請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34681
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳文哲 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Shan Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林清山 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:22:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2008-01-27 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-01-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-01-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 未具名。2005。中華民國輸入植物或植物產品檢疫規定。行政院農業委員會公告。農授防字第0941490512號。
朱耀沂、趙榮台。1995。進口木材之小蠹蟲及長小蠹蟲。台灣省林業試驗所,台北市。97頁。 林宗俊、黃振文、謝文瑞。2003。台灣廣葉杉萎凋病相關喙殼菌之鑑定。植物病理學會刊12:33-42。 林俊秀、汪大雄、吳萬益、任憶安。1993。杉木利用現況之調查。林業試驗所研究報告季刊8:365-369。 殷蕙芬、黃復生、李兆麟。1984。中國經濟昆蟲志第二十九冊鞘翅目小蠹蟲科。科學出版社,北京。205頁。 陳輝、袁鋒、張霞。2000。小蠹蟲與真菌共生關係的研究進展。西北林學院學報 15:80-85。 黃生、徐堉峰、余澄堉、呂至堅、羅尹廷、鄭雅茵、何孟娟、林孟賢、闕宏軒、楊莉玲、周柏成。2000。金門國家公園昆蟲多樣性之研究。http://www.kmnp.gov.tw/chinese/file/kmnp_research89_insect.pdf 黃守宏、石憲宗、鄭清煥。2003。台灣寶冠木及梅樹上發現的蠹蟲種類。台灣昆蟲 23:101-111。 張玉珍、范義彬。1989。台灣樹木重要害蟲調查。林業試驗所林業叢刊第32號,台北市。45頁。 張東柱、謝煥儒、張瑞璋、傅春旭。1999。台灣常見樹木病害。台灣省林業試驗所,台北市。202頁。 楊政川、林讚標、孔繁浩。2000。大陸杉木在台灣之地理變異:生態區與省區劃分之研究。台灣林業科學 15:301-315。 楊國禎。2005。台灣杉、杉木、柳杉。http://tnl.org.tw/article/taxa/taxo.pdf。 姚榮鼐(總編)。1992。國立台灣大學農學院實驗林管理處概況。國立台灣大學農學院實驗林管理處,台北市。24頁。 謝仁壽。2004。木材技術科學。http://home.kimo.com.tw/woodindustry/commercial_woods/taiwan/taiwansoft010_china_fir.htm。 闗秉宗。2003。物種多樣性的人造林。科學發展36:18-23。 Aksit, T., Ü. Cakmak, and F. Ozsemercu. 2005. Some new xylophagous species on fig trees ( Ficus carica cv. calymirna L.) in AydÝn, Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 29: 211-215. Atkinson, T. H. 1986. Biology of the Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera) in a tropical deciduous forest at Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 69: 303-310. Aukema, B. H., and K. F. Raffa. 2004a. Gender- and sequence-dependent predation within group colonizers of defended plants: a constraint on cheating among bark beetles? Oecologia 138: 253-258. Aukema, B. H., and K. F. Raffa. 2004b. Behavior of adult and larval Platysoma cylindrical (Coleoptera: Histeridae) and larval Medetera bistriata (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) during subcortical predation of Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. Insect Behav. 17: 115-128. Beardmore, J. A., G. C. Mair, and R. I. Lewis. 1997. Biodiversity in aquatic systems in relation to aquaculture. Aquacult. Res. 28: 829-839. Borror, D. J., and R. E. White. 1970. Insects. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 404 pp. Bright, D. E., and R. E. Skidmore. 1997. A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Supplement 1 (1990-1994). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 368 pp. Byers, J. A. 1992. Attraction of bark beetles, Tomicus piniperda, Hylurgops palliatus , and Trypodendron domesticum and other insects to short-chain alcohols and monoterpenes. J. Chem. Ecol. 18: 2385-2402. Campbell, J. M. 2005. Family Biphyllidae. http://www.canacoll.org/Coleo/Checklist/PDF%20files/BIPHYLLIDAE.pdf. Chen, H. J. 1998. Biomass and nutrient distribution in a Chinese-fir plantation chronosequence in southwest Hunan, China. Forest Ecol. Manag. 105: 209-216. Chenier, J. V. R., and B. J. R. Philogene. 1989. Evaluation of three trap designs for the capture of conifer-feeding beetles and other forest Coleoptera. Can. Entomol. 121: 159-167. Coyle, D. R., D. C. Booth, and M. S. Wallace. 2005. Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) species, flight, and attack on living Eastern Cottonwood trees. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 2049-2057. Crossley, D. A., R. N. Coulson, and C. S. Gist. 1997. Trophic level effects on species diversity in Arthropod communities of forest canopies. Environ. Entomol. 2: 1097-1100. Czokajlo, D. and S. A. Teale. 1999. Synergistic effect of ethanol and α-pinene in primary attraction of the larger pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda. J. Chem. Ecol. 25: 1121-1130. Dieckmann, U., P. Marrow, and R. Law. 1995. Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the Red Queen. J. Theor. Biol. 176: 91-102. Douce, G. K. 1993. Pine bark beetles. Cooperative Extension Service, the University of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, Athens. 1 pp. Erbilgin, N., and K. F. Raff. 2001. Modulation of predator attraction to pheromones of two prey species by stereochemistry of plant volatiles. Oecologia 127: 444-453. Erbilgin, N., E. V. Nordheim, B. H. Aukema, and K. F. Raffa. 2002. Population dynamics of Ips pini and Ips grandicollis in red pine plantations in Wisconsin: within- and between-year associations with predators, competitors, and habitat quality. Environ. Entomol. 31: 1043-1051. Farrell, B. D., A. S. Sequeira, B. C. O’Meara, B. B. Hormark, J. H. Chung, and B. H. Jordal. 2001. The evolution of agriculture in beetles (Curculionoidea: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Evolution 55: 2011-2027. Flechtmann, C. A. H. 2000. Scolytidae in pine plantations: Overviews and situation in Brazil Escolitídeos nas florestas de Pinus no Brasil. Serie Tecnica Ipef. 13: 49-56. Flechtmann, C. A. H., A. L. T. Ottati, and C. W. Berisford. 2000. Comparsion of four trap types for ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) in Brazilian Eucalyptus stands. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 1701-1707. Guérard, N., E. Dreyer, and F. Lieutiera. 2000. Interactions between Scots pine, Ips acuminatus (Gyll.) and Ophiostoma brunneo-ciliatum (Math.): estimation of the critical thresholds of attack and inoculation densities and effects on hydraulic properties in the stem. Ann. For. Sci. 57: 681-690. Halloin, L. 2003. Major bark beetles of the intermountain west. Forest Health Silviculturist, Washington Dept. of Natural Resources. 18 pp. Holsten, E. H., R. E. Burnside, and S. J. Seybold. 2000. Attractant semiochemicals of the engraver beetle, Ips perturbatus, in south-central and interior Alaska. Research paper. United States Department of Agriculture. 9 pp. Johnston, M. 2001. Impact of climate change on boreal forest insect outbreaks. http://adaptation.nrcan.gc.ca/app/filerepository/19848DBACB0D4C92A8FD8460B002C2D4.pdf. Jones, M. E., T. D. Paine, M. E. Fenn, and M. A. Poth. 2004. Influence of ozone and nitrogen deposition on bark beetle activity under drought conditions. Forest Ecol. Manag. 200: 67-76. Jordal, B. H., R. A. Beaver, and L. R. Kirkendall. 2001. Breaking taboos in the tropics: incest promotes colonization by wood-boring beetles. Global Ecology & Biogeography 10: 345-357. Kenis, M., B. Wermelinger, and J. C. Grégoire. 2004. Research on parasitoids and predators of Scolytidae - a review. pp. 237-290. In: F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J. C. Grégoire, and H. F. Evans, eds. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. http://www.wsl.ch/forest/wus/entomo/Antago/antahome-en.ehtml#Kenis. Kipfmueller, K. F., and W. S. Thomas. 2002. Climate and mountain pine beetle-induced tree mortality in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness area. Final report to the USFS research joint venture agreement. Kohl, J. 2005. Experts on the field of forest biodiversity. http://www.iascp2004.org.mx/downloads/paper_339.pdf. Krieger, C. 1998. An overview of bark beetle control methodologies. Management Notes. 17. http://www.gov.pe.ca/photos/original/af_bark_beetle.pdf. Kuschel, G. 1995. A phylogenetic classification of Curculionoidea to families and subfamilies. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 14: 5-33. Larsen, D. R. 1996. Measures of Diversity. http://www.snr.missouri.edu/nr3110/pdf/simpsons.pdf. Lassau, S. A., D. F. Hochuli, G. Cassis, and C. A. M. Reid. 2005. Effects of habitat complexity on forest beetle diversity: do functional groups respond consistently? Diversity and Distributions 11: 73-82. Leslie, E., and T. Bradley. 2001. Brief literature review of the Douglas-fir bark beetle. Silva Ecosystem Consultants Ltd. http://www.silvafor.org/publications/library/docs/DougFirBarkReview.pdf. Lindgren, B. S. 1983. A multiple funnel trap for scolytid beetles (Coleoptera). Can. Entomol. 115: 299-302. Lombardero, M. J., M. P. Ayres, B. D. Ayres, and J. D. Reeves. 2000. Cold tolerance of four species of bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in North America. Environ. Entomol. 29: 421-432. López, M. F., M. Shibayama, V. Tsutsumi, S. O. Angélica, R. Cisneros, and G.. Zúñiga. 2005. Effect of the alfa-pinene on the midgut cells from bark beetle Dendroctonus valens leconte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae): Ultra structural evidence. http://ciasem2005.cigb.edu.cu/Abstracts_Post_Biol/Maria_Fernanda.pdf. Magurran, A. E. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Croom Helm, London. 179 pp. Martin, L. M., K. A. Moloney and B. J. Wilsey. 2005. An assessment of grassland restoration success using species diversity components. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 327-336. Meckel M. 2004. Effects of native prairie plantings on insect diversity. http://web.grinnell.edu/cps/Student_Involvement/Student_Projects/M_Michaela.pdf. Nally, R. M., and E. Fleishman. 2004. A successful predictive model of species richness based on indicator species. Conserva, Biol. 18: 646-654. Niwa, C. G., and R. W. Peck. 2002. Influence of prescribed fire on carabid beetle (Carabidae) and spider (Araneae) assemblages in forest litter in southwestern Oregon. Environ. Entomol. 31: 785-796. Oliver, J. B., and C. M. Mannion. 2001. Ambrosia beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) species attacking chestnut and captured in ethanol-baited traps in middle Tennessee. Environ. Entomol. 30: 909-918. Oregon State University. 2005. Cedar and redwood bark beetles in southwest Oregon. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/douglas/forestry/Cedar%20Bark%20Beetles.pdf. Peters, S. E. 2004. Evenness of Cambrian–Ordovician benthic marine communities in North America. Paleobiology 30: 325-346. Price, D. L. 2004. Species diversity and seasonal abundance of Scarabaeoid dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Geotrupidae and Trogidae) attracted to cow dung in central New Jersey . J. New York Entomol. Soc. 112: 334-347. Pureswaran, D. S., B. T. Sullivan, and M. P. Ayres. 2005. Fitness consequences of pheromone production and host selection strategies in a tree-killing bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). http://www.dartmouth.edu/~mpayres/pubs/Pureswaran.etal.2006.pdf. Purvis, A., and A. Hector. 2000. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405: 212-219. Reeve, J. D. 1997. Predation and bark beetle dynamics. Oecologia 112: 48-54. Rudinsky, J. A. 1962. Ecology of Scolytidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 7: 327-348. Samman, S., J. Logan, B. Bentz, J. Chew, M. Downing, T. Eager, K. Gibson, D. Leatherman, L. Livingston, S. Munson, B. Short, and W. Sorensen. 2000. Assessment and response to bark beetle outbreaks in the Rocky Mountain area. Report to Congress from Forest Health Protection, Washington Office, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. Schroeder, L. M. 1988. Attraction of the bark beetle Tomicus piniperda and some other bark-and wood-living beetles to the host volatiles α-pinene and ethanol. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 46: 203-210. Schroeder, L. M. 2003. Difference in responses to α-pinene and ethanol, and flight periods between the bark beetle predators Thanasimus femoralis and T. formicarius (Col.: Cleridae). Forest Ecol. Manag. 177: 301-311. Schroeder, L. M., and A. Lindelow. 1989. Attraction of scolytids and associated beetles by different absolute amounts and proportions of α-pinene and ethanol. J. Chem. Ecol. 15: 807-817. Sequeira, A. S., B. B. Normark, and B. D. Farrell. 2000. Evolutionary assembly of the conifer fauna: distinguishing ancient from recent associations in bark beetles. Proc. Biol. Sci. 267: 2359-2366. Shepherd, W. P. 1995. Biology and host finding of predaceous hister beetles (Coleoptera: Histeridae) associated with Ips spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University. Stirling, G., and B. Wilsey. 2001. Empirical relationships between species richness, evenness, and proportional diversity. Am. Nat. 158: 286-299. Stockholm, 2000. Volatile constituents in conifers and conifer-related wood-decaying fungi. http://www.lib.kth.se/Sammanfattningar/faldt000920.pdf. Vinson, M. R., and C. P. Hawkins. 1998. Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local basin, and regional scales. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 43: 271-293. Wegensteiner, R. 2004. Pathogens in bark beetles. pp. 291-313. In: F. Lieutier, K. R. Day, A. Battisti, J. C. Grégoire, and H. F. Evans, eds. Bark and Wood Boring Insects in Living Trees in Europe, a Synthesis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. http://www.wsl.ch/forest/wus/entomo/Antago/antahome-en.ehtml#Kenis. Wood, D. L. 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27: 411-446. Wood, S. L., and D. E. Bright. 1992. A Catalog of Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera), Part2: Taxonomic Index Volume B. Brigham Young University. 1460 pp. Zanuncio, J. C., M. F. Sossai, C. A. H. Flechtmann, T. V. Zanuncio, E. M. Guimaraes, and M. C. Espindula. 2005. Plants of Eucalyptus clone damaged by Scolytidae and Platypodidae (Coleoptera). Pesq. Agropec. Bras., Brasilia 40: 513-515. Zeledon, E. 2005. Seed predation by specialist bark beetles in the tropics on two palm species: Irlatea deltoidae, and Welfia regia. 9 pp. http://www.ots.duke.edu/en/education/reu/2002/projects/esther_zeledon.pdf. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34681 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 杉木(Cunninghamia lanceolata) 屬針葉植物,是重要的建築木材,具經濟重要性。小蠹蟲(scolytid)屬象鼻蟲科的小蠹蟲亞科(Curculionidae: Scolytinae)為林木重要的經濟害蟲,亦有多種列為檢疫害蟲;被認為是造成2002年台灣中部多處杉木萎凋枯死的元兇。因小蠹蟲受林木所釋出的氣味所吸引,本試驗利用α-蒎烯(α-pinene)及乙醇(95% ethanol)二種混合誘引劑以林根氏多層誘蟲器(Lindgren multiple funnel traps)調查杉木人造林中小蠹蟲的種類。自2004年6月至2005年5月於台大實驗林內茅埔營林區中的64-7、65-7、69-5及70-3等4個地號土地選為樣區,分別設立3、3、7、12共25組陷阱,試驗期間每60天更換誘引劑,每2週調查1次誘集鞘翅目昆蟲之種類及數目。調查結果顯示共誘得40,366隻小蠹蟲,分屬9族30屬共73種(其中19種僅誘集到1隻),佔誘集鞘翅目昆蟲總數之53.7%(共誘集75,153隻甲蟲,隸屬59科);其中18種小蠹蟲為台灣已記錄種,2種台灣特有種,27種新記錄種,5種近似種及21種(8種僅捕獲1隻)疑似新種。誘集的小蠹蟲中,以Hypothenemus eruditus Westwood、Phloeosinus pertuberculatus Eggers、Scolytoplatypus pubescens Hagedorn、Xyleborus affinis Eichhoff (屬管制類的小蠹蟲)及Xylosandrus mancus (Blandford)數量最多,各佔誘集小蠹蟲總數之37%、24.4%、7.8%、7.6%及6.4%。為比較陷阱調查之結果,本研究還進行了段木調查,調查方式如下:收集樣區內之枯倒杉木,各樣區取3個1.5公尺長的木頭,各裁截成三段(段木),共進行3次;將段木帶回並用以飼養其內之小蠹蟲,結果共飼養出6科鞘翅目昆蟲,以P. pertuberculatus小蠹蟲的數量最多,佔42.6%(然而在陷阱調查中其數量位居第三)。杉木林中微氣候的變化不大,但大雨或颱風仍可能影響陷阱誘引劑氣味的釋放及小蠹蟲的飛行能力,因此試驗期間有1次颱風影響其後所進行之調查結果,其小蠹蟲的種類及族群數量是全年調查中最少的。文中亦探討鞘翅目昆蟲、小蠹蟲、小蠹蟲與天敵、前5種優勢的鞘翅目種類及小蠹蟲種類在整年調查期間族群之動態。在捕獲的甲蟲中共發現12科小蠹蟲的天敵,當中以隱翅蟲科及出尾蟲科的數量較多。四組樣區中以隱翅蟲科和小蠹蟲出現的相關性較佳(r = 0.73),優勢的小蠹蟲中以H. eruditus與出尾蟲科(r = 0.87)及X. affinis與郭公蟲科(r = 0.88)有極好的相關性。純杉木林中鞘翅目昆蟲及小蠹蟲種的豐富度分別為5.04及5.1,多樣性指數中的辛普森值分別為0.62及0.72,此數據可提供生態保育參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) belongs to the needle plant with economical significance for the usage of construction lumber. The scolytids (Curculionidae: Scolytinae), that are key pests in the forest and some are also quarantine pests, are likely to cause the dying of Chinese-fir in central Taiwan, 2002. The scolytids are attracted by volatile chemicals released from trees or woods, therefore in this study two lures, α-pinene and ethanol, were used with 12-units of Lindgren multiple funnel traps to investigate the species of scolytids in Chinese-fir plantation. From June 2004 to May 2005 in Nei-Mou-Pu Tract of NTU Experimental Forest, 3, 3, 7 and 12 traps were set in the no. 64-7, 65-7, 69-5 and 70-3 lots, respectively. During the investigation period, the beetles in the 25 traps were collected every other week and the lures were replaced every 60 days. The result showed that 40,366 scolytid individuls belonging to 73 species (including 9 species with only one specimen in the investigation period), 30 genera, and 9 tribes were collected and the number was 53.7% of that of total beetles (75,153 beetles belonging to 59 familes were collected). These 73 scolytid species included 2 endemic species, 18 recorded species, 5 near species, 27 new recorded species and 21 possible-new species (8 species had one specimen only) in Taiwan. The numbers of Hypothenemus eruditus Westwood, Phloeosinus pertuberculatus Eggers, Scolytoplatypus pubescens Hagedorn, Xyleborus affinis Eichhoff, and Xylosandrus mancus (Blandford) were 37%, 24.4%, 7.8%, 7.6%, and 6.4%, respectively, and they were the top five species of attracted scolytids in the collection. Three1.5-meter-length dead woods were collected in each lot, and each wood was cut into 3 lumbers to breed the insects which were collected in these woods. This experiment was repeated three times and it was for the comparison of the beetles in the traps. Finally 6 families of beetles were collected. Phloeosinus pertuberculatus Eggers was the third rich species in the traps; however, it was the most abundant one (accounted for 42.6% of beetles) in the woods. The microclimate changes little in pine forest, but heavy rain or typhoon influences the release rate of lures and the flight ability of scolytids. Therefore, after a typhoon hit Taiwan the numbers of scolytid species and their populations were the least in the investigation. The correlation between the numbers of total scolytids and their natural enemies that belong to 12 families and between the numbers of 5 dominant scolytids and these natural enemies were studied. In the collection, the numbers of Staphylinidae and Nitidulidae were the most abundant ones of these natural enemies. In these four areas the correlation between Staphylinidae and total scolytids is the most significant one (r = 0.73). Among 5 dominant scolytids, the correlations between H. eruditus and Nitidulidae is the most significant one (r = 0.87) and between X. affinis and Cleridae (r = 0.88) are the most two significant ones. In the pure pine forest the species richness of beetles and scolytids are 5.04 and 5.1, respectively, and the Simpson’s indices are 0.62 and 0.72, respectively. These data might be the good reference for the study on ecological conservation. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:22:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-P92632001-1.pdf: 4712724 bytes, checksum: 588a16d4b1d02896a38d4c74f530bf6b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要……………………………………………………………………i
英文摘要……………………………………………………………………ii 目錄…………………………………………………………………………iv 表次…………………………………………………………………………vi 圖次…………………………………………………………………………vii 壹、 緒言……………………………………………………………………1 貳、 往昔研究………………………………………………………………2 一、 台大實驗林概述………………………………………………2 二、 杉木……………………………………………………………2 三、 小蠹蟲概述……………………………………………………5 四、 小蠹蟲族群變動的因素………………………………………5 五、 林根氏多層誘蟲器……………………………………………6 六、 誘引劑…………………………………………………………8 七、 小蠹蟲天敵……………………………………………………8 八、 生物多樣性………………………………………….…………9 參、 材料與方法…………………………………………………………10 一、試驗地點………………………………………………………10 二、誘引裝置………………………………………………………12 三、誘引調查………………………………………………………12 四、段木收集………………………………………………………12 五、標本的處理與鑑定……………………………………………12 六、族群動態………………………………………………………12 七、天敵的選定……………………………………………………13 八、相關性分析……………………………………………………13 九、多樣性分析……………………………………………………13 肆、 結果…………………………………………………………………14 一、種類調查………………………………………………………14 (一)鞘翅目昆蟲………………………………………………14 (二)天敵………………………………………………………17 (三)小蠹蟲……………………………………………………18 二、族群動態…………………………………………………………35 (一)鞘翅目昆蟲………………………………………………35 (二)天敵與小蠹蟲……………………………………………44 (三)小蠹蟲……………………………………………………44 三、小蠹蟲與天敵之相關性分析……………………………………57 四、段木採集…………………………………………………………62 五、生物多樣性………………………………………………………62 伍、討論……………………………………………………………………65 陸、引用文獻………………………………………………………………72 柒、誌謝……………………………………………………………………78 捌、附錄……………………………………………………………………79 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 台大實驗林杉木林中小蠹蟲種類及族群變化 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Species and population changes of scolytids (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) in Chinese-fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in NTU Experimental Forest | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-1 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭武康,陳健忠,柯俊成 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 小蠹蟲,林根氏多層誘蟲器,天敵,生物多樣性, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | scolytid,Lindgren multiple funnel traps,enemy,biodiversity, | en |
dc.relation.page | 80 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-01-25 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.6 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。