Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34205Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 朱文儀 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Huan-Chu Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃奐衢 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T05:58:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-07-03 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-03 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-06-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | ENGLISH REFERENCES
Asquith P, Bruner R F, Mullins D W. 1983. The giants to bidding firms from merger. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 121-139. Beaver W H. 1968. The information content of annual earnings announcement. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 67-92. Blackburn V L, Dark F H, Hanson R C. 1997. Mergers, method of payment and returns to manager and owner-controlled firms. Financial Review 32: 569-589. Brouters K D, Hastenbury P V, Ven J V D. 1998. IF most mergers fail why are they so popular? Long Range Planning 31: 347-353. Chatterjee S, Wernerfelt B. 1991. “The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence”, Strategic Management Journal 12: 33-48. Conn R L, Connell F. 1990. International mergers: returns to U.S. and British Firms’. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 17: 689-711. Datta D K, Pinches G E, Narayanan V K. 1992. Factors influencing wealth creation from mergers and acquisitions: a meta-analysis. Strategic Management Journal 13: 67-84. Dodd P. 1980. Merger proposal, management discretion, and stockholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 8: 105-137. Doukas J, Travlos N G. 1998. The effect of corporate multinationalism on shareholders’ wealth: evidence from international acquisitions. Journal of Finance 43:1161-1175. Duggal R. 1995. Agency cost and firm value: further evidence from bidding firms”, International Journal of Finance 7: 1183-1194. Fama E F, Fisher L, Jensen M, Roll R. 1969. The adjustment of stock prices to new information. International Economic Review 10: 1-21. Franks J R, Harris R S.1989. Shareholder wealth effects of corporate takeovers: the U.K. experience 1955-1985. Journal of Financial Economics 23: 225-249. G.aughan P A. 2002. Mergers, Acquisitions, and Corporate Restructurings. John Wiley & Sons. Grant E B. 1980. Market implication of differential anounts of interim information. Journal of Accounting Research 18: 255-268. Harris R S, Ravenscraft D. 1991. The Role of Acquisitions in Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from the U.S. Stock Market. Journal of Finance 46: 825-844. Jensen M C, Meckling W H. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360. Jensen M C, Ruback R S. 1983. The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50. Khanna T, Palepu K. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging market? an analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance 55: 867-891. Kiymaz H, Mukherjee T K. 2000. The impact of country diversification on wealth effects in cross-border mergers. Financial Review 35: 37-58. Kohers N, Kohers T. 2000. The value creation potential of high-tech mergers. Financial Analysis Journal 56: 40-50. Lintner J. 1965. Security prices, risk and maximal gain from diversification. Journal of Finance 587-616. McNichols M, Manegold J G. 1983. The effect of the information environment on the relationship between financial disclosure and security price variability. Journal of Accounting and Economics 5: 49-74. Makhija M V. 2004. The value of restructuring in emerging economies: the case of the Czech Republic. Strategic Management Journal 25: 243-267. Pattel J M. 1976. Corporate forecasts of earnings per share and stock price behavior: empirical tests. Journal of Accounting Research 14: 246-276. Raad F, Wu H K. 1994. Acquiring Firm’s Stock Returns: Method of Payment, Chang in Leverage, and Management Ownership. Journal of Economics Finance 2: 13-29. Ramaswamy K, Li M, Veliyath R. 2002. Variations in ownership behavior and propensity to diversify: a study of the Indian corporate context. Strategic Management Journal 23: 345-358. Roll R. 1986. The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 59: 197-216. Seth A, Song K P, Pettit R R. 2002. Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: an empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of U.S. firms. Strategic Management Journal 23: 921-940. Sharpe W. 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risks. Journal of Finance 435-442. Singh H. and Montgomery C. A. 1987. Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal 8: 377-386. Sudarsanam S, Holl P, Salami A. 1996. Shareholder wealth gains in mergers: effects of synergy and ownership structure. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 23: 673-698. Ziebart D A. 1985. Control of beta reliability in studies of abnormal return magnitudes: a methodological note. Journal of Accounting Research 23: 920-926 CHINESE REFERENCES 彭一正(Peng Y C),臺灣企業進行國際併購對股東財富影響之實證研究,輔仁大 學管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十一年六月。 葉秋美(Ye Q M),臺灣企業購併宣告對股東財富之影響,國立政治大學國際貿易研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十二年六月。 陳匯中(Cheng H C),上市公司購併宣告對股東財富影響之研究,國立政治大學企管研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。 鄭至宏(Jeng C H),從內部化理論與代理理論探討台灣企業併購活動之股價效果,輔仁大學管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十四年六月。 蕭惠元(Hsiao H Y),購併活動對股價行為與會計資訊之影響--以上市公司為例,東吳大學會計研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十五年六月。 謝惠貞(Hsie H),購併活動對國內上市主併公司價值影響之研究,國立臺灣大學會計研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十六年六月。 羅明敏(Ro M M),台灣企業海內外購併宣告對主併公司股東財富影響之實證研究,朝陽科技大學財金所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十七年六月 沈建良(Chern J L),上市公司購併宣告對股價影響之研究-以電子業及食品業為例,國立政治大學企管研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國八十九年六月。 孫梅瑞(Sun M),國內上市公司從事公司購併活動對經營績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企管研究所,未出版博士論文,民國八十九年六月。 林喜淳(Lim, H S),購併宣告對股價的影響之研究-資訊電子為例,國立政治大學企管研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國九十年六月。 沈中華(Shen C H)、李建然(Lee J Z),事件研究法,事件研究法,華泰出版社, 民國九十年九月。 吳青松(Wu C S),國際企業管理---理論與實務,智勝出版社,民國九十一年三月。 古御呈(Ku Y),國內上市上櫃電子公司併購宣告對股價影響之研究,實踐大學企業管理研究所,未出版碩士論文,民國九十二年六月。 WEBSITES http://www.tse.com http://www.nyse.com http://newmops.tse.com | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/34205 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 有鑑於臺灣經貿環境日益發達、全球佈局步伐日趨繁湊下,臺灣企業參與或主導併購活動的頻率亦日漸揚升,是故,併購,尤其是全球性的併購,對臺灣企業、學界、政府,乃至於投資人,都是一項關鍵的議題。因此,本研究提出以臺灣企業為主併者,亦即聚焦於臺灣企業主動佈局的思維與角色,對全球進行併購時,國內股市所產生之累積平均異常報酬的分析,以及其成因的研究。
本研究的合併案資料來源為SDC資料庫,而樣本取樣期間為1/1/1990至12/31/2005,取樣標的為臺灣上市、櫃公司為併購案中之主併者,且該併購案之交易金額最少需為100萬美元,總計有109個研究樣本。此外,各樣本相關的股市資訊乃是由臺灣經濟資料庫(TEJ)中所粹擷而得。 本研究的研究法有二:針對標準累積平均異常報酬現象的分析,乃是運用事件研究法;而對於標準累積平均異常報酬的成因分析則採OLS迴歸法分析。 本文研究顯示,此109個合併案的主併者,其標準平均異常報酬及標準累積平均異常報酬之顯著峰值乃於宣告日後一交易日顯現,而並非宣告當日,這也符合了我國既有的「上市上櫃公司及興櫃股票公司合併或分割應注意事項」及「對上市公司重大訊息說明記者會作業程序」的法條規範之精神,而值得注意的是,此峰值為正向而非負向。而在潛在成因的研究方面,本研究共探討了六個可能的因子,即「主併者之產業」、「多角化程度」、「牽涉區域配對」、「宣告年度」、「交易後持股比例」,及「交易金額」,而研究顯示唯「多角化程度」具顯著影響,但解釋能力仍不大,亦即上述六個因子,無法顯著證明為此109個合併案所致的主併者標準累積平均異常報酬之直接影響成因,此原因可能是臺灣為新興經濟體,與成熟經濟體的歐美經濟行為不同,且臺灣股市結構與美股不同所致。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The study originates from the intention to investigate the standardized cumulative average abnormal returns (SCAR) in the stock market and the possible determinants in of the M&A activities, especially the global ones, with Taiwanese enterprises as acquirers due to the topics’ increasing significance and urgent necessity for the enterprises, academia, government, and investors as well under the more prosperous economic environment and more rapid globalization tide.
The M&A data were collected from the SDC database with the sampling period from 1/1/1990 to 12/31/2005. The samples are the Taiwanese listed or OTC companies which act as the acquirers in the M&A cases with the transaction scale higher than USD 1 million, amounting to 109 qualified cases. Additionally, the stock market related information was collected from the TEJ databases. Two methodologies are employed in this research. For the investigation on the SCAR, the event study serves; for the analysis of the determinants, the OLS regression functions. Findings of the 109 M&A cases show that the SCAR reaches the peak on the next effective transaction date to the date announced instead of the date announced, complying with the regulations and the spirit of “Guidelines for Mergers or Splits by Listed, OCT, and Emerging Stock Companies” and “Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation Procedures for Press Conferences Concerning Material Information of Listed Companies”. However, the peak appears to be positive instead of negative. As to the analyses of the determining factors, six variables are examined: acquirer’s industry, diversification, region match, year announced, percentage owned after the transaction, and the transaction scale. The statistical results show that, only diversification surfaces the significant impact on SCAR but with a low R2. That is, the six factors couldn’t be directly verified to contribute to SCAR. The reasons why may be attributed to the different economic stage that Taiwan locates in and U.S.A. belong to. In other words, the emerging economic behavior would diverge from the developed one. In addition, the distinct structures of stock markets in Taiwan and in U.S.A also serve the potential cause. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:58:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92741009-1.pdf: 939982 bytes, checksum: 8fc899118fd3120ce014398da1d1d50f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | CONTENTS
ABSTRACT (CHINESE) i ABSTRACT (ENGLISH) ii ACKNOWLEGEMENT (CHINESE) iv CONTENTS v CONTENTS OF TABLES ix CONTENTS OF FIGURES xii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 MOTIVATION 1 1.2 RESEARCH SUBJECT 2 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTIONS 2 1.4 CONTRIBUTIONS 3 1.5 ORGANIZATION OF THIS THESIS 3 1.5.1 THE CHAPTERS OF THIS THESIS 3 1.5.2 THE RESEARCH FLOW OF THIS THESIS 4 CHAPTER TWO: LIRERATURE REVIEW 2.1 THE DEFINITION OF M&A 6 2.2 THE MAJOR TYPES OF M&A 6 2.2.1 THE PERSPECTIVE OF LAWS 6 2.2.2 THE PERSPECTIVE OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 8 2.3 RATIONALES OF M&A 10 2.3.1 THE ECONOMIC MOTIVES 10 2.3.2 THE PERSONAL MOTIVES 10 2.3.3 THE STRATEGIC MOTIVES 11 2.4 THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN M&A ANOUNCEMENT AND STOCK PRICES 11 2.5 INDEPENDENT VARTIABLES 17 2.6 HYPOTHESES 19 2.7 RESEARCH FRAMWORK 22 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1 RESEARCH SAMPLE 24 3.2 DATA SOURCES 24 3.3 SELECTION OF DAYS FOR ANALYSES 24 i3.4 EQUILIBRIUM PREDICTION OF RETURNS MODLE 26 3.4.1 MARKET MODEL 26 3.4.2 MARKET-ADJUSTED RETURNS MODEL 27 3.4.3 MEAN-ADJUSTED RETURNS MODEL 27 3.5 CALCULATION OF ABNORMAL RETURNS 28 3.5.1 CALCULARION OF AVERAGE ABNORMAL RETURNS 28 3.5.2 CALCULARION OF CUMULATIVE AVERAGE ABNORMAL RETURNS 29 3.6 STATISTICAL TEST METHODS 29 3.6.1 TEST FOR AVERAGE ABNORMAL RETURNS 29 3.6.2 TEST FOR CUMULATIVE AVERAGE ABNORMAL RETURNS 30 3.7 DEPENDENT VARIABLE 30 3.8 INDEPENDENT VARIABLES 31 3.8.1 ACQUIRER’S INDUSTRY 31 3.8.2 DIVESIFICATION 32 3.8.3 REGION MATCH 33 3.8.4 YEAR ANNOUNCED 34 3.8.5 PERCENTAGE OWNED AFTER TRANSACTION 34 3.8.6 TRANSACTION SCALE 35 3.9 STATISTICAL SOFTWARE 36 CHAPTER FOUR: EMPIRICAL RESULTS AND ANALYSES 4.1 PROFILE OF RESEARCH SAMPLE 37 4.2 STATISTICS OF ABNORMAL RETUNS 39 4.3 STATISTICS OF OLS REGRESSION 42 4.3.1 ORIGINAL OLS REGRESSION RESULTS 42 4.3.2 OLS REGRESSION RESULTS OF NEW CODING 48 4.4 DISCUSSION 53 CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS, LIMITATIONS, & FUTURE RESERCH 5.1 CONCLUSIONS 58 5.1.1 CONCLUSIONS OF ABNORMAL RETURNS 58 5.1.2 CONCLUSIONS OF REGRESSION MODLE 58 5.2 LIMITATION 59 5.3 FUTURE REASERCH 60 APPENDIX 61 REFERENCES 71 ENGLISH REFERENCES 71 CHINESE REFERENCES 74 WEBSITES 75 CONTENTS OF TABLES CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Table 1-1 Major five waves of M&A in U.S.A. 2 CHAPTER TWO: LIRERATURE REVIEW Table 2-1 Classification of various kinds of M&A. 9 Table 2-2 Classification of various kinds of M&A motives. 11 Table 2-3 Empirical Research on the relationship between M&A and stock price: Taiwan cases 12 Table 2-4 Empirical Research on the relationship between M&A and stock price: Western cases 14 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Table 3-1 The industrial codes of high-tech industry based on SDC base 32 Table 3-2 The coding rationale for industry 32 Table 3-3 The coding rationale for diversification. 33 Table 3-4 The coding rationale for region matches 34 Table 3-5 The coding rationale for year announced 34 Table 3-6 The coding rationale for percentage owned after transaction 35 Table 3-7 The coding rationale for transaction scale 36 CHAPTER FOUR: EMPIRICAL REULTS AND ANALYSES Table 4-1. Chronological distribution of sample data based on the year announced during the period of 1/1/1990 to 12/31/2005. 38 Table 4-2. Statistic results for SAR and SCAR of the 109 M&A cases. 40 Table 4-3. Original coding rationales. 43 Table 4-4. Correlation among independent variables by Pearson method: original coding. 43 Table 4-5. Correlation among independent variables by Spearman method: original coding. 44 Table 4-6. The OLS regression results of original coding. 44 Table 4-7. The OLS regression results of original coding with acquirers’ industry as the independent variable. 45 Table 4-8. The OLS regression results of original coding with diversification as the independent variable. 46 Table 4-9. The OLS regression results of original coding with region match as the independent variable. 46 Table 4-10. The OLS regression results of original coding with the year announced as the independent variable. 47 Table 4-11. The OLS regression results of original coding with percentage owned after the transaction as the independent variable. 47 Table 4-12. The OLS regression results of original coding with the transaction scale as the independent variable. 48 Table 4-13. New coding rationales. 49 Table 4-14. Correlation among independent variables by Pearson method: new coding. 50 Table 4-15. Correlation among independent variables by Spearman method: new coding. 50 Table 4-16. The OLS regression results of new coding. 50 Table 4-17. The OLS regression results of new coding with diversification as the independent variable. 52 Table 4-18. Summary of the statistical results. 52 Table 4-19. Major source of NYSE volume. 55 Table 4-20. Public Transaction-Distribution of public volume on NYSE 56 Table 4-21. Percent turnover in Taiwan stock market and on NYSE from 1990 to 2005 56 CONTENTS OF FIGURES CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Figure 1-1 Research flow of this thesis. 5 CHAPTER TWO LIRERATURE REVIEW Figure 2-1 Conceptual categories of M&A from the perspective of laws. 8 Figure 2-2 The Framework of this research. 23 CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Figure 3-1. The illustration of date announced, event window, and estimation period. 26 CHAPTER FOUR: RESEARCH REULTS AND ANALYSES Figure 4-1. Individual percentage of research samples with distinct backgrounds in terms of the acquirers’ industries and the region matches. 38 Figure 4-2 Chronological distribution of qualified sample data on the basis of acquirers’ industries, the region matches, and the year announced 39 Figure 4-3 SAR of the 109 M&A cases within 21 days. 41 Figure 4-4 SCAR of the 109 M&A cases within 21 days. 41 Figure 4-5 Sources of capital of listed companies in Taiwan in 2005 57 Figure 4-6 Securities transaction categorized types of investors in 2005. 57 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 事件研究法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 併購 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 累積平均異常報酬 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | M&A | en |
| dc.subject | SCAR | en |
| dc.subject | Event Study | en |
| dc.title | 全球併購與股市標準累積平均異常報酬之關係:
以台灣上市上櫃公司做為主併者之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Global Mergers & Acquisitions and
Standardized Cumulative Average Abnormal Returns: Empirical Evidence from Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 唐纓璋,黃延聰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 併購,累積平均異常報酬,事件研究法, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | M&A,SCAR,Event Study, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-06-28 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 商學研究所 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf Restricted Access | 917.95 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
