請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32273
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 李培芬(Pei-fen Lee) | |
dc.contributor.author | Ta-ching Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 周大慶 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:40:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-09 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-09 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Aebischer, N. J., P. A. Robertson, and R. E. Kenward. 1993. Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313-1325.
Amadon, D. 1974. Taxonomic notes on the Serpent-eagles of the genus Spilornis. Bull. Br. Ornithol. Club. 94: 159-163. Andersen, D. E. 1990. Nest defense behavior of red-tailed hawks. Condor 92: 991-997. Ardia, D. R. 2002. Energetic consequences of sex-related habitat segregation in wintering American kestrels (Falco sparverius). Can. J. Zool. 80: 516-523. Ardia, D. R., and K. Bildstein. 2001. Sex-related differences in habitat use in wintering American kestrels. Auk 118: 746-750. Ardia, D. R., and K. L. Bildstein. 1997. Sex-related differences in habitat selection in wintering American kestrels, Falco sparverius. Anim. Behav. 53: 1305-1311. Arthur, S. M., W. B. Krohn, and J. R. Gilbert. 1989. Home range characteristics of adult fisher. J. Wildl. Manage. 53: 674-679. Askins, R. A. 1995. Hostile landscapes and the decline of migratory songbirds. Science 267: 1956-1957. Bechard, M. J. 1982. Effect of vegetative cover on foraging site selection by Swainson’s Hawk. Condor 84: 153–159. Beier, P. and J. E. Drennan. 1997. Forest structure and prey abundance in foraging areas of northern goshawks. Ecol. Appl. 7: 564-571. Bennett, J. R. and P. H. Bloom. 2005. Home range and habitat use by Great Horned Owls (Bubo virginianus) in southern California. J. Raptor Res. 39: 119-126. Berger, D. B. and H. C. Mueller. 1959. The bal-chatri: a trap for the birds of prey. Bird-Banding 30: 18-26. Bildstein, K. L., W. Schelsky, and J. Zalles. 1998. Conservation status of tropical raptors. J. Raptor Res. 32: 3-18. Bird, D. M. 1988. American kestrel. In: Palmer, R. S. (ed.), Handbook of North American Birds, Vol. 5. Yale University Press, New Haven. pp. 253–290. BirdLife International 2004. Important Bird Areas in Asia: key sites for conservation. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 13. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK. BirdLife International 2007. Spilornis cheela. In IUCN 2007. 2007 IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 17 September 2008. Block, W. M. and L. A. Brennan. 1993. The habitat concept in ornithology: theory and applications. Curr. Ornithol. 11: 35-91. Blondel, J. 2000. Evolution and ecology of birds on islands: trends and prospects. Vie et Milieu 50: 205-220. Blondel, J., D. Chessel, and B. Frochot. 1988. Bird species impoverishment, niche expansion and density inflation in Mediterranean islands habitats. Ecology 69: 1899-1917. Bloom, P. H., M. D. McCrary and M. J. Gibson. 1993. Red-shouldered Hawk home-range and habitat use in southern California. J. Wildl. Manage. 57: 258-265. Bosch, R., J. Real, A. Tintó, E. L. Zozaya and C. Castell. 2010. Home-ranges and patterns of spatial use in territorial Bonelli's Eagles Aquila fasciata. Ibis 152: 105-117. Brazil, M. 2009. Birds of East Asia: China, Taiwan, Korea, Japan, and Russia. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA. p. 126. Brown, L. H., and D. Amadon. 1968. Eagles, hawks, and falcons of the world. Wellfleet press, Secaucus. pp. 945. Burnham, W. A., D. F. Whitacre, and J. P. Jenny. 1994. The Maya Project: use of raptors as tools for conservation and ecological monitoring of biological diversity. In: B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor (eds.), Raptor conservation today. World Working Group For Birds Of Prey And Owls, London. Burt, W. H. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. J. Mamm. 24: 346-352. Carey, A. B., S. P. Horton and B. L. Biswell. 1992. Northern Spotted Owls: influence of prey base and landscape character. Ecol. Monogr. 62: 223-250. Chang, H.-T., K.-S. Hsiu, W.-L. Cho, S.-Y. Lu, C.-B. Chu and F.-H. Fung. 1985. The flora at Shiungchou Wung (Banana Bay). Kenting National Park Headquarters, Department of Interior, Taipei, Taiwan. [In Chinese with English summary] Chang, H.-W., T.-C. Chou, G. De-Leung, C.-A. Cheng, C.-C. Chang, C.-T. Yao, L.-Y. Chuang, C.-H. Wen, Y.-C. Chou, K.-Y. Tan, and C.-C. Cheng. 2008. An improved PCR method for gender identification of eagles. Mol. Cell. Probe. 22: 184-188. Chen, C.-T. and Y.-L. Chung. 2003. Using IKONOS Images to Delineate the Vegetation Distribution in Kenting National Park. J. National Park, Taipei, Taiwan. 13: 85-102. Chen, H.-S. 1997. Observations of the breeding biology and the effects of habitat fragmentation on Formosan Crested Goshawks (Accipiter trivirgatus formosae) in Kenting National Park, Taiwan. M.Sc. thesis, Arkansas State University, Fayetteville, USA. Chen, M.-Y., K.-C. Lu, and C.-Y. Lin. 1991. Post-fire succession of some plant communities at Kenting National Park in Taiwan. Kenting National Park Headquarters, Kenting. [In Chinese] Chou, T.-C. 2005. A study of breeding biology and habitat using of Formosan Crested Serpent Eagle in the Kenting National Park (1). Kenting National Park Headquarters, Department of Interior, Taipei, Taiwan. [In Chinese with English summary] Chou, T.-C. 2006. A study of breeding biology and habitat using of Formosan Crested Serpent Eagle in the Kenting National Park (2). Kenting National Park Headquarters, Taiwan. [In Chinese with English summary] Chou, T.-C., and H.-J. Shiu. 2007. A study of breeding biology and habitat using of Formosan Crested Serpent-eagle in the Kenting National Park (3). Kenting National Park Headquarters, Kenting. [In Chinese with English summary] Chou, T.-C., P.-F. Lee, and H.-S. Chen. 2004. Breeding biology of the Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela hoya in Kenting National Park, Taiwan. pp. 557-568. In: Chancellor, R. D. and B.-U. Meyburg (eds.), Raptors worldwide. World Working Group on Birds of Prey, Berlinn, and MME-BirdLife Hungary, Budapest. Clements, J. F., T. S. Schulenberg, M. J. Iliff, B.L. Sullivan, and C. L. Wood. 2010. The Clements checklist of birds of the world. Version 6.5. Downloaded from http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/Clements%206.5.xls/view. Cody, M. L. 1985. An introduction to habitat selection in birds. In: Cody, M. L., eds. Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York. pp. 4-56. Connor, L. M., and B. W. Plowman. 2001. Using Euclidean distances to assess nonrandom habitat use. pp. 275–290. In: Millspaugh, J. J. and J. M. Marzluff (eds.). Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego, California, USA. Connor, L. M., M. D. Smith, and L. W. Burger. 2003. A comparison of distance-based and classification-based analysis of habitat use. Ecology 84: 526–531. Del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal. 1994. Family Accipitridae (Hawks and Eagles). Handbook of the birds of the world Vol. 2. New world vultures to guineafowl. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain. p. 133. Dixon, K. R., and J. A. Chapman. 1980. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61: 1040-1044. Dykstra, C. R., J. L. Hays, F. B. Daniel and M. M. Simon. 2001. Home range and habitat use of suburban Red-Shouldered Hawks in Southwestern Ohio. Wilson Bull. 113: 308–316. ESRI. 1996. Arc View GIS 3.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA. ESRI. 2006. ArcGIS 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redmond, CA, USA. Fargallo J.A., G.. Blanco and E. Soto-Largo. 1998. Forest management effects on nesting habitat selected by Eurasian Black Vultures (Aegypius monachus) in Central Spain, J. Raptor Res. 32: 202–207. Ferguson-Lees, J. and D. A. Christie. 2001. Raptors of the World, Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, USA. pp. 457-459. Fernández, M., J. Oria, R. Sánchez, L. M. Gonzalez, and A. Margalida. 2009. Space use of adult Sapnish Imperial Eagles Aquila adalberti. Acta. Ornithol. 44: 17-26. Fieberg, J., and C. O. Kochanny. 2005. Quantifying home-range overlap: the importance of the utilization distribution. J. Wildl. Manage. 69: 1346-1359. Gorman, T. A., J. D. Erb, B. R. McMillan, and D. J. Martin. 2006. Space use and sociality of river otters (Lontra Canadensis) in Minnesota. J. Mamm. 87: 740-747. Griffin, C. R., and T. S. Baskett. 1985. Food availability and winter range sizes of immature and adult bald eagles. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 592-594. Harestad A. S., and F. L. Bunnell. 1979. Home range and body weight-a reevaluation. Ecology 60: 389-402. Harris, S., W. J. Cresswell, P. G. Forde, and W. J. Trewhella. 1990. Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data: a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of animals. Mamm. Rev. 20: 97-123. Hayne, D. W. 1949. Calculation of size of home range. J. Mamm. 30: 1-18. Hodder, K. H., R. E. Kenward, S. S. Wall, and R. T. Clarke. 1998. Estimating core ranges: a comparison of techniques using the Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). J. Raptor Res. 32: 82-89. Hooge P. N., and B. Eichenlaub. 1997. Animal movement extension to Arcview. Alaska Science Center - Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey. Anchorage. Hooge, P. N. 1995. Dispersal dynamics of the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. Huang, K. Y., Y. S. Lin and L. L. Severinghaus. 2006. Comparison of three common methods for studying the diet of nestlings in two Accipiter species. Zool. Studies 45: 234-243. Janes, S. W. 1985. Habitat selection in raptorial birds. In: Cody, M. L. (ed.), Habitat selection in birds. Academic Press, New York, USA. pp. 159-188. Jarvis, A. M. and A. Robertson. 1999. Predicting population sizes and priority conservation areas for 10 endemic Namibian bird species. Biol.Conserv. 88: 121-131. Johnson, D. H. 1980. The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71. Julien, M. and J.-M. Thiollay. 1996. Effects of rain forest disturbance and fragmentation: comparative changes of the raptor community along natural and human-made gradients in French Guiana. J. Biogeogr. 23: 7-25. Karubian, J., and L. Carrasco. 2008. Home range and habitat preferences of the Banded Ground-cuckoo (Neomorphus radiolosus). Wilson J. Ornithol. 120: 205-209. Katnik, D. D., D. J. Harrison, and T. P. Hodgman. 1994. Spatial relations in a harvested population of marten in Maine. J. Wildl. Manage. 58: 600-607. Kaufman, J. H. 1962. Ecology and social behavior of the coati (Nasau narica) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Zool. 60: 95-222. Keeley, W., and M. J. Bechard. 2011. Flushing distances of ferruginous hawks nesting in rural and exurban New Mexico. J. Wildl. Manage. 75: 1034-1039. Kennedy, P. L., J. M. Ward, G. A. Rinker, and J. A. Gessaman. 1994. Post-fledging areas in Northern Goshawk home ranges. In: Block, W. M., M. L. Morrison and M. H. Reiser (eds.), The Northern Goshawk: Ecology and management. Studies in Avian Biology No. 16, Cooper Ornithological Society. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence. pp. 75-82. Kenward R.E. 2001. A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, London. pp. 157-159. Kenward, R. E. 1992. Quantity versus quality: programmed collection and analysis of radio tracking data. In: I. G. Priede and S. M. Swift (eds.), Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and tracking animals. Ellis Horwood, Chichester. pp. 231-246. Kernohan, B. J., R. A. Gitzen, and J. J. Millspaugh. 2001. Analysis of animal space use and movements. In: Millspaugh, J. J. and J. M. Marzluff (eds.), Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego. pp. 125-166. Kostrzewa, A. 1996. A comparative study of nest-site occupancy and breeding performance as indicators for nesting-habitat quality in three European raptor species. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 8: 1-18. Krüger, O. 2000. Correlates of population density and body weight of raptors in the family Accipitridae: a comparative study. J. Zool. 250: 185-191. Krüger, O. 2005. The evolution of reversed sexual size dimorphism in hawks, falcons and owls: a comparative study. Evol. Ecol. 19: 467-486. Lee, R.-Y. and S. -C. Lin. 2006. Utilizing spatial technology and landscape ecology indices to analyze the influences of the land cover transition in Kenting National Park. J. Geographical Sci. 46: 31-48. Lin, W.-H. 2005. A review of the breeding ecology of the Crested Serpent Eagle (Spilornis cheela ) in the Taipei area. Raptor Res. Taiwan 5: 31-44. [In Chinese with English summary] Lin, W.-H., Y.-H Chang, Y.-M. Wang and Y.-W., Yan. 1998. Breeding habits of the Crested Serpent Eagle at GuanyingShan, Northern Taiwan. Asian Raptor Research and Conservation - The first Symposium on Raptors of South-East Asia. The Committee for the Symposium on Raptors of South-East Asia, Shiga. pp. 288-292. Liu, C.-H. 2011. Diurnal activity pattern of Crested Serpent-eagle Spilornis cheela hoya in Kenting, southern Taiwan. Master thesis, National University of Tainan, Tainan. [In Chinese with English abstract] Liu, H.-Y. 2000. An introduction to the plant ecology of Kenting National Park. Kenting National Park Headquarters, Kenting. [In Chinese] Lu, S.-H., L.-S. Hwang and K.-J. Tang. 2004. Diurnal and annual temperature variations in experimental forests of the Taiwan Forestry Research Institute. Taiwan J. For. Sci. 19: 15-25. Macdonald, D. W. 1983. The ecology of carnivore social behavior. Nature 301: 379-384. Manly, B. F. J. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte Carlo methods in biology, 2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, New York. Manly, B. F. J., L. L. McDonald, and D. L. Thomas. 1993. Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies. Chapman and Hall, London, United Kingdom. Massemin, S., E. Korpimaki, and J. Wiehn. 2000. Reversed sexual size dimorphism in raptors: evaluation to the hypotheses in kestrels breeding in a temporally changing environment. Oecologia 124: 26-32. Mazur, K. M., P. C. James and S. D. Frith. 1998. Barred Owl home range and habitat selection in the boreal forest of central Saskatchewan. The Auk 115: 746-754. McGrath, M. T, S. DeStefano, R. A. Riggs, L. L. Irwin, G. J. Roloff. 2003. Spatially explicit influences on northern goshawk nesting habitat in the interior Pacific Northwest. Wildl. Monogr. 154: 1-63. McGrath, P. E. 2005. Site fidelity, home range, and daily movements of white perch, Morone Americana, and striped bass, Morone Saxatilis, in two small tributaries of the York river, Virginia, Ph.D. dissertation, The College of William and Mary, Gloucester Point. Meyburg, B.-U. and R. D. Chancellor. 1989. Raptors in the modern world. World working group for birds of prey and owls, London, U.K. Morioka, T. 1995. Spilornis cheela In: The birds of prey in Japan. Bun-ichi Sogo Shuppan Co. Ltd., Tokyo. pp. 248-255. Mueller, H. C., and K. Meyer. 1985. The evolution of reversed sexual dimorphism in size: A comparative analysis of the Falconiformes of the Western Palearctic. Curr. Ornithol. 2: 65-101. Naoroji, R. K., and S. G. Monga. 1983. Observations on the crested serpent eagle (Spilornis cheela) in Rajpipla Forests - south Gujarat. J. Bombay Nat. His. Soc. 80: 273-285. Neu, C., C. Byers, and J. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildlife Manage. 38: 541–545. Newton, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. T. and A. D. Poyser, Berkhamsted, UK. Newton, I. and R. D. Chancellor. 1985. Conservation studies on raptors. ICBP, Tech. Publ. No. 5, Cambridge, U.K. Nijman, V. 2006. The endemic Bawean Serpent-eagle Spilornis baweanus: habitat use, abundance and conservation. Bird Conserv. Int. 16: 131-143. Ontiveros, D, J. M. Pleguezuelos and J. Caro. 2005. Prey density, prey detectability and food habits: the case of Bonelli’s eagle and the conservation measures. Biol. Conserv. 123: 19-25. Pakkala, T., J. Kouki and J. Tiainen. 2006. Top predator and interference competition modify the occurrence and breeding success of a specialist species in a structurally complex forest environment. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 43: 137-164. Palladini, M. A. 2007. The response of Cooper’s hawks to experimental Ponderosa pine forest restoration treatments in an adaptive management. M.Sc. thesis, Humboldt State University, USA. Paton, P. W. C., F. J. Messina, and C . R. Griffin. 1994. A phylogenetic approach to reversed size dimorphism in diurnal raptors. Oikos 71: 492-498. Peery, M. Z. 2000. Factors affecting interspecies variation in home-range size of raptors. Auk 117: 511–517. Powell, R. A. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: Boitani, L. and T. K. Fuller (eds.), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology. Columbia State University, New York. pp. 65-110. Powell, R. A., J. W. Zimmerman, and D. E. Seaman. 1997. Ecology and Behavior of North American Black Bears: Home ranges, Habitat and Social Organization. Chapman and Hall, London. Real, J. and S. Mañosa. 2001. Dispersal of juvenile and immature Bonelli’s eagles in Northeastern Spain. J. Raptor. Res. 35: 9–14. Reynolds, R. T., R. T. Graham, M. H. Reiser, R. L. Bassett, P. L. Kennedy, D. A. Boyce, Jr., G. Goodwin, R. Smith and E. L. Fisher. 1992. Management recommendations for the northern goshawk in the southwestern United States. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southwest Region. Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. General Technical Report RM-217. 90 pp. Roth, T. and D. Weber. 2008. Top predators as indicators for species richness? Prey species are just as useful. J. Appl. Ecol. 45: 987–991. Rutz, C. 2006. Home range size, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behaviour of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Ardea 94: 185-202. Samuel, M. D., and M. R. Fuller. 1994. Wildlife radiotelemetry. In: Bookhout, T. A. (ed.), Research and management techniques for wildlife and habitats, 5th ed. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda. pp. 370-418. Sano, K. 2003. Breeding biology of the Ryukyu Crested Serpent Eagle in Ishigaki Island, Okinawa. Strix 21: 141-150. Schoener, T. W. 1968. Sizes of feeding territories among birds. Ecology 3: 123-141. Seaman, D. E., and R A. Powell. 1990. Identifying patterns and intensity of home range use. Intl. Conf. on Bear Res. and Manage. 8: 243-249. Seaman, D. E., B. Griffith, and R. A. Powell. 1998. KERNELHR: a program for estimating animal home ranges. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 26: 95-100. Seaman, D. E., J. J. Millspaugh, B. J. Kernohan, G. C. Brundige, K. J. Raedeke, and R. A. Gitzen. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. J. Wildl. Manage. 63: 739-747. Sheldon, F. H., R. G. Moyle and J. Kennard. 2001. Ornithology of Sabah: history, gazetteer, annotated checklist, and bibliography. Ornithological Monographs no. 52. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. pp. 102-105. Smallwood, J. A. 1988. A mechanism of sexual segregation by habitat in American kestrels (Falco sparverius) wintering in southcentral Florida. Auk 105: 36–46. Spencer, W. D., and R. H. Barrett. 1984. An evaluation of the harmonic mean measure for determining carnivore activity areas. Acta Zool. Fennica 171: 255-259. Springer, J. T. 1982. Movement patterns of coyotes in south central Washington. J. Wildl. Manage. 46: 191-200. Stamps, J. A.and M. Buencher. 1985. The territorial defence hypothesis and the ecology of insular vertebrates. Q. Rev. Biol. 60: 155–181. Stepanyan, L. S. 1993. New data on the taxonomy of the genus Spilornis (Accipitridae, Aves). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 72: 132-145. Su, H.-J. 1985. Vegetation analysis on the native habitat of Formosan Sika Deer and proposal of its reintroduction area. In: The Formosan Sika Deer reintroduction research 1984 annual report. Kenting National Park, Kenting. pp. 63-99. [In Chinese with English abstract] Thiollay, J. M. 1989a. Area requirements for the conservation of rain forest raptors and game birds in French Guiana. Conserv. Biol. 3: 128-137. Thiollay, J. M. 1989b. Censusing of diurnal raptors in a primary rain forest: comparative methods and species detectability. J. Raptor Res. 23: 72-84. Thiollay, J. M. 1998a. Current status and conservation of Falconiformes in tropical Asia. J. Raptor Res. 32: 4-55. Thiollay, J. M., 1998b. Distribution patterns and insular biogeography of South Asian raptor communities. J. Biogeography 25: 57-72. Thiollay, J. M. 1993. Response of a raptor community to shrinking area and degradation of tropical rain forest in the south western Ghâts (India). Ecography 16: 97-110. Thiollay, J. M. 1994. A world review of tropical forest raptors: current trends, research objectives and conservation strategy. In: B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor (eds.), Raptor conservation today. World Working Group for Birds of Prey and Owls, London. pp. 231-239. Thiollay, J. M., and B. U. Meyburg. 1988. Forest fragmentation and the conservation of raptors: a survey on the island of Java. Biol. Cons. 44: 229-250. Thompson, C. M. and McGarigal, K. 2002. The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York, USA. Landscape Ecol. 17: 569-586. Tordoff, H. B. 1954. Automatic live trap for raptorial birds. J. Wildl. Manage. 18: 281-284. Tufto, J., R. Andersen, and J. Linnell, 1996. Habitat use and ecological correlates of home range size in a small cervid: the roe deer. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 715-724. Ueta, M. and J. S. Minton. 1996. Habitat preference of Crested Serpent Eagles in southern Japan. J. Raptor Res. 30: 99-100. Van Balen, B. S. 1998. Tropical forest raptors in Indonesia: recent information on distribution, status, and conservation. J. Raptor Res. 32: 56-63. Van Balen, S. 1994. The status and conservation of birds of prey in the Sondaic and Wallacean regions of Indonesia. pp. 245-254. In: B.-U. Meyburg and R. D. Chancellor (eds.), Raptor conservation today. World Working Group for Birds of Prey and Owls, London. Wang, H.-H., I.-F. Sun, C.-T. Chien, F.-J. Pan, C.-F. Kuo, M.-H. Yu, H.-L. Ku, S.-H. Wu, Y.-P. Cheng, S.-Y. Chen, and Y.-C. Kao. 2004. Tree species composition and habitat types of a Karst forest in Kenting, southern Taiwan. Taiwan J. For. Sci. 19: 323-35. [in Chinese with English summary] Watson, R. T. 1998. Conservation and ecology of raptors in the tropics. J. Raptor Res. 32: 1-2. Weick, F. and L. Brown. 1980. Birds of prey of the world, Collins, London. White G. C., and Garrott, R. A. 1990. Analysis of wildlife radiotracking data. Academic Press, London. Widen, P. 1994. Habitat quality for raptors: a field experiment. J. Avian Biol. 25: 219–223. Willey, D. W., and C. van Riper. 2007. Home range characteristics of Mexican spotted owls in the Canyonlands of Utah. J. Raptor Res. 41: 10-15. Worton, B. J. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecol. Model. 38: 277-298. Worton, B.J. 1989. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution on home-range stueies. Ecology 70: 164-168. Wu, S.-H., C.-L. Pan, H.-L. Ku, H.-Y. Tzeng and H.-H. Wang. 2007. Diversity of Lianas in Kentign uplifted coral reef forest, Southern Taiwan. Quarterly J. of Chinese Forestry. 40: 31-42. [In Chinese] Wywialowski, A. P. 1987. Habitat structure and predators: choices and consequences for rodent habitat specialists and generalists. Oecologia 72:39-45. Yamaguchi, N., and D. W. Macdonald. 2003. The burden of cooccupancy: intraspecific resource competition and spacing patterns in American mink, Mustela vison. J. Mamm. 84: 1341-1355. Younk, J. V. and M. J. Bechard. 1992. Effects of gold mining activity on northern goshawks breeding in Nevada’s Independence and Bull Run Mountains (Annual Report 1992). Raptor Research Center, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, USA. Zabel, C. J., K. McKelvey, and J. P. Ward, Jr. 1995. Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina). Can. J. Zool. 73: 433-439. Zhang, E.-D. 2000. The preliminary observing on breeding ecology of the Spilornis cheela. Zool. Res. 21: 92-93. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32273 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 人類對猛禽主要的威脅包括棲地破壞、環境污染和獵殺。大冠鷲(Spilornis cheela hoya)是蛇鵰(S. cheela)這個種類中體型最大的亞種且僅分布於台灣。由於侷限於一個地區或小島上的特有物種,其存活更容易受到各種威脅影響,因此收集猛禽對棲地需求和利用的訊息,有助於增進保育管理計劃的發展和有效性。
本研究於2005年至2007年間利用無線電追蹤及地理資訊系統,針對台灣南部不同性別與年齡(成鳥和亞成鳥)的大冠鷲,進行活動範圍與核心區域的交互作用與空間利用監測。根據最小多邊形 (minimum convex polygon, MCP) 法,8隻雄鳥和6隻雌鳥的平均活動範圍計算分別為16.65 km2 和 6.93 km2;根據固定核心區域法(95% fixed kernel method, 95% FK)則分別為 4.50 km2 和 1.46 km2。所有個體的活動範圍經獨立區域法(Area Independent Method, AIM)驗證,存在客觀集中利用的核心區域,雄鳥和雌鳥的客觀核心區域平均大小分別為1.16 km2 和 0.36 km2,大於主觀以50% fixed kernel定義的雄鳥(0.64 km2)和雌鳥(0.20 km2) 核心區域面積。以固定核心區域法計算的雄鳥平均活動範圍是雌鳥的 3.2 倍大,以AIM 獲得的雄鳥核心區域是雌鳥的 2.9倍大。所有被繫放個體的活動範圍呈現高度相互重疊,甚至核心活動區域也與其他個體分享。雌性-雌性、雌性-雄性、以及雄性-雄性個體間三種組合的核心區域面積重疊的平均比例分別為1.9%、14.9%、和37.0%,兩兩之間呈現顯著差異,即雄鳥的核心區域重疊度高,雌鳥的核心區域享程度低。相較於雄鳥對雄鳥和雄鳥對雌鳥,雌鳥之間的核心區域的空間分布與利用呈現明顯的排他性,由於雌鳥的平均體重高於雄鳥18%,此種空間利用型態的差異顯然與雌鳥的強勢行為有關。 雖然不同性別個體在年度活動範圍大小呈現明顯差異,但是在乾季則只有95% FK活動範圍有顯著差異。不同年齡(成鳥、亞成鳥和幼鳥)的年度和乾季活動範圍無明顯差異,但在濕季亞成鳥的MCP活動範圍小於成鳥及幼鳥。除了亞成鳥,成鳥、幼鳥、雌鳥、雄鳥等組合,以及綜合所有個體,比較其乾季和濕季間的MCP及95% FK活動範圍沒有明顯差異。 此外,為了解在整個研究區和個別個體的活動範圍兩種層級的空間尺度下,大冠鷲對於棲地的利用是否具有選擇性,以及哪一些棲地型態是大冠鷲重要的棲地。我採用並比較距離分析(distance-based analysis, DA)和構成分析(compositional analysis, CA)兩種常用的棲地選擇分析方法在結果排序上的不同。以DA 和CA兩種方法都能證明大冠鷲在整個研究區和個別的活動範圍兩個尺度下對棲地型態有非逢機利用的現象。雖然兩種方法對棲地偏好排序在最前的 混合林和相思樹林兩類棲地順序一樣,但混合林利用比例高於相思樹林甚多。CA法除了較無法偵測出利用邊緣棲地的情況,對於部分可用棲地類型受限於在高一層級尺度的選擇下被排除時,使得CA法遺失這類棲地的訊息。不若DA法資料獲得具有不受個體活動範圍限制的優勢。 我也注意到,由研究區高密度的大冠鷲族群分布,以及能夠利用各種棲地環境,雖然有程度上差異,仍然符合島嶼症狀(insular syndrome)中的密度補償和生境擴張兩個主要現象。 由於亞洲地區相關大冠鷲定量棲地研究資料並不多,本研究所獲得大冠鷲活動範圍、重要棲地類型與特色、以及相對利用程度等資訊,可供這個物種及其他地區亞種的棲地保育或經營管理策略參考。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The Formosan Crested Serpent-eagle (Spilornis cheela hoya) is regarded as the largest subspecies of the Serpent-eagle and endemic to Taiwan. The survival of endemic species limited to one region or on little island are especially more likely to be threatened. Quantitative researches about their demand for the use of space and habitats in this region are very limited. Gather information on the habitat requirements and utilization of a raptor species will improve the development and effectiveness of management plan for its conservation.
I studied the home range and core areas of a native population of Crested Serpent-eagles in southern Taiwan by radio-telemetry from November 2005 to May 2007. Geographic information system were used to assess size of ranging area and as well as habitat composition. Mean home range areas for eight male and six female individuals were 16.65 km2 and 6.93 km2 based on the estimation by the minimum convex polygon (MCP) method and 4.50 km2 and 1.46 km2 by the 95% fixed kernel (FK) method, respectively. Mean core areas for male and female were 1.16 km2 and 0.36 km2 based on the estimation by the AIM (Area Independent Method) and 0.64 km2 and 0.20 km2 by the 50% FK method, respectively. Mean kernel home ranges of male eagles were 3.2 times greater than those of females, and AIM core areas of males were 2.9 times greater than those of females. All of the individuals exhibited core area overlap, especially in the case of male to male core areas. Female to female core area overlap was on average 1.9%. The same female had on average 14.9% of its core area overlapping with that of another male’s core area. Male to male average core area overlapping was 37.0%. These three combinations of core area overlap ratios were statistically significant. In general, relationships of female-female at the level of core area showed range exclusivity than female-male and male-male. Male core areas were considerably shared with the other same sex and opposite sex birds, but the core areas of female eagles were smaller and showed an extremely low level of sharing with other females. Since female eagles were 18% heavier than males, the difference in spacing pattern may be related to female dominance. In dry season, significant differences were observed between sexes in 95% FK area, but not in MCP home range. Annual and dry season home ranges were similar between ages, but in wet season subadults had smaller MCP home range then adults and juveniles. There was no seasonal difference in the MCP home range and 95% kernel area using by the total individuals or subgroups of males, females, adults and juveniles. Compositional analysis (CA) approach and distance-based analysis (DA) approach were adopt to test whether eagles selected particular habitats at two scales: selection of home ranges within the study site and selection of habitats within home ranges. Both DA and CA methods demonstrated that habitats used nonrandom in both study area scale and home range scale, however, only two top-ranking habitats, mixed forest and Acacia confusa forest, typically secondary forest, were the same for different habitat analysis techniques. According to this research, Crested Serpent-eagles were sedentary to their ranging area in southern Taiwan. No distinct seasonal ranges shifting or migratory behavior was observed among banded individuals. Local population displaying with high density and exerting all types of forest habitat provide a supplement to the phenomenon of insular syndrome. The results of this study contribute to identifying Crested Serpent-eagles’ vital attributes of home range size, habitat components, and relative proportional habitat utilization, which may probably be applied to planning habitat conservation and forest management plans for them and related species. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:40:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-D91225007-1.pdf: 1647644 bytes, checksum: f5353bd8e9f9000d3ec8ea2ee98fe58c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭.………….. …ii ABSTRACT…. iv 摘 要…….. vii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 THREATS TO TROPICAL RAPTORS 1 SERPENT-EAGLES 1 HABITAT REQUIREMENTS 3 LITERATURE CITED 5 CHAPTER 2. SPACING PATTERN OF THE CRESTED SERPENT-EAGLE 8 ABSTRACT 8 INTRODUCTION 9 METHOD 12 Study area ……………………………………………………………………….12 Trapping and radiomarking 13 Radio-telemetry and tracking 14 Data collection and processing 15 RESULTS 20 Radio-telemetry 20 Home range 20 Core area… 21 Body mass ……………………………………………………………………….22 Home range and core area overlap 22 DISCUSSION 23 LITERATURE CITED 27 CHAPTER 3. HOME RANGE AND HABITAT SELECTION OF THE CRESTED SERPENT-EAGLE IN SOUTHERNTAIWAN 40 ABSTRACT 40 INTRODUCTION 41 METHODS 44 Study area... 44 Trapping and Radiotagging 46 Radio tracking 47 Habitat delineation 48 Assigning habitat attributes to telemetry data 50 Distance-based Analysis 50 Compositional Analysis 52 RESULTS 53 Home range 53 Habitat use 54 Distance-based Analysis 55 Compositional Analysis 56 DISCUSSION 58 LITERATURE CITED 64 CHAPTER 4. CONCLUSIONS AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS 82 CONCLUSIONS 82 MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS 84 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 大冠鷲(Spilornis cheela hoya)活動範圍與棲地選擇 | zh_TW |
dc.title | HOME RANGE AND HABITAT SELECTION OF CRESTED SERPENT-EAGLE (Spilornis cheela Hoya) | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許富雄,柯淳涵,袁孝維,丁宗蘇,許皓捷 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 無線電追蹤,活動範圍,核心區域,空間利用,棲地選擇,大冠鷲, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | radio-telemetry,home range,core area,space use,habitat selection,Spilornis cheela hoya, | en |
dc.relation.page | 85 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生命科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 生態學與演化生物學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.61 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。