161:275-292. 28.Friedman A and Weiner HL. Induction of anergy or active suppression following oral tolerance is determined by antigen dosage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994; 91:6688-6692. 29.Yoshida T, Hachimura S and Kaminogawa S. The oral administration of low-dose antigen induces activation followed by tolerization, while high-dose antigen induces tolerance without activation. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1997; 82, 207-215. 30.Faria AM, Maron R, Ficker SM, Slavin AJ, Spahn T and Weiner HL. Oral tolerance induced by continuous feeding: enhanced upregulation of transforming growth factor-beta/interleukin-10 and suppression of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Autoimmun. 2003; 20: 135-145. 31.Chen Y, Inobe J, Marks R, Gonnella P, Kuchroo VK and Weiner HL. Peripheral deletion of antigen-reactive T cells in oral tolerance. Nature. 1995; 376:177-180. 32.Appleman LJ and Boussiotis VA. T cell anergy and co-stimulation. Immunol Rev. 2003; 192:161-180. 33.Zhang X, Izikson L, Liu L and Weiner HL. Activation of CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells by oral antigen administration. J Immunol. 2001; 167:4245-4253. 34.Lloyd M and Ling S. Therapeutic potential of oral tolerance. Nature Rev Immunol. 2004; 4:407-419. 35.Patriarca G, Nucera E, Roncallo C, Pollastrini E, Bartolozzi F, De pasquale T, Buonomo A, Gasbarrini G, Di Campli C and Schiavin D. Oral desensitizing treatment in food allergy: clinical and immunological results. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003; 58:1217-1223. 36.Russo M, Nahori MA, Lefort J, Gomes E, de Castro Keller A, Rodriguez D and Ribeiro OG, Adriouch S, Gallois V, de Faria AM and Vargaftig BB. Suppression of asthma-like response in different mouse strains by oral tolerance. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2001; 24:518-526. 37.Wiedermann U, Janh-Schmid B, Bohle B, Repa A, Renz H, Kraft D and Ebner C. Suppression of antigen-specific T- and B-cell responses by intranasal or oral administration of recombinant bet v 1, the major birch pollen allergen, in a murine model of type I allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999; 103: 1202-1210. 38.Sato MN, Carvalho AF, Siliva AO, Maciel Jr, Fusaro AE and Duarte AJ. Oral tolerance induced to house dust mite extract in naive and sensitized mice: evaluation if immunoglobulin G anti-immunoglobulin E autoantibodies and IgG-IgE complexes. Immunology. 1998; 95: 193-199. 39.Yasue M, Yokota T, Kajiwara Y, Suko M and Okudaira H. Inhibition of airway inflammation in rDer f 2-sensitized mice by oral administration of recombinant der f 2. Cell Immunol. 1997; 181: 30-37. 40.Hsu CH, Lin SS, Liu FL, Su WC and Yeh SD. Oral administration of a mite allergen expressed by zucchini yellow mosaic virus in cucurbit species downregulates allergen-induced airway inflammation and IgE synthesis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113: 1079-1085. 41.Liu YH, Kao MC, Lai YL and Tsai JJ. Efficacy of local nasal immunotherapy for Dp2-induced airway inflammation in mice: Using Dp2 peptide and fungal immunomodulatory peptide. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 112: 301-310. 42.Chua KY, Stewart GA, Thomas WR, Simpson RJ, Dilworth RJ, Plozza TM, Turner KJ. Sequence analysis of cDNA coding for a major house dust mite allergen, Der p 1. Homology with cysteine proteases. J Exp Med. 1988; 167:175-82. 43.Valenta R, Kraft D. Recombinant allergen molecules: tools to study effector cell activation. Immunol Rev. 2001; 179:119-27. 44.Tsai JJ, Shen HD, Chua KY. Purification of group 2 Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus allergen and prevalence of its specific IgE in asthmatics. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2000; 121:205-10. 45.Park GM, Lee SM, Lee IY, Ree HI, Kim KS, Hong CS, Yong TS. Localization of a major allergen, Der p 2, in the gut and faecal pellets of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000; 30:1293-1297. 46.Smith MA, Benjamin DC, Hozic N, Derewenda U, Simth WA, Thomas WR, Gafvelin G, Hage-Hamsten M, Chapman MD. The molecular basis of antigenic cross-reactivity between the group 2 mite allergen. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107:977-984. 47.Mueller GA, Benjamin DC, Rule GS. Tertiary structure of the major house dust mite allergen Der p 2: sequential and structural homologies. Biochemistry. 1998; 37:12707-12714. 48.Derewenda U, Li J, Derewenda Z, Dauter Z, Mueller GA, Rules GS, Benjamin DC. The crystal structure of a major dust mite allergen Der p 2, and its biological implications. J Mol Biol. 2002; 318:189-197. 49.Mantyjavi R, Rautiainen J, Virtanen T. Lipocalins as allergen. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000; 1482:308-317. 50.Asero R, Mistrello G, Roncarolo D, Amato S, van Ree R. A case of allergy to beer showing cross-reactivity between lipid transfer proteins. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001; 87:65-67. 51.Wu B, Elst LV, Carlier V, Jacquemin MG, Saint-Remy JM. The Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus group 2 allergen contains a universally immunogenic T cell epitope. J Immunol. 2002; 169:2430-2435. 52.Verhoef A, Lamb JR. Threshold signaling of human Th0 cells in activation and anergy: modulation of effector function by altered TCR ligand. J Immunol. 2000; 164:6034-6040. 53.Valenta R, Kraft D. Recombinant allergen molecules: Tools to study effector cell activation. Immunol Rev. 2001; 179:119-127. 54.Bancyx F. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 1999; 10:411-421. 55.Missiakas D, Raina S. Protein folding in the bacterial periplasm. J Bacteriol. 1997; 179:2465-2471. 56.Cereghino JL, Cregg JM. Heterologous protein expression in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000; 24:45-66. 57.Hakkaart GAJ, Harmsen MM, Chua KY, Thomas WR, Aalberse RC, van Ree R. Expression of the house dust mite allergen Der p 2 in the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Clin Exp Allergy. 1998; 28:45-52. 58.Giddings G. Transgenic plants as protein factories. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2001; 12:450-454. 59.Chargelegue D, Obregon P, Drake PM. Transgenic plants for vaccine production: expectations and limitations. Trends Plant Sci. 200; 6:495-496. 60.Sojikul P, Buehner N, Manson HS. A plant signal peptide-hepatitis B surface antigen fusion protein with enhanced stability and immuogenicity expressed in plant cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003; 100:2209-2214. 61.Gao Y, Ma Y, Li M, Cheng T, Li SW, Zhang J, Xia NS. Oral immunization of animals with transgenic cherry tomatillo expressing HBsAg. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003; 9:996-1002. 62.Ma SW, Zhao DL, Yin ZQ, Mukherjee R, Shigh B, Qin HY, Stiller CR, Jevnikar AM. Transgenic plants expressing autuantigens fed to mice to induce oral immune tolerance. Nature Med. 1997; 3:793-796. 63.Avesani L, Falorni A, Tornielli GB, Marusic C, Porceddu A, Polcerari A, Faleri C, Calcinaro F, Pezzotti M. Improved in planta expression of the human islet autoantigen glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65). Transgenic Res. 2003; 12:203-212. 64.Azhar AM, Singh S, Anand KP, Bhatnager R. Expression of protective antigen in transgenic plants: a step towards edible vaccine against anthrax. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002; 299:345-351. 65.Chung Y, Choi J, Chang YS, Cho SH, Kang CY. Preventive and therapeutic effects of oral tolerance in a murine model of asthma. Immunobiol. 2002; 206:408-423. 66.Zemann B, Schwaerzler C, Griot-Wenk M, Nefzger M, Mayer P, Schneider H, de Weck A, Carballido JM, Liehl E. Oral administration of specific antigens to allergy-prone infant dogs induces IL-10 and TGF-b expression and prevents allergy in adult life. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003; 111:1069-1075. 67.Tsuji NM, Mizumachi K, Kurisaki JI. Interlukin-10-secreting Peyer’s path cells are responsible for active suppression in low-dose oral tolerance. Immunology. 2001; 103:458-464. 68.Weiner HL. The mucosal milieu creates tolerogenic dendritic cells and TR1 and TH3 regulatory cells. Nature Immunol. 2001; 2:671-672. 69.Mucida D,Kutchukhidze N, Erazo A, Russo M, Lafaille JJ, Curotto de Lafaille MA. Oral tolerance in the absence of nature occurring Tregs. J Clin Invest. 2005; 1:1-11. 70.何祥 口服Der p 2重組蛋白於小鼠氣喘模式降低呼吸道發炎之研究 碩士論文 國立台灣大學免疫學研究所 2003. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35894 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要
氣喘是目前在兒童最普遍發生的過敏疾病,在開發中及已開發國家中約有百分之十的兒童面臨此種疾病。過敏性氣喘往往伴隨著呼吸道過度反應、嗜酸性白血球在肺部的浸潤、呼吸道分泌過多黏液等症狀。口服給予某種特定抗原可以導致免疫系統對於此種抗原的不反應現象,稱之為「口服耐受性」。口服耐受性目前已知的機制是肇因於誘導T淋巴球對於特定抗原的不反應、或排除對特定抗原有免疫反應的T淋巴球、或是免疫系統活化一群調節性T淋巴球。在對於過敏性疾病的治療方面,口服耐受性的應用似乎是一種可行的方法。誘發口服耐受性需要大量口服給予蛋白質,若是用以往獲得過敏原蛋白的傳統方法,如直接從塵、植物、動物萃取過敏原蛋白而來,不但會有其他雜蛋白污染的問題,成本較為昂貴且產量低。蛋白質重組技術可以解決以上的問題。我們使用了酵母菌Pichia pastoris蛋白質表現系統,來表現主要過敏原「家塵Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus第二群過敏原」(Der p 2)。然後,以酵母菌生產的Der p 2 餵食氣喘模式的小鼠,以評估誘發口服耐受性對於治療過敏性氣喘疾病的實用性。此外, 我們也建立另一種重組蛋白系統Der p 2基因轉殖番茄植株來大量表現Der p 2 重組蛋白質。 在餵食低劑量由酵母菌生產而來的Der p 2過敏原於此過敏原致敏的小鼠動物模式中,研究發現可以降低對於Der p 2過敏原有專一性的免疫球蛋白IgE與IgG1的產生,其呼吸道過度反應的現象相對於餵食緩衝液的正對照組也較緩和。 而分析肺沖洗液的實驗中發現小鼠餵食重組Der p 2過敏原後,其呼吸道的嗜酸性白血球浸潤現象程度降低。但在全身性耐受指標方面,如脾臟細胞對於過敏原的刺激反應或是其細胞激素的分泌,並沒有明顯的差異。 總論而言,此研究顯示口服低劑量酵母菌生成的Der p 2 過敏原在小鼠氣喘模式中可誘發口服耐受性。未來,應用口服Der p 2基因轉殖番茄誘發口服耐受性以治療氣喘疾病是可以期望的。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Abstract
Asthma is one of the most common allergic diseases in children, and affects more than 10% children population in both developing and developed countries. Allergic asthma is associated with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), eosinophils infiltration and increased mucus secretion in the airway. Oral administration of antigen is a method of inducing antigen-specific unresponsiveness that is called oral tolerance. That is result of inducing antigen-specific T cells anergy or deletion or a group of antigen-specific regulatory T cells to suppress antigen-specific immune response. The induction of oral tolerance is suggested to be a possible immunotherapy for allergic diseases. A large amount of allergen is needed for oral administration to induce oral tolerance. However, the traditional method to generate a specific allergen from natural mites, plant or animal extracts is limited due to the problem of other unnecessary molecules contamination and expensive but low-yield production. Recombinant technologies can be used to prevent these problems. We hope to develop a large scale protein expression system for allergen specific immunotherapy. In the present study, we used the yeast Pichia pastoris protein expression systems for producing the major allergen, house dust mite Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus group 2 allergen (Der p 2). Then, the recombinant Der p 2 proteins derived from yeast was fed to a Der p 2-sensitized asthma murine model to investigate the application of oral tolerance induction as therapy for allergic asthma. Furthermore, we also generated a protein expression system of Der p 2-transgenic tomato plant to produce large amount of rDer p 2. In this study, oral feeding with low dose of rDer p 2 derived from yeast would decrease Der p 2-specific IgE and IgG1 titers in serum after immunization. The airway hyperresponsiveness was significantly reduced in mice fed with rDer p 2 compared to the positive control. The infiltration of eosinophils in BALF was also decreased in mice fed with rDer p 2. Those results indicated that mice fed with rDer p 2 could inhibit the local airway inflammation. However, the systemic immunological tolerance indexes, such as the proliferation and cytokine secretion upon allergen stimulation of splenocytes, did not show significant difference. Conclusively, our data suggested that oral delivery of low dose yeast-derived rDer p 2 could induce oral tolerance in a local allergic airway inflammation murine model. The application of oral delivery of Der p 2-transgenic tomato to induce oral tolerance as a new therapy for asthma diseases is prospective. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T07:47:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92450005-1.pdf: 1885693 bytes, checksum: efe8e3060c7e81ce7f49c1ae1e5abdea (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
封面 口試委員審定書 授權書 誌謝……………………………………………………………………-1- Abstract………………………………………………………………I 中文摘要………………………………………………………………III Abbreviation…………………………………………………………IV Contents………………………………………………………………V Contents of figures…………………………………………………VI Chapter I. General Introduction…………………………………1 1.1 An overview of asthma…………………………………………2 1.2 An overview of oral tolerance………………………………6 1.3 Characterization of allergen Der p 2……………………9 1.4 The expression systems of recombinant allergen………11 1.5 Aim of this study………………………………………………13 Chapter II. Materials and Methods………………………………14 2.1 Materials and reagents………………………………………15 2.2 Methods……………………………………………………………24 Chapter III. Results………………………………………………36 3.1 Expression of recombinant Der p 2 protein in yeast…37 3.2 Generation of Der p 2-transgenic tomato and total protein analysis……………………………………………………37 3.3 Establishment of rDer p 2-induced murine model of asthma…………………………………………………………………38 3.4 Oral tolerance induction with rDer p 2 in murine model of asthma………………………………………………………………41 Chapter IV. Discussion……………………………………………44 Figures…………………………………………………………………49 References……………………………………………………………68 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 氣喘 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家塵過敏原 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 口服耐受性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Der p 2 allergen | en |
| dc.subject | oral tolerance | en |
| dc.subject | asthma | en |
| dc.title | 在小鼠氣喘模式中以口服給予Der p 2過敏原誘導抗原特異之耐受性 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Induction of antigen-specific tolerance by oral administration of Der p 2 allergen in a murine model of asthma | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭石通,吳文勉 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 氣喘,口服耐受性,家塵過敏原, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | asthma,oral tolerance,Der p 2 allergen, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 76 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 醫學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 口腔生物科學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 口腔生物科學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.84 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
