請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33983
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李存修(Tsun-Siou Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | "Wei-Chun, Lin" | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林韋君 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T05:50:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-05 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-02-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-05 | |
dc.identifier.citation | References
Andrew K. Prevost, Remash P. Rao, Mahmud Hossain, 2002. Determinants of board composition in New Zealand: a simultaneous equations approach. Journal of Empirical Finance 373-397. Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C., 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 377-397. Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny. 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control. Journal of Political Economy. 94:3, 461-88. Baliga, B.R., Moyer, R.C. and Rao, R.S, 1996. CEO duality and firm performance: What's the fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17, (1), 41-53. Bathala, C., Rao, R.P., 1995. The determinants of board composition: an agency theory perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics 16, 59-69. Baysinger, B.D., Butler, H.N., 1985. Corporate governance and the board of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1, 101-124. Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black, 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law. 27(2), Winter 2002, 231-273. Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black, 1999. The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance, Business Lawyer 54, 921-963. Borokhovich, K., Parrino, R., Trapani, T., 1996. Outside directors and CEO selection. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 337-355. Dalton, D.R., Kesner, I.F., 1987. Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: an international perspective. Journal of International Business Studies 18, 33-42. Dalton, D.R., Dailey, C M., Ellstrand, A.E. and Johnson, J.L., 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance, Strategic Management Journal, 19, (3), 269-290. Damodar N. Gujarati , 2003. Basic Econometrics Evans, J. and Weir, C., 1995. Decision processes, monitoring, incentives and large firm performance in the UK, Management Decision, 33, (6), 32-37.35 Grossman, S.J., Hart, O., 1982. Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives.In: McCall, J.J. (Ed.), The Economics of Information and Uncertainty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 107-137. Harris, M., Raviv, A., 1991. The theory of capital structure. Journal of Finance 46,297-356. Hermalin, E.B., Weisbach, S.M., 1988. The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics 19, 589-606. Hermalin, E.B., Weisbach, S.M., 1991. The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance.Financial Management 20, 101-112. Jensen, M.C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76, 323-329. Klein, A., 2002. Economic determinants of audit committee independence. The Accounting Review, April, 435-452. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lo’ pez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and Robert Vishny., 1999. Corporate Ownership Around the World. Journal of Finance. 54:2, 471-520. Lawrence, J., Stapledon, G.P., 1999. Is board composition important? A study of listed Australian companies. Research Report, CCLSR,University of Melbourne. Li, J., 1994. Ownership structure and board composition: a multi-country test of agency theory predictions. Mana gerial and Decision Economics 15, 359-368. MacAvoy, Paul W., S. Cantor, J. Dana and S. Peck, 1983. ALI proposals for increased control of the corporation by the board of directors: An economic analysis. In Statement of the Business Roundtable on the American Law Institute's Proposed 'Principles of Corporate Governance and Structure: Restatement and Recommendations, exhibit C-1. Gallant, A. Ronald, and J. Jeffery Goebel, 1976. Three-stage least-squares estimations for a system of simultaneous, nonlinear, implicit equations. Journal of Econometrics 5, 71-88 Rosenstein, S., Wyatt, J., 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26, 175-191. Schellenger, M.H., Wood, D.D., Tashakori, A., 1989. Board of director composition, shareholder wealth, and dividend policy. Journal of Management 15, 457-467. 36 Tosi, H.L.Jr and Gomez-Mejia, L.R., 1994. CEO compensation monitoring and firm performance, Academy-of-Management-Journal, 37, (4), 1002-1016. Weisbach, S.M., 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of FinancialEconomics 20, 431-460. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33983 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 此篇論文運用了同步迴歸–三階段最小平方法來探討公司績效與董事
會組成的雙向關係,其中我們以所有獨立董、監事席次佔所有董、監會席次的比例來代表董事會組成的獨立性。我們的研究結果發現這兩個變數間的關係是互相影響,且正向的相互良性循環。在董事會組成的式子裡,實證結果顯示應變數–董事會的獨立性,與公司績效、現金權、電子相關產業虛擬變數正相關;與公司規模、成長性負相關。而在公司績效的式子裡,應變數–公司績效與董監事質押比例、負債比例與研發費用負相關;與董事會組成獨立性、現金權、偏離程度與公司規模成反比。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This paper employ a simultaneous equation model to explore the cause and effect relationship between board composition (we proxy it by the percentage of the independent members on the board, including directors and supervisors) and firm performance. Our finding reveals that the two variables impact and interact with each other jointly in a positive manner that brings a virtuous circle into companies. In the board composition equation, we find evidence that the percentage of independence of the board correlate positively to firm performance 、cash flow right and
electronics-related industry and is negatively impacted by firm size and growth opportunities. In the other equation, firm performance is inversely impacted by equity pledge percentage 、debt ratio and research and development expenditure and positively relates to board independence、cash flow right、divergence percentage and firm size. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:50:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93723040-1.pdf: 1185764 bytes, checksum: e53f60dc431e12bfd184e9b30ff689bd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書… … … … … … … … … … … … … i 致謝… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … … ii 中文摘要… … … … … … … … … … … … … … …iii 英文摘要… … … … … … … … … … … … … … … iv 1.Introduction....................................... 1 2.Literature Review.................................. 2 Does board composition affect firm performance? ..... 3 Does firm performance affect board compos ition? .....5 The ambiguous relationship between firm performance and board composition.................................... 6 3. Methodology....................................... 7 Board composition equation........................... 8 Firm performance equation............................13 4. Model............................................ 16 5. Data Collection ......................................... 19 6. Empirical Results ............................... 22 7. Conclusion....................................... 33 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 董事會組成與公司績效之雙向關係研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The interaction between board composition and firm
performance – a simultaneous equation approach | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳業寧(Yeh-Ning Chen),葉銀華(Yin-Hua Yeh) | |
dc.subject.keyword | 同步迴歸,公司績效,董事會組成, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | simultaneous equation,firm performance,board composition, | en |
dc.relation.page | 36 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-06 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.16 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。