請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35450完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 葉怡玉(Yei-Yu Yeh) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Ying Yang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 楊婷媖 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:53:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-08-02 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Awh, E., Serences, J., Laurey, P., Dhaliwal, H., van der Jagt, T., & Dassonville, P. (2004). Evidence against a central bottleneck during the attentional blink: Multiple channels for configural and featural processing. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 95-126.
Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon Press. Broadbent, D. E., & Broadbent, M. H. P. (1987). From detection to identification: Response to multiple targets in rapid serial visual presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 105-113. Bundesen, C. (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 97, 523-547. Carrier, L. M., & Pashler, H. (1995). Attentional limits in memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1339-1348. Cavanagh, J. P., & Chase, W. G. (1971). The equivalence of target and nontarget processing in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 493-495. Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127. Corballis, M. C., Roldan, C. E., & Zbrodoff, J. (1974). Response set effects in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 2, 501-508. Cowan, N. (2001) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87-114. Davis, R. (1959). The role of “attention” in the psychological refractory period. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 211-220. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-989. Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource limitation or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191-200. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458. Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended cisual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139. Eriksen, C. W., & Hoffman, J. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding form visual displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 155-160. Fagot, C., & Pashler, H. (1995). Repetition blindness: Perception or memory failure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 275-292. Giesbrecht, B., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Visual masking during the attentional blink: Tests of the object substitution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 238-258. Giesbrecht, B., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2004). Seeing the light: Adapting luminance reveals low-level visual processes in the attentional blink. Brain and Cognition, 55, 307-309 Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454-1466. Isaak, M. I., Shapiro, K. L., & Martin, J. (1999). The attentional blink reflects retrieval competition among multiple rapid serial visual presentation items: Tests of an interference model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1774-1792. Jolicœur, P. (1999a). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616. Jolicœur, P. (1999b). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1091-1113. Jolicœur, P., & Dell’Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attentional and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Lawrence, D. H. (1971). Two studies of visual search for word targets with controlled rates of presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 558-564. Loach, D., & Mari-Beffa, P. (2003). Post-target inhibition: A temporal binding mechanism? Visual Cognition, 10, 513-526. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281. Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 382, 616-618. Maki, W. S., Couture, T., Frigen, K., & Lien, D. (1997). Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: Perceptual interference and retrieval competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1393-1411. Maki, W. S., Frigen, K., & Paulson, K. (1997). Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1014-1034. Martens, S., & Johnson, A. (2005). Timing attention: Cuing target onset interval attenuates the attentional blink. Memory & Cognition, 33, 234-240. Martens, S., Wolters, G., & van Raamsdonk, M. (2002). Blinks of the mind: Memory effects of attentional processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1275-1287. McCann, R., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). The locus of the single-channel bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-485. Mohs, R. C., & Atkinson, R. C. (1974). Recognition time for words in short-term, long-term or both memory stores. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 830-835 Moray, N. (1967). Where is attention limited? A survey and a model. Acta Psychologica, 27, 84-92. Palmer, J. (1994). Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks. Vision Research, 34, 1703-1721. Palmer, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123. Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358-377. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25. Potter, M. C. (1975). Meaning in visual search. Science, 187, 965-966. Potter, M. C., Chun, M. M., Banks, B. S., & Muckenhoupt, M. (1998). Two attentional deficits in serial target search: The visual attentional blink and an amodal task-switch deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 979-992. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 849-860. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1995). Similarity determines the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 653-662. Reeves, A., & Sperling, G. (1986). Attention gating in short-term visual memory. Psychological Review, 93, 180-206. Ruthruff, E., Miller, J., & Lachmann, T. (1995). Does mental rotation require central mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 552-570. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002a). E-Prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002b). E-Prime reference guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84,1-66. Shapiro, K. L., Driver, J., Ward, R., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Priming from the attentional blink: A failure to extract visual tokens but not visual types. Psychological Science, 8, 95-100. Shapiro, K. L., Raymond, J. E., & Arnell, K. M. (1994). Attentional to visual pattern information produces the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357-371. Smith, M. (1967). Theories of the psychological refractory period. Psychological Bulletin, 67, 202-213. Smith, M. C., & Fabri, P. (1975). Post-cueing after erasure of the icon: Is there a set effect? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 63-72. Sperling, G., Budiansky, J., Spivak, J. G., & Johnson, M. C. (1971). Extremely rapid visual search: The maximum rate of scanning letters for the presence of a numeral. Science, 174, 304-311. Telford, C. W. (1931). The refractory phase of voluntary and associative responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 14, 1-35. Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136. Van Selst, M., & Jolicœur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905-921. Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (1999). Attentional switching in spatial and nonspatial domains: Evidence form the attentional blink. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 458-469. Vogel, E. K., Luck, S. J., & Shapiro, K. L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674. Ward, R., Duncan, J., & Shapiro, K. (1996). The slow time-course of visual attention. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 79-109. Weichselgartner, E., & Sperling, G. (1987). Dynamics of automatic and controlled visual attention. Science, 238, 778-780. Wichens, D. D., Moody, M. J., & Vidulich, M. (1985). Retrieval time as a function of memory set size, type of probes, and interference in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 154-164. Wickens, C. D. (1984). Processing resources in attention. In R. Parasuraman & D. R. Davies (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 63-102). London: Academic Press. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integrationi model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419-433. Wong, K. F. E. (2002). The relationship between attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 54-71. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35450 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在必須對兩目標物辨識及報告時，當兩目標物的時間間距為兩百至五百毫秒，對第一目標物的正確反應會影響到對第二目標物的反應，此一現象稱之為注意力瞬盲。有許多模型企圖對此現象提出解釋。在本研究中，垂直操弄目標物的可能數量，以釐清各不同模型。實驗一的結果顯示當第一目標物與第二目標物均來自較少的可能性時，會減輕注意力瞬盲的現象。在實驗二中，藉由直接告訴受試者可能的目標物來進一步降低在可能性少時的注意力需求量。結果顯示當兩目標物均來自較少的可能性時，注意力瞬盲現象消失。實驗三則要求受試者對第一目標物做快速的按鍵反應以增加注意力需求量，結果在所有情況中均有注意力瞬盲現象出現。現有模式均無法解釋本研究之結果，注意力瞬盲現象有待未來研究提供解釋。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | When two targets are to be identified and reported, the performance of the second target (T2) is deficient when it occurs 200-500 msec after the first target (T1), and it is called the attentional blink (AB). Several models have been proposed to account for this phenomenon. To test these different models, the number of possible targets was orthogonally manipulated. The results from Experiment 1 showed attenuation in the AB magnitude when both T1 and T2 came from a small set size (SS). The attentional demand was reduced in the small set-size condition by giving instructions of possible targets in Experiment 2, and no AB was found. An immediate response to T1 was added to increase the attentional demand in Experiment 3, where AB was found in the SS condition. None of the existing models could explain the results. Further studies are needed to understand the AB phenomenon. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:53:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92227008-1.pdf: 347430 bytes, checksum: e6586892b2bbaebf77492f2817628cfc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Introduction 1
Experiment 1 23 Method 23 Results 26 Discussion 30 Experiment 2 32 Method 32 Results 33 Discussion 35 Experiment 3 37 Method 37 Results 38 Discussion 41 General Discussion 42 References 51 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 目標物可能數量 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 注意力瞬盲 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | attentional blink | en |
| dc.subject | number of possible targets | en |
| dc.title | 目標物數量對注意力瞬盲之調控 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Number of Possible Targets Modulates the Attentional Blink | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃金蘭(Chin-Lan Huang),汪曼穎 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 注意力瞬盲,目標物可能數量, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | attentional blink,number of possible targets, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 59 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 339.29 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。