請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32521完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 莊裕澤(Yuh-Jzer Joung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Yi Chan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 詹子儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T04:11:16Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-29 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-26 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] Benjamin B. Bederson. PhotoMesa: A zoomable image browser using quantum
treemaps and bubblemaps. In UIST ’01: Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 71–80, New York, NY, United States, November 2001. ACM Press. [2] Benjamin B. Bederson and James D. Hollan. Pad++: A zooming graphical interface for exploring alternate interface physics. In UIST ’94: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 17–26, New York, NY, United States, November 1994. ACM Press. [3] Benjamin B. Bederson, Ben Shneiderman, and Martin Wattenberg. Ordered and quantum treemaps: Making effective use of 2D space to display hierarchies. ACM Transaction on Graphics, 21(4):833–854, October 2002. [4] Car and Driver.com. http://www.caranddriver.com/. Retrieved September 2005 from http://www.caranddriver.com/. [5] Stuart K. Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman, editors. Readings in information visualization: using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, United States, 1999. [6] Erran Carmel, Stephen Crawford, and Hsinchun Chen. Browsing in hypertext: a cognitive study. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22(5):865– 884, September/October 1992. [7] Hsinchun Chen, Andrea L. Houston, Robin R. Sewell, and Bruce R. Schatz. Internet browsing and searching: User evaluations of category map and concept space techniques. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(7):582– 603, May 1998. [8] Gouthami Chintalapani, Catherine Plaisant, and Ben Shneiderman. Extending the utility of treemaps with flexible hierarchy. In IV ’04: Proceedings of the Information Visualisation, Eighth International Conference on (IV’04), pages 335–344, Washington, DC, United States, July 2004. IEEE Computer Society. [9] William S. Cleveland and Robert McGill. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387):531–554, September 1984. [10] TheBrain Technologies Corp. http://www.thebrain.com/. Retrieved June 2006 from http://www.thebrain.com/. [11] J. F. Cove and B. C. Walsh. Online text retrieval via browsing. Information Processing and Management, 24(1):31–37, 1988. [12] Abe Crystal and Paula Land. Metadata and search. In Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, September 28, 2003. http://dublincore.org/groups/corporate/Seattle/, September 2003. [13] Abe Crystal and Paula Land. Metadata and search: Global corporate circle DCMI 2003 workshop. In Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, September 28, 2003. http://dublincore.org/groups/corporate/Seattle/, September 2003. [14] dmoz open directory project. About the open directory project. Retrieved June 2006 from http://dmoz.org/about.html. [15] Peter Eklund, Nataliya Roberts, and Steve Green. OntoRama: Browsing RDF ontologies using a hyperbolic-style browser. In CW ’02: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Cyber Worlds (CW’02), pages 405–411, Washington, DC, United States, November 2002. IEEE Computer Society. [16] George W. Furnas, Louis M. Gomez, Thomas K. Landauer, and Susan T. Dumais. Statistical semantics: How can a computer use what people name things to guess what things people mean when they name things? In Proceedings of the 1982 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 251–253, New York, NY, United States, March 1982. ACM Press. [17] Rajiv Gandhi, Girish Kumar, Ben Bederson, and Ben Shneiderman. Domain name based visualization of web histories in a zoomable user interface. In DEXA ’00: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, pages 591–600, Washington, DC, United States, September 2000. IEEE Computer Society. [18] Carl Gutwin. Focus and context: Improving focus targeting in interactive fisheye views. In CHI ’02: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, volume 4, pages 267–274, New York, NY, United States, April 2002. ACM Press. [19] Ivan Herman, Guy Melan¸con, and M. Scott Marshall. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1):24–43, January 2000. [20] Ron R. Hightower, Laura T. Ring, Jonathan I. Helfman, Benjamin B. Bederson, and James D. Hollan. Graphical multiscale web histories: A study of PadPrints. In HYPERTEXT ’98: Proceedings of the Ninth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia : Links, Objects, Time and Space—Structure in Hypermedia Systems, pages 58–65, New York, NY, United States, June 1998. ACM Press. [21] Mao Lin Huang. Information visualization of attributed relational data. In CRPITS ’01: Australian symposium on Information visualisation, pages 143–149, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2001. Australian Computer Society, Inc. [22] Eero Hyv¨onen, Miikka Junnila, Suvi Kettula, Eetu M¨akel¨a, Samppa Saarela, Mirva Salminen, Ahti Syreeni, Arttu Valo, and Kim Viljanen. Metadata and beyond: Finnish museums on the semantic web: The user’s perspective on MuseumFinland. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2004 (MW2004), March/April 2004. [23] Eero Hyv¨onen, Samppa Saarela, and Kim Viljanen. Ontogator: Combining view and ontology-based search with semantic browsing. In Proceedings of the XML Finland 2003 Conference, Open Standards, XML, and the Public Sector, October 2003. [24] Inc. Inxight Software. Inxight startree. Retrieved June 2006 from http://www.inxight.com. [25] Brian Johnson and Ben Shneiderman. Tree-maps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In VIS ’91: Proceedings of the second Conference on Visualization ’91, pages 284–291, Los Alamitos, CA, United States, October 1991. IEEE Computer Society Press. [26] Susanne Jul and George W. Furnas. Navigation in electronic worlds: A chi 97 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 29(4):44–49, October 1997. [27] Eser Kandogan. Visualizing multi-dimensional clusters, trends, and outliers using star coordinates. In KDD ’01: Proceedings of the seventh ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 107–116, New York, NY, United States, 2001. ACM Press. [28] Kirk L. Kroeker. Seeing data: New methods for understanding information. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 24(3):6–12, May/June 2004. [29] John Lamping, Ramana Rao, and Peter Pirolli. A focus+context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. In CHI ’95: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 401–408, New York, NY, United States, May 1995. ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. [30] Tom Lanning, Kent Wittenburg, Michael Heinrichs, Christina Fyock, and Glenn Li. Multidimensional information visualization through sliding rods. In AVI ’00: Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pages 173– 180, New York, NY, United States, May 2000. ACM Press. [31] Bongshin Lee, Cynthia Sims Parr, Dana Campbell, and Benjamin B. Bederson. How users interact with biodiversity information using TaxonTree. In AVI ’04: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 320– 327, New York, NY, United States, May 2004. ACM Press. [32] Jock Mackinlay. Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 5(2):110–141, 1986. [33] Eetu M¨akel¨a, Eero Hyv¨onen, Samppa Saarela, and Kim Viljanen. Ontoviews - a tool for creating semantic web portals. In Proceedings of the Third International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2004), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 797–811. Springer, November 2004. [34] Eetu M¨akel¨a, Eero Hyv¨onen, and Teemu Sidoroff. View-based user interfaces for information retrieval on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference Workshop End User Semantic Web Interaction, November 2005. [35] Eetu M¨akel¨a, Kim Viljanen, Petri Lindgren, Mikko Laukkanen, and Eero Hyv¨onen. Semantic yellow page service discovery: The veturi portal. In Poster paper of the Fourth International Semantic Web Conference, November 2005. [36] Gary Marchionini. Information Seeking in Electronic Environments. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, United States, 1995. [37] Gary Marchionini and Ben Brunk. Towards a general relation browser: A GUI for information architects. Journal of Digital Information, 4(1), April 2003. [38] Gary Marchionini and Ben Shneiderman. Finding facts vs. browsing knowledge in hypertext systems. Computer, 21(1):70–80, January 1988. [39] Michael J. McGuffin, Gord Davison, and Ravin Balakrishnan. Expand-ahead: A space-filling strategy for browsing trees. In INFOVIS ’04: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (INFOVIS’04), pages 119–126, Washington, DC, United States, October 2004. IEEE Computer Society. [40] Chris McMahon, Rose Crossland, Alistair Lowe, Tulan Shah, Jon Sims Williams, and Steve Culley. No zero match browsing of hierarchically categorized information entities. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 16(3):243–257, June 2002. [41] Tamara Munzner. Exploring large graphs in 3D hyperbolic space. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 18(4):18–23, July/August 1998. [42] MuseumFinland. http://museosuomi.cs.helsinki.fi/. Retrieved June 2006 from http://museosuomi.cs.helsinki.fi/. [43] David A. Nation, Catherine Plaisant, Gary Marchionini, and Anita Komlodi. Visualizing websites using a hierarchical table of contents browser: WebTOC. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Human Factors and the Web, June 1997. [44] Quang Vinh Nguyen and Mao Lin Huang. A space-optimized tree visualization. In INFOVIS ’02: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’02), pages 85–92, Washington, DC, United States, October 2002. IEEE Computer Society. [45] Lucy Nowell, Robert Schulman, and Deborah Hix. Graphical encoding for information visualization: An empirical study. In INFOVIS ’02: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’02), pages 43–50, Washington, DC, United States, October 2002. IEEE Computer Society. [46] Sung Park and Richard Catrambone. Represented and representing dimensions in relational information displays. In 8th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV’04), pages 605–612, Washington, DC, United States, July 2004. IEEE Computer Society. [47] Catherine Plaisant, Jesse Grosjean, and Benjamin B. Bederson. SpaceTree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In INFOVIS ’02: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis’02), pages 57–64, Washington, DC, United States, October 2002. IEEE Computer Society. [48] Catherine Plaisant, Ben Shneiderman, Khoa Doan, and Tom Bruns. Interface and data architecture for query preview in networked information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 17(3):320–341, July 1999. [49] Haystack Project. The universal information client. Retrieved June 2006 from http://haystack.lcs.mit.edu/. [50] George G. Robertson, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Stuart K. Card. Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In CHI ’91: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 189–194, New York, NY, United States, April/May 1991. ACM Press. [51] Doug Schaffer, Zhengping Zuo, Saul Greenberg, Lyn Bartram, John Dill, Shelli Dubs, and Mark Roseman. Navigating hierarchically clustered networks through fisheye and full-zoom methods. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3(2):162–188, June 1996. [52] SearchTools.com. Faceted metadata search and browse. Retrieved June 2006 from http://www.searchtools.com/info/faceted-metadata.html. [53] Ben Shneiderman, David Feldman, Anne Rose, and Xavier Ferr´e Grau. Visualizing digital library search results with categorical and hierarchical axes. In DL ’00: Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries, pages 57–66, New York, NY, United States, 2000. ACM Press. [54] Vineet Sinha and David R. Karger. Magnet: Supporting navigation in semistructured data environments. In SIGMOD ’05: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 97–106, New York, NY, United States, June 2005. ACM Press. [55] Stanley S. Stevens. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, New Series, 103(2684):677–680, 1946. [56] Thinkmap. http://www.thinkmap.com. Retrieved June 2006 from http://www.thinkmap.com. [57] John Tait Ting-Sheng Lai and Sharon McDonald. Image browsing and navigation using hierarchical classification. In CIR ’99: Proceedings of the Challenge of Image Retrieval–the Second UK Conference on Image Retrieval, February 1999. [58] Janet Wesson, MC du Plessis, and Craig Oosthuizen. A ZoomTree interface for searching genealogical information. In AFRIGRAPH ’04: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Computer Graphics, Virtual Reality, Visualisation and Interaction in Africa, pages 131–136, New York, NY, United States, November 2004. ACM Press. [59] Leland Wilkinson. The grammar of graphics, Second edition. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, United States, 2005. [60] Kent Wittenburg, Tom Lanning, Michael Heinrichs, and Michael Stanton. Parallel bargrams for consumer-based information exploration and choice. In UIST ’01: Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, pages 51–60, New York, NY, United States, 2001. ACM Press. [61] Yahoo! http://www.yahoo.com. Retrieved January 2006 from http://www.yahoo.com. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32521 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 利用視覺化方法(visualization techniques)來呈現多維度資訊(multi-dimensional information)能幫助使用者更有效地瀏覽，這些方法包含了sliding rods、star coordinates和parallel bargrams都能清楚地呈現每個維度以及所有的項目。然而，這些方法也還是有些缺點，他們都主要著重在每個項目上，而沒有呈現出其他像是維度間關係的資訊，並且，這樣的呈現會受限於資料量大小及維度的數目而無法呈現大量的資訊。
因此為了解決以上的問題，本研究提出了一個hyperbolic-like點線圖的設計，其中每個節點代表一個維度。為了能選擇最好的呈現方式，我們整理了學者的研究關於不同圖形屬性(graphical attribute)傳遞不同型態資料的效果，之後我們對受試者做實驗，觀察他們對於不同圖形屬性有何不同的看法。經過一系列的實驗，我們發現利用節點顏色(node color hue)來呈現不同類別的維度、線段長短(edge length)呈現維度不同的重要性、節點顏色深淺(node color saturation)來呈現資料量大小為最有效。此外，我們也證明了圖形的呈現更能表現多維度資訊相對於以文字為主的介面。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | To use visualization techniques to display multi-dimensional information helps users browse effectively. Among of them such as sliding rods, star coordinate, and parallel bargrams, present each dimension with all items clearly. However, these still can be improved. Most of them focus on an individual item without the relations between dimensions. Besides, the display is limited by
the size of the data sets and the number of the dimensions. In this paper we propose a hyperbolic-like nodes and edges diagram, where a node represents a dimension. In order to choose the best display, we arrange previous studies of the effectiveness of the graphical attributes for conveying different types of information. Afterwards, we conduct a within-subject empirical study of the effectiveness of our conclusion. Through experiments, we find that node color hue, edge length, and node color saturation are effective to encode dimension classification, dimension importance, and data volume effectively. In addition, we prove that the graphical display is much better than the text-based one to present multi-dimensional information. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T04:11:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93725021-1.pdf: 9556292 bytes, checksum: 24fd69ba8ef78d93c9bbc552ccec055f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.4 Thesis Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 2 Related Work 5 2.1 Browse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 2.2 Browsing Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2.1 Single Hierarchical Browse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.2.2 Multi-Dimensional Browse . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.2.2.1 Concept Hierarchies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2.2.2 Multi-faceted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.2.2.3 View-based . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 2.2.3 Brief Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.3 Visualization Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.3.1 Space Filling Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.3.2 Node Link Techniques . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 2.3.3 Better Uses of Screen Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.3.1 Hyperbolic View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 2.3.3.2 Zoomable User Interface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 2.3.3.3 Large Tree Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.3.3.4 Hybrid of Treemaps and Node-Link Diagrams . . . . . 26 2.3.4 Multi-dimensional Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.3.4.1 Parallel Bargrams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 2.3.4.2 Star Coordinates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.3.4.3 Sliding Rods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 2.3.5 Brief Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 2.4 Survey Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3 Empirical Study 31 3.1 Overview. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.2 Attributed Information Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.2.1 Information Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.2.2 Graphical Attributes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.2.2.1 Scale of Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.2.2 Graphical Encoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.2.3 GraphicalMapping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.2.4 Visualization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.3 Experimental Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3.3.1 Test Bed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3.2 Method : Experiment 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3.2.1 Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3.2.2 Platform and Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.3.2.3 Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.3.2.4 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.3.3 Method : Experiment 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.3.3.1 Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.3.3.2 Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 3.3.3.3 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.4 Method : Experiment 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.4.1 Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 3.3.4.2 Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 3.3.4.3 Procedure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 4 Results and Discussion 46 4.1 Results of Empirical Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.1.1 Experiment 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 4.1.2 Experiment 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 4.1.3 Experiment 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 4.2 Analysis of Empirical Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.2.1 Analysis of Response Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 4.2.1.1 Experiment 1: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2.1.2 Experiment 1: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 56 4.2.1.3 Experiment 1: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 57 4.2.1.4 Experiment 2: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 4.2.1.5 Experiment 2: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.2.1.6 Experiment 2: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 60 4.2.1.7 Experiment 3: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 4.2.1.8 Experiment 3: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.2.1.9 Experiment 3: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 63 4.2.2 Analysis of Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2.2.1 Experiment 1: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 4.2.2.2 Experiment 1: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.2.2.3 Experiment 1: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 66 4.2.2.4 Experiment 2: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.2.2.5 Experiment 2: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.2.2.6 Experiment 2: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 68 4.2.2.7 Experiment 3: Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 4.2.2.8 Experiment 3: ExperimentalModel . . . . . . . . . . . 70 4.2.2.9 Experiment 3: Analysis of Variance . . . . . . . . . . . 70 5 Conclusion and Future Work 73 5.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 5.2 FutureWork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 Bibliography 75 A Experiment 1 82 A.1 Dimension Classification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 A.2 Dimension Importance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 A.3 Data Volume . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 B Experiment 2 92 C Experiment 3 97 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 視覺化情境式多維度瀏覽 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Visualization Support to Contextual Multi-dimensional Browse | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳玲玲(Ling-Ling Wu),陳炳宇(Bing-Yu Chen),陳祝嵩(Chu-Song Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊視覺化,多維度視覺化,情境式瀏覽, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information visualization,Multi-dimensional visualization,Contextual browse, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-26 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 9.33 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。