請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33796
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 石正人(Cheng-Jen Shih) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chih-Chi Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李志琦 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T05:46:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-26 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Adams J, Rothman ED, Kerr WE, Paulino ZL. 1977. Estimation of the number of sex alleles and queen matings from diploid male frequencies in a population of Apis mellifera. Genetics 86: 583-596.
Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM. 2003. Herbivores and the success of exotic plants: a phylogenetically controlled experiment. Ecol Lett 6: 712-715. Allen CR, Forys EA, Rice KG, Wojcik DP. 2001. Effects of fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on hatching turtles and prevalence of fire ants on sea turtle nesting beaches in Florida. Fla Entomol 84: 250-253. Antolin MF, Ode PJ, Heimpel GE, O’Hara RB, Strand MR. 2003. Population structure, mating system, and sex-determining allele diversity of the parasitoid wasp Habrobracon hebetor. Heredity 91: 373-381. Ascunce, MS, Bouwma AM, Shoemaker D. 2009. Characterization of 24 microsatellite makers in 11 species of fire ants in the genus Solenopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1475-1479. Ascunce MS, Yang CC, Oakey J, Calcaterra L, Wu WJ, Shih CJ, Goudet J, Ross KG, Shoemaker D. 2011. Global invasion history of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Science 331: 1066-1068. Beye M, Hasselmann M, Fondrk MK, Page RE, Jr, Omholt SW. 2003. The gene csd is the primary signal for sexual development in the honeybee and encodes an SR-type protein. Cell 114: 419-429. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D. 2005. Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11. Brown MJ, Schmid-Hempel P. 2003. The evolution of female multiple mating in social hymenoptera. Evolution 57: 2067-2081. Buschinger A. 1983. Sexual behavior and slave raiding of the dulotic ant, Harpagoxenus sublaevis (Nyl.) under field conditions (Hym., Formicidae). Insect Soc 30: 235-240. Buschinger A, Fischer K. 1991. Hybeidization of chromosome-poly-morphic populations of the inquiline ant, Doronomyrmex kutteri (Hym., Formicidae). Insect Soc 38: 95-103. Callaway RM, Thelen GC, Rodriguez A, Holben WE. 2004. Soil biota and exotic plant invasion. Nature 427: 731-733. Chalcraft DR, Andrews RM. 1999. Predation on lizard eggs by ants: species interactions in a variable physical environment. Oecologia 19: 285-292. Chang CC. 2010. Colony relatedness and microgeographical genetic structure of red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta in Taiwan. pp.25-26 National Taiwan University Master Thesis. Chen JS, Shen CCH, Lee HJ. 2006. Monogynous and polygynous red imported fire ants, Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Taiwan. Environ Entomol 35: 167-172. Cho S, Huang ZY, Green DR, Smith DR, Zhang J. 2006. Evolution of the complementary sex determination gene of honey bees: balancing selection and trans-species polymorphisms. Genome Res 16: 1366-1375. Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, Maclsaac HJ. 2004. Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7: 721-733. Cook JM, Crozier RH. 1995. Sex determination and population biology in the Hymenoptera. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 281-286. Drake JM, Baggenstos P, Lodge DM. 2005. Propagule pressure and persistence in experimental populations. Biol Lett 1: 480-483. Drees BM. 1994. Red imported fire ant predation on nestlings of colonial waterbirds. Southwest Entomol 19: 355-359. Drescher J, Blüthgen N, Frldhaar H. 2007. Population structure and intraspecific aggression in the invasive ant species Anoplolepis gracilipes in Malaysian Borneo. Mol Ecol 16: 1453-1465. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611-2620. Facon B, Hufbauer RA, Tayeh A, Loiseau A, Lombaert E, Vitalis R, Guillemaud T, Lundgren JG, Estoup A. 2011. Inbreeding depression is prugen in the invasive insect Harmonia axyridis. Curr Biol 21: 1-4. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2003. Inference of population structure using multilocus genetype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587. Forys EA, Quistorff A, Allen CR, Wojcik DP. 2001. The likely cause of extinction of the tree snail Orthalicus reses reses (Say). J Moll Stud 67: 368-376. Frankham R, Ralls K. 1998. Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature 392: 441-442. Frankham R. 2005. Resolving the genetic paradox in invasive species. Heredity 94: 385. Garlapaty RB, Cross DC, Perera OP, Caprio MA. 2008. Characteristics of 11 polymorphic microsatellite makers in the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Mol Ecol Notes 9: 822-824. Glémin S. 2003. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating. Evolution 57: 2678-2687. Hasselmann M, Gempe T, Schiøtt M, Nunes-Silva CG, Otte M, Beye M. 2008. Evidence for the evolutionary nascence of a novel sex determination pathway in honeybees. Nature 454: 519-522. Holloway AK, Heimpel GE, Strand MR, Antolin MF. 1999. Survival of diploid males in Bracon sp. near hebetor (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 92: 110-116. Holway DA, Lach L, Suarez AV, Tsutsui ND, Case TJ. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33: 181-233. Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2009. Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9: 1322-1332. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. 2002. Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 164-170. Kelly DW, Muirhead JR, Heath DD, Macisaac HJ. 2006. Contrasting patterns in genetic diversity following multiple invasions of fresh and brackish waters. Mol Ecol 15: 3641-3653. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199-204. Kolar CS, Lodge DM. 2002. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alian fishes in North America. Science 298: 1233-1235. Kolbe JJ, Glor RE, Schettino LR, Lara AC, Larson A, Losos JB. 2004. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431: 177-181. Krieger MJB, Keller L. 1997. Polymorphism at dinucleotide microsatellite loci in fire ant Solenopsis invicta populations. Mol Ecol 6: 997-999. Langkilde T. 2009. Invasive fire ants alter behavior and morphology of native lizards. Ecology 90: 208-217. Lee CE. 2002. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17: 386-391. Lockwood JL, Cassey P, Blackburn T. 2005. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 223-228. Lodge DM. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for Ecologyecology. Trends Threds Ecol Evol 8: 133-137. Lofgren CS. 1986. History of imported fire ants in the United States. pp. 36-47. In: Fire ants and leaf-cutting ants: biology and management. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 2000. 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasion species database (GISD). Aliens 12: 12. Mitchell CE, Power AG. 2003 Release of invasive plants from fungal and viral pathogens. Nature 421: 625-627. Moller H. 1996. Leesons for invasion theory from social insects. Biol Conserv 78: 125-142. Montarry J, Andrivon D, Glais I, Corbiere R, Mialdea G, Delotte F. 2010. Microsatellite makers reveal two admixed genetic groups and ongoing displacement within the French population of invasive plant pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mol Ecol 19: 1965-1977 Moulis RA 1996. Predation by the imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) on loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests on Wassaw National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia. Chelonian Conserv Bio 2: 433-436. Page RE, Metcalf RA. 1984. A population investment sex ratio for the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Am Nat 124: 680-702. Pamilo P, Sundström L, Fortelius W, Rosengren R. 1994. Diploid males and colony-level selection in Formica ants. Ethol Ecol Evol 6: 221-235. Peakall R, Smouse PE. 2006. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295. Pedersen JS, Krieger JB, Vogel V, Giraud T, Keller L. 2006. Native supercolonies of unrelated individuals in the invasive agentine ant. Evolution 60: 782-791. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A. 2004. GeneClass2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95: 536-539. Porter SD, Savignano DA. 1990. Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology 71: 2095-2106. Porter SD. 1988. Impact of temperature on colony growth and developmental rates of the ant, Solenopsis invicta. J Insect Physiol 34: 1127-1133. Porter SD, Willams DF, Patterson RS Fowleri HG. 1997. Intercontinental differences in the abundance of Solenopsis fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): escape from natural enemies? Environ Entomol 26: 373-384. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype datadata. Genetics 155: 945-959. Qian ZQ, Crozier YC, Schlick-Steiner BC, Steiner FM. 2008. Characterization of expressed sequence tag (EST)-derived microsatellite loci in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Conserv Genet 10:1373-1376. Rannala B, Mountain JL. 1997. Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. PNAS 94: 9197-9201. Ratnieks FLW. 1990. The evolution of polyandry by queens in social Hymenoptera: the significance of the timing of removal diploid males. Behav Evol Sociobiol 26: 343-348. Raymond M, Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249 Roman J, Darling JA. 2007. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22: 454-464. Ross KG, Fletcher DJC. 1986. Diploid male production a signification colony mortality factor in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:283-291. Ross KG, Shoemaker DD. 1997. Nuclear and mitochondrial genetic structure in two social forms of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta: insights into transitions to an alternate social organization. Heredity 78: 590-602. Ross KG, Vargo EL, Keller L, Trager JC. 1993. Effect of a founder evenr on variation in the genetic sex-determining system of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Genetic Soc Am 135: 843-854. Rousset F, 2008. Genepop'007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103-106. Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann Entomol Soc Am 87: 651-701. Strassmann J. 2001. The rarity of multiple mating by females in the social Hymeniptera. Insectes Soc 48: 1-13. Swindell WR, Bouzat JL. 2006. Reduced inbreeding depression due to historical inbreeding in Drosophila melanogaster: evidence for purging. J Evol Eiol 19: 1257-1264. Thomas ML, Becker K, Abbott K, Frldhaar H. 2010. Superolony mosaics: two different invasions by the crazy ant, Anoplolepis gracilipes, on Christmas Island, Indian Ocean. Biol Invasions 12: 677-687. Torchin ME, Lafferty KD, Dobson AP, McKenzie VJ, Kuris AM. 2003. Introduced species and their missing parasites. Nature 421: 628-630. Tschinkel WR. 1993. Resource allocation, brood production and cannibalism during colony founding in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 33: 209-223. Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ. 2000. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an incasive species. PNAS 97:5948-5953. Valles SM, Porter SD. 2003. Identification of polygyne and monogyne fire ant colonies (Solenopsis invicta) by multiplex PCR of Gp-9 alleles. Insectes Soc 50: 199-200. Vanderwoude C,Elson-Harris M, Hargreaves JR, Harris E, Plowman KP. 2004. An overview of the red imported fire ants (Solenopsis invicta) eradication plan for Australia. Records of the South Australian Museum Series 7: 11-16. Verhulst EC, Zande LVD, Beukboom LW. 2010. Insect sex determination: it all evolves around transformer. Genet Dev 20: 376-383. Wilgenburg EV, Driessen G, Beukeboom LW. 2006. Single locus complementary sex determination in Hymenoptera: and “unintelligent” design? Front Zool 3:1-15. Yang CC, Shoemaker DD, Wu WJ, Shih CJ. 2008. Population genetic structure of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta, in Taiwan. Insectes Soc 55: 54-65. Yang CC, Shoemaker DD, Wu JC, Lin YK, Lin CC, Wu WJ, Shih CJ. 2009. Successful establishment of the invasive fire ant Solenopsis invicta in Taiwan: Insights into interactions of alternate social forms. Diver. Distrib. 15: 709-719. Yang CC, Yu YC, Valles SM, Oi DH, Chen TC, Shoemaker D, Wu WJ, Shih CJ. 2010. Loss of microbial (pathogern) infections associated with recent invasions of the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Biol Invasions 12: 3307-3318. Zayed A, Constantin SA, Packer L. 2007. Successful biological invasion despite a severe genetic load. Plos One 2: e868 Zhang R, Li Y, Liu N, Porter SD. 2007. An overview of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in mainland China. Fla Entomol 90: 723-730. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33796 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 遺傳多樣性是物種生存與演化的根基,當入侵生物抵達新的環境時,僅有少數奠基者 (founder) 得以成功定殖而導致遺傳多樣性降低,提昇自交衰亡 (inbreeding depression) 或累積致死因子 (deletrous) 而滅絕的機率,卻依然成功入侵新環境並對當地生物產生危害,降低當地生物多樣性。其中社會性昆蟲僅需少量奠基者即可成功定殖,使得拓殖初期難以偵測其入侵與否直至產生穩定族群,加上其繁殖力強、擴散能力高以及形成「超級個體 (super individual)」之高競爭力導致社會性昆蟲如螞蟻、黃蜂、以及白蟻成為近年來新興的入侵生物。源自南美之入侵紅火蟻 (Solenopsis invicta) 於近幾年證實入侵臺灣、中國及澳洲等國家,提供一個了解入侵生物成功關鍵相當好之題材。入侵紅火蟻之性別是由單一基因座互補性別決定系統 (single locus complementary sex determination [sl-CSD] system) 決定;理論上,入侵紅火蟻會因喪失遺傳多樣性而大量產生二倍體不孕雄蟲進而產生嚴重衰亡。本研究利用族群遺傳的方式來了解入侵紅火蟻如何克服此項困難。我們計算配對交配蟻后 (match mated queen) 之比例來回推性別決定基因之等位基因數,估算臺灣火蟻之性別決定基因擁有12.5個不同等位基因,此結果與臺灣火蟻之入侵來源並無明顯差別。接著利用12個微隨體基因座 (microsatellite) 於桃園120巢火蟻中進行分析,結果顯示兩個不同基因群 (genetic cluster) 混雜分布於其中,代表至少發生兩次以上不同來源的入侵事件。這些跡象顯示入侵紅火蟻可能因為多次入侵臺灣而維持其遺傳多樣性,進而逃離性別決定基因之遺傳負荷 (genetic load) 成為一成功之入侵生物。本研究不僅發現需要大量遺傳標記才可發現的隱藏入侵事件,更提供了遺傳多樣性與多次入侵成功重要關聯的證據。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Genetic diversity is one of the key determinants for species’ survival and evolution. From the conservation biology perspective, a small population is prone to extinction by inbreeding depression or accumulation of deleterious mutations. Invasive species, however, are generally successful in introduced ranges despite loss of genetic diversity due to small founder population sizes, which gives rise to a paradox between invasion and conservation biology in term of genetic diversity. Social insects, such as ants, wasps, and termites, represent a highly successful group of invasive species not only because their small founder population sizes often lack immediately recognizable signature but also their great dispersal power, high reproductive rate and the competitive ability of “super individuals”. One of the notorious ant invaders, the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), originating from South America, has been accidentally introduced into the USA, Australia, Taiwan and China. Invasions by fire ants in these areas provide an excellent framework to investigate the factors contributing to the successful establishment of social insects especially since this species utilizes a single locus complementary sex determination (sl-CSD) system. Theoretically, the genetic load is predicted to be much more profound for S. invicta due to the mass production of sterile diploid males imposed by loss of genetic diversity. This study therefore aimed to determine how fire ants overcome such a disadvantage using population genetic approaches. An assessment of genetic variation at 12 microsatellite loci in 120 fire ant colonies in northern Taiwan (Taoyuan) revealed that Taoyuan was colonized by ants on a minimum of two occasions. Furthermore, estimates of genetic diversity at the CSD locus by calculating the proportion of match matings (queens mated with males harboring identical CSD allele) do not differ significantly between fire ant populations in Taiwan and the putative source, the USA, suggesting that the successful invasion of fire ants is likely attributable to adequate genetic diversity maintained by larger propagule number (e.g, multiple invasions). In summary, this study not only highlights that cryptic invasions might be undetected until the deep genetic structure of focal populations has been revealed but also signifies the importance of genetic diversity in shaping the invasion success of fire ants. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:46:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98632004-1.pdf: 871186 bytes, checksum: 1fde11dd3092e97c285ce9a3f10efdac (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書............................................I
誌謝.....................................................II 中文摘要................................................III Abstract.................................................IV Table of Contents........................................VI List of Tables.........................................VIII List of Figures..........................................IX Abbreviation Table........................................X 1. Introduction...........................................1 2. Materials and methods..................................7 2.1 Sample collection.....................................7 2.1.1 Sample collection for population genetic studies....7 2.1.2 Sample collection for estimating the number of CSD alleles...................................................8 2.2 Allele number for the single locus complementary sex determination gene ........................................9 2.3 Population genetics of fire ants......................10 2.3.1 DNA extraction and social form determination by Gp-9 multiplex PCR.............................................10 2.3.2 Microsatellites analyses............................11 2.3.3 Mitochondrial DNA haplotype analysis................12 2.4 Genetic analysis......................................13 2.4.1 Genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and linkage disequibrium......................................13 2.4.2 STRUCTURE analysis..................................14 2.4.4 Exclusion tests.....................................15 2.4.5 Assignment tests....................................16 3. Results................................................16 3.1 Estimation of the number of complementary sex determination alleles.....................................16 3.2 Social form and mtDNA haplotype distribution in Taoyuan ................................................17 3.3 Genetic diversity, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium of microsatellite markers.........18 3.4 Population structure of S. invicta in Taoyuan........19 4. Discussion............................................27 4.1 Genetic bottleneck? Is complementary sex determination load important?..........................................28 4.2 The role of propagule pressure: big inoculum size or multiple invasions?......................................31 4.3 Fire ant invasion hypothesis: from a genetic approach ................................................34 5. References............................................36 Appendix.................................................45 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 以繁殖體壓力及遺傳多樣性探討臺灣入侵紅火蟻成功入侵模式 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The role of propagule pressure and genetic diversity in successful invasion of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) in Taiwan | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 王忠信(John Wang) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃榮南,楊景程 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 入侵紅火蟻,入侵生物學,性別決定基因,族群遺傳,微隨基因座,繁殖體壓力, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | fire ant,invasion biology,microsatellite,population genetics,propagule pressure,Solenopsis invicta, | en |
dc.relation.page | 47 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 850.77 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。