請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35218
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 林惠玲(Hui-Lin Lin) | |
dc.contributor.author | Mei-Ching Lo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 羅梅青 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:44:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Amir, R., Evstigneev, L. and Wooders, J. (2003), “Noncooperative versus cooperative R&D with endogenous spillover rates.” Games and Economic Behavior, 42, 184–207.
Arrow, K. (1962),“Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention.” In: Universities-National Bureau of Economic Research Conference. Aschhoff, B. and Schmidt, T. (2008), “Empirical Evidence on the Success of R&D Cooperation—Happy Together?”, Rev Ind Organ, 33, 41–62. Atallah, G. (2002), “ Vertical R&D spillovers, cooperation, market structure and innovation.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11 (3), 179–209. Barkema, H. G., Shenkar, O. and Vermeulen, F. (1997),” Working abroad, working with others: how firms learn to operate international joint ventures.” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (2), 426–442. Bayona, C., Marco, T. G. and Huerta, E. (2001), “Firms’ motivations for cooperative R&D:an empirical analysis of Spanish firms.” Research Policy, 30 (8), 1289-1307. Becker, W. and Dietz, J. (2004), “R&D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry.” Research Policy, 33, 209–223. Belderbos, Réné, et al. (2004),” Cooperative R&D and firm performance”, Research Policy, 33, 1477–1492. Belderbos, René, et al. (2004), “Heterogeneity in R&D cooperation strategies.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 1237-1263. Benfratello, L. and Sembenelli, A. (2002), “Research joint ventures and firm level performance.” Research Policy, 31, 493–507. Bondt, R. D. (1996) , “Spillovers and innovative activities.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15, 1–28. Bondt, R. D. and Veugelers, R. (1991), “Strategic investment with spillovers.” European Journal of Political Economy, 7, 345–366. Bondt, R. D. and Slaets, P. and Cassiman, B. (1992), “The degree of spillovers and the number of rivals for maximum effective R&D.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 35–54. Branstetter, L. and Sakakibara, M. (1988), “Japanese research consortia: a microeconometric analysis of industrial policy.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 66, 207–233. Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. (2002), “R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium.” American Economic Review, 92 (4), 1169–1184. Cincera, M., Kempen, L., Vanpottelsberghe, B., Veugelers, R. and Sandchez, C. V. (2003), “Productivity growth. R&D and the role of international collaborative agreements: some evidence for Belgian manufacturing companies.” Brussels Economic Review, 46 (3), 107–140. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A. (1989), “Innovation and Learning: the two faces of R&D.” Economic Journal, 99 (397), 569–596. Colombo, M. G. and Garrone, P. (1996), “Technological Cooperative Agreements and Firm's R&D Intensity:A Note on Causality Relations”, Research Policy, 25, 923– 932. Das, T. K. and Teng, B. S. (2000), “A resource-based theory of strategic alliances.” Journal of Management, 26, 31–61. Dasgupta, P. and David, P.A. (1994), “Towards a new economics of science.” Research Policy, 23 (5), 487–521. D’Aspremont, C. and Jacquemin, A. (1988), “Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in duopoly with spillovers.” American Economic Review, 78 (5), 1133–1137. Eaton, B. C. and Eswaran, M. (1997), “Technology trading coalitions in supergames.” Rand Journal of Economics ,28 (1),135–149. Eswaran, M. and Gallini, N. (1996), “Patent policy and the direction of technical change.” The Rand Journal of Economics, 27 (4), 722–746. Fritsch, Michael and Lukas, Rolf (2001), “Who cooperates on R&D?” Research Policy, 30, 297–312. Gary P. Pisano (1990), “The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 153–176. Gloria Sa ́nchez-Gonza ́lez, Nuria Gonza ́lez-A ́lvarez and Mariano Nieto (2009), “Sticky information and heterogeneous needs as determining factors of R&D cooperation with customers,” Research Policy, 38, 1590–1603 Hamel, G. (1991), “Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances.” Strategic Management Journal, 12, 83–103. Harrigan, K. R. (1988), “Strategic alliances and partner asymmetries.” Management International Review, 4, 53–72. Heller, M.A. and Eisenberg, R.S. (1998) “Can patents deter innovation?” The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280, 698–701. Hennart, J. F. (1988), “A transaction cost theory of equity joint ventures.” Strategic Management Journal, 9, 361–374. Hippel, Von (1988), “Sources of Innovation.” Oxford University Press, Oxford. Huber, G. P. (1991), “Organizational learning:The processes and the literatures.” Organizational Science, 2, 88-115. Kale, P., Dyer, J. H. and Singh, H.R. (2002), “Alliance capability, stock market response, and Long term alliance success: the role of alliance function.” Strategic Management Journal, 23 (8), 747–767. Kamien, M. I., Muller, E. and Zang, I. (1992), “Research joint ventures and R&D cartels.” American Economic Review ,82 (5), 1293–1306. Kamien, Morton I. and Zang, Israel (2000), “Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 995–1012. Kesteloot, Katrien and Veugelers, Reinhilde (1995), “Stable R&D cooperation with spillovers.” Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4 (4), 651–672. Katsoulacos, Yannis and Ulph, David (1998), “Endogenous spillovers and the performance of research joint ventures.” Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 333–357. Klevorick, Alvin K. et al.(1995) , “On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities.” Research Policy, 24, 185–205. Kogut, Bruce (1988), A study of the life-cycle of joint ventures. In: Contractor, F.J., Lorange,P. (Eds.), Cooperative Strategies in International Business, Lexington. MA and Heath, Lexington, Toronto, 169–185. Kogut, Bruce (1988), “Joint ventures: theoretical and empirical perspectives.” Strategic Management Journal, 9, 319–332. Kogut, Bruce (1989), “The stability of joint ventures: reciprocity and competitive rivalry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (2), 183–198. König, H., Licht, G. and Staat, M. (1994) “R&D Co–operation and Inovation Activity. In:Gahlen, B., Hesse, H., Ramser, H. J.(Eds) ”, Europäische Integrationsprobleme aus wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Sicht, Siebecg, Tübingen, 219–242. Leahy, Dermot and Peter, Neary J. (1997), “Public policy towards R&D in oligopolistic industries.” The American Economic Review, 87 (4), 642–662. Lhuiller, Stéphane and Pfister, Etienne (2009) “R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects:Empirical evidence from French CIS data”, Research Policy, 38, 45–57. Lin, H. L. and Chen, J. C. (2010), “The Determinants of Firm’s R&D Cooperation strategies ─Evidence from Taiwanese Innovative Firm”, Manuscript. Lööf, Hans and Broström, Anders (2008), “Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness?” The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33 (1), 73–90. Lööf, Hans and Heshmati, Almas (2002), “Knowledge capital and performance heterogeneity: a firm-level innovation study.” International Journal of Production Economics, 76 (1), 61–85. Lowe, Julian and Taylor, Peter (1998), “R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements:complementary strategies and complementary assets.” R&D Management, 28 (4), 263–278. Martin, Stephen (2002), “Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D.” Journal of Economics, 75 (1), 1–32. Michael L. Katz (1986), “An analysis of cooperative research and development.” The Rand Journal of Economics, 17, 527–543. Miotti, Luis and Sachwald, Frédérique (2003), “Co–operative R&D: why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis.” Research Policy, 32, 1481–1499. Miyata, Yukio (1996), “An Analysis of cooperative R&D in the United States.” Technovation, 16 (3), 123–131. Mora-Valentin, Eva M. et al. (2004), “Determining factors in the success of R&D cooperative agreements between firms and research organizations.” Research Policy, 33 (1), 17–40. Nagda, B. A., Gregerman S. R., Jonides, J. W., Hippel, V. and Lerner, J. S. (2000), “Research partnerships.” Research Policy, 29 (4–5), 567–586. Nakamura, Masao (2003), “Research alliances and collaborations: introduction to the special issue.” Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 47–49. Nordhaus, William D. (1969), “Invention Growth and Welfare.” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Okamuro, Hiroyuki (2007), “Determinants of successful R&D cooperation in Japanese small businesses: the impact of organizational and contractual characteristics.” Research Policy, 36 (10), 1529–1544. Park, S. H. and Ungson, G. R. (1997), “The effect of partner nationality, organizational dissimilarity, and economic motivation in the dissolution of joint ventures.” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (2), 279–307. Porter, Michael (1987), “From competitive strategy to cooperative strategy.” Harvard Business Review, 65 (3), 43-59. Reuer, Jeffrey J. and Zollo, Maurizio (2005), “Termination outcomes of research alliances.” Research Policy, 34 (1), 101-115. Roberts, Edward Baer and Berry, Charles A. (1985), “Entering new businesses: selecting strategies for success.” Sloan Management Review, 26 (3), 3–17. Robertson, Thomas S. and Gatignon, Hubert (1998), “Technology Development Mode:A Transaction Cost Conceptualization.” Strategic Management Journal, 19 (6), 515–531. Röller, Lars–Hendrik, et al. (1997), “Why firms form Research Joint Ventures: theory and evidence.” CEPR Discussion Paper Series, No. 1654. Romer, Paul M. (1990), “Endogenous technical change.” Journal of Political Economy, 94 (5), 71–102. Schmookler, Jacob (1966), “Invention and Economic Growth.” Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA. Spence, Michael (1984), “Cost reduction, competition and industry performance.” Econometrics, 52, 101–121. Steurs, Geert (1995), “Inter–industry R&D spillovers: what difference do they make?” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 249–276. Suzumura, Kotaro (1992), “Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in oligopoly with spillovers.” American Economic Review, 82 (5), 1307–1320. Teece, David J. (1992), “Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18 (1), 1–25. Tether, Bruce S. (2002), “Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis.” Research Policy, 31, 947–967. Tyler, Beverly B. and Steensma, H. Kevin (1995), “Evaluating technological collaborative opportunities: a cognitive modeling perspective.” Strategic Management Journal, 16, 43–70. Vonortas, Nicholas, S. (1994), “Inter–firm cooperation with imperfectly appropriable research.” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 12, 413–435. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/35218 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究的主要目的在於探討台灣技術創新廠商的研發與創新行為。我們主要利用國科會企劃處2007年「台灣地區第二次產業創新活動調查研究」的資料,來探討廠商在選擇是否進行合作,或是決定合作研發策略(包括垂直合作、水平合作與機構合作)的影響因素,以及探究研發合作策略是否會影響創新活動的失敗。在研究方法上,採用兩階段法進行實證分析,第一階段為Multivariate Probit Model,第二階段採用Probit Model。
本文定義創新活動失敗為廠商在93~95三年間曾終止進行或拖延任何的創新活動,研究時將廠商分為製造業與服務業,以探討合作研發與創新活動失敗間的關係。實證結果顯示,就製造業而言,當廠商進行研發合作將會增加創新失敗的可能性,若進一步探討不同的合作策略,當廠商採取單一的垂直或水平合作則創新活動較不易失敗,而若同時進行水平與機構的合作研發方式,會減輕創新失敗的機率;就服務業而言,當廠商同時進行垂直與機構或是同時採取水平與機構的混合合作方式,亦會降低創新失敗的可能性。此外,不論是製造業或是服務業廠商,流入外溢效果會減輕創新失敗的機率,而就研發支出而言,對於創新活動失敗的影響製造業呈現倒U字型,服務業則呈現U型的特性。再者,實證結果顯示當某種資訊來源流入的外溢效果愈大時,合作研發廠商愈可能進行該類型的合作研發方式,且不同合作研發策略之間具有互補性的關係,且規模愈大的廠商愈會進行合作研發。最後,本研究特別針對中小企業做進一步的分析與討論,所得的結論與上述相類似。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | By analyzing the newly collected data from 2007 Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey, we explore the determinants for innovative firms to engage in R&D cooperation with four types of decisions, including non-corporation, vertical cooperation, horizontal cooperation, and institutional cooperation. In addition, we identify the impact of
heterogeneities in the determinants on the failure of innovating activities. We use Multivariate Probit Model and Probit Model. It is likely to succeed in innovating activities when the firms adopt vertical cooperation, horizontal cooperation, or horizontal and institutional cooperation together for manufacture sectors. Meanwhile, it is favorable to choose vertical cooperation and institutional cooperation jointly or horizontal cooperation and institutional cooperation jointly for service sectors. Moreover, the failure of innovating activities is affected by incoming spillover effects and the R&D expenditure across manufacture and service sectors. In the empirical model of cooperative decision, we find that the determinants of R&D cooperation include incoming spillover effects and firm size, and that there exist complementarities between vertical cooperation, horizontal cooperation, and institutional cooperation. Finally, we do further research on the small and medium enterprise, and obtain the similar results. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:44:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98323016-1.pdf: 810733 bytes, checksum: 4b970ae248fb260a45704ea7e4e78307 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次(含頁碼) 目錄
謝辭 i 摘要 ii Abstract iii 第一章 前言 1 第二章 理論與實證文獻回顧 3 2.1 合作研發相關理論 3 2.2 實證文獻回顧 5 第三章 資料來源與樣本說明 10 3.1 台灣地區研發活動和專利申請概況 10 3.2 資料來源 15 3.3 樣本說明 18 3.3.1 台灣企業技術創新活動的合作研發情形 18 3.3.2 台灣企業技術創新活動的成功與失敗 19 3.3.3 合作研發的外溢效果、受阻因素以及專利申請與創新失敗 22 第四章 模型設定與變數說明 33 4.1 模型設定 33 4.2 變數說明 36 4.2.1 依變數 36 4.2.2 影響創新活動失敗的變數 37 4.2.3 影響研發合作策略的變數 44 第五章 實證結果與分析 54 5.1 製造業廠商研發合作策略與創新失敗結果的實證分析 54 5.2 服務業廠商研發合作策略與創新失敗結果的實證分析 60 5.3 製造業與服務業之實證結果比較 66 5.4 中小企業研發合作策略與創新失敗結果的實證分析 67 第六章 結論與建議 72 參考文獻 75 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 廠商合作研發策略與創新失敗—台灣創新廠商之驗證 | zh_TW |
dc.title | R&D Cooperation Strategies And the Failure of Innovation
—Evidence from Innovative Firms in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭秀玲,楊志海 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 合作研發策略,創新活動,失敗,台灣創新調查, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | R&D cooperation,Innovation,failure,Taiwan Technological Innovation Survey, | en |
dc.relation.page | 81 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 791.73 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。