Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 社會科學院
  3. 經濟學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33563
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor管中閔(Chung-Ming Kuan)
dc.contributor.authorYung-Shan Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳永善zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T04:47:32Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-20
dc.date.copyright2006-07-20
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-17
dc.identifier.citation鄒孟文與劉錦添(1997), “外人直接投資對台灣製造業波及效果之實證”, 《經濟論文叢刊》, 25:2, 155–181。
Aitken, B.J. and Harrison, A.E (1999), “Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment?”, American Economic Review, 89(3), 605–18.
Barrios, S. and Strobl, E. (2002), “Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the spanish experience”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 138, 456–481.
Blomstrぴom, M. (1986), “Foreign investment and productive efficiency: The case of mexico”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(1), 97–112.
Blomstrぴom, M. and Edward, W. N. (1994), “Multinational corporations and productive convergence in mexico”, in William J. Baumol, Richard R. Nelson, and Edward N. Wolff (eds.), Convergence of Productivity: Cross National Studies and Ilistroical Evidence, Oxford University Press.
Blomstrぴom, M. and Kokko, A. (1998), “Multinational corporations and spillovers”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 12, 247–77.
Blomstrぴom, M. and Persson, H. (1983), “Foreign investment and spillover efficiency in an underdeveloped economy: Evidence from the mexican manufacturing industry”, World Development, 11(6), 493–501.
Blomstrぴom, M. and Sjぴoholm, F. (1999), “Technology transfer and spillovers: Does local paticipation with multinationals matter?”, European Economic Review, 43(4-6), 915–923.
Bosco, M. G. (2001), “Does fdi contribute to technological spillovers and growth? a panel data anylysis of hungarian firms”, Transnational Corporations, 10(1), 43–68.
Buchinsky, M. (2001), “Quantile regression with sample selection: Estimating women’s return to education in the u.s.”, Empirical Economics, 26, 87–113.
Castellani, D. and Zanfei, A. (2002), “Technology gaps, absorptive capacity and the impact of inward investments on productivity of european firms.”,Economica, 41(162), 176–193.
Caves, R.E. (1974), “Multinational firms, competition and productivity in host-country markets”, Economica, 41, 176–93.
Chuang, Y.-C. and Lin, C.-M. (1999), “Foreign direct investment, r&d and spillover efficiency: Evidence from taiwan’s manufacturing firms”, The Journal of Developmen Studies, 35, 117–137.
Dimelis, S. (2005), “Spillovers from foreign direct investment and firm growth: Technological, financial and market structure effects”, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1), 85–104.
Dimelis, S. and Louri, H. (2002), “Foreign ownership and production efficiency: a quantile regression anyalysis”, Oxford Economic Papers, 54, 449–469.
Djankov, S. and Hoekman, B. (2000), “Foreign investment and productivity growth in czech enterprises”, world Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.
Driffield, N. (2001), “The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the uk.”, Manchester School, 69(1), 103–119.
Girma, S., Greenaway, D., and Wakelin, K. (2001), “Who benefits from foreign direct investment in the uk?”, Scottish journal of Plitical Economy, 48(2), 119–133.
Girma, S. and Wakelin, K. (2002), “Are there regional spillovers from fdi in the uk”, in David Greenaway, Richard Upward, and Katharine Wakelin (eds.), Trade, Investment, Migration and Labout Markets, Basingstoke, UK:Macmillan.
Globerrman, S. (1979), “Foreign direct investment and ‘spillouver’ efficiency benefits in canadian manufactruing industries”, Canadian Journal of Economics, 12(1), 42–56.
Gぴorg, H. and Greenaway, D. (2002), “Much ado about nothing? do domestic firms really benefit from foreign directt investment?”, CEPR Discussion paper 3485.
Gぴorg, H. and Strobl, E. (2001), “Multinational companies and productivity spillovers: A meta-analysis”, Economic Journal, 111(473), 723–739.
(2003), “Multinational companies, technology spillovers and plant survival.”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(4), 581–595.
Haddad, M. and Harrison, A. (1993), “Are there positive spillovers from foreign direct investment? evidence from panel data for morocco”, Journal of Development Economics, 42, 51–74.
Harris, R. and Robinson, C. (2004), “Productivity impacts and spillovers from foreign ownership in the united kingdom”, National Institute Economic Review, 187, 58–75.
Haskel, J.E., Pereira, S.C, and Slaughter, M.J. (2002), “Does inward foreign direct investment boot the productivity of domestic firms”, NBER Working Paper 8724.
Ichimura, H. (1993), “Semiparametric least squares (sls) and weighted sls estimation of single-index models”, Journal of Econometrics, 58, 71–120.
Kathuria, V. (2000), “Productivity spillovers from technology transfer to indian manufacturing firms.”, Journal of International Development, 12(2), 343–369.
Keller, W. and Yeaple, S. (2003), “Multinational nterprises, international trade, and productivity growth: Firm-level evidence from the united states.”, GEP Research Paper 03/03.
Kinoshita, Y. (2001), “R&d and technology spillovers through fdi: Innovation and absorptive capacity”, CEPR Discussion Paper Dp2775.
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G. (1978), “Regression quantile”, Econometrica, 46, 33–50.
Kokko, A. (1994), “Technology, market characteristics and spillovers”, Journal of Development Economics, 43, 279–93.
(1996), “Productivity spillovers from competition between local firms and foreign affiliates.”, Journal of Development Studies, 32, 602–611.
Kokko, A., Tansini, R., and Zejan, M. C. (1996), “Local technological capaility and productivity spillovers from fdi in the uruguayan manufacturing sector”, The Journal of Development Studies, 32, 602–611.
Kokko, A., Z., Mario, and T., Ruben (2001), “Trade regimes and spillover effects of fdi: Evidence from uruguay.”, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137,124–149.
Konings, J. (2001), “The effects of foreign direc investment on domestic firms:Evidence from firm level panel data in emerging economies”, Economics of Transition, 9(3), 619–33.
Kuan, C.-M. (2004), “An introduction to quantile gression”, Working paper,Institute of Economics Academia Sinica.
Kugler, M. (2001), “The diffusion of externalities from foreign direct investment:The sectoral pattern of technological spillovers.”, Working paper.
Li, X., Liu, X., and Parker, D. (2001), “Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in the chinese manufacturing sector.”, Economic Systems,25(4), 305–321.
Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., and Wei, Y. (2000), “Productivity spillovers from foreign direct investment: Evidence from uk industry level panal data”, Journal of Interntional Business Studies, 31, 407–425.
L´opez-C´ordova, J. E. (2002), “Nafta and mexico’s manufacturing productivity: An empirical investigation using micro-level data.”, Working paper.
Powell, J. (1984), “Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression model”, Journal of Econometrics, 25, 303–325.
(1986), “Censored regression quantiles”, Journal of econometrics, 32, 143–155.
Ruane, F. and Ugur, A. (2002), “Foreign direct investment and productivity spillovers in irish manufacturing industry: Evidence from firm level panel data.”, Trinity Economic Papers 02/06.
Sjぴoholm, F. (1999a), “Productivity growth in indonesia: The role of regional characteristics and direct foreign investment”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(3), 559–584.
(1999b), “Technology gap, competition and spillovers from direct foeign investment: Evidence from establishment data”, Journal of Development Studies, 36(1), 53–73.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33563-
dc.description.abstract本文採用Koenker and Bassett (1978) 提出的分量迴歸方法研究台灣製造業的技術外溢效果, 並試圖合理解釋文獻上分岐的看法。與過去的文獻不同的地方在於, 本文是國內首次以分量迴歸方法研究技術外溢效果, 同時為研究不同廠商規模下的外溢效果, 將樣本區分為大廠商與中小企業兩群, 並以SLS 估計式及二階段法矯正樣本選擇偏誤。實証結果顯示, 台灣製造業同時存在正外溢效果和負外溢效果, 需視國內廠商和外資廠商是否為競爭對手或是合作對象而定。本文同時支持過去文獻正反兩方的的結論, 並突顯出只能解釋平均效果的最小平方法的不足之處。zh_TW
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:47:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93323034-1.pdf: 788001 bytes, checksum: a22b14eb533442b55d42ef3233c877f7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄
1 前言 5
2 文獻回顧 7
3 分量迴歸 12
3.1 分量迴歸. . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.1 分量迴歸. . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.1.2 分量迴歸的大樣本性質. . . . . 14
3.2 樣本選擇偏誤. . . . . . . . . . 16
4 資料與實證分析 20
4.1 資料來源. . . . . . . . . . . . 20
4.2 實證分析. . . . . . . . . . . . 24
5 結論 30
參考文獻 31
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject半參數最小平方估計式zh_TW
dc.subject二階段法zh_TW
dc.subject樣本選擇偏誤zh_TW
dc.subject分量迴歸zh_TW
dc.subjectTwo-stageen
dc.subjectSample selection biasen
dc.subjectSemiparametric Least Squareen
dc.subjectQuantile Regressionen
dc.title台灣製造業外溢效果 — 分量迴歸應用zh_TW
dc.titleThe Spillovers of Manufacture Industry in Taiwan--Quantile Regression.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee徐美(Mei Hsu),林惠玲(Hui-Lin Lin)
dc.subject.keyword分量迴歸,樣本選擇偏誤,二階段法,半參數最小平方估計式,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordQuantile Regression,Sample selection bias,Two-stage,Semiparametric Least Square,en
dc.relation.page45
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-17
dc.contributor.author-college社會科學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept經濟學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:經濟學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
769.53 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved