Skip navigation

DSpace JSPUI

DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets

Learn More
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Publication Year
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Advisor
  • Search TDR
  • Rights Q&A
    • My Page
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 會計學系
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33691
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield???ValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor李書行
dc.contributor.authorChia-Ying Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳佳盈zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T05:44:39Z-
dc.date.available2006-07-21
dc.date.copyright2006-07-21
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-13
dc.identifier.citationAlt, Konrad S., Managing Reputation Risk. 2002. The RMA Journal (September): 40-44.
Baird, Inga Skromme and Howard Thomas. Toward a Contingency Model of Strategic Risk Taking. 1985. The Academy of Management Review.
Beierle, Thomas C. 2003. The Benefits and Costs of Environmental Information Disclosure: What Do We Know About Right-to-Know?
Bell, R. and T. Glade. 2004. Quantitative risk analysis for landslides. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences (4): 117–131.
Brown, Gregory W. and Donald H. Chew. 1999. Corporate Risk Strategies and Management.
Cruz, Marcelo G. 2002. Modeling, measuring and hedging operational risk.
Desgagne, Bernard Sinclair. 2000. Environmental Risk Management and the Business Firm.
Eccles, Robert, R.Herz, M. Keegan, and D. Phillips. 2001. The ValueReporting Revolution: Moving Beyond the Earnings Game.
Entwistle, Gary M. 1999. Exploring the R&D Disclosure Environment. Accounting Horizons 13: 323-341.
Fell, R. and Hartford, D. 1997. Landslide risk management. Landslide risk assessment – Proceedings of the Workshop on Landslide Risk Assessment (February): 19 – 21.
Ge, Weili and S. McVay. 2005. The Disclosure of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Accounting Horizons 19: 137-158.
Glassman, Cynthia A. 2001. Strategic Risk Quadruple Jeopardy. The RMA Journal (September): 52-53.
Johnsson, Hans V.A. and P.E. Kihlstedt. 2005. Performance-Based Reporting.
Karow, J. Chris. 2001. Operational Risk. The RMA Journal (February): 64-67.
Kass, S. L. and J. M. McCarroll. 1997. Environmental disclosure in Securities and Exchange Commission filing.
Koonce, L., M.L. McAnally, and M. Mercer. 2005. How Do Investors Judge the Risk of Financial Items? The Accounting Review (18): 221-241.
Lintstock and Imagination. 2004. Added values? Measuring the value relevance of sustainability reporting.
M, Gibbins, Richardson A, and Waterhouse J. 1990. The Management of Corporate financial disclosures: Opportunism, ritualism, policies and processes. Journal of Accounting Research (28): 121-143.
Michael-Leiba, M., Baynes, F., and Scott, G. 2000. Quantitative landslide risk assessment of Cairns, Australia. Landslides in research, theory and practice: 1059–1064.
Prybylski, Hank. 2001. Market Risk Still a Balancing Act. The RMA Journal (March): 68-70.
Schrand, C., and J. Elliott. 1998. Risk and financial reporting: A summary of the discussion at the 1997 AAA/FASB conference. Accounting Horizons 12 (September): 271- 282.
Simons, Robert L. 1999. A Note on Identifying Strategic Risk.
Simons, Robert. 1999. How Risky is Your Company? Harvard Business Review (May-June): 85-94.
Slater, Alyson and Sean Gilbert. 2004. The Evolution of Business Reporting: Make Room for Sustainability Disclosure. Environmental Quality Management (Autumn): 41-48.
Slywotzky, Adrian J. and J. Drzik. Countering the Biggest Risk of All. 2005. Harvard Business Review (April): 78-88.
Stoneburner, Gary, A. Goguen, and A.Feringa. 2002. Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33691-
dc.description.abstract由於商業環境日趨複雜以及對資訊的需求增加,企業風險揭露的課題越來越受到重視,故本論文欲探討風險揭露對於資訊使用者的重要性、定義適當揭露的範圍及風險種類,並提供企業風險模型架構以助企業衡量其風險,進而了解風險與公司表現的關係為何。風險揭露模型包含了自然災害風險、財務風險、營運風險以及策略風險四個構面,並藉由三個不同產業的公司年度報表之研究了解如何以此架構衡量並揭露公司所面臨的風險。最後,透過實證分析的方法檢視揭露的風險與公司表現間的關係。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractEnterprises risk disclosure has become important issue since the business environment is more complicated, information needed for investment is required wider range. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the importance of risk disclosure to users, define the scope and types of risks should be disclosed, provide the framework of enterprise risk model to facilitate enterprise evaluating its risks, and examine how risk factors relate to the performance of company. Four dimensions of risks such as hazard, financial, operational, and strategic risk are included in the enterprise risk model for risk assessment. Followed by the model, three cases are studied to understand how to apply the evaluation by framework to information provided in annual reports. Finally, empirical research for regression analysis is done to examine the relationship between risks disclosed and the performance of company.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:44:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93722015-1.pdf: 361852 bytes, checksum: 84145a4479b983a29fbeded865725e63 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsContent
Chapter I Overview 1
1.Background and Motivation 1
2.Research Purpose 2
3.Research Structure 3
Chapter II Literature Review 4
1.Risk Assessment and Disclosure 4
2.Types of risk 6
(1)Hazard risk 8
(2)Financial risk 11
(3)Operational risk 14
(4)Strategic risk 17
3.Risk Models 20
Chapter III Research Methodology 26
1.Research Design 26
2.Research Methods 31
(1)Case Studies 31
(2)Regression 31
3.Data and Sample 35
Chapter IV Empirical Results – Case Analyses 37
1.Ford 37
2.GE 44
3.TSMC 49
4.Comparison 54
Chapter V Empirical Results
– Regression Analysis 58
1.Relations between Risks and Variance of Earnings
58
2.Relations between Risks and Returns 60

Chapter VI Conclusion and Future Suggestion 63
1.Conclusion 63
2.Limitations and Suggestions 64
Reference 66
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject風險揭露與評估zh_TW
dc.subject企業風險模型zh_TW
dc.subjectRisk Disclosure and Assessmenten
dc.subjectEnterprise Risk Modelen
dc.title企業風險揭露之研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Research on Enterprise Risk Disclosureen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee杜榮瑞,歐進士
dc.subject.keyword企業風險模型,風險揭露與評估,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordEnterprise Risk Model,Risk Disclosure and Assessment,en
dc.relation.page67
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-16
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept會計學研究所zh_TW
Appears in Collections:會計學系

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  Restricted Access
353.37 kBAdobe PDF
Show simple item record


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved