Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33318Full metadata record
| ???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 李瑞庭(Anthony J. T. Lee) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Fen Tu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 杜佩芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:34:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2014-08-05 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-05 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-27 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] W. Amaldoss, S. Jain, Trading up: A strategic analysis of reference group effect, Marketing Science, Vol. 27, 2008, pp. 932-942.
[2] E. W. Anderson, C. Fornell, S. K. Mazvancheryl, Customer satisfaction and shareholder value, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, 2004, pp. 172-185. [3] L. Backstrom, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, X. Lan, Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution, Proceedings of International Conference on Knowledge Discovery in Data Mining, 2006, pp. 44-54. [4] D. M. Boyd, N. B. Ellison, Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, 2008, pp. 210-230. [5] J.H. Choi, Living in Cyworld: Contextualising Cy-Ties in South Korea, Uses of Blog, 2006, pp. 173-186. [6] F. D. Davis, Perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, 1989, pp. 319-340. [7] J. Donath, D. Boyd, Public displays of connection, Technology Journal, Vol. 22, 2004, pp. 71-82. [8] N. B. Ellison, C. Steinfield, Cliff Lampe, The benefits and Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, Vol. 12, 2007, pp. 1143-1168. [9] O. Foros, B. Hansen, Competition and compatibility among Internet service providers, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 12, 2001, pp. 411-425. [10] G. E. Fruchter, Z. J. Zhang, Dynamic targeted promotions: A customer retention and acquisition perspective, Journal of Service Research, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2004, pp. 13-19. [11] P. A. Geroski, Model of technology diffusion, Research Policy, Vol. 29, 2000, pp. 603-625. [12] E. Hargittai, Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2007, pp. 276-297. [13] R. Jones, H. Mendelson, Information goods vs. industrial goods: Cost structure and competition. Management Science, Vol. 57, No. 1, 2011, pp. 164-176. [14] M. L. Katz, C. Shapiro, Network externality, competition, and compatibility, The American Economic Review, Vol. 75, No. 3, 1985, pp. 424-440. [15] W. R. King, J. He, A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model, Information and Management, Vol. 43, 2006, pp. 740-755. [16] D. Lee, H. Mendelson, Adoption of information technology under network effects, Information Systems Research, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2007, pp. 395-413. [17] M. Moretto, Competition and irreversible investments under uncertainty, Information Economics and Policy, Vol. 20, 2008, pp. 75-88. [18] C. H. Loch, B. A. Huberman, A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion, Management Science, Vol. 45, No. 2, 1999, pp. 160-177. [19] G. Lyer, A. Pazgal, Internet shopping agent: Virtual co-location and competition, Marketing Science, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2001, pp. 85-106. [20] A. Musalem, Y. V. Joshi, How much should you invest in each customer relationship? A competitive strategic approach, Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 3, 2009, pp. 555-565. [21] T. Noe, G. Parker, Winner take all: Competition, strategy, and the structure of returns in the Internet economy, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 14, 2005, pp. 141-164. [22] D. Sledgianowski, S. Kulviwat, Using social network site: The effects of playfulness, critical mass and trust in a hedonic context, The Journal of Computer Information System, 2009, pp.74-83. [23] S. Strauss, Marketing strategies for products with cross-market network externalities, Working Paper, No. YSM163, School of Management, Yale University, 2000. [24] A. Sundarajan, Nonlinear pricing of information goods, Management Science, Vol. 50, No. 12, 2004, pp.1660-1673. [25] J. Tirole, The Theory of Industrial Organization, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1988. [26] S. Valenzuela, N. Park, K. F. Kee, Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 14, 2009, pp. 875-901. [27] B. Wellman, A. Q. Haase, J. Witte, K. Hampton, Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 45, 2001, pp. 436-455. [28] J. C. Westland, Critical mass and willingness to pay for social networks, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 9, 2010, pp. 6-19. [29] N. Xia, S. Rajagopalan, Standard vs, customer products: Variety, lead time, and price competition, Marketing Science, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2009, pp. 887-900. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/33318 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 近年來社群網站越來越流行,使用人數增加,人們花在上面的時間也越來越多。由於市場極具潛力,因此越來越多企業加入這個市場,市場競爭日趨激烈。然而,目前所提出的許多競爭模型,皆未考慮到社群網站的特性。因此,在本篇論文中,我們首先找出影響社群網站競爭力的因素,接著利用這些因素建構兩個競爭模型:同質及異質。在同質競爭模型中,使用者的內在喜好是一致的(沒有差異性);而在異質競爭模型中它則有明顯的差異。然後,我們分析兩個競爭模型的投資策略,並根據使用者本質比較其兩個模型的差異性。分析結果顯示由於網路效應,一個網站的投資金額隨著使用者人數的增加而減少,但隨著競爭網站的使用者人數的增加而增加。當競爭網站的邊際利潤增加,使用者為同質時,投資金額會上升;若使用者為異質且競爭網站的邊際利潤大於網站本身的邊際利潤時,投資金額則會下降。當網站的邊際利潤增加,使用者為同質時,投資金額並不受影響;使用者是異質時,投資金額會減少。而網站的利潤隨著邊際利潤與使用者人數的增加而增加。在同質模型中,由於網站的投資金額,隨著競爭網站邊際利潤與使用者人數的增加而增加,因此,其利潤將減少;在異質模型中,由於網站的市場大小,隨著競爭網站邊際利潤與使用者人數的增加而增加,因此,其利潤將增加;所以,隨著競爭網站邊際利潤與使用者人數的增加,使用者是異質時,網站的利潤將增加,但使用者是同質時,網站的利潤將減少。由於邊際利潤與使用者人數對於同質與異質模型有不同的效應,因此,我們建議對不同本質的使用者,應有不同的最佳化策略。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Social Network Sites (SNSs) have grown rapidly and become more and more popular in recent years. As SNSs have a great potential to earn profit, many companies try to operate their own social network sites to earn benefits. As a result, there are a lot of competitors in the market. Although many competition models have been developed, they do not consider the specific features of SNSs. Therefore, in this thesis, we first identify the features of SNSs and then utilize these features to propose two competition models of SNSs, namely, homogeneous and heterogeneous. The users are homogeneous in terms of intrinsic preference in the former model while they are heterogeneous in the latter model. Then, we analyze and compare both models according to users’ constituents. The analytical results show that the investment of one site A decreases with the number of users in site A; however, it increases with the number of users in the rival site B if the number of users in site A is not much smaller than the number of users in site B because of network effect in both models. In addition, as B’s marginal profit increases, A’s investment increases in the homogeneous model and increases in the heterogeneous model only when B’s marginal profit is larger than A’s. Also, as A’s marginal profit increases, A’s investment decreases in the heterogeneous model; however, it is irrelevant in the homogeneous model. As for the profit, the profit of site A increases with A’s marginal profit and the number of users in A in both models. As B’s marginal profit and the number of users in B increase, A’s profit increases in the heterogeneous model; however, it decreases in the homogeneous model. This is because A’s investment increases with B’s marginal profit and the number of users in B in the homogeneous model, and thus A’s profit decreases. Nevertheless, A’s market share increases with B’s marginal profit and the number of users in B in the heterogeneous model, and thus A’s profit increases. Since the effects of the marginal profit and the number of users on the sites’ investment strategies and profits in the homogeneous model are different from those in the heterogeneous model, we suggest various optimal strategies for different user constituents. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:34:23Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98725009-1.pdf: 654471 bytes, checksum: f43356060dfec5b4ff8a35a75bba067b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents vii
List of Figures viii List of Tables ix Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Preliminary Concepts and Problem Definitions 6 Chapter 3 The Homogeneous Model 8 Chapter 4 The Heterogeneous Model 18 Chapter 5 Conclusions and Future Work 31 References 34 Appendix 37 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 競爭模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 社群網站 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 網路效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 投資策略 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 賽局理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Competition model | en |
| dc.subject | Network effect | en |
| dc.subject | Investment strategy | en |
| dc.subject | Game theory | en |
| dc.subject | Social network site | en |
| dc.title | 社群網站競爭模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A Competition Model of Social Network Sites | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳正綱,林妙聰 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社群網站,競爭模型,網路效應,投資策略,賽局理論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Social network site,Competition model,Network effect,Investment strategy,Game theory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 39 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-27 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| Appears in Collections: | 資訊管理學系 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 639.13 kB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
