Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 動物科學技術學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32532
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor姜延年(Yan-Nian Jiang)
dc.contributor.authorJih-Yih Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳志毅zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T04:11:21Z-
dc.date.available2006-07-31
dc.date.copyright2006-07-31
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-25
dc.identifier.citation毛麟,1987。乳牛育種,毛麟博士演講專集。美國飼料穀物協會技術書籍。
池雙慶,1977。乳牛群改良-性能檢定報表:DHI-101使用說明。中華民國乳業發展協會。
李善男,曾青雲,林慶雄,張菊犁,黃遠清,1988。台灣荷蘭乳牛群改良計畫與種公牛選拔。第一屆家畜家禽遺傳育種研討會專輯。P.203。
張菊犁,宋永義,1985。台灣荷蘭泌乳牛體性狀與乳產量的關係。中畜會誌14(3-4):131~135。
張菊犁,曾青雲,陳志毅,李素珍,鄭瑞基,陳茂墻,1997。台灣荷蘭乳牛群性能改良計畫。畜產研究30(1):56~65。
張菊犁,2001。女牛的飼養與選育。行政院農業委員會畜產試驗所專輯第78號。
張菊犁,2002。乳牛群性能改良計畫說明書。中華民國乳業發展協會。
家畜改良事業團,1998。乳用種雄牛評價成績。農林水產省畜產局家畜生產課,日本。
張沅、張勤,1993。畜禽育種中的線性模式。北京農業大學出版社。
Anderson, R. D. 1978. Studies on Eestimation of Variance Componets. Ph. D. Thesis, Department of Animal Science, Cornell University.
Ashton-Tate. 1986. dBase III plus, version 1.1. Computer database program.
Banos, G. and G. E. Shook. 1990. Genotype by environment interaction and genetic correlations among parities for somatic cell count and milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 73:2563-2573.
Beaumont, C. 1991. Comparison of Henderson’s method I and restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters of reproductive traits. Poultry Sci. 70: 1462-1468.
Benson, R. H. 1985. The NCDHIP Record Plans. National cooperative dairy herd improvement progrm handbook:A-4.
Berning L.M. and G. E. Shook. 1992. Prediction of mastitis using milk somatic cell count N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase, and lactose. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1840-1848.
Boettcher, P. J., J. C. M. Dekkers, and B. W. Kolstad. 1998. Development of an udder health index for sire selection based on somatic cell score, udder conformation, and milking speed. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1157-1168.
Bourdon, R. M. 2000. Understanding Animal Breeding. 2th Ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc. New Jersey, USA.
Carlen, E., E. Strandberg, and A. Roth. 2004. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production in the first three lactations of Swedish Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 87:3062-3070.
Castillo-Juarez, H., P. A. Oltenacu, and E. G. Cienfuegos-Rivas. 2002. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among milk production and composition traits in primiparous Holstein cows in two different herd environments. Livest. Prod. Sci. 78:223-231.
Chang, C. L., C. J. Tseng, S. J. Lee, J. Y. Chen, C. Y. Huang, S. C. Lee, and H. L. Chang. 2001. Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) program in Taiwan. J. Taiwan Livestock Res. 34(4) : 285-295.
Cue, R. I., H. G. Monardes, and J. F. Hayes. 1987. Correlations between production traits in first lactation Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 70:2132-2137.
Dechow, C. D., G. W. Rogers, L. Kleit, and T. J. Lawlor. 2003. Heritabilities and correlations among body condition score, dairy form and selected linear type traits. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2236-2242.
Dempfle, L. and Grundl E. 1988. Identification of superior animals and their use in improvement programmes. Advances in Animal Breeding, Pudoc Wageningen, 56-72.
DeVeer, J. C. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1986. Comparison of heritability estimates from daughter on dam regression with three models to account for production level of dam. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2890-2896.
Dickinson, F. N., H. D. Norman, R. L. Powell, L. G. Waite, B. T. McDaniel, and US Dept. of Agriculture. 1976. Procedures used to calculate the USDA-DHIA Modified Contemporary Comparison. USDA-ARS Prod. Res. Rep. 165:18-34.
Dommerholt, J. 1975. Correction of Cows Milk Yield for Differences in Age, Season and Stage of Lactation. Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Ducrocq, V. and B. Besbes. 1993. Solution of multiple trait animal models with missing data on some traits. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 110:81-92.
Emanuelson, U. 1988. Recording of production diseases in cattle and possibilities for genetic improvements: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci. 20:89-106.
Gallo, L., P. Carnier, M. Cassandro, R. Dal Zotto, and G. Bittante. 2001. Test-day genetic analysis of condition score and heart girth in Holstein Friesian cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2321-2326.
Groeneveld, E. 2003. VCE5, User’s guide and reference, Manual version 1.0, Institute of Animal Husbandry and Animal Behavior, Neustadt, Germany.
Grommers, F. J., D. van de Geer, H. van de Vliet, P. A. Henricks, and F. P. Nijkamp. 1989. Polymorphonuclear leukocyte functions: relationship between induced migration into the bovine mammary gland and in vitro cell activity. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 23:75-78.
Hansen, M., M. S. Lund, M. K. Sørensen, and L. G. Christensen. 2002. Genetic parameters of dairy character, protein yield, clinical mastitis, and other diseases in the Danish Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 85:445-452.
Hazel, L. N. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28: 476-490.
Hazel, L. N., G. E. Dickerson, and A. E. Freeman. 1994. The selection index - then, now, and for the future. J. Dairy Sci. 77:3236-3251.
Henderson, C. R. 1949. Estimation of changes in herd environment. Journal of Dairy Science 32: 706-721.
Henderson, C. R. 1953. Estimation of variances and covariances components. Biometrics 39: 465-477
Henderson, C. R. 1974. General flexibility of linear model techniques for sire evaluation. J.Dairy Sci. 57:963-972.
Henderson, C. R. 1975a. Rapid method for computing the inverse of a relationship matrix. J.Dairy Sci. 58:1727-1730.
Henderson, C. R. 1975b. Inverse of a matrix of relationship due to sires and maternal grandsires. J.Dairy Sci. 58:1917-1921.
Henderson, C. R. 1976a. Multiple trait sire evaluation using the relationship matrix. J.Dairy Sci. 59:769-774.
Henderson, C. R. 1980. A simple method for unbiased estimation of variance components in mixed model. J. Anim. Sci. 51 (Suppl. 1): 119-125.
Henderson, C. R. 1984. Application of Linear Models in Animal Breeding . University Guelph.
Heringstad, B., G. Klemetsdal, and J. Ruane. 2000. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle: A review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:95-106.
Hill, A. W. 1981. Factors influencing the outcome of Escherichia coli mastitis in cows. Res. Vet. Sci. 31:107-112.
Hill, W. G.., M. R. Edwards, M. K. A. Ahmed, and R. Thompson. 1983. Heritability of milk yield and composition at different levels and variability of production. Anim. Prod. 36:59-66.
Holstein Canada. 2002. WHO’S WHO–2002 February. Corporate Place, Brantford, Canada.
Holstein Association USA. 2005. Sire Summaries–2005 May. Holstein Assoc. Bratteboro, VT ,USA.
INTERBULL. 1992. Sire evaluation procedures for dairy production traits practised in various countries. Bull. No. 5, International Bull Evaluation Service, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jamrozik, J. 1992. Ocena wartości hodowlanej buhajόw i krόw w obrebie stada przy użyciu modelu zwierzecia. Zeszyty Naukowe AR, Kraków 172.
John, F. L. 1972. Genetics Of Livestock Improvement. 2th Ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, USA.
Kitchen, B. J., G. Middleton, I. G. Durward, R. J. Andrews, and M. C. Salmon. 1980. Mastitis diagnostic tests to estimate mammary gland epithelial celldamage. J. Dairy Sci. 63:978-983.
La Motte, L. R. 1970. A class of estimators of variance components. Tech. Report 10, Univ. of Kentucky.
Lassen, J., M. Hansen, M. K. Sørensen, G. P. Aamand, L. G. Christensen, and P. Madsen. 2003. Genetic relationship between body condition score, dairy character, mastitis, and diseases other than mastitis in first-parity Danish Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3730–3735.
Lund, T., F. Miglior, J. C. M. Dekkers, and E. B. Burnside. 1994. Genetic relationships between clinical mastitis, somatic cell count, and udder conformation in Danish Holsteins. Livest. Prod. Sci. 39:243-251.
Lund, T. and J. Jensen. 1996. Genetic and phenotypic parametersfor clinical mastitis, somatic cell production deviance and proteinyield in dairy cattle. Page 4 in Proc. 47th Annu. Mtg. Eur. Assoc.Anim. Prod., Lillehammer, Norway. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen,The Netherlands.
McDowell, R. E. 1988. Some observations in Taiwan dairy farming. Report to COA. Taipei, Taiwan.
Miller, R. H., R. E. Pearson, M. H. Fohrman, and M. E. Creegan. 1972. Methods of projecting complete lactation production from part-lactation yield. J. Dairy Sci. 55:1602-1611.
Mirande, S. L. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1985. Trends in genetic and phenotypic variances for milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 68:2278.
Monardes, H. G. and J. F. Hayes. 1985. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between lactation cell counts and milk yield and composition of Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1250-1256.
Mrode, R. A. and G. J. T. Swanson. 1996. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Anim. Breed. Abstr. 64:847-857.
Nielsen, U. S., G. A. Pedersen, J. Pedersen, and J. Jensen. 1997. Genetic correlations among health traits in different lactations. Proceedings of the international workshop on genetic improvement of functional traits in cattle; health. Uppsala, Sweden, June 1997. Interbull Bull. 15:68-77.
Norman, H. D., R. L. Powell, and F. N. Dickinson. 1976. Modified contemporary and herdmate comparisons in sire summary. J. Dairy Sci. 59:2155-2161.
Norman, H. D., R. L. Powell, and G. R. Wiggans. 1991. Comparison of genetic evaluations from animal model and modified contemporary comparison. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2309-2316.
Norman, H. D., R. L. Powell, J. R. Wright, and R. E. Pearson. 1996. Phenotypic relationship of yield and type scores from first lactation with herd life and profitability. J. Dairy Sci. 79:689–701. Norman, H. D., R. L. Powell, J. R. Wright, and C. G. Sattler. 2001. Overview of progeny-test programs of artificial-insemination organizations in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1899-1912.
Norman, H. D., P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright, and J. S. Clay. 1999. Comparison of test interval and best prediction methods for estimation of lactation yield from monthly, a.m.-p.m., and trimonthly testing. J. Dairy Sci. 82:438-444.
Norman, H. D., R. L. Powell, J. R. Wright, and C. G. Sattler. 2003. Timeliness and effectiveness of progeny testing through artificial insemination. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1513-1525.
Paape, M. J., W. P. Wergin, and A. J. Guidry. 1981. Phagocytic defense of the ruminant mammary gland. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.137:555
Patterson, H. D. and Thompson, R. 1971. Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554
Persson, K., C. H. Sandgren, and H. Rodriquez-Martinez.1992. Studies of endotoxin-induced neutrophil migration in bovine teat tissues using indium-III–labeled neutrophils and biopsies. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53:2235-2242.
Philipsson, J., G. Ral, and B. Berglund. 1995. Somatic cell count as a selection criterion for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 41:195-200.
Poso J. and E. A. Mantysaari. 1996. Relationships between clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production for the first three lactations of Finnish Ayrshire. J. Dairy Sci. 79:1284-1291.
Powell, R. L. and H. D. Norman. 2006. Major advances in genetic evaluation techniques. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1337-1348.
Pryce, J. E., M. P. Coffey, and S. Brotherstone. 2000. The genetic relationship between calving interval, body condition score and linear type and management traits in registered Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2664-2671.
Pyorala, S. 2003. Indicators of inflammation in the diagnosis of mastitis. Vet. Res. 34:565-578.
Quaas, R. L. 1976. Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics 32: 949-953.
Rao, C. R. 1971a. Estimation of variance components – MINQUE theory. J. Multivariate Anal. 1: 257-275.
Rao, C. R. 1971b. Minimum variance quadratic unbiased estimation of variance components. J. Multivariate Anal. 1: 445-456.
Reents, R., J. Jamrozik, L. R. Schaeffer, and J. C. M. Dekkers. 1995. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day records of somatic cell score. J. Dairy Sci. 78:2847-2857.
Robert G. D. S., H. T. James, and A. D. David. 1997. Principles and Procedure of Statistics a Biometrical Approach. 3th ED. McGraw-Hill Inc. New York, USA.
Rogers, G. W., G. Banos, and U. Sander-Nielsen. 1999. Genetic correlations among protein yield, productive life, and type traits from the United States and diseases other than mastitis from Denmark and Sweden. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1331-1338.
Rupp, R. and D. Boichard. 1999. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, production, udder type traits, and milking ease in first-lactation Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 82:2198-2204.
SAS. 1991. System for Statistical Graphics, 1st Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
SAS. 1999. User’s Guide: Statistics. Release 8.02 Edition. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
Schaeffer, L. R. 1994. Multiple-country comparison of dairy sires. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2671-2678.
Schutz, M. M. 1994. Genetic evaluation of somatic cell scores for United States dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2113-2129.
Searle, S. R. 1971. Linear Models. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
Short, T. H. and T. J. Lawlor. 1992. Genetic parameters of conformation traits, milk yield and herd life in Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1987-1998.
Swalve, H. H. 1995. Test day models in the analysis of dairy production data—A review. Arch. Anim. Breed. 38:591-612.
Thompson, J. R., K. L. Lee, A. E. Freeman, and L. P.Johnson. 1983. Evaluation of a linearized type appraisal system for Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 66:325-331.
Thompson, R. 1976. Design of experiments to estimate heritability when observations are available on parents and offspring. Biometrics 32, 903-917.
Thompson, R., S. Brotherstone, and I. M. S. White. 2005. Estimation of quantitative genetic parameters. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360:1469-1477.
Thompson, W. A. 1962. The problem of negative estimates of variance components.Ann. Math. Stat. 33:272-278.
Van Dorp, T. E., J. C. M. Dekker, S. W. Martin, and J. P. T. M. Noordhuizen. 1998. Genetic parameters of health disorders, and relationship with 305-day milk yield and conformation traits of registered Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2264-2270.
Van Vleck, L. D. and G. E. Bradford. 1964. Heritability of milk yield at different levels. Anim. Prod. 6:285-290.
Van Vleck, L. D. and G. E. Bradford. 1965. Comparison of heritability estimates from daughter-dam regression and paternal half sib correlation. J. Dairy Sci. 48:1372-1375.
VanRaden, P. M. and G. R. Wiggans. 1991. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2737-2746.
Veerkamp, R. F., and S. Brotherstone. 1997. Genetic correlations between linear type traits, food intake, live weight and condition score in Holstein Friesian dairy cattle. Anim. Sci. 64:385-392.
Veerkamp, R. F., C. L. Gerritsen, E. P. C. Koenen, A. Hamoen, and G. De Jong. 2002. Evaluation of classifiers that score linear type traits and body condition score using common sires. J. Dairy Sci.85:976-983.
Wade, K. M. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1989. genetic parameters for production traits of Holstein in California, New York, and Wisconsin. J. Dairy Sci. 72:1280-1285.
Weigel, K. A. and T. J. Lawlor. 1998. Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2040-2044.
Weigel, K. A., T. J. Lawlor, P. M. VanRaden, and G. R. Wiggans. 1998. Use of linear type and production data to supplement early predicted transmitting abilities for productive life. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2040-2044.
Westell, R. A. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1987. Simultaneous genetic evaluation of sires and cows for large population of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 70: 1006-1018
Wezyk, S. and T. Szwaczkowski. 1997. Application of methodology in breeding strategies for laying fowl. World’s Poultry Science Journal, Vol. 53, December 1997.
Wiggans, G. R., I. Misztal, and L. D. Van Vleck. 1988. Implementation of an animal model for genetic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 71(Supp 2):54-69.
White, J. M., W. E. Vinson, and R. E. Pearson. 1981. Dairy cattle improvement and genetics. J. Dairy Sci. 64:1305-1317.
Wilcox, C. J., S. N. Gaunt, and B. R. Farthing. 1971. Genetic interrelationships of milk composition and yield. South. Coop. Ser. Bull. 15. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32532-
dc.description.abstract本研究之目的係利用台灣荷蘭乳牛群之現場資料,估計包括乳產量、乳成分與體細胞數分數等泌乳性狀之遺傳率與遺傳相關,此類重要經濟性狀之遺傳參數未來可應用愈台灣乳牛之遺傳評估作業。
依據台灣乳牛群性能改良計畫 (dairy herd improvement, DHI) 所建立之DHI資料庫,以SQL server之ODBC (open database connectivity ) 資料連線設定擷取牛隻初產日期介於1989年4月至2003年11月間計580場酪農戶、1,752頭公牛及已完成乳量性能檢定之後裔女兒牛共109,944頭,經由dBASE III PLUS程式與SAS統計分析軟體 (SAS 8.2, 1991) 進行資料編輯與整理,最後使用VCE5 (variance component estimate 5.0, 2003) 軟體進行前三泌乳期產乳量與生乳品質等性狀之遺傳參數估計,整理後各泌乳期的資料集分別包括性狀資料檔各27,917、18,759及9,258筆紀錄,固定效應變級數CYS (herd-year-season) 各361、358及339個與牛隻系譜資料檔包括5個世代,各45,651、30,095及19,257筆紀錄。
台灣荷蘭乳牛泌乳性狀遺傳參數之估算是以多性狀動物模式 (animal model) 之限制性最大似然法 (Restricted Maximum Likehood, REML) 進行。估計結果顯示,全期乳量 (305 days milk yield, MY)、全期脂量 (305 days fat yield, FY)、全期蛋白質量 (305 days protein yield, PY) 與體細胞數分數等性狀,於前三泌乳期之遺傳率估值分別為0.34 ± 0.02、0.37 ± 0.02、0.38 ± 0.02與 0.16 ± 0.01;0.22 ± 0.02、
0.21 ± 0.02、0.24 ± 0.02與0.09 ± 0.01;0.24 ± 0.03, 0.28 ± 0.03, 0.31 ± 0.03 與0.12 ± 0.03,各項乳產量性狀多為中至高度遺傳率;而體細胞數分數性狀則為低遺傳率,此結果與國外其它研究報告之估計相似。前三泌乳期之遺傳率估值以第一泌乳期最高,後續泌乳期則較低,此現象可能為環境變方隨泌乳期的增加而變大所致。在遺傳相關方面,前述之乳產量性狀間於前三泌乳期內均呈現高度之遺傳正相關,估值範圍介於0.82至 0.99之間,顯示選拔台灣荷蘭乳牛產乳量性狀對於增加乳脂量與蛋白質量具有正向選拔反應,惟體細胞數分數與乳產量性狀之間多為中度遺傳負相關 (–0.40至 0.13),若進行單性狀選拔低體細胞數分數牛隻之策略可能有利於產乳量的提昇。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters, including heritabilities and correlations, of milk yield, milk components and somatic cell score traits with field data of Holsteins in Taiwan, All these genetic parameter estimates of important economic traits would be expected to be used in the genetic evaluation of dairy cows in the future.
Dairy production data were retrieved through SQL server using open database connectivity (ODBC) from the Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) database in Taiwan, and original 109,944 records from Holstein cows with first calving from April 1989 to November 2003 were included which were from to 580 herds and 1,752 sires, respectively. These original retrieved data were edited with dBASE III PLUS and used to request summary statistics by SAS package firstly, and the genetic parameters of milk yield, somatic cell score and milk components for the first three lactations were estimated with VCE5 software. The data set included files of trait records (27,916, 18,758 and 9,257 cows for first, second and third lactation, respectively), county-year-season fixed factor (361, 358, and 339 levels for each lactation, respectively), and pedigree of 4 generations of ancestors.
The genetic parameters of lactation were estimated with Restricted Maximum Likelihood using animal model. Model included fixed county-year-season effects, random animal and error. Estimated heritabilities for the first three lactations included 305d milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY) and log somatic cell score (LSCS) were 0.34 ± 0.02, 0.37 ± 0.02, 0.38 ± 0.02, and 0.16 ± 0.01 for first lactation, 0.22 ± 0.02, 0.21 ± 0.02, 0.24 ± 0.02, and 0.09 ± 0.01 for second lactation, and 0.24 ± 0.03, 0.28 ± 0.03, 0.31 ± 0.03 and 0.12 ± 0.03 for third parity respectively. Those heritability estimates were moderate for production traits and lower for log somatic cell score trait which was in agreement with the literature. Heritability estimates of the first lactation for all traits were higher than the later lactations been estimated, and the decreasing of heritability estimates for later lactations may be caused by increasing environmental variance. Genetic correlation estimates across lactations for the three milk yield traits were positive and ranged from 0.82 to 0.99, implying that selection for milk yield will appear genetic improvement for fat yield and protein yield traits. There were almost negative genetic correlations estimates between production and log somatic cell score traits (ranged from –0.40 to 0.13), however, LSCS was not show disadvantageous effect if only milk yield was selected.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:11:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93626002-1.pdf: 712137 bytes, checksum: 456cbda73e468df93eacf69d17ae6893 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents壹、中文摘要 1
貳、前言 3
參、文獻檢討 6
一、乳牛群性能改良與遺傳育種 6
二、台灣荷蘭乳牛群性能良計畫 9
三、乳牛之泌乳性狀 26
四、遺傳評估技術 34
五、變方-共變方成分與遺傳參數之估計 39
肆、材料與方法 45
一、「泌乳性狀分析資料集」之編輯 47
二、泌乳性狀系譜資料集」之編輯 47
三、變方-共變方成分與遺傳參數之估計 48
伍、結果與討論 52
一、基礎統計 52
二、台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期泌乳性狀遺傳參數之估計 62
陸、結論 85
柒、參考文獻 86
捌、英文摘要 99
玖、附錄 101

表 次
表1. 乳牛群性能改良計畫1984至2004年資訊設備更新與資料處理規模 17
表2. 乳牛群性能改良計畫1993至2003年各年度乳產量性狀與之摘要統計 19
表3. 乳牛群性能改良計畫1993至2003年各年度乳成分性狀與體細胞數分數之摘要統計 20
表4. 乳牛群性能改良計畫2003至2004年體細胞數分數各月份分布頻度 23
表5. 乳牛群性能改良計畫2003年之泌乳牛胎次分布 24
表6. 乳牛群性能改良計畫2003與2004年牛群之空胎日數與每次懷孕所需配種次數 25
表7. 台灣荷蘭乳牛「泌乳性狀分析資料集」之摘要性統計 54
表8. 「泌乳性狀分析資料集」各年份乳之產量與體細胞數分數性狀摘要統計 60
表9. 「泌乳性狀分析資料集」各年份之乳成分性狀摘要統計 61
表10. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期泌乳性狀摘要統計 65
表11. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期各項資料分佈 66
表12. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期乳產量與體細胞數分數性狀之變方成分 68
表13. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期乳成分性狀之變方成分 69
表14. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期乳產量與體細胞數分數性狀之遺傳率 74
表15. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期乳成分性狀之遺傳率 74
表16. 台灣荷蘭乳牛前三泌乳期體細胞數分數性狀與相關泌乳性狀之遺傳相關 77
表17. 台灣荷蘭乳牛第一泌乳期泌乳性狀之遺傳相關 82
表18. 台灣荷蘭乳牛第二泌乳期泌乳性狀之遺傳相關 83
表19. 台灣荷蘭乳牛第三泌乳期泌乳性狀之遺傳相關 84

圖 次
圖1. 乳牛群性能改良計畫1993至2003年之測乳戶數、頭數與規模之摘要統計 18
圖2. 台灣荷蘭乳牛「泌乳性狀分析(子)資料集」之資料編輯總綱流程圖 46
圖3.「泌乳性狀分析資料集」乳產量性狀箱型圖分布檢視 55
圖4.「泌乳性狀分析資料集」體細胞(分)數性狀箱型圖分布檢視 56
圖5.「泌乳性狀分析資料集」乳成分性狀箱型圖分布檢視 57
圖6.「泌乳性狀分析資料集」雄親之後裔女兒牛群數分布 59
附 錄
附錄 1. 「泌乳性狀分析資料集」之編輯 101
附錄 2. 「泌乳性狀系譜資料集」之編輯 114
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣荷蘭乳牛泌乳性狀之遺傳參數估值zh_TW
dc.titleEstimates of genetic parameters for lactation traits in Taiwan Holsteinsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.coadvisor朱有田(Yu-Ten Ju)
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林恩仲(En-Chung Lin),張菊犁(Chu-Li Chang),黃鈺嘉(Yu-Chia Huang)
dc.subject.keyword台灣荷蘭乳牛,泌乳性狀,遺傳參數,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordTaiwan Holsteins,lactation traits,genetic parameters,en
dc.relation.page120
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-26
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept動物科學技術學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:動物科學技術學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  目前未授權公開取用
695.45 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved