請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34274完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡星陽(Shing-Yang Hu) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Che-Wei Kang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 康哲維 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T06:00:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2007-07-19 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-19 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-06-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
黃寶慧,「台灣股市競價撮合與行情揭示制度對資訊揭露的影響之研 究」,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民國84年 詹宜潔,「台灣證券市場之限價單的研究」,國立政治大學財務管理 研究所碩士論文,民國90 年。 蔡弘凱,「臺灣股市下單積極性之研究」,國立台灣大學財務金融研 究所碩士論文,民國91年 張國宏,「透明度對台灣證券市場波動性、流動性及效率性之響」, 國立高雄第一科技大學財務管理研究所碩士論文,民國91年 黃寶慧,「委託單驅動市場的下單研究」,國立中山大學企業管理研 究所博士論文,民國92年 王裕翔,「限價單,市場深度的實證研究-以台灣證券市場為例」, 國立清華大學科技管理研究所碩士論文,民國93年 劉學庸,「揭露五檔買賣價量措施對台灣股市的影響」,銘傳大學財 務金融學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,民國93年 梁育立,「市價單與限價單日內績效之研究」,國立台灣大學企業管 理系博士論文,民國93年 英文文獻 Ahn, Hee-Joon, Kee-Hong Bae, and Kalok Chan, 2001, 「Limit orders, depth, and volatility:Evidencefrom the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong」, Journal of Finance 56, 767-778. Al-Suhaibani, M., and Kryzanowski, L., 2000,「An Exploratory Analysis of the Order Book,and Order Flow and Execution on the Saudi Stock Market」,Journal of Banking and Finance 24, 1323-1357. Al-suhaibani, M., and Kryzanowski, L., 2001, 「Limit vs. market order trading on the Saudi Stock Market」, working paper. Biais, B., Hillion, P., Spatt, C., 1995, 「An Empirical Analysis of the Limit Order Book and the Order Flow in the Paris Bourse」Journal of Finance 50, 1655-1689. Chan, K., Chung P. Y., and Johnson, H., 1995, 「The Intraday Behavior of Bid-Ask Spreads for NYSE Stocks and CBOE Options」, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 30, 329-346. Foster, F.D., and Viswanathan, S., 1993, 「Variations in Trading Volume, Return Volatility and Trading Costs: Evidence on Recent Price Formation Models」, Journal of Finance 48, 187-211. Griffiths, M., Smith, B., Turnbull, A., and White, R., 2000, 「The Costs and Determinants of Order Aggressiveness」, Journal of Financial Economics 56, 65-88. Glosten, L. R., and Harris, L., 1988, 「Estimating the Components of the Bid-Ask Spread」,Journal of Financial Economics 21, 123-142. Harris, L., 1986, 「A Transactions Data Study of Weekly and Intradaily Patterns in Stock Returns」, Journal of Financial Economics 16, 99-117. Harris, L., 1994, 「Minimum Price Variations, Discrete Bid/Ask Spreads and Quotation Sizes」,Review of Financial Studies 7, 149-178. Harris, L., and Hasbrouck, J., 1996, 「Market vs. Limit Orders: the SuperDOT Evidence on Order Submission Strategy」, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 213-231. James ,J., Angel,1997,「Tick Size, Share Prices, and Stock Splits」,Journal of Finance Vol. 52 No.2 Jain, P. C., and G.-H. Joh, (1988), 「The Dependence between Hourly Prices and Trading Volume」, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 269-283. Madhavan, A., 1992, 「Trading Mechanisms in Securities Market」, Journal of Finance 47,607-642. Madhavan, A., 1996, 「Security Prices and Market Transparency」, working paper. McInish, T. and R. Wood, 1992, 「An Analysis of Intraday Patterns in Bid/Ask Spreads for NYSE Stocks」, Journal of Finance 47, 753-764 Niemeyer, J., and Sandas, P., 1993, 「An Empirical Analysis of the Trading Structure at the Stockholm Stock Exchange」, Journal of Multinational Financial Management 3, 63-101. Ranaldo, A., 2001, 「Order aggressiveness」, working paper. Visaltanachoti, N., Charoenwong, C., and Ding, D., 2003, 「Analysis of Limit Order Book and Order Flow」, working paper. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34274 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究主要探討台灣證券市場在實施揭露未成交五檔買賣價申報價與量之後,市場上平均各檔買賣價差及市場深度的行為為何,對於所有市場參與者而言,如能更了解市場上委託簿價差的情況,及委託單集中的情形,就能了解市場上對於流動性的需求高低,進而增進下單時決定價格的能力。實證結果發現,在考慮樣本所在價位的升降單位之後,第一檔買賣價差顯著比買端與賣端各檔價差來的大;申報量則出現不對稱情形,買端越高報價其申報量越多,賣端也是較高報價申報量較多,可見在買端出現投資人下單積極度較高的情形,願意用比較高的價格來進行交易。進一步將台灣證券市場的相對升降單位比例與其他國家交易所相比較之後,發現台灣市場的相對升降單位比例較大,這也是除了資訊不對稱較嚴重之外造成買賣價差相對其他檔價差大的另外原因。
本研究亦探討了各檔報價價差以及各檔報價之申報量在日內以及一週內的型態之實證研究,結果發現開盤和收盤時因為資訊的累積和資訊的不確定,所以使得市場的流動性變差,因此在日內型態中,價差呈現U字型、申報量呈現倒U字型;而一週內的型態較不一致,各類價差在一週內不同交易日並無顯著不同的情形,而申報量雖然在一週內不同交易日有顯著不同的情形,但是並沒有明顯之型態可循。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper extensively employs the order and trade data to analyze the shape of limit order book. We try to give the spreads and depths of the five best bid /ask quotes a brief relationship. Taking the tick size into account, we find that the bid-ask spread is larger than other spreads away from the market. The depths of the five best bid/ask quotes have a different shape between bid and ask side. On the bid side, the depth at the market is the largest compared with the other depths away from the market, but on the ask side the depth at the market is the smallest. We contributed the larger bid-ask spreads to a larger tick size and the information asymmetry problems.
Moreover, we analyze the intraday and intraweek type of spreads and depths. This study first shows that the spreads and depths have a similar intraday pattern. The spreads have a U-shaped pattern, and the depths have a inverted U-shaped pattern. Second, the spreads are not significantly different during a week. Oppositely, the depths are significantly different during a week, but have no pronounced intraweek pattern. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T06:00:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93723085-1.pdf: 381927 bytes, checksum: ff9151340513bbb320261ba911212d24 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭...................................................I
中文摘要..............................................II 英文摘要.............................................III 第一章、緒論...........................................1 1.1 研究背景...........................................1 1.2 研究動機與目的.....................................5 第二章、文獻回顧與探討................................10 2.1 委託簿各檔價差與申報量型態實証研究之相關文獻......10 2.2 委託簿日內型態實証研究之相關文獻..................13 2.3 揭露未成交五檔資訊制度之介紹......................17 第三章、研究設計......................................19 3.1 研究資料來源......................................19 3.2 研究方法..........................................20 3.2.1 委託單價量型態議題..............................22 3.2.2 委託單日內型態與週內型態議題....................29 第四章、實證結果......................................32 4.1. 敘述統計.........................................32 4.2. 委託簿價量型態分析............................34 4.2.1 各檔未成交買賣價差與申報量之實證分析..........34 4.2.2 委託單日內型態與週內型態之實證分析............42 第五章、結論與建議....................................45 5.1. 結論.............................................45 5.2. 研究限制與未來研究方向建議.......................49 參考文獻..............................................50 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.subject | 市場深度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 買賣價差 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 限價單委託簿 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 最佳五檔買賣報價 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | bid-ask spread | en |
| dc.subject | market depths | en |
| dc.subject | five best bid/ask quotes | en |
| dc.subject | limit order book | en |
| dc.title | 最佳五檔買賣價量與限價單委託簿之實證研究-以台灣證券市場為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Empirical Result of the Five Best Bid/Ask Quotes and Depths in Limit Order Book- Take TAIEX for Exmaple | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建宏(Chien-Hung Chen),詹場(Chan Chang) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 最佳五檔買賣報價,市場深度,買賣價差,限價單委託簿, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | five best bid/ask quotes,market depths,bid-ask spread,limit order book, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 71 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-06-23 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 372.98 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
