請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35388完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 丁宗蘇(Tzung-Su Ding) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-June Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 何麗君 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:50:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2005-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2005-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2005-07-28 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allen, C. R., Pearlstine, L. G., Wojcik, D. P., Kitchens, W. M., 2001. The spatial distribution of diversity between disparate taxa: Spatial correspondence between mammals and ants across south Florida, USA. Landscape Ecology 16, 453-464.
Andersen, A. N., 1995. Measuring more of biodiversity: geneus richness as a surrogate for species richness in Australian ant faunas. Biological Conservation 73, 39-43. Awad, A. A., Griffiths, C. L., Turpie, J. K., 2002. Distribution of South African marine benthic invertebrates applied to the selection of priority conservation areas. Diversity and Distribution 8, 129-145. Balmford, A., Lyon, A. J. E., Lang, R. M., 2000. Testing the higher-taxon approach to conservation planning in a megadiversity group: the macrofungi. Biological Conservation 93,209-217. Benayas, T. M. R., de la Montaña, E., 2003. Identifying area of high-vaule vertebrate diversity for strengthening conservation. Biological Conservation 114, 357-370. Bonn, A., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Gaston, K. J., 2002. Threatened and endemic species: are they good indicators of patterns of biodiversity on a national scales? Ecology Letters 5, 733-741. Bonn, A., Gaston, K. J., 2005. Capturing biodiversity: selecting priority areas for conservation using different criteria. Biodiversity and Conservation 14, 1083-1100. Brummitt, N., Lughadha, E. N., 2003. Biodiversity: where’s hot and where’s not. Conservation Biology 17, 1442-1448. Cabeza, M., Moilanen, A., 2001. Design of reserve network and the persistence of biodiversity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 242-248. Ceballos, G., Rodríguez, P., Medellín, R. A., 1998. Assessing conservation priorities in megadiverse Mexico: mammalian diversity, endemicity, and endangerment. Ecological Applications 8, 8-17. Cincotta, R. P., Wisnewski, J., Engelman, R., 2000. Human population in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404, 990-992. Cleary, D. F. R., 2004. Assessing the Use of butterflies as indicators of logging in Borneo at three taxonomic levels. Journal of Economic Entomology 97, 429-435. Cowling, R. M., Pressey, R. L., Rouget, M., Lombard, A. T., 2003. A conservation plan for a global biodiversity hotspot - the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Biological Conservation 112, 191-216. Curnutt, J., Lockwood, J., Lue, H.-K., Nott, P., Russell, G., 1994. Hotspots and species diversity. Nature 367, 326-327. Ding, T. S., 2001. Species Diversity at Different Spatial Scales: Birds in Yushan, Taiwan, and East Asia. Ph. D. Dissertation. University of California, Davis. USA. Dobson, A. P., Rodriguez, J. P., Robert, W. M., Wilcove, D. S., 1997. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550-553. Eeley, H. A. C., Lawes, M. J., Reyers, B., 2001. Priority areas for the conservation of subtropical indigenous forest in southern Africa: a case study from KwaZulu-Natal. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 1221-1246. Fragan, W. F., Kareiva, P. M., 1997. Using compiled species lists to make biodiversity comparisons among region: a test case using Oregon butterflies. Biological Conservation 80, 249-259. Faith, D. P., Walker, P. P. A., 1996, How do indicator groups provide information about the relative biodiversity of different sets of area? On Hotspots, complementarity and pattern-based approaches. Biodiversity Letters 3, 18-25. Fjeldsa, J., 2000. The relevance of ecosystem in choosing priority areas for global conservation. Environmental Conservation 27, 67-75. Franklin, J. F., 1993. Preserving biodiversity—species ecosystem or landscapes? Ecological Applications 3, 202-205. Fuller, R. M., Wyatt, B. K., Barr, C. J., 1998. Countryside survey from ground and space: different perspectives, complementary result. Journal of Environmental Management 54, 101-126. Fox, J. N., Beckley, L. E.,2005. Priority areas for conservation of Western Australian coastal fishes: A comparison of hotspot, biogeographical and complementarity approaches. Biological Conservation 125, 399-410. Gärdenfors, U., 2001. Classifying threatened species at national versus global levels. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16, 511-516. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., 1995. Mapping biodiversity using surroga1tes for species richness: macro scales and New World birds. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 262, 335-341. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., 1996. The spatial distribution of threatened species: macro-scale and New World birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 236, 235-240. Gaston, K. J., Blackburn, T. M., 2000. Patteren and Process in macroecology. Great Britain, Blackwell Science, Oxford. Gjerde, I., Sætersdal, M., Rolstad, J., Bolm, H.H., Storaunet, K. O., 2004. Fine-scale diversity and rarity hotspots in northern forests. Conservation Biology 18, 1032-1042. Griffin, P. C., 1999. Endangered species diversity ‘hot spots’ in Russia and centers of endemism. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 497-511. Harcourt, A. H. 2000. Coincidence and mismatch of biodiversity hotspots: a global survey for the order, primates. Biological Conservation 93, 163-175. Heaney, L. R., 1986. biogeography of mammals in SE Asia: estimation rate of colonization, extinction and speciation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 28, 127-165. Hobohm, C., 2003. Characterization and ranking of biodiversity hotspots: centers of species richness and endemism. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 279-287. Howard, P. C., Viskanic, P., Davenport, T. R. B., Kigenyi, E. W., Baltzer, M., Dickinson, C. J., Lwanga, J. S., Matthew, R. A., Balmford, A., 1998. Complementary and the use of indicator group for reserve selection in Uganda. Nature 394, 472-45. Humphries, C. J., Williams, P. H., Vane-Wright, R. I., 1995. Measuring biodiversity value for conservation. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 26, 93-111. Humphries, C. J., 2001. Hotspots: going off the boil? Diversity and Distribution 7, 104-105. Jaffre, T., Bouchet, P., Veillon, J., 1998. Threatened plants of New Caledonia: Is system of protected areas adequate? Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 109-135. Joly, K., Myers, W. L., 2001. Patterns of mammalian species richness and habitat associations in Pennsylvania. Biological Conservation 99, 253-260. Kati, V., Devillers, P., Dufrêne, M., Legakis, A., Despina, V., Lebruin, P., 2004. Hotspots, complementarity or representativeness? Designing optimal small-scale reserves for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation 120, 471-480. Kerr, J.T., 1997. Species richness, endemism and the choice of areas for conservation. Conservation Biology 11, 1094-1100. Kerr, J. T., Packer, L., 1997. Habitat heterogeneity as a determinant of mammal species richness in high-energy regions. Nature 385, 252-254. Kress, W. J., Heyer, W. R., Acevedo, P., Coddington, J., Cole, D., Erwin, T. L., Meggers, B. J., Pogue, M., Thorington, R. W., Vari, R. P., Weitzman, M. J., Weitzman, S. H., 1998. Amazonian biodiversity: assessing conservation priorities with taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1577-1587. Krupnick, G. A., Kress, W. J, 2003. Hotspots and ecoregions: a test of conservation priorities using taxonomic data. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 2237-2253. Kunin, W. E., 1997. Sample shape, spatial scale and species counts: implications for reserve design. Biological Conservation 82, 369-377. la Ferla, B., Taplin, J., Ockwell, D., Lovett, J. C., 2002. Continental scale patterns of biodiversity: can higher taxa accurately predict African plant distributions? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 138, 225-235. Lawton, J. H., Bignell, D. E., Bolton, B., Bloemers, G. F., Cggleton, P., Hammond, P. M., Hodda, M., Holt, R. D., Larsen, T. B., Mawdsley, N. A., Stork, N. E., Srivastava, D. S., Watt, A. D., 1998. Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391, 72-76. Levin, S. A., 1992. The problem of patteren and scale in ecology. Ecology 73, 1943-1967. Lombard, A.T., 1995. The problems with multi-species conservation:do hotspots, ideal reserves and existing reserves coincide? South African Journal of Zoology 30, 145–163. Lund, M. P., Rahbek, C., 2002. Cross-taxa congruence in complementarity and conservation of temperate biodiversity. Animal Conservation 5, 163-171. MacArthur, R. H., Wilson, E. O., 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press. Mace, G.. M., Balmford , A., Boitani, L., Cowlishaw, G., Dobson, A. P., Faith, D. P., Gaston, K. J., Humphries, C. J., Vane-Wright, R. I., Williams, P. H., Lawton, J.H., Margules, C.R., May, R.M., Nicholls, A.O., Possingham, H.P., Rahbek, C., van Jaarsveld, A.S., 2000. It's time to work together and stop duplicating conservation efforts. Nature 405, 393-393. Margules, C. R., Pressey, R. L., 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243-253. May, R. M., 1988. How many species are there on earth. Science 241, 1441-1449. Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N., Thomsen, J.B., 1998. Biodiversity hotspots and major tropical wilderness areas: approaches to setting conservation priorities. Conservation Biology 12, 516-520. Monroe, B. L., Sibley, C. G.., 1993. A World Checklist of Birds. Yale Univ. Press. New Heaven. Muriuki, J. N., de Klerk, H. M., Bennun, L. A., Corowe, T. N., vanden Berge, E., 1997. Using patterns of distribution and diversity of Kenyan birds to select and prioritize areas for conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 6, 191-210. Myers, N., 1988. Threatened biotas: “ Hotspots ” in tropical forests. Environment 8, 1-20. Myers, N., 1990. The biodiversity challenge: expanded hotspots analysis. Environment 10, 243-256. Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Gustavo, A. B., da Donseca, Kent, J., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853-858. Norris, K., Pain, D. J., 2002. Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles and their Application. Cambridge Univ. Press. Noss, R. F., 1987. From plant communities to landscape in conservation inventories: A look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation 41, 11-37. Ojeda, R. A., Stadler, J., Brandl, R., 2003. Diversity of mammals in tropical-temperate Neotropics: hotspots on a regional scale. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 1431-1444. Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Powell, G. V. N., Wikramanayake, E. D., 2002. Conservation biology for the biodiversity crisis. Conservation Biology 16, 1-3. Park, S. A., Harcourt, A. H., 2002. Reserve size, local human density, and mammalian extinctions in US protected areas. Conservation Biology 16, 800-808. Pearson, D. L., Cassola, F., 1992. World-wide species richness patterns of Tiger Beetles (Coleopteran: Cicindelidae): indicator taxon for Biodiversity and conservation studies. Conservation Biology 6, 376-391. Peterson, A. T., Egbert, S. L., Sanchez-Cordero, V., Price, K. P., 2000. Geographic analysis of conservation priority: endemic bird and mammals in Veracruz, Mexico. Biological Conservation 93, 85-94. Poiani, K.A., Richter, B.D., Anderson, M.G., Richter, H.E., 2000. Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: functional sites, landscapes, and networks. BioScience 50, 133-146. Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., Solow, A. R., Csuti, B., White, D., Ding, R., 2000. Choosing reserve networks with incomplete species information. Biological Conservation 94, 1-10. Prendergast, J. K., Quinn, R. M., Lawton, J. H. Eversham, B. C., Gibbons, D. W., 1993. Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategies. Nature 365, 335-337. Reyers, B., van Jaarsveld, A.S., Krüger, M., 2000. Complementarity as a biodiversity indicator strategy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 267, 505–513. Reid, W. V., 1998. Biodiversity hotspots. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13, 275-280. Rosenzweig, M. L., 1996. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. Rouget, M., 2003. Measuring conservation value at fine and broad scales: implications for a diverse and fragmented region, the Agulhas Plain. Biological Conservation 112, 217-232. Samson, F. B., Konpf, F. L., 1993. Mapping biological diversity. Wildlife Society Bulletin 21, 509-514. Sauberer, N., Zulka, K.P, Abensperg-Traun, M., Berg, H. M., Bieringer, G., Milasowszky, N., Moser, D., Plutzar, C., Pollheimer, M., Storch, C., Trostl, R., Zechmeister, H., Grabherr, G.., 2000. Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biological Conservation 117, 181-190. Shafer, C. L., 2001. Inter-reserve distance. Biological Conservation 100, 215-227. Shmida, A., Wilson, M. V., 1985. Biological determinants of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography 12, 1-21. Sfenthourakis, S., Legakis, A., 2001. Hotspots of endemic terrestrial invertebrates in southern Greece. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 1387-1417. Sluys, R., 1999. Global diversity of land planarians （Platyhelminthes, Tricladida, Terricola）: a new indicator-taxon in biodiversity and conservation studies. Biodiversity and Conservation 8, 1663-1681. Stockwell, D., Peterson, A. T., 2003. Comparison of resolution of methods used in mapping biodiversity patterns from point-occurrence data. Ecological Indicators 3, 213-221. Troumbis, A. Y., Dimitrakopoulos, P. G., 1998. Geographic coincidence of diversity threatspots for three taxa and conservation planning in Greece. Biological Conservation 84, 1-6. van Rensburg, B. J., Chown, S. L., Gaston, K. J., 2002. Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scales: A test using South African birds. The American Naturalist 159, 566-577. Venevsky, S., Venevskaia, I., 2005. Hierarchical systematic conservation planning at the national level: Identifying national biodiversity hotspots using abiotic factors in Russia. Biological Conservation 124, 235-251. Virolanien, K. M., Ahlroth, P., Hyvärinen, E., Korkeamäki, E., Mattila, J., Päivinen, J., Rintala, T., Soumi, T., Suhonen, J., 2000. Hot spots, indicator taxa, complementarity and optimal network of taiga. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B 267, 1143-1147. Voris, H. K., 2000. Maps of Pleistocene sea levels in Southeast Asia: shorelines, river systems and time durations. Journal of Biogeography 27, 1153-1167. Whittaker, R.H., Willis, K.J., Field, R., 2001. Scale and species richness: towards a general, hierarchical theory of species diversity. Journal of Biogeography, 28, 453-470. Williams, P., Humphries, C., 1994. Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness and endemism in conservation. In: Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (eds Forey, P.L., Humphries, C.J. & Vane-Wright, R.I.). Oxfod University Press, Oxford, pp. 1–14. Williams, P., Gibbons, D., Margules, C., Rebelo, A., Humphries, C., Pressey, R., 1996. A comparison of richness hotspots, rarity hotspots, and complementary areas for conserving diversity of British birds. Conservation Biology 10, 155-174. Williams, P. H., Gaston, K. J., Humphries, C. J., 1997. Mapping biodiversity value worldwide: combing higher-taxon richness from different groups. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 264, 141-148. Williams, P. H., Morre, L. J., Toham, A. K., Brooks, T. M., Strand, H., D’amico, H., Wisz, M., Burgess, N. D., Balmford, A., Rahbek, C., 2003. Integrating biodiversity priorities with conflicting socio-economic values in the Guinean-Congolian forest region. Biodiversity and Conservation 12, 1297-1320. Wiens, J. A., 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3, 385-397. Yip, J. Y., Corlett, R. T., Doudgeon, D., 2004. A fin-scale gap analysis of the existing protected area system in Hong Kong, China. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 942-957. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35388 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 生物多樣性熱點的選擇與分析對於進行保育區的選擇有相當大的助益。本研究以100×100 km網格劃分東亞地區鳥類分佈圖層，比較(1)所有物種豐富物、(2)狹佈種豐富度、(3)瀕危種豐富度、以及(4)互補法四種方法所選擇的生物多樣性熱點網格相關性；更進一步討論，不同分類群其物種多樣性之空間相關性，以及屬豐富度及科豐富度是否能夠作為物種豐富度之指標物種。
研究結果發現，不同方法所得到的生物多樣性熱點彼此之間相關性不高，以互補法所選取之熱點在相同之面積下較能包含較多之物種，且屬豐富度和種豐富度間具有相當高之相關性。因此，不同方法所得到的生物多樣性熱點難以互相替代。在進行保護區選擇時，可優先考慮狹佈種以及瀕危種為對象，而且若能應用互補法，則能夠使同樣面積擁有最大物種數，使保育工作更有效率。若在野外調查種豐富度有其困難時，可考慮以屬豐富度來代替種豐富度。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The selections and analyses of biodiversity hotspot are critical for establishing protected areas. Using a 100×100 km grid system of bird breeding ranges in East Asia, I compared the spatial correlation of biodiversity hotspots selected by (1) total species richness, (2) limited-ranged species richness, (3) endangered species richness, and (4) complementary method. Furthermore, I examined the distribution of species richness of various avian orders and families and the correlation among species richness, genus richness, and family richness.
I found that there were low spatial correlations among biodiversity hotspots selected by different methods. With same area, the hotspots selected by complementary method covered more species than other methods. There were high correlations among species richness, genus richness, and family richness. I conclude the hotspots of total species, limited-ranged species, and endangered species were not congruent with each other. In selecting protected areas, hotspots of limited-ranged species and endangered species should be given priorities and using complementary method could maximize the species covered by a given area and increase the efficiency of protected areas. Genus richness could be a good surrogate of species richness if obtaining species richness is difficult for field investigation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:50:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-R91625041-1.pdf: 6845216 bytes, checksum: 41515e59087a34654fb5e7a0b93b93f6 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要П
AbstractШ 前言1 生物多樣性熱點起源1 生物多樣性熱點類別2 所有物種2 狹佈種3 稀有種3 瀕危種4 互補法4 生物多樣性替代值5 尺度7 東亞鳥類生物多樣性熱點7 研究方法9 鳥種名單及分佈範圍圖層9 網格系統9 網格認定與物種分布10 熱點選取10 不同方法選定熱點之空間相關性12 物種累積曲線13 不同目、科其物種豐富度的空間相關性13 屬豐富度與科豐富度13 結果15 鳥類物種分布15 不同生物多樣性值間之相關關係16 不同熱點網格之空間分布17 台灣鳥類物種分布18 互補法與物種累積曲線18 不同目、科物種豐富度之間的空間相關性19 不同分類層級豐富度間的相關性19 討論21 各類生物多樣性熱點之分布21 不同類別熱點22 互補法23 不同目、科之間的空間相關性24 屬豐富度與科豐富度25 尺度25 保育-誰為優先26 引用文獻28 表37 圖42 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 互補法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 生物多樣性熱點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 狹佈種 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 瀕危種 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Complementary method | en |
| dc.subject | Biodiversity Hotspots | en |
| dc.subject | Endemic species | en |
| dc.subject | Endangered species | en |
| dc.title | 東亞鳥類生物多樣性熱點之選擇與分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Selections and Analyses of Avian Biodiversity Hotspots
in East Asia | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 93-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李培芬,袁孝維,邱祈榮 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 生物多樣性熱點,狹佈種,瀕危種,互補法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Biodiversity Hotspots,Endemic species,Endangered species,Complementary method, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 69 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2005-07-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 森林環境暨資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-94-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 6.68 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。