請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32657
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 陳明杰 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chen-Wei Chiu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 邱湞瑋 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:13:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2006-07-29 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-29 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-24 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 王如意、易任 (1992) 應用水文學(上) 國立編譯館 18-237頁。
甘俊二、陳清田、陳焜耀 (1996) 台灣地區作物需水量推估模式之合適性研究 中國農業工程學報 42(2):8-19。 邱永和 (1977) 區域蒸發散估算問題-以台灣西南地區為例 氣象學報 23(2):34-42。 施鈞程 (2003) 台灣森林集水區之蒸發散量推估 國立中興大學水土保持研究所碩士論文。 夏禹九 (1980) 集水區蒸發散量之初步研究 農業工程學報 26(1):50-56。 夏禹九、黃正良(1999) 福山試驗林的水文特性 中華林學季刊 32(1):39-51。 徐森雄、宋義達 (1987) 從氣象資料估算蒸發量 中華水土保持學報 18(2):83-89。 陳信雄 (1990) 森林水文學 國立編譯館 1-226頁。 陳信雄、廖學誠、黃正良、詹進發 (1997) 應用Hamon公式推估福山試驗林蒸發散之研究 台大實驗林研究報告 11(4):21-30。 陳姜琦 (2002) 應用衛星遙測於區域蒸發散量之估算 國立成功大學水利及海洋工程研究所碩士論文。 黃景滄 (1997) 關刀溪森林集水區之蒸發散量推估 國立中興大學水土保持研究所碩士論文。 黃隆明 (1998) 澎湖蒸發散量推估之研究 水土保持學報30(3):241-249。 黃裕群 (2000) 關刀溪森林集水區之蒸發散量推估 國立中興大學水土保持研究所碩士論文。 童慶斌、陳主惠 (2001) 台灣地區合理之蒸發散折算係數與區域蒸發散量估算方法之建立(1/2)及(2/2) 經濟部水資源局計畫報告。 蔡西銘、邱金火、林殷瑋 (2001) 地理資訊系統推估區域蒸發散量之研究 中原學報 29(3):219-229。 劉明揚 (2004) 台灣地區蒸發量之研究 建國學報 23:1-29。 鄭皆達、夏禹九 (1990) 台灣上游森林集水區水文特性之探討 土壤沖蝕及河川沖淤研討會論文集:213-227頁 中國農業工程學會。 Allen R. G., L.S. Pereira, D.Raes, and M. Smith (1998) Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome. Amatya D.M., R. W Skaggs, and J.D. Gregory (1995) Comparison of methods for Esitimating REF-ET. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering. 121(6):427-435. Bos M.G., J. Vos, and R.A. Feddes (1996) CRIWAR 2.0:A Simulation Model on Crop Irrigation Water Requirement. ILRI publication 46. Cruff R.W. and T.H.Thompson (1967) A Comparisonof Methods of Estimating Potential Evapotranspiration from Climatological Data in Arid and Subhumid Environments. USGS water-supply paper 1839-M.:1-28. Doorenbos J. and W.O. Pruitt (1977) Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome. Doorenbos J. and W.O. Pruitt (1984) Guidelines for Predicting Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, 2nd ed. Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome. Fisher J.B., T.A. DeBiase, Ye Qi, Ming Xu, A.H. Goldstein (2005) Evapotranspiration Models Compared on a Sierra Nevada Forest Ecosystem. Environmental Modelling and Software 20:783-796. Geiger R., R.H. Aron, and P. Toddhunter (2003) The Climate Near The Ground, 6th Ed. New York:Rowman and Littlefield. George B.A., B.R. S. Reddy, N.S. Raghuwanshi, and W.W. Wallender (2002) Decision Support System for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 128(1):1-10. Grismer M. E., M. Orang, R. Snyder, and R. Matyac (2002) Pan Evaporation to Reference Evapotranspiration Conversion Methods. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 128(3):180-184. Irmak S., D. Z. Haman, and J. W. Jones (2002) Evaluation od Class A Pan Coefficients for Estimating Reference Evapotranspiration in Humid Location. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage 128(3):153-159. Lu J., G.S. Sun, G. McNulty, and D. M. Amatya (2005) A Comparison of Six Potential Evapotranspiration Methods for Regional Use in the Southeastern United States. Journal of The American Water Resources Association 41(3):621-633. Molengar Ngoundo and Shiow-Long Tsai (2003) Select a Suitable Method for Potential Evapotranspiration Determination. 中華農學會報 4(6):574-588. Pereira A.R. and W.O. Pruitt (2004) Adaptation of the Thornthwaite Scheme for Estimating Daily Reference Evapotranspiration. Agricultural Water Management 66:251-257. Qiu G.Y., K. Miyamoto, S Sase, Y. Gao, P. Shi, and T. Yano (2002) Comparison of the Three-Temperature Model and Conventional Models for Estimating Transpiration. Japanese Agricultural Research Quarterly 36(2):73-82. Rosenberry D.O., D. I. Stannard, T.C. Winter, and M.L. martinez (2004) Comparison of 13 Equations for Determining Evapotranspiration from a Prairie Wetland, Cottonwood Lake Area, North Dakota, USA. Werlands 24(3):483-497. Royce L.F. (2004) An Evaluation of Reference Evapotranspiration Models in Louisiana. A Thesis Submitted to the Gradurate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Natural Science. Swanson R. H. (1972). 'Water Transpired by Tree is Indicated by Heat Pulse Velocity.' Agric. Meteorol 10: 277-281. Sun, G., S.G. Mcnulty, D.M. Amatya, R.W. Skaggs, L.W. Swift Jr., J.P. Shepard, H. Riekerk (2002) A Comparison of the Watershed Hudrology of Coastal Forester Wetlands and the Mountainous Upland in the Southern US. Journal of Hydrology 263:92-104. Tani M. (1996) An Approach to AnnualWater Balance for Small Mountainous Catchments with Wide Spatial Distributions of Rainfall and Snow Water Equibalent. Journal of Hydrology 183:205-225. Watson, I. and A. D. Burnett. (1995) Hydrology:An environment approach. Boca Raton, FL:CRC Press. Xu C.Y. and V.P. Singh (2002) Cross Comparison of Empirical Equations for Calculating Potential Evapotranspiration with Data from Switzerland. Water Resources Managament 16:197-219. Xu C.Y. and D.Chen (2005) Comparison of Seven Models for Estimation of Evapotranspiration and Groundwater Recharge Using Lysimeter Measurement Data in Germany. Hydrological Processes 19:3717-3734. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32657 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 為了探討勢能蒸發散計算公式在中海拔地區的適用性,本研究利用日月潭氣象站與阿里山氣象站之2001年至2005年氣象觀測資料為基礎,選擇了六種勢能蒸發散公式,Hamon、Thornthwaite、Makkink、Priestly-Taylor、Turc及Penman-Monteith公式,經過六種公式計算結果並分別與Pan Method計算結果比較其勢能蒸發散表現。在日月潭氣象站的比較結果,以輻射為基礎的公式之Priestly-Taylor公式不論是計算日勢能蒸發散量或者是計算月勢能蒸發散量上,與Pan Method計算結果之相關性高,且平均絕對離差以及均方根誤差皆為最小;而在阿里山氣象站則是Makkink公式的計算結果與Pan Method的計算結果相關性高,且平均絕對離差以及均方根誤差皆為最小。在兩個氣象站都是以考慮輻射項的公式有較好的相關性,此與劉(2004)提出的研究結果近似。
日月潭氣象站包含輻射項的公式的計算結果中顯示,使用日淨輻射量當作參數來計算的Turc公式全年皆有高估的情形,Makkink公式則是呈現低估的情形,Priestly-Taylor公式夏季期間相當符合,冬季則稍有低估。 阿里山氣象站包含輻射項的公式的計算結果中顯示,使用日淨輻射量當作參數來計算的Priestly-Taylor公式,其月勢能蒸發散量計算結果在夏季期間會有高估的情況。而利用日輻射量當作參數計算的Makkink公式與Turc公式,Turc公式亦呈現夏季高估的情形,Makkink公式其月平均勢能蒸發散量計算結果與Pan Method的計算結果趨勢則相當符合,冬季稍有低估情形。因此使用這些公式計算勢能蒸發散量時,必須考慮當地輻射項的差異,以避免計算結果與實際的蒸發散變化趨勢不相符。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This research choose six calculating potential evapotranspiration(PET) methods compared with Pan method to discuss the suitability of potential evapotranspiration in medium elevation area such as in Alishan and in Sun Moon Lake. Six calculating methods include Hamon method, Thornthwaite method, Makkink method, Priestly-Taylor method, Turc method, and Penman-Monteith methods. In Sun Moon Lake Meteorological station, according to daily PET and monthly PET calculated by six methods, radiation-based Priestly-Taylor method has the best correlation with Pen method. However, Makkink method has the best correlation with Pen method in Alishan meteorological station. Results in both meteorological stations show that calculating methods considered radiation would have better suitability, which is similar to Liu’s study in 2004.
In Sun-Moon Lake meteorological station, the monthly PET calculated by Turc Method,using daily net radiation as a parameter, will be overestimated in whole year. Makkink method, using daily radiation as a parameter, will be underestimated in whole year. Priest-Taylor Method, using daily radiation as a parameter, will be underestimated during winter. In Alishan meteorological station, the monthly PET calculated by Priestly–Taylor Method,using daily net radiation as a parameter, will be overestimated in summer period. However, Makkink and Turc methods using daily radiation as a parameter will have similar value to Pan method. Turc Method will overestimated during summer and Makkink Method will be underestimated during winter. Therefore, when using those methods to calculate potential evapotranspiration, it is necessary to consider the difference of local radiation to avoid discrepancy between the calculated result and data tendency. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:13:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92625016-1.pdf: 912131 bytes, checksum: ef9570cedd271e78d042ca17cd2d67e0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 圖目次---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- III
表目次---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV 摘要-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- V Abstract--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI 一、 前言----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 二、 前人研究----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 (一)蒸發散概述------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 (二)蒸發散的測量--------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 (三)蒸發量的估算--------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 (四)蒸發散量的估算------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 (五)勢能蒸發散公式的表現--------------------------------------------------------- 9 三、 研究材料與方法------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 (一)研究對象概述-------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 (二)分析方法-------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 四、 結果與討論------------------------------------------------------------------------- 26 (一)各公式計算之結果-------------------------------------------------------------- 26 (二)各公式計算結果與Pan Method計算結果比較---------------------------- 33 五、 結論---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 六、 參考文獻---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 勢能蒸發散計算方法應用於中海拔地區之比較 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Comparison of Calculating Potential Evapotranspiration Methods Applied to the Medium Elevation Area | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳信雄,盧惠生,黃瓊王彪 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 勢能,蒸發散,中海拔, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | potential,evapotranspiration,medium elevation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 53 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 890.75 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。