請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32556
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 柯承恩 | |
dc.contributor.author | Chung-Chia Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 劉仲嘉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:11:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-25 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
1. 王玉珍,2002。股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究,國立中央大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 2. 王鼎立,2002。董事會結構與公司盈餘的傳遞效果,東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。 3. 王嘉穎,2000。我國上市公司財務危機與監理因素之關聯性研究-實質所有權之探討,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 4. 江雅雲,1999。我國上市公司董監事改選機制與其經營績效之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 5. 何里仁,2003。公司治理之資訊透明度與績效評核關聯性之研究,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文。 6. 何幸芳,2003。獨立董監事對公司價值與盈餘資訊內涵影響之研究,輔仁大學金融研究所碩士論文。 7. 呂春綢,2003。我國獨立董監制度與公司績效關係研究,國立台北大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 8. 吳昆皇,1995。上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。 9. 吳美穎,2004。內在公司治理機制之探討--股東組成與股權集中度對公司治理績效之影響,輔仁大學管理學研究所碩士論文。 10. 吳祥福,2003。財務報表重編與董監獨立性/專業性之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 11. 吳建頤,1999。董事會規模對公司價值的影響,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 12. 李愛珠,2004。多空頭市場下公司治理與公司經營績效關聯性差異之研究,東吳大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 13. 林君玲,1999。企業財務危機預警資訊之研究--考慮公司監理因素,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 14. 林宗輝,2004。公司治理與企業績效關聯性之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 15. 侍台誠,1994。董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事的影響,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 16. 洪世馨,2003。設立外部董事與企業經營績效之關係,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 17. 洪顧紜,2005。獨立董監事與公司績效關聯性之研究,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 18. 高蘭芬,2002。董監事股權質押之代理問題對會計資訊與公司績效之影響,國立成功大學會計學博士論文。 19. 孫秀蘭,1996。董事會制度與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 20. 馬瑜霙,2003。我國獨立董事與獨立監察人之屬性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 21. 莊宗憲,2005。公司治理機制與公司經營績效之實證研究,銘傳大學會計研究所碩士論文。 22. 黃鈺光,1993。我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 23. 黃金蓮,2001。台灣上市(櫃)企業財務績效與外資持股比例之關聯性研究,中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。 24. 張明峰,1991。股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 25. 張峻萍,1999。公司監理與經營績效之關係,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 26. 張詩玫,1999。董事會特性與公司經營績效關聯性之探討,國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 27. 張雅琳,2004。我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究,大葉大學會計資訊研究所碩士論文。 28. 陳宏姿,2001。董監事結構與企業財務績效關聯之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 29. 陳碧滋,2001。我國上市公司股價行為與董監因素關連性之探討,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 30. 陳迪,2003。 董事會、監察人特性與公司績效關聯之再探討,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。 31. 陳麗婷,2005。財務報表重編與公司治理特性之研究,國立交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。 32. 游昀玲,2004。公司經營績效與代理問題對外部董監事聘任宣告效果影響之研究,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。 33. 楊慧玲,2000。董事會結構及其變動對股東財富與經營績效影響之研究,朝陽科技大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 34. 葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,公司治理與評等系統,商智文化,2002。 35. 葉志成,2005。公司治理與企業聲望關係之研究,靜宜大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 36. 熊大中,2000。我國企業財務危機與董監股權質押關連性之研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 37. 廖秀梅,2004。董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響,國立台北大學會計學研究所博士論文。 38. 謝淑娟,1994。觀點探討股權結構與公司經營績效之關係-以台灣上市公司為實證,國立交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。 39. 謝宇泰,2005。獨立董監事特性與盈餘管理之關聯性研究,國立成功大學會計學研究所碩士論文。 二、英文部分 1. Agrawal, A. and C.R. Knoeber, (2001) “Do Some Outside Directors Play a Political Role?” Journal of Law & Economics, Vol.44, pp.179-198. 2. Agrawal, A. and G.N. Mandelker, (1990) “Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments” Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, Vol.25, pp.143-161. 3. Bacon, J. (1973) “Corporate Directorship Practices:Membership and Committees of the Board” New York:The Conference Board and American Society of Corporate Secretaries. 4. Barnhart, S.W. and S. Rosenstein, (1998) “Board composition, managerial ownership, and firm performance: An empirical analysis” Financial Review, Vol.33, pp.1-16. 5. Baysinger, B. and R.E. Hoskisson, (1990) “The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate Strategy” Academy of Management Review, Vol.15, pp.72-87. 6. Beasley, M.S. (1996)”An Empirical Analysis of the Relation between the Board of Director Composition and Financial Statement Fraud” Accounting Review Vol.71 pp.443-465. 7. Bhagat, S. and B. Black, (2002) “The Non-Correlation Between Board Indpendence and Long-Term Firm Performance” Journal of Corporation Law, Vol.27, pp.231-273. 8. Black, B. (2001) “Does Corporate Governance Matter? A Crude Test Using Russian Date” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol.149, pp.2131-2150. 9. Byrd, J.W. and K.A. Hickman, (1992)”Do Outside Directors Monitor Managers” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.32, pp.195-221. 10. Claessens, S. et al. (2000) “The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.58 pp.81-112. 11. Chaganti, R.S., V. Mahajan, and S. Sharma, (1985)”Corporate Borad Size, Composition and Corporate Failures in Retailing Industry” Journal of Management Studies, Vol.22, pp.400-417. 12. Chen, Y. and S. Hu, (2001) “the controlling shareholder’s personal stock loan and firm performance” working paper, National Taiwan University. 13. Daily, C.M. and D.R. Dalton, (1993) “Board of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications” Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, Vol.17, pp.65-81. 14. DeAngelo, L. E. (1986) ”Accounting Numbers as Market Valuation Substitutes: A Study of Management Buyouts of Public Stockholders” Accounting Review, Vol.61, pp.400-420. 15. Demsetz, H. (1983) “the Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm” Journal of Law & Economics, Vol.26, pp.375-390. 16. Fama, E.F. (1980) “Agency problems and the theory of the firm” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.88, pp.288-307. 17. Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, (1983a) “Separation of ownership and control” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol.26, pp.301-325. 18. Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, (1983b) “Agency problems and residual claims” Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, pp.327-349. 19. Fich, E.M. (2005) “Are Some Outside Directors Better than Others? Evidence from Director Appointments by Fortune 1000 Firms” Journal of Business, Vol.78, pp.1943-1971. 20. Haugen, R.A. and L.W. Senbet, (1981) ”Resolving the Agency Problems of External Capital through Options” Journal of Finance, Vol. 36, pp.629-647. 21. Hermalin, B.E. and M.S. Weisbach, (1988) ”The determinants of board composition” Journal of Economics, Vol.19, pp.589-606. 22. Hermalin, B.E. and M.S. Weisbach, (1991) “The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on Firm Performance” Financial Management, Vol.20, pp.101-112. 23. Hiner, O.S. (1967) “The Size of Company Boards” Management International Review, Vol.7, pp.69-86. 24. Holmstrom, B.B. (1979) “Moral Hazard and Observability” Journal of Economics, Vol. 10, pp.74-91. 25. Jensen, M.C. (1993) “The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems,” Journal of Finance, Vol.48, pp.831-880. 26. Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, (1976) “Theory of the firm:managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.3 pp.305-360. 27. Jensen, M.C. and R.S. Ruback, (1983) “The market for corporate control:the scientific evidence,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 11, pp.5-50. 28. Kesner, I.F. (1987) “Director's Stock Ownership and Organizational Performance: An Investigation of Fortune 500 Companies” Journal of Management, Vol.13, pp.499-508. 29. Klapper, L.F. and I. Love, (2004) “Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets” Journal of Corporate Finance Vol. 10 pp.703-728. 30. La Porta et al. (1999)”Corporate Ownership around the world” Journal of Finance Vol.54 pp.471-517. 31. Lin, S., P.F. Pope, and S. Young, (2003) “Stock Market Reaction to the Appointment of Outside Directors” Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol.30, pp.351-382. 32. Mangel, R. and H. Singh, (1993) “Ownership Structure, Board Relationships and CEO Compensation in Large US Corporations” Accounting & Business Research, Vol.23, pp.339-350. 33. Matolcsy, Z., D. Stokes, and A. Wright (2004) “Do Independent Directors Add Value?” Australian Accounting Review, Vol.14, pp.33-40. 34. Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, (1988) “Management ownership and market valuation:an empirical analysis,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp.293-316. 35. Pound, J. (1988) “Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.20, pp.237-265. 36. Pearce J.A. and S.A. Zahra, (1992) “Board Composition from a Strategic Contingency Perspective” Journal of Management Studies, Vol.29, pp.411-438. 37. Rosenstein, S. and J.G. Wyatt, (1990)”Outside Directors, Board Independence, and Shareholder Wealth” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.26, pp.175-191. 38. Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny, (1986) “Large Shareholders and Corporate Control” Journal of Political Economy, Vol.94, pp.461-488. 39. Shleifer, A. and R.W. Vishny, (1997) “A Survey of Corporate Governance” Journal of Finance Vol.52 pp.737-783. 40. Simpson, W.G. and A.E. Gleason, (1999) “Board structure, ownership, and financial distress in banking firms” International Review of Economics and Finance Vol.8 pp.281-292. 41. Singh, M. and W.N. Davidson, (2003) “Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol.27, pp.793-816. 42. Stearns, L.B. and M.S. Mizruchi, (1993) “Board Composition and Corporate Financing: the Impact of Financung Institution Representation on Borrowing” Academy of Management Journal, Vol.36, pp.603-618. 43. Weisbach, M.S. (1988) “Outside directors and CEO turnover,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 20, pp.431-460. 44. Yermack, D. (1996) “Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors,” Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 40, pp.185-211. 45. Zahra, S.A. and J.A. Pearce (1989) “Boards of directors and corporate financial performance:a review and integrated model,” Journal of Management, Vol. 15, pp.291-334. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32556 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著美國安隆(Enron)公司爆發財務醜聞案,國內的訊碟及博達等掏空公司資產案亦接連不斷發生,引發各界對加強公司治理的呼聲。而我國董監事機制為公司治理的核心所在,故強化董監事機制為國內當務之急。因此,台灣證券交易所及櫃檯買賣中心分別在民國91年2月22日與91年2月25日修訂上市、上櫃審查準則,規定自即日起,初次申請有價證券上市、上櫃公司須聘請二席以上獨立董事及一席以上獨立監察人,否則不予上市、上櫃。
本研究以民國91至93年台灣上市、上櫃公司為研究對象,並排除金融業,藉由敘述性統計及多元迴歸分析,探討董監事規模、董監事持股比率、董監事股票質押比率、獨立董監事席次比率、自願或強制設置獨立董監事、獨立董監事兼職情況及獨立董事職業背景與公司經營績效(ROA、ROE、EPS及Tobin,s Q)之關聯性。實證結果如下: 1、董監事規模與公司經營績效呈顯著的負相關。 2、董監事持股比率與公司經營績效呈顯著的正相關。 3、董監事股票質押比率與公司經營績效呈顯著的負相關。 4、獨立董監事席次比率與公司經營績效呈顯著的正相關。 5、自願設置獨立董監事公司的經營績效顯著優於未設置者。 6、強制設置獨立董監事公司的經營績效顯著優於未設置者。 7、強制設置獨立董監事公司的經營績效顯著優於自願設置者。 8、獨立董事由其他公司高階管理者、專業學者及專門職業人員擔任與公司經營績效呈顯著的正相關。 9、獨立董監事兼任其他公司董監事情形與公司經營績效呈顯著的負相關。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After the scandals such as Enron in the U.S, and InfoDisc, ProComp in Taiwan, the board of directors and supervisors have become the main issue when talking about corporate governance. It is urgent to strengthen the board of
directors and supervisors mechanism in Taiwan. On February 22 and 25, 2002, Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporation (TSEC) and Over-the-Counter (OTC) amended “Criteria for Review of Securities Listings” and ”Criteria Governing Review of Securities Traded on OTC Markets”, forcing that the corporations before IPO should have at least two independent directors and one independent supervisor in order to become public hold companies or be traded on OTC market. In this research, the samples are all the companies in the Taiwan Stock Exchange Corporate (TSEC) and Over-the-Counter market (OTC) from 2002 to 2004, and financial industry is excluded. We would like to discuss the relationship between the corporate performance (ROA, ROE, EPS and Tobin’s Q) and characteristics of the board of directors and supervisors through descriptive statistics and OLS regression analysis. The independent variables including the size of the board, the shareholding structure, the percentage of shares pledged, the percentage of independent directors and supervisors and whether they are voluntary or compulsory, the existence of other jobs held by independent directors and supervisors, and their occupational background. Our empirical results show that 1. The size of the board of directors and supervisors is significantly negatively associated with corporate performance. 2. The shareholding structure of the board members and supervisors is significantly positively associated with corporate performance. 3. The percentage of shareholding pledged by board members and supervisors is significantly positively associated with corporate performance. 4. The percentage of independent directors and supervisors is significantly positively associated with corporate performance. 5. The corporate performance of the companies with voluntary independent directors and supervisors is significantly better than those without independent directors and supervisors. 6. The corporate performance of the companies with compulsory independent directors and supervisors is significantly better than those without independent directors and supervisors. 7. The corporate performance of the companies with compulsory independent directors and supervisors is significantly better than those with voluntary independent directors and supervisors. 8. Independent directors who are scholars, experts or top managers in other companies are significantly positively associated with corporate performance. 9. The existence of other jobs held by independent directors and supervisors is significantly negatively associated with corporate performance. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:11:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93722044-1.pdf: 717245 bytes, checksum: 55d3f08c4254bccef738763a6b77e2dd (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論
第一節 研究背景................. 1 第二節 研究動機與目的.............. 5 第三節 論文架構................. 8 第二章 文獻探討 第一節 代理理論.................10 第二節 公司治理與經營績效............17 第三節 獨立董事與獨立監察人...........26 第四節 我國公司治理之現況............35 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構.................39 第二節 研究假設.................40 第三節 研究模型與變數定義............49 第四節 樣本選取與資料來源............61 第四章 實證結果與分析 第一節 敘述統計.................63 第二節 實證結果分析...............78 第五章 結論 第一節 研究結論.................95 第二節 研究建議................ 100 第三節 研究限制................ 102 參考文獻.......................104 附錄一........................113 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 董監事機制及其獨立性與公司經營績效之關聯性研究 | zh_TW |
dc.title | An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Corporate Performance and Board and Supervisors’ Mechanism and Independence | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 蔡揚宗,楊孟萍 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 董監事,獨立董監事,公司治理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Board of Directors and Supervisors,Independent Directors and Supervisors,Corporate Governance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 118 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 700.43 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。