請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32523完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 杜榮瑞 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Han Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭涵 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:11:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-27 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-25 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allison, S. T., and D. M. Messick. 1990. Social decision heuristics in the use of shared resources. Journal Behavioral Decision Making 3: 195-204.
Arrow K. 1974. The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton. Arya, A., J. Fellingham, and J. Glover. 1997. Teams, repeated tasks, and implicit incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics 23: 7-30. Balakrishnan, R., N. J. Nagarajan, and K. Sivaramakrushnan. 1998. The effect of property rights and audit information quality on team incentives for inventory. Management Science 44: 1193-1204. Barber, B. 1983. The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Bendor, J., R. M. Kramer, and S. Stout. 1991. When in doubt: Cooperation in the noisy prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution 35: 691-719. Birnberg, J. G., and C. Snodgrass. 1988. Culture and Control: A field study. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 13:.447-464. Coletti, A. L., K. L. Sedatole, and K. L. Towry. 2005. The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments. The Accounting Review 80: 477-500. Das, T. K., and B. Teng. 1996. Risk types and inter-firm alliance structures. Journal of Management Studies 33: 827-843. -----, and -----. 2001. Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies 22: 251-283. Dawes, R. 1980. Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology 31: 169-195. Deci, E. L., R. Koestner, and R. M. Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125: 627-668. Frey, B. S., and R. Jegen. 2001. Motivation crowding theory. Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 589-611. Hardin, R. 1991. Trusting persons, trusting institutions. In Strategy and Choice, edited by R. J. Zeckahuser, Cambridge, MA: MIT. -----. 1992. The street-level epistemology of trust. Annual Krit 14: 152-176. Hewstone, M. 1990. The “ultimate attribution error”? A review of the literature on intergroup casual attribution. European Journal of Social Psychology 12: 241-269. Jin, N. and T. Yamagishi. 1997. Group heuristics in social dilemmas. Japanese Journal of Social Psychology 12: 190-198. (in Japanese with an English abstract). Jones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review 20: 404-437. Kollock, P. 1994. The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust. American Journal of Sociology 100: 313-345. Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 569-597. Kreps, D. M. 1990. Corporate culture and economic theory. In Perspectives on Positive Political Economy, edited by J. Alt, and K. Shepsle. New York: Cambridge University Press. Luhmann, N. 1988. Familiarity, confidence, and trust: problems and alternatives. In Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, edited by D. Gambetta, 94-108. Cambridge, MA: Oxford University Press. Malhotra, D. and J. K. Murnighan. 2002. The effects of contracts on interpersonal trust. Administrative Science Quarterly 47: 534-559. Mayer, R. C., J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20: 709-734. Messick, D. M., and W. G. Liebrand. 1995. Individual heuristics and the dynamics of cooperation in large groups. Psychological Review 102: 131-145. Miller, G. J. 1992. Managerial Dilemmas: The Political Economy of Hierarchies. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pettigrew, T. F. 1979. The ultimate attribution error: extending allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 5: 461-476. Rabbie, J. M. 1991. Determinants of instrumental intra-group cooperation. In Cooperation and prosocial behavior, edited by Hinde, R. A., and J. Groebel, 238-263. Cambridge University Press. Ross, L. 1977. The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10, edited by L. Berkowitz, 173-220. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Rousseau, D. M., S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer. 1998. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review 23: 393-404. Smith, K., S. Carroll, and S. Ashford. 1995. Intra- and inter-organizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal 38: 7-23. Tajfel, H. 1970. Experiments in inter-group discrimination. Scientific America 233: 96-102. Tenbrunsel, A. T., and D. M. Messick. 1999. Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44: 684-707. Turner, J. C. 1987. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell. Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in inter-firm networks: the paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42: 35-67. Wilson, W., N. Chun, and M. Kayatani. 1965. Projection, attraction, and strategy choices in inter-group competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 432-435. -----, and M. Kayatani. 1968. Inter-group attitudes and strategies in games between opponents of the same or of a different race. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9: 24-30. Yamagishi, T. 1986. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51: 110-116. -----. 1988. Seriousness of social dilemma and the provision of a sanctioning system. Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 32-42. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32523 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Coletti et al. (2005)發現，控制系統透過財務誘因激發合作，並將合作結果回饋給合作者。本論文將檢視上述歷程是否可以建立信任，進而激發後續合作，更進一步探討內外團體對上述歷程是否會有所影響。
實驗結果顯示，控制系統對信任的影響是由控制系統激發的合作中介，且該信任激發後續合作。不論在內團體或外團體的情況下，控制系統對信任的影響完全是被控制系統激發的合作中介。信任對後續合作的影響也並非被內外團體的因素所調節。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This thesis examines whether a control system can induce cooperative decisions and then help develop trust among pairs of partners in making decisions regarding resource contribution to a joint project. It also explores the role of in-group favoritism in the above relationships. A 2 (strong control system vs. no control system) x 2 (paired with an in-group member vs. paired with an out-group member) between-subjects design is adopted to examine these issues in a prisoner’s dilemma setting.
Seventy eight graduate students participate in a computerized experiment and are asked to make 20 periods of decisions on the level of resource they will devote to a joint project of which the outcome is jointly determined by himself (herself) and the paired partner. After 20 periods of decisions, they make another 20 periods of decisions, all without the existence of any control system. The results show that a strong control system can induce the participants’ cooperative behavior. The observed cooperation mediates the relationship between control system and trust. The trust built in the previous periods induces trust in the subsequent periods. In addition, in-group favoritism has positive effects on cooperative behavior and on the build up of trust. Further, in-group favoritism moderates the mediating effect of cooperation on the association between control system and trust. Limitations and implications are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:11:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93722018-1.pdf: 273187 bytes, checksum: 990128648e9a56b811a6f9c8c9840098 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Abstract………………………………………………………………ii
1 Introduction…..………………………………………1 2 Background and Hypotheses Development….…………4 2.1 Risks in Collaborative Environment…..……………4 2.2 Trust, Control System, and Cooperation...…………6 2.3 In-group Favoritism, Trust, and Cooperation..…11 2.4 Control System, In-group Favoritism, Trust, and Cooperation..13 3 Experiment..………………………………………15 3.1 Subjects………………………………………..…..15 3.2 Design and Task………………………………..…15 3.3 Procedure……………………………………………19 4 Result..…………………………………………….20 4.1 Manipulation Check……………………..……….20 4.1.1 Control System………..………………………………20 4.1.2 Group Membership….………………………………..20 4.2 Test for Hypothesis 1…………………………..21 4.3 Test for Hypotheses 2...………..…………………22 4.4 Test for Hypothesis 3………………………………..24 4.5 Test for Hypotheses 4 and 5.………………………25 4.6 Test for Hypotheses 6……………………………….27 4.7 Test for Hypothesis 7……………………………..30 5 Discussion and Conclusion….………………………32 Reference………………………………………………………..34 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 控制系統與內外團體對信任及資源投入決策之影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Effects of Control System and In-group Favoritism on Trust and Cooperative Decisions in a Social Dilemma Setting: An Experimental Investigation | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李書行,高泉豐 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 控制系統,信任,內團體偏好,合作,囚犯困境, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Control system,Trust,In-group favoritism,Cooperation,Prisoner’s dilemma, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 37 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 會計學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 266.78 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。