請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34796
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 魏家豪(Wim De Reu) | |
dc.contributor.author | Mercedes Valmisa | en |
dc.contributor.author | 美麗 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:34:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-05 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | I. 中文論著
一.莊子文本與註釋 陳鼓應,《莊子今註今譯》,台北:台灣商務:1999 傅佩榮,《傅佩榮解讀莊子》,台北:立緒文化:2002 郭慶藩撰,《莊子集釋》,北京:中華書局:1961 王夫之,《老子衍,莊子通,莊子解》,北京:中華書局:2009 香港中文大學中國文化研究所,《先秦兩漢古籍逐字索引叢刊。莊子逐字索引》,香港:商務印書館:2000 二.研究專書 奧修 Osho,《道。The Pathless Path》,台北:生命潛能文化事業:2003 陳鼓應,《道家文化研究第八輯》,香港:上海古籍出版社:1995 陳鼓應,《老莊新論》, 台北:五南出版社:2007 陳鼓應,《莊子哲學》, 臺北:台灣商務:2010 劉笑敢,《兩種自由的追求。莊子與沙特》,台北:台灣出版社:1994 劉笑敢,《莊子哲學及其演變》, 北京:北京大學出版社 : 1988 徐復觀,《中國人性論史。先秦篇》, 台北:台灣商務出:2007 蕭振邦,《深層自然主義:《莊子》思想的現代詮釋》。台北:鵝湖出版社:2009 三.期刊論文 高君和,〈論《莊子》書中有關「身體障礙者」之論述〉,《哲學與文化月刊》第三十,五卷第九期(2008-9):157-173。 過常寶與侯文華,〈論《莊子》“卮言”即“優語” 〉, 《北京師範大學學報》(社會科學版)2007 年 第 4 期。 張號 ,〈先秦道家“因”范畴初探〉,《三峡大学学报》(2008)湖北:北京。 張鵬,〈古漢語“因”的語法化〉。Zunyi: Normal University Press: 2007 佐藤將之,〈戰國時代「誠」概念的形成與意義:以《孟子》、《莊子》、《吕氏春秋》為中心〉。台灣學生書局:臺北版社:2009 II. 外文論著 一.研究專書 Aime Martin, Louis (1838). Ouvres Philosophiques de Descartes, publies d’apres les textes originaux. Paris: Auguste Desrez Ames, Roger T. (1988). Wandering at ease in the Zhuangzi. Albany: University of New York Arnau, Juan (2006). La palabra frente al vacio. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica Bennett, Maxwell; Dennett, Daniel; Hacker, Peter; Searle, John (2003). Neuroscience and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1980). Mil Mesetas. Valencia: Pre-Textos (1993). ¿Que es la Filosofia? Barcelona: Anagrama Gasche, Rodolphe (1999). Of Minimal Things. Studies on the Notion of Relation. Standford: Standford University Press Graham, Angus C. (1978). Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press (1989). Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court Hansen, Chad (1992). A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought. A Philosophical Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press Husserl, Edmund (1931). Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. The Netherlands: Kluwer Publishers (1936). The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press (1939). Experience and Judgment. London: Routledge Izutsu, Toshihiko (1984). Sufism and Taoism: A Comparative Study of Key Philosophical Concepts. California: University of California Press Jullien, Francois (1998). Un sage est sans idees. Paris: Seuil (1989). Proces ou Creation, Une introduction a la pensee des lettres chinois. Seuil : Des Travaux (reed. Le Livre de Poche, Biblio, 1996) Kern, Martin (2005). Text and Ritual in Early China. Seattle: University of Washington Press Kjellberg, Paul and Ivanhoe, Philip J. (1996). Essays on Skepticism, Relativism and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. Albany: University of New York Press MacMillan, I. C. (1978). Strategic Formulation: Political Concepts. St. Paul: West Publishing Marion, Jean-Luc (2001). De Surcroit. Etudes sur les Phenomenes Satures. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France Moeller, Hans George (2004). Daoism Explained, From the Dream of the Butterfly to the Fishnet Allegory. La Salle: Open Court Mollgaard, Eske. (2007). An Introduction to Daoist Thought. Action, Language and Ethics in Zhuangzi. Routledge: Oxford Nehamas, Alexander (1985). Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press Nietzsche, Friedrich (1954). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. New York: The Viking Press (originally written between 1883 and 1885) Sartre, Jean-Paul (1943). Being and Nothingness. Paris: Gallimard Searle, John (2007). Freedom and Neurobiology. Reflections on Free Will, Language, and Political Power. New York: Columbia University Press (2008). Philosophy in a New Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Slingerland, Edward (2003). Effortless Action: wu-wei as conceptual metaphor and spiritual ideal in Early China. Oxford: New York University Press Taylor, Mark C. (1998). Critical Terms for Religious Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Watson, Burton (1964). Zhuangzi, Basic Writings. New York: Columbia University Press Weber, Max (1962). The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Bacon Press 二.期刊論文 Allison, Robert Elliot (2007). “Wittgenstein, Lao Tzu and Chuang Tzu: the Art of Circumlocution.” Asian Philosophy 17:1, pp. 97-108 Chao Fulin (2006). “On the Origin and Development of the Idea of “De” in Pre-Qin Times.” Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1:2, pp. 161-184 De Reu, Wim (2010). “How to Throw a Pot: The Centrality of the Potter’s Wheel in the Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 20:1, pp. 43-66 (2006). “Right Words Seem Wrong: Neglected Paradoxes in Early Chinese Philosophical Texts.” Philosophy East and West 56:2, pp. 281-300. Fraser, Chris (2008). “Psychological Emptiness in the Zhuangzi.” Asian Philosophy 18:2, pp. 123-147 (2009). “Skepticism and Value in the Zhuangzi.” International Philosophical Quarterly 49:4, pp. 439-57 Galvany, Albert (2009). “Debates on mutilation: bodily preservation and ideology in early China.” Asiatische Studien, 64.1:67-91. (2009). “Discussing usefulness: trees as metaphors in the Zhuangzi.” Monumenta Serica, 57:71-97. Graham, A. C. (1969). “Chuang-tzu’s Essay on Seeing Things as Equal.” History of Religions, 9:2-3. Moreno, Cesar (2004). “Break Freak: Fenomeno (Notas para una geneidetica: Eidos y monstrum)” Δαίμων. Revista de Filosofia 32:55-75. Stevenson, C. L. (1938). “Persuasive Definitions.” Mind 47:187, pp. 331-350. Wang, Youru (2003). “Philosophy of Change and the Deconstruction of the Self in the Zhuangzi.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 27:3, pp. 345-60 Wu, Genyou (2006). “On the Idea of Freedom and Its Rejection in Chinese Thought and Institutions.” Asian Philosophy 16:3, pp. 219-235 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34796 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文要探討《莊子》的自由觀念。《莊子》以自由化來理解自由,指的是個人從本質主義的觀點中自由化後所能達到的境界,並且行為與此相符呼應。因此,我先對《莊子》中達成自由的過程進行重構,提出自由化的過程包含了認識與行為實踐,又可以分為對「觀點主義」的察覺,對「無己」的自我關注,以及使自己處於「事實之樞紐」的三層結構。接著,我探討了自由的狀態在自我轉換與自由化中所衍伸的含意,以及至人的所有特徵。在此,我大量使用《莊子》內篇、外篇和雜篇中的內容,也探討大量的議題來處理自由的問題。我認為,以自由觀點為進路可以幫助我們對《莊子》的哲學體系有一致且全面的理解,同時在所有主題中,找到新的關聯意涵。本論文也對那些認為《莊子》沒有明確自由觀念的論證提出挑戰,指出自由不但是《莊子》的中心課題,同時在解釋學上,也是得以有意義地重新建構《莊子》哲學的首選。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This dissertation investigates the conception of Freedom in the Zhuangzi. The Zhuangzi understands Freedom as Liberation – namely, as the state of the person who has achieved liberation from a set of substantialistic views and is able to behave in a corresponding way. Thus I firstly conduct a reconstruction of the process of liberation in the Zhuangzi, which includes both epistemological and behavioral practices and can be structured in three steps: becoming aware of “perspectivism”, achieving self-regard as “non-self”, and situating oneself in “the axis of reality”. Secondly, I explore the implications of the state of Freedom to which this process of self-transformation and liberation leads, as well as the features of the liberated person. I use a wide range of texts from the Zhuangzi’s Inner, Outer and Miscellaneous chapters for this purpose, and an equally wide range of topics is discussed in dealing with the idea of Freedom. I propose that approaching the philosophy of the Zhuangzi from the point of view of Freedom is helpful in providing a consistent and comprehensive explanation of the Zhuangzian philosophical system as a whole in which all topics find a new interrelated meaning. This dissertation thus challenges the argument that the Zhuangzi does not elaborate a coherent conception of Freedom, showing that Freedom not only is a central topic in the Zhuangzi, but is also a privileged hermeneutical key to meaningfully reconstruct its philosophy. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:34:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98124013-1.pdf: 1749404 bytes, checksum: 4b9f45ae50b00079e9dfacddf4fb8b4e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝詞 2
摘要 3 目錄 4 第一章.序言 6 第一章.第一節.研究背景 6 研究目標 6 研究的論點 7 第一章.第二節.《莊子》的詮釋問題 8 《莊子》哲學的複雜性 8 《莊子》哲學的獨特性與普遍性 9 《莊子》哲學的暗示性 10 《莊子》哲學整體的重建 10 第一章.第三節. 《莊子》的語言問題 12 《莊子》獨特言論方式的功能 12 《莊子》的觀點主義 15 第二章.自由化的過程 17 第二章.第一節.觀點主義 18 方生性及相對主義 19 採取立場的觀點主義 23 不二的思想及出現者的權利 30 權威性之挖牆腳 34 第二章.第二節.無己 38 至人無己 39 才全而德不形 45 無用之用及異常之用 50 第二章.第三節.事實之樞紐 57 「道樞」、「天倪」、「天鈞」 58 「兩行」、 「兩忘」、「兩見」 68 「守其宗」 71 「縣解」、「桎梏解」 74 第二章.第四節.總結 78 觀點主義 78 無己 79 事實之樞紐 80 第三章.至人與自由 83 第三章.第一節.自由境界之面貌 83 逍遙遊 84 現象領域之擴張 89 幕後推手 96 第三章.第二節.自發性並非《莊子》哲學之主軸 101 Spontaneous、「自然」、「自發」之界定 102 如何達成《莊子》「後設自然」的價值 106 誤以自發性為自然價值的詮釋危機 114 第三章.第三節.自由還是接受? 118 反對《莊子》為自由哲學的觀點 118 反駁《莊子》為非自由哲學的觀點 122 藉由《莊子》的五個比喻來談自由 133 第三章.第四節.總結 139 自由境界之面貌 140 自發性並非《莊子》哲學之主軸 142 自由還是接受? 143 第四章.結論 146 參考書目 149 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 《莊子》的自由觀念 _ 以自由為詮釋關鍵來重建《莊子》哲學的整體_ | zh_TW |
dc.title | Freedom in Zhuangzi _ Using Freedom as a hermeneutical key to reconstructing the philosophy of the Zhuangzi | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 施維禮(Wolfgang Schwabe),郭梨華 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 莊子,自由,自由化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Zhuangzi,Freedom,Liberation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 153 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 哲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.71 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。