Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 商學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34300
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor朱文儀
dc.contributor.authorMan-Chun Huangen
dc.contributor.author黃曼君zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T06:02:03Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-03
dc.date.copyright2006-07-03
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-06-21
dc.identifier.citation1. Ashforth, B. E. & Mael, F. 1989. Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14: 20-39.
2. Ashforth, B.E. & Mael, F. 1992. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13: 103-123.
3. Baker, W. 1990. Market networks and corporate behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 96: 589- 625.
4. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. 1993. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W, C, Borman (Eds.), Personal selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Bhattachrya, C. B., Rao, H., & Glynn, M. A. 1995. Understanding the bond of identification: An investigation of its correlates among art museum members. Journal of Marketing, 59: 46-57.
6. Bradach, J. L., & Eccles, R. G. 1989. Price, authority, and trust: From ideal types to plural forms. In W. R. Scott (Ed.), Annual review of sociology, 15: 97-118. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
7. Burt, R.S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Coase, 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica
9. Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: S95-S120.
10. De Vellis, R. F. 1991. Scale development theory and applications. London, SAGE.
11. Dutton, J. M., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail C. V. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 239-263.
12. Dyne, V., Linn, Graham, J. W., & Dienesch, R. M. 1994. Organizational citizenship behavior: Construct redefinition, operationalization and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 37: 765-802.
13. Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: Social virtues and the creation of prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton.
14. Gabarro, J. J. 1978. The development of trust, influence, and expectations. In A.G. Athos &J. J. Gabarro (Eds.), Interpersonal behaviors: Communication and understanding in relationships: 290-303. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15. Gambetta, D. (Ed.). 1988. Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
16. Ghoshal, S. & Moran, P. 1996. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21: 13-47.
17. Granovetter, M.S. 1985. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481-510.
18. Granovetter, M. S. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In N. Nohria & R. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action: 25-56. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
19. Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 85-112.
20. Hakansson, H. & Snehota, I. 1995. Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.
21. Jacobs, J. 1965. The death and life of great American cities. London: Penguin Books.
22. Larson, A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76-104.
23. Miskel, C.G., Mcdonald, D., & Blomm, S. 1983. Structural and expectancy linkings within schools and organizational effectiveness. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 19: 49-82.
24. Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Review, 23: 242-266.
25. Nunnally, J. C. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York, McGraw-Hill.
26. Powell, W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295-336.
27. Putnam, R. D. 1993. The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. American Prospect, 13: 35-42.
28. Putnam, R. D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6: 65-78.
29. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1992. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 483-498.
30. Ring, P. S., & Van de Ven, A. H. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 19:90-118.
31. Smidts, A., Pruyn, A.T., & Riel, C. B. M. 2001. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 44:1051-1062.
32. Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 464-476.
33. Tsai, W. 2000. Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 925-939.
34. Tsai, K. Y. 2000. The research of employee satisfaction, job involvement, organizational commitment and tendency of resigning in Hua Chin group. Unpublished master dissertation, Graduate Institute of Human Resource Management, National Sun Yat-sen University.
35. Tyler, T. R., & Kramer, R. M. 1996. Whither trust? In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research: 1-15. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Uzzi, B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
37. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35-67.
38. Wang, P. C. 1999. SPSS and behavioral science. Taipei, Psychological Publishing Co., Ltd.
39. Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34300-
dc.description.abstract本論文採用問卷調查的方式,進行研究社會資本、組織成員的行為,與組織績效之間的關係。問卷發放對象為國立台灣大學14個學生社團。
本論文的研究架構是根據與社會資本及組織認同相關的文獻,所建構而成。本論文中,「社會資本」包括三個構面:社交狀況、信任程度,與組織認同。組織成員的行為,本論文稱為「分享與支持的行為」,包括知識分享行為、忠誠與參與的行為,及建議別人參與其社團的意願。在組織的績效方面,本論文採用社團知名度、社員對社團的滿意度,及社員的留團期間,來作為「社團績效」的衡量指標。
本研究根據國立台灣大學學務處課外活動指導組,歷年來所公佈的社團評鑑名單,挑選績優社團與非績優社團作為研究樣本。同時挑選績優社團與非績優社團的目的為,以資比較績優社團與非績優社團的成員,在社會資本及分享與支持的行為上,是否有差異性的存在。
本研究的分析單位為社團成員,研究發現如下:
1. 組織成員所擁有的社會資本愈高,其愈會表現出分享與支持的行為。
2. 實證結果顯示社員們的信任程度與建議別人參加其社團的意願之間,並沒有存在顯著的相關性。這表示在成員對於組織的涉入程度上, 信任程度所帶來的影響相較於組織認同所帶來的影響,有程度上的差異。也就是說,當組織成員認同他們的組織時,將會更有意願去表現更多支持其組織的行為,亦即,具有組織認同的成員對於其組織有更高的涉入程度。
3. 分享與支持的行為可以促進組織內部的團結合作與和諧的氣氛,進而增進成員們對於其組織的滿意度。然而,實證結果卻顯示分享與支持的行為,對於社團知名度及社員留團期間的解釋能力上,則較為不足。
4. 實證結果顯示績優社團的成員比起非績優社團的成員,擁有較高的社會資本,及表現較多的分享與支持的行為,
關鍵字:社會資本、組織認同、分享與支持的行為、社團績效、學生社團
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation conducted a questionnaire survey in 14 student clubs of National Taiwan University to examine the relationships among social capital, behaviors of organizational members, and organizational performance.
The research framework is based on the theoretical foundations of existing literatures on social capital and organizational identification. The construct of social capital in this dissertation includes three dimensions: social interactions, trust & trustworthiness, and organizational identification. The behaviors of organizational members, which are called as sharing & supporting behaviors, include knowledge sharing behavior, behavior of loyalty & participation, and willingness of advising others to join the club. This research employed club popularity, members’ satisfaction with the club, and members’ duration of staying in the club to indicate club performance.
This research selected two types of student clubs: well-performing and non-well-performing clubs as our research samples based on the winning lists of the club evaluation published by the Office of Extracurricular Activities Section in National Taiwan University. The purpose of considering these two types of clubs is to compare the social capital and sharing & supporting behaviors between well-performing and non-well-performing clubs.
The unit of analysis of this research is the individual member of student clubs in National Taiwan University. The findings of this research are listed as follows.
1. The higher the level of social capital among organizational members, the more the extent organizational members are engaged in sharing and supporting behaviors.
2. The empirical results showed that there exist insignificant relationship between trust & trustworthiness and willingness of advising others to join the club; this manifests that the level of members’ involvement in the organization with regard to trust & trustworthiness is different from that with regard to organizational identification. Organizational members who identify with their organization would be more willing to behave in a more supportive manner for their organization. That is, organizational members with organizational identification have higher involvement in the organization.
3. Sharing & supporting behaviors result in cooperative, united, and harmonious climate in an organization; this contributes to members’ satisfaction with the organization. However, the empirical results showed that sharing & supporting behaviors have lower explanatory power in club popularity, and members’ duration of staying in the club than in members’ satisfaction with the organization.
4. The empirical results showed that members in well-performing clubs are possessed of higher level of social capital and higher level of sharing & supporting behaviors than those members in non-well-performing clubs.
Key words: Social capital; Organizational identification; Sharing & supporting behaviors; Club performance; Student clubs
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:02:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93741012-1.pdf: 652844 bytes, checksum: 0f77ab15ad2199ae4e02270fae82b7c4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents1. Introduction 9
1.1. Research Backgrounds and Motivations 9
1.2. Research Questions 10
1.3. Research Process 11
1.4. Research Subject 13
1.5. Structure of This Dissertation 13
2. Literature Review 15
2.1. Social Capital 15
2.1.1. Comparisons with Market and Hierarchy 19
2.1.2. Comparisons with Transaction Cost, Agency, and Game Theories 20
2.1.3. South Korean Student Radical Activists 22
2.2. Functions of Social Capital 23
2.2.1. Expectations and Trustworthiness 23
2.2.2. Information Channels 24
2.2.3. Norms and Sanctions 24
2.3. Dimensions of Social Capital 25
2.3.1. Cognitive Dimension of Social Capital 25
2.3.2. Structural Dimension of Social Capital 25
2.3.3. Relational Dimension of Social Capital 25
2.4. Social Capital and Intellectual Capital 26
2.5. Empirical Research on Social Capital 28
2.6. Identity and Identification 30
3. Research Framework and Hypotheses 32
3.1. Research Framework 32
3.1.1. Social Capital: Cognitive Dimension 33
3.1.2. Social Capital: Structural Dimension 35
3.1.3. Social Capital: Relational Dimension 35
3.1.4. Sharing & Supporting Behaviors 36
3.1.5. Club Performance 37
3.2. Hypotheses 37
3.2.1. Social Interactions 37
3.2.2. Trust & Trustworthiness 38
3.2.3. Organizational Identification 39
3.2.4. Sharing & Supporting Behaviors and Club Performance 40
3.2.5. Social Capital and Sharing & Supporting Behaviors Comparisons among Student Clubs 40
4. Research Methodology 42
4.1. Research Sample 42
4.2. Data Collection 44
4.3. Measurements of Variables 49
4.4. Reliability Analysis 53
4.5. Analytical Methods 55
5. Results 57
5.1. Descriptive Statistics 57
5.2. Pearson Correlation Analysis 58
5.3. Regression Analysis 62
5.4. One-Way ANOVA 70
5.5. Independent Samples t-Test 77
6. Conclusions 83
6.1. Conclusions 83
6.2. Limitations of the Research 85
6.3. Managerial Implications and Future Research 86
References 89
Appendix I: Questionnaire (English) 93
Appendix II: Questionnaire (Chinese) 98
Figures
Figure 1: Research Flowchart 12
Figure 2: Two Types of Network Structure 17
Figure 3: Social Capital in the Creation of Intellectual Capital 27
Figure 4: A Model of Social Capital and Value Creation 28
Figure 5: Research Framework 32
Figure 6: Classification of Student Clubs in National Taiwan University 43
Tables
Table 1: Comparisons of Different Perspectives of Social Capital 18
Table 2: Comparisons of Market, Hierarchy, and Network 20
Table 3: Comparisons with Transaction cost, Agency, and Game Theories 21
Table 4: Empirical Findings of Social Capital 29
Table 5: Background Information of the 14 Participating Clubs 46
Table 6: Categories of the 14 Participating Clubs 47
Table 7: Descriptive Statistics of Respondents’ Profiles (N=400) 48
Table 8: Expected Influences of Social Capital on Sharing & supporting behaviors 51
Table 9: Expected Influences of Sharing & supporting behaviors on Club Performances 52
Table 10: Results of Reliability Test (N=400) 54
Table 11: Descriptive Statistics of Research Variables (N=400) 58
Table 12: Mean, Standard Deviation, and Correlations (N=400) 61
Table 13: Regression of Sharing & Supporting Behaviors (N=400) 63
Table 14: Comparison between Research Hypotheses (H-1, H-2 & H-3) and Empirical Outcomes -- Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis 66
Table 15: Regression of Club Performance (N=400) 68
Table 16: Comparison between Research Hypotheses (H-4) and Empirical Outcomes -- Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis 70
Table 17: Social Capital Comparison of Three Groups -- One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe’s test (N=400) 72
Table 18: Sharing & Supporting Behaviors Comparison of Three Groups -- One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe’s test (N=400) 74
Table 19: Popularity and Satisfaction Comparison of Three Groups -- One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe’s test (N=400) 76
Table 20: Comparison between Research Hypotheses (H-5 & H-6) and Empirical Outcomes -- One-Way ANOVA and Scheffe’s test 77
Table 21: Social Capital Comparison between Well- and Non-Well-Performing Clubs (N=400) 79
Table 22: Sharing & Supporting Behaviors Comparison between Well- and Non-Well-Performing Clubs (N=400) 80
Table 23: Popularity and Satisfaction Comparison between Well- and Non-Well-Performing Clubs (N=400) 81
Table 24: Comparison between Research Hypotheses (H-5 & H-6) and Empirical Outcomes -- Independent Samples t-Test 82
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject組織認同zh_TW
dc.subject學生社團zh_TW
dc.subject社團績效zh_TW
dc.subject分享與支持的行為zh_TW
dc.subject社會資本zh_TW
dc.subjectSocial capitalen
dc.subjectOrganizational identificationen
dc.subjectSharing & supporting behaviorsen
dc.subjectClub performanceen
dc.subjectStudent clubsen
dc.title社會資本、分享與支持行為,及組織績效-國立台灣大學學生社團之實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleSocial Capital, Sharing & Supporting Behaviors, and Organizational Performance-An empirical study of student clubs in National Taiwan Universityen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃延聰,黃國?
dc.subject.keyword社會資本,組織認同,分享與支持的行為,社團績效,學生社團,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordSocial capital,Organizational identification,Sharing & supporting behaviors,Club performance,Student clubs,en
dc.relation.page101
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-06-22
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept商學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:商學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
637.54 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved