請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33687完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 邱顯比(Shean-Bii Chiu),陳業寧(Yeh-ning Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Jung Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃子容 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T05:44:36Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-24 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-13 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1.Banking Sector “More Challenges and Stronger Message for Every Bogy” Foreign Investment and Foreign Trade Agency (FIFTA) The Government of Mongolia. Sep., 2002.
2.De Adrian N. Lonescu“The race for Privatizing Romgaz Is On.” Journal Naitonal(2006) 3.F. Cornelli; David D. Li. “Large Shareholders, Private Benefits of Control, and Optimal Schemes of Privatization.” The RAND Journal of Economics 28(Winter 1997), 585-604. 4.John G. Riley and William F. Samuelson. “Optimal Auctions.” The American Economic Review, Vol. 71, No. 3. (Jun., 1981), pp. 381-392. 5.K. Kiani. “UAE firm wins 26pc stake in PTCL.” DAWN internet edition. June, 2005. 6.N. Uhlenbruck, Julio De Castro. ”Privatization FromThe AZcquirer’s Perspective: A Merger And Acquisition Based Framework.” Journal of Managerial Studies 35:5(September 1998). 7.O. Fremond and J. Nellis. “Preemptive Rights and Privatization.” The World Bank Group, Finance, Private Sector, and Infrastructure Network (December 1998). 8.R. Jelic, R. Briston, W. Aussenegg. “The choice of privatization method and the financial performance of newly privatized firms in transition economies.” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2003. 9.R. Engelbrecht-Wiggans. “On a Possible Benefit to Bid Takers from Using Multi-Stage Auctions.” Management Science Vol. 34, No.9. (Sep., 1988), pp. 1109-1120. 10.S. Michael Giliberto and Nikhil P. Varaiya. “The Winner’s Curse and Competition in Acquisitions: Evidence from Failed Bank Auction.” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, No. 1(Mar., 1989), pp.59-75. 11.S. Grubanovic. “Serbia ‘Open for Business’.“ (Sep., 2003.) 12.Steven L. Jones, William L. Megginson, Robert C. Nash, Jeffry M. Netter. “Share issue privatizations as 'nancial means to political and economic ends.” Journal of Financial Economics 53 (1999) 217-253. 13.William L. Megginson and Jeffry M. Netter. “From State To Market: A Survey Of Empirical Studies On Privatization.” Journal of Economic Literature (June 2001). 14.Vihang R. Errunza and Sumon C. Mazumdar. “Privatization: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Economic Literature, (February 2000). | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33687 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 對參與公股競標的競標者而言，綜效和私有利得是決定競標者出價的兩大主因，而採取一次性的競標或兩階段的競標影響了政府和競標者的決策。隨著政府宣佈取得控制權的股份的多寡不但影響了兩兆的決策，也影響了國庫收入。在本文中探討政府在面臨外在環境的因素以及得標者所可能採取之傷害併後公司的舉動下，所該選擇之最佳決策，以及其中之結果和發現可適時的解釋和運用在世界各國民營化之過程中政府所採行的某些決策上。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | I analyzed optimal schemes for privatization of state-owned enterprises using two-tier auction. Two independent forces, the expected synergy generated and private benefits obtained by the acquirer, affect the bidder’s bids and bid-taker’s revenue. Moreover, the government has to be concerned about the auction approach it adopts since it will affect the expected revenue. In this paper, based on game theory literature and microeconomic theory, I showed the two-tier auction dominates one-stage auction under a certain condition. Besides, to announce how many initial shares bidders should buy affects the bidders’ bid and the profit allocation between the bidder and the bid-taker. In order to obtain maximum expected return, the government should make the determination on a case by case basis and some implications of results in this paper can explain some cases of privatization around the world. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T05:44:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93723007-1.pdf: 1220289 bytes, checksum: fff2439f349df1c19092c1a5208f950d (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………i
誌謝………………………………………………………………ii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………iii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………iv Section I: Introduction..............................1 Section II: Describe the game........................6 Section III: Statistic Comparison...................13 Section IV: The expected revenue of the government..19 Section V: Further research.........................24 Section VI: Conclusion..............................25 References………………………………………………………27 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 競標 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 二階段 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民營化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | privatization | en |
| dc.subject | the bidder | en |
| dc.subject | two-tier auction | en |
| dc.title | 民營化之兩階段競標 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Privatization of State-owned Enterprises of Two-tier Auction Design | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳聖賢 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 二階段,民營化,競標, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | privatization,two-tier auction,the bidder, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 28 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-16 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 財務金融學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.19 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。