請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35447完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 許圳塗(Chou-Tou Shii) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Po-Wen Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳柏文 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:53:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 沈再木、傅仰人、葉德銘、張維斌. 2004. 台灣盆花產業之回顧與展望. 台灣花卉園藝之回顧與展望研討會. 台灣花卉園藝. 200:102-117.
阮育雄. 2003. 鳳梨花外銷大陸之潛力與策略. 台灣花卉園藝. 198:16-19. 呂政璋. 2001. 三倍體香蕉cv. Raja 胚性細胞極化與非極化生長之調控與質量化體胚生產. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 李淑真. 1997. 百香果胚乳組織培養不定芽及體胚誘導之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 邱金春. 1991. 觀賞鳳梨組織培養繁殖褐化問題解決之道. 台灣省農業試驗所技術服務. 5:10-12. 周邵蓮. 1989. 蜻蜓鳳梨的組織培養. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 馬溯軒和王淑娥. 1977. 鳳梨之組織培養繁殖.中國園藝. 23:107-113. 郭俊緯. 2003. 香蕉體胚衍生胚性細胞懸浮培養、胚性細胞極性誘導與體胚發生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 陳鴻吉. 2002. 觀賞鳳梨RAPD遺傳親緣性分析及擎天屬龍鳳品種之細胞培養與體胚再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 章錦瑜. 1999. 最新室內觀賞植物. 淑馨出版社. 台灣台北. p95-125. 張麗慧. 2003. 玉扇鳳梨(Tillandsia cyanea)及擎天屬(Guzmania cv. Cherry)觀賞鳳梨花器衍生癒合組織細胞懸浮培養與再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 黃怡菁. 1994. 香蕉細胞懸浮培養及原生質體培養體胚誘導研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文. 黃學林和李筱菊. 2000. 植物體細胞胚胎發生. 科學農業. 48:120-127. 楊晴惠. 1999. 觀賞鳳梨組織培養不定芽再生之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 劉信良. 2000. 流蘇細胞懸浮培養生長發育及其pH變化之特性. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. 蔡淑華. 1973. 植物組織切片技術綱要. 茂昌股份有限公司. 台北. pp. 72. 鍾仁彬和許圳塗. 1995. 甘藍組織培養不定芽發生及再生模式. 中國園藝. 41:261-278. 鍾仁彬. 2001.香蕉胚性細胞懸浮培養胞外pH變化與極化非極化生長調控及縐折生物反應器機能之探討. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文. 羅靜琪. 2004. 流蘇幼花衍生胚性細胞懸浮培養及體胚發生誘導. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文. Ammirato, P. V. 1984. Induction, maintenance, and manipulation of development in embryogenic cell suspension cultures. In: Vasil, I. K. (ed). Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants. Vol. I. Academic Press, Inc. London. p. 139-151. Firoozabady, E. and N. Gutterson. 2003. Cost-effective in vitro propagation methods for pineapple. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 844-850. Brandau, K., W. Preil, and R. Lieberei. 1997. Differences in compounds released by embryogenic and non-embryogenic suspension cultures of Euphorbia pulcherrima . Bio. Planta. 39:113-124. Carneiro, L.A., R. F. G. Araujo, G. J. M. Brito, M. H. P. B. Fonseca, A. Costa, O. J. Crocomo and E. Mansur. 1999. In vitro regeneration from leaf explants of Neoregelia cruenta (R. Graham) L. B. Smith, an endemic bromeliad from eastern Brazil. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 55:79-83. Charriere, F., B. Sotta, E. Miginiac, and G. Hahne. 1999. Induction of adventitious or somatic embryoson in vitro cultured zygoticembryos of Helianthus annuus:Variation of endogenous hormone levels. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 37:751-757. Corre, F., Y. Henry, A. Rode, and C. Hartmann. 1996. Em gene expression during somatic embryogenesis in the monocot Triticum aestivum L. Plant Sci. 117:139-149. Emons, A. M. C., W. V. J. Vos, and H. Kieft. 1992. A freeze fracture analysis of the surface of embryogenic and non-embryogenic suspension cells of Daucus carota. Plant Sci. 87:5-97. Escalona, M., G. Samson, C. Borroto, and Y. Desjardins. 2003. Physiology of effects of temporary immersion bioreactors on micropropagated pineapple plantlets. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. –Plant. 39:651-656. Fei, S., P. E. Read, and T. P. Riordan. 2000. Improvement of embryogenic callus induction and shoot regeneration of buffalograss by silver nitrate. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 60:197-203. Finer, J. J. 1994. Plant regeneration via embryogenic suspension culture. In: Dixon, R. A. Gonzales. (eds) Plant Cell Culture: A Practical Approach. second edition. Oxford, New York, pp. 99-125. Firoozabady, E. and N. Gutterson. 2003. Cost-effective in vitro propagation methods for pineapple. Plant Cell Rep. 21: 844-850. Hosoki, T. and T. Asahira. 1980. In vitro propagation of Bromeliads in liquid culture. HortSci. 15: 603-604. Jime´nez, V. M. and F. Bangerth. 2001. Hormonal status of maize initial explants and of the embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus cultures derived from them as related to morphogenesis in vitro. Plant Sci. 160:247-257. Kenza, L. and C. Hassan. 1998. Vegetative multiplication of date palms from in vitro cultured inflorescences: effect of some growth regulator combinations and organogenetic potential of various. Agronomie. 18:573-580. Kikushi, A. K., S. Satoh, N. Nakamura, and T. Fujii.1995. Differences in pectic polysaccharides between carrot embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli. Plant Cell Rep. 14:279-284. Kimberly, A. P., J. M. Affolter, and H. Y. Wetzstein. 2003. Enhanced seed germination and seedling growth of Tillandsia Eizii in vitro. HortSci. 38:101-104. Li, L. and R. Qu. 2002. In vitro somatic embryogenesis in turf-type bermudagrass: roles of abscisic acid and gibberellic acid, and occurrence of secondary somatic embryogenesis. Plant Breed. 121:155-158. Mekers, O. 1977. In vitro propagation of some Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae). Acta Hort. 78: 311-320. Mekers, O. and J. G. Van Onsem. 1983. In vitro propagation of Vriesea cultivars in comparison with other ornamental Bromeliaceae. Acta Hort. 131: 125-130. Merecr, H. and G. B. Kerbauy. 1992. In vitro Multiplication of Vriesea fosteriana. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 30: 247-249. Neeta, D. S., L. George, and E. Susan. 2000. Direct regeneration of shoots from immature inflorescence cultures of turmeric. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 62:235-238. Petersen, K. K., J. Hansen, and P. Krogstrup. 1999. Significance of different carbon sources and sterilization methods on callus induction and plant regeneration of Miscanthus x ogiformis Honda 'Giganteus'. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 58: 189-197. Pintos, B., J. P. Martin, M. L. Centeno, N. Villalobos, H. Guera, and L. Martin. 2002. Endogenous cytokinin levels in embryogenic and non-embryogenic calli of Medicago arborea L. Plant Sci. 163:955-960. Sasaki, K. K. Shimomura, K. Hiroshi, and H. Harada. 1994. IAA metabolism in embryogenic and non-embryogenic carrot cells. Plant Cell Physiol. 35:1159-1164. Shizuka, O. and S. Satowaki. 1998. The effects of inorganic salts and growth regulators on in vitro shoot proliferation and leaf chlorophyll content of Delphinium cardinale. Sci. Hort. 81:149-158. Smith, D. L. and A. D. Krikorian. 1990. Low external pH replaces 2,4-D in maintaining and multiplying 2,4-D-initiated embryogenic cells of carrot. Physiol. Plant. 80: 329-336. Stirn, S., A. P. Mordhorst, S. Fuchs, and H. Lorz, 1995. Molecular and biochemical potential and regenerative capacity of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cell cultures. Plant Sci. 106:195-206. Teixeira, J. B., M. R. Sondahl, and E. G. Kirby. 1994. Somatic embryogenesis from immature inflorescences of oil palm. Plant Cell Rep. 13:247-250. Teng, W. L. 1997. An alternative propagation method of Ananas through nodule culture. Plant Cell Rep. 16:454-457 Thomas, C., D. Meyer, C. Himber, and A. Steinmetz. 2004. Spatial expression of sunflower SERK gene during induction of somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis. Plant physiol. biochem. 42:35-42. Torello, W. A., R. Rufner, and A. G. Symington. 1985. The ontogeny of embryo from long-term callus cultures of red fescue. HortSci. 21:938-942. Von Arnold, S, I. Sabala, P. Bonzhkov, J. Dyachok, and L. Filonova. 2002. Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 69:233-249. Verdeil, J. L., C. Huet, F. Grosdemange, and J. Buffard-Morel. 1994. Plant regeneration from cultured immature inflorescences of coconut (Cocos nucifera L.): evidence for somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Rep. 13:218-221. Von Arnold, S., I. Sabala, P. Bonzhkov, J. Dyachok, and L. Filonova. 2002. Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tiss. Organ Cult. 69:233-249. Wilson, K. J., W. Stillwell, T. Maxam, and K. T. Baldridge. 1991. Membrane fluidity changes in embryogenic and non-embryogenic cultures of Asclepias and Daucus in response to auxin removal. Physiol. Planta. 82: 633-639. Zimmer, K. and W. Pieper. 1976. Method and problems of clonal propagation of bromeliads in vitro. Acta Hort. 64: 25-29. Ziv, M. and H. Linnen-Kipnis. 2000. Bud regeneration from inflorescence explants for rapid propagation of geophytes in vitro. Plant Cell Rep. 19:845-850. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35447 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 紅羽鶯歌鳳梨(Vriesea erecta)吸芽的莖頂分切以及幼葉培養,接種於1/2 MS培養基添加NAA 1.0 mg/L + TDZ 1.0mg/L,兩個月後分別可由葉腋及葉基誘導出多量的不定芽,但芽體叢生不易抽長,需分切並移至含有NAA 0.5 mg/L的培養基以助芽體生長與不定根形成。
以牡丹彩葉鳳梨(Neoregelia cv. Peony)之花序作為培植體誘導不定芽,於2個月後有不定芽體的再生,移至1/2 MS添加NAA 1.0 mg/L + 2ip 1.0 mg/L的培養基中進行芽體的增殖,在一年內可再生小植株並達出瓶階段。紅羽鶯歌鳳梨與牡丹彩葉鳳梨之花器培植體,培養於1/2 MS添加2,4-D的培養基,於2 ~ 3個月可誘導粒狀癒合組織發生。紅羽鶯歌鳳梨誘導發生率較低,僅花托與花藥分別有6.6與20%的發生率;牡丹彩葉鳳梨以子房與花柱誘導發生率較高,分別為71.4%與60%。 玉扇空氣鳳梨(Tillandsia cyanea)葉片液體培養以1/2 MS培養基添加NAA 0.1 mg/L + BA 0. 1 mg/L效果較好,在3週後由葉片基部產生芽體,每1小植株8 ~ 10葉片可誘導出3.2個芽體。 玉扇空氣鳳梨之芽體健化以添加IAA 0.2 ~ 2.0 mg/L有較高的發根率,而添加NAA會造成毒害。牡丹彩葉鳳梨則以添加NAA 1.0 mg/L有較好的健化及發根效果,在移出溫室後的存活率可達100%。 以玉扇空氣鳳梨之胚狀體進行細胞懸浮培養,以MS為基礎培養基添加2,4-D 1.5 mg/L,在3 ~ 4個月後可得到均質的細胞系。每繼代週期內細胞增生量約為原來之1倍,提高蔗糖濃度到9.0%,對於細胞生長相沒有影響,但可能不利胚性細胞的釋放。取30 ~ 60目大小之細胞團,於含有NAA 0.2 mg/L、2ip 0.2 mg/L、kinetin 0.1 mg/L、zeatin 0.05 mg/L及ABA 0.1 mg/L的MS培養基,2個月可觀察到體胚的再生,然而體胚發生模式為間接體胚再生,尚未能同步化與個別化 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The compressed shoot tip and young leaf from suckers of Vriesea erecta were excised as explants. The regeneration medium used was 1/2 MS supplemented with NAA 1.0 mg/L + TDZ 1.0 mg/L, showing high efficiency in stimulation of caulogenesis. Numerously adventitious buds appeared in the leaf axil and the base of leaf explants, but the cluster buds sprouting was restricted. Better growth could be approached by transferring the adventitious buds to medium supplemented with NAA 0.5 mg/L after separation.
Adventitious buds were obtained 2 months after excising inflorescence of Neoergelia cv. Peony as explants;those buds were then transferred to 1/2 MS supplemented with NAA 1.0 mg/L + 2ip 1.0 mg/L for multiplication. Regeneration of Neoergelia cv. Peony via inflorescence tip culture from one stock plant can provide mass plantlets transfer to greenhouse in one year. The florets of Vriesea erecta and Neoregelia cv. Peony were excised as explants and inoculated on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D. The granular calli could be induced after 2 ~ 3 months of culture. However, the frequency of callogenesis of Vriesea erecta was low, only 6.6% and 20% in anther and receptacle explants. The frequency were 71.4% and 60% in ovary and style explants of Neoregelia cv. Peony. The leaves of Tillandsia cyanea were separated from the base of plantet for liquid culture. The axillary buds were sprouting from leaf basal after 3 weeks of culture. The treatment of 1/2 MS supplemented with NAA 0.1 mg/L + BA 0. 1 mg/L has better result, an average of 3.2 buds was obtained from each plantlet with 8 ~ 10 leaves. For Tillandsia cyanea, a medium supplemented with IAA 0.2 ~ 2.0 mg/L was suitable of root development, while NAA was toxic. Neoregelia cv. Peony showed better response to NAA 1.0 mg/L, high concentration could enhance growth in plantlets. The survival in exvitro transplant of the plantlets approached to 100% in greenhouse. Embryoids were used as initiative material for cell suspension of Tillandsia cyanea .The medium was MS supplemented with 2,4-D 1.5 mg/L, which achieved homogenous cell clusters after 3 ~ 4 months of culture. The PCV(Packed cell volume)doubled during one subculture period. High sucrose concentration up to 9.0% did not change the cell line type, but inhibited the releasing of embryogenic cell. Two months after plating suspension cells by 30 ~ 60 mesh scale on MS supplemented with NAA 0.2 mg/L、2ip 0.2 mg/L、kinetin 0.1 mg/L、zeatin 0.05 mg/L and ABA 0.1 mg/L, somatic embryos were developed via indirect somatic embryogenesis, but not synchronized and individualized. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:53:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R92628121-1.pdf: 2372654 bytes, checksum: 8c2b11009032a8f27ec4faf6499a1f0c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 前言(Introduction)…………………………………………………………1
前人研究(Literature Review)……………………………………………3 一、觀賞鳳梨之微體繁殖……………………………………………………3 (一)胚體組織…………………………………………………………3 (二)營養組織……………………………………………………………4 (三)生殖組織………………………………………………………5 二、植物體胚發生……………………………………………………7 (一)體胚發生………………………………………………………7 (二)胚性潛力………………………………………………………7 (三)極性建立………………………………………………………8 材料與方法(Material and Methods)……………………………………10 一、不定芽與癒合組織誘導…………………………………………………10 (一)吸芽莖頂與幼葉培養…………………………………………10 (二)花序培養………………………………………………………11 1. 不定芽誘導………………………………………………11 2. 癒合組織誘導……………………………………………12 (三)間接不定芽誘導………………………………………………12 (四)次生培植體芽體增殖…………………………………………12 (五)芽體健化與發根………………………………………………13 (六)苗體馴化及移植………………………………………………13 二、細胞懸浮培養…………………………………………………………14 (一)懸浮系統建立…………………………………………………14 (二)蔗糖濃度處理………………………………………………14 (三)細胞團分級與平板培養………………………………………15 (四)體胚發育及切片解剖形態觀察………………………………15 結果(Results)………………………………………………………………16 一、不定芽與癒合組織誘導………………………………………………16 (一)吸芽莖頂與幼葉培養…………………………………………16 (二)花序培養………………………………………………………16 1. 不定芽誘導…………………………………………….16 2. 癒合組織誘導…………………………………………17 (三)間接不定芽誘導………………………………………………18 (四)次生培植體芽體增殖…………………………………………19 (五)芽體健化與發根………………………………………………19 (六)苗體馴化及移植………………………………………………20 二、細胞懸浮培養…………………………………………………………21 (一)懸浮系統建立…………………………………………………21 (二)蔗糖濃度處理…………………………………………………21 (三)細胞團分級與平板培養………………………………………22 討論(Discussion)…………………………………………………………49 一、莖頂與葉片培養之影響因子…………………………………………49 二、花器培養誘導逆分化、再分化之探討…………………………………51 三、次生培植體芽體增殖…………………………………………………52 四、芽體健化與植株建立…………………………………………………53 五、懸浮細胞培養與平板再生體胚………………………………………54 中文摘要(Summary)……………………………………………………56 英文摘要(Summary)……………………………………………………57 參考文獻(Reference)……………………………………………………59 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 器官發生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 觀賞鳳梨 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 組織培養 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 體胚發生 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | somatic embryogenesis | en |
| dc.subject | tissue culture | en |
| dc.subject | ornamental bromeliad | en |
| dc.subject | organogenesis | en |
| dc.title | 彩葉屬(Neoregelia)、鶯歌屬(Vriesea)及空氣屬(Tillandsia)觀賞鳳梨組織培養器官發生與體胚發生之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Organogenesis and Somatic Embryogenesis in Tissue Culture of Ornamental Bromeliads of Neoregelia, Vriesea and Tillandsia | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張唯勤(Wei-Chin Chang),張耀乾(Yao-Chien Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 觀賞鳳梨,組織培養,器官發生,體胚發生, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | ornamental bromeliad,tissue culture,organogenesis,somatic embryogenesis, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 64 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.32 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
