請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34864
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 洪鎌德(Lien-Te Hong) | |
dc.contributor.author | Huan-chen Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王環珍 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:35:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-01-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-01-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-01-08 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 參考書目
中文部分: 石元康 1989 《洛爾斯》。台北:東大圖書公司。 1991 〈自由主義式的平等:德我肯論權利〉,收入戴華、鄭曉時主編,《正義及其相關問題》。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁317-42。 江宜樺 1998 《自由主義、民族主義與國家認同》。台北:揚智文化。 2001 〈約翰•密爾論自由、功效與民主政治〉,收入蔡英文、張福建(主編),《自由主義政治思想論文集》。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁53-79。 李美華(譯) 1998 《社會科學研究方法.》(The Practice of Social Research ,Earl Babbie著)。台北:時英出版社。 林子儀 1999 《言論自由與新聞自由》。台北:元照出版公司。 林芳玫 1999 《色情研究─從言論自由到符號擬象》。台北:女書文化。 邱小平 2005 《表達自由─美國憲法第一修正案研究》。北京:北京大學。 洪鎌德 1998 《社會學說與政治理論─當代尖端思想之介紹》。台北:揚智文化。 1999 《21世紀社會學》。台北:揚智文化。 2002 《自由主義》。台北:一橋出版社。 2003 《女性主義》。台北:一橋出版社。 2004 《當代主義》。台北:揚智文化。 施俊吉 1991 〈論羅爾斯的差異原則〉,收入戴華、鄭曉時主編,《正義及其相關問題》。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁305-16。 張福建 1991 〈羅爾斯的差異原則及其容許不平等的可能程度〉,收入戴華、鄭曉時主編,《正義及其相關問題》。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁281-304。 戴華 1991 〈個人與社會正義:探討羅爾斯正義理論中的「道德人」〉,收入戴華、鄭曉時主編,《正義及其相關問題》。台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁257-80。 謝世民 2000 〈合理契約論與刑法自由主義〉,《台灣哲學研究》,第三期。台北:桂冠出版社。頁157-83。 顧燕翎(編) 1996 《女性主義理論與流派》。台北:女書文化。 英文部分: Anderson, E. 1991 “J. S. Mill’s Experiments in Living.” Ethics ,102. Bacchi, C. L. 1990 Same Difference: Feminism and Sexual Difference. Allen and Unwin. Baker, E. C. 1989 Human Liberty and Freedom of Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bedau, H. A. 2001 “ Feinberg’s Liberal Theory of Punishment.” In Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 5, 105-37. Bentham, Jeremy. 1983 Anarchical Fallacies. In Jeremy Waldron (ed.), Nonsense on Stilts, London: Cambridge University Press. Berlin, Isaiah 1969 Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press. 1969 “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press. Burton, P. F. 1996 Content on the Internet: Free or Unfettered. At http://www.dis.strath.ac.uk/people/paul/CIL96.html. Bynum, T. W. and S. Rogerson (eds.) 2004 Computer Ethics and Professional Responsibility. Oxford: Blackwell. Callan, Eamonn. 2000 “Discrimination and Religious Schooling.” In Will Kymlicka & Wayne Norman (eds.), Citizenship in Diverse Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Campbell, K. (ed.) 1992 Critical Feminism: Argument in the Disciplines. Buckingham, Philadelphia: Open University Press. Cohen, J. 1993 “Freedom of Expression.” In Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol 22, No.3. Crittenden, Jack 1992 Beyond Individualism---Reconstituting the Liberal Self. New York: Oxford University Press. Dull, R. A. 2001 “Harms and Wrongs?” In Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 5, 13-37. Dworkin, Andrea 1981 Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women’s Press. Dworkin, Ronald 1977 Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1985. “Do We Have a Right to Pornography?” In A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1989 “Liberal Community.” California Law Review, 1989, 77. 1993 “Women and Pornography.” New York Review of Books, XL/17. 2000 Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Easton, S. 1994 The Problem of Pornography: Regulation and the Right to Free Speech. London: Routledge. Feinberg, Joel 1973 Social Philosophy. New York: Prentice-Hall. 1984 Harm to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1985 Offense to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999 “The Offence Principle.” (excerpt from Offense to Others) In G. Sher and B. Brody (eds.), Social and Political Philosophy: Contemporary Readings. Harcourt Brace, 84-96. Fish, S. 1994 There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech...and It’s a Good Thing too. New York: Oxford University Press. Flathman, R. 1987 The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Gray, John 1986 Liberalism. Milton Keynes: Open Press. 1996 Mill on Liberty: A Defence. London: Routledge. 2000 Two Faces of Liberalism. New York: Polity. Gruen, L. and G. Panichas (eds.) 1997 Sex, Morality, and the Law. New York: Routledge, ch.3. Gutmann, Amy 1985 “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 14. 1995 “Civic Education and Social Diversity.” Ethics. Harcourt, B. E. 2001 “Joel Feinberg On Crime and Punishment.” Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 5, 149-67. Hobbes, Thomas 1968 Leviathan, C.B. Macpherson (ed.), London: Penguin Books. Hornsby, J. and Langton, R. 1998 “Free Speech and Illocution.” Legal Theory, 4(1), 21-37. Jacobson, D. 2000 “Mill on Liberty, Speech, and the Free Society.” In Philosophy and Public Affairs, 29, no.3. Kateb, G. 1989 “The Freedom of Worthless and Harmful Speech.” In Bernard Yack (ed.), Liberalism without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith N. Shklar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kramer, M. 2002 “Why Freedoms Do Not Exist by Degrees.” In Political Studies, Vol 50. Kukathas, Chandran 1997 “Cultural Toleration.” In Ian Shapiro & Will Kymlicka (eds.), Ethnicity and Group Rights: Nomos XXXIX. New York: New York University Press. Kukathas, Chandran & Philip Pettit (eds.) 1990 A Theory of Justice and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press. Kymlicka, Will 1989 Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 2001 Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Langton, R. 1990 “ Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women, and Pornographers.“ In Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19, no.4. 1993 “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” In Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol.22, No.4. Locke, John 1689 Second Treatise of Government. Page citations to the edition of Laslett, 1965. Lyons, D. 1994 Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Macedo, Stephen. 1995 “Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God vs. John Rawls?” Ethics, 105, 468-496. MacKinnon, Barbara. 2001 Ethics: Theory and Contemporary Issues. Wadsworth. MacKinnon, Catharine 1984 “Brief, Amicus Curiae.” In William H. Hudnut III (et al.), American Booksellers Association Inc., US District Court, Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. 1987 “Not a Moral Issue and Francis Biddle’s Sister: Pornography, Civil Rights and Speech.” In Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 146-162, 163-197. 1989 Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1992 “Pornography, Civil Rights and Speech.” In Catherine Itzin (ed.), Pornography: Women, Violence and Civil Liberties. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mason, Andrew 1993 “Liberalism and the Value of Community,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Mill, John Stuart 1859. On Liberty. Page citations to the edition of Currin V. Shields, 1956. 1962 Utilitarianism and Other Writings. Edited by Mary Warnock. Glasgow: Collins. Nozick, Robert. 1974 Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books, Inc. Okin, S. 1987 ”Justice and Gender” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 16/1:42-72. Paul, Jeffrey (ed.) 1981 Reading Nozick. London: Rowman and Littlefield. Posner, Richard A. 1994 Sex and Reason: The Regulation of Sexuality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Rawls, John. 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1988 “The Priority of Right and Ideas of the Good,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 17. 1993 Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. 1999a. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1999b Collected Papers. Edited by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Raz, J. 1986 The Morality of Freedom. Clarendon: Oxford University Press. Rees, J. C. 1991 “A Re-reading of Mill on Liberty.” In John Gray and G.W. Smith (ed.), J. S. Mill-On Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge. Riley, J. 1998 Mill on Liberty. New York: Routledge. Sandel, Michael J. 1982 Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scanlon, T. 1972 “A Theory of Freedom of Expression.” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, no.2. Schauer, F. 1982 Free Speech: a Philosophical Enquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Shapiro, Ian & Will Kymlicka (eds.) 1997 Ethnicity and Group Rights: Nomos XXXIX. New York: New York University Press. Stewart, H. 2001 “Harms, Wrongs and Self-Backs in Feinberg’s Moral Limits of Criminal Law.” In Buffalo Criminal Law Review. 5, 47-67. Strum, Philippa 2000 When the Nazis Came to Skokie. Kansas: University Press of Kansas. Sunstein, C. 1994 Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech. New York: Free Press. Taylor, Charles 1985a. “On Negative Freedom.” In Taylor 1985b. 1985b Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ten, C. L. 1991 “Mill’s Defence of Liberty.” In John Gray and G.W. Smith (eds.), J. S. Mill –On Liberty in Focus. London: Routledge. Tong, Rosenmarie 1989 Feminist Thought: A Comprehensive Introduction. Boulder & San Francisco: Westview Press. Vallentyne, Peter (ed.) 1991 Contractarianism and Rational Choice: Essays on Gauthier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Weckert, J. 1997 Giving Offence on the Internet. In Bynum and Rogerson 2004, 327- 340. West, C. 2003 “The Free Speech Argument Against Pornography.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 33( 3), 391-422. Williams, B. (ed.) 1981 Obscenity and Film Censorship: An Abridgement of the Williams Report. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wittgenstein, L. 1953 Philosophical Investigations. Edited by G. E. M. Anscombe and Rush Rhees. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell. Wolff, Jonathan 1991 Robert Nozick. Cambridge: Polity Press. Wolff, R. P. 1968 The Poverty of Liberalism. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press. Young, Iris M. 1995 “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Ideal of Universal Citizenship.” In Ronald Beiner (ed.), Theorizing Citizenship. Albany: State University of New York Press. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34864 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本文研究目的,即是要在自由主義的脈絡下,探究「言論自由」的限度。主要包括以下五大部分:
一、在自由主義社會中,政府當局可有合理理由限制言論自由?此等限制,是否嚴重侵害個人基本自由?上述問題實與下列更基本的問題相關,即:在自由主義社會中,政府當局可有合理理由限制個人基本自由? 二、穆勒(John Stuart Mill,1806-1873)的傷害原則(the harm principle),其在言論自由此一議題上的意涵為何? 三、范柏格(Joel Feinberg,1926-2004)的冒犯原則(the offence principle),其在言論自由此一議題上的意涵為何? 四、自由主義如何看待色情刊物?其背後理由又為何?女性主義(feminism)部分人士反對色情刊物,其所持理由是否能成立? 五、社群主義 (communitarianism)認為自由主義理論中所謂的人,是「孤立的人」; 因「孤立的人」並非事實,是以立於其上的自由主義式的言論自由等主張自當無法成立。社群主義上述質疑是否站得住腳? | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:35:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-94-P92341011-1.pdf: 1083615 bytes, checksum: c27c1979c322a08c708fd6e9527e9b15 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
第一章 緒論 5 1.研究動機 5 2.研究目的 7 3.研究途徑與方法 9 4.文獻探討 10 5.研究範圍與限制 16 第二章 傷害原則:穆勒論言論自由 24 1.自由主義的基本主張 24 2.思想自由與言論自由 26 3.穆勒的傷害原則 32 4.大家長主義與「功利主義的反噬」 39 5.從傷害原則論色情出版與仇恨言論 49 第三章 冒犯原則:范柏格論言論自由 55 1.范柏格的冒犯原則 55 2.從冒犯原則論色情出版與仇恨言論 61 3.冒犯原則的難題 68 第四章 色情權利:麥肯能與德渥肯的爭論 75 1.西方色情爭論的歷史 76 2.德渥肯論色情權利 81 3.反對色情-麥肯能的主張 86 4.對麥肯能理論的批判 93 第五章 「我的言論自由」或「我們的言論自由」-自由主義與社群主義之爭 96 1.自由主義與社群主義 97 2.自由主義與同化 101 3.社群主義的容忍原則 103 4.自由主義者的答辯:馬西度的回應 105 5.自由主義與社群主義的調合:卡藍的嘗試 107 6.社群主義的謬誤 111 第六章 結論 115 參考書目 120 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 言論自由的限度:從自由主義觀之 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Boundary of Free Speech: From a Liberalist Point of View. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林正弘(Cheng-Hung Lin),陳顯武(Hsien-Wu Chen) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 言論自由,穆勒,范柏格,德渥肯,麥肯能, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | free speech,J. S. Mill,Joel Feinberg,C. MacKinnon, | en |
dc.relation.page | 137 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-01-09 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 國家發展研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-94-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.06 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。