請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32064
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳文哲,陳秋男,石正人 | |
dc.contributor.author | Ren-Wei Lin | en |
dc.contributor.author | 林仁偉 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:30:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2011-07-31 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Allwood, A. J. 2000. Regional approaches to the management of fruit flies in the Pacific. pp. 439-448. In: K. H. Tan, ed. Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Sinaran Bros., Penang, Malaysia.
Allwood, A. J., A. Chinajariyawong, R. A. I. Drew, E. L. Hamacek, D. L. Hancock, C. Hengsawad, et al. 1999. Host plant records for fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in South-East Asia. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology. Supplement 7. 92 pp. Alyokhin, A. V., R. H. Messing, and J. J. Duan. 2001. Abundance and mating behavior of Oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) near methyleugenol-baited traps. Pan-Pacific Entomol. 77: 161-167. Asquith, A. 1992. Attraction of Hawaiian ground litter invertebrates to protein hydrolysate bait. Environ. Entomol. 21: 1022-1028. BAPHIQ. 2005. Annual report. Bureau of Animal and Plant Health Inspection and Quarantine Council of Agriculture Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Byers, J. A., and S. J. Castle. 2005. Area-wide models comparing synchronous versus asynchronous treatments for control of dispersing insect pests. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 1763-1773. Chang, N. T., M. D. Su, T. H. Wen, C. C. Kuo, and P. Y. Lai. 2002. Application of GIS and GPS to the monitoring of fruit fly populations. pp. 93-110. In: S. C. Wang, C. C. Ho, C. C. Chen, and W. H. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Insect Ecology and Fruit Fly Management. Plant Protec. Soc. R. O. C., Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Chen, C. C., and Y. J. Dong. 2001. Evaluation of trapping effectiveness of improved McPhail trap for Oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Formosan Entomol. 21: 65-75. (in Chinese) Chen, C. N., E. Y. Cheng, Y. B. Hwang, C. H. Kao, and W. Y. Su. 1996. Relationship between the population density of Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel), and its host fruit yield in Taiwan. Plant Prot. Bull. 38: 149-166. (in Chinese) Chen, W. S., and Y. I. Chu. 1998. Influence of non-economic host plants on the population dynamics of the Oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)). pp. 44-68. In: Y. C. Liu, and C. C. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium Taiwan Fruit Fly Control Tactics. Department of Entomology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Cheng, E. Y., C. H. Kao, M. Y. Chiang, and Y. B. Hwang. 2003. Modernization of oriental fruit fly control in Taiwan: the planning and execution of an area-wide control project. pp. 49-66. In: C. C. Ho, C. C. Tzeng, L. M. Hsu, J. T. Yang, and S. C. Wang, eds. Proceeding of the Workshop on Plant Protection Management for Sustainable Development: Technology and New Dimension, held at the National Museum of Natural Science, Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Cheng, E. Y., Y. B. Hwang, C. H. Kao, and W. Y. Su. 2000. The manual of controlling Oriental fruit flies. Taiwan Agric. Res. Inst. Spec. Publ. 91. 58 pp. (in Chinese) Chiu, H. H., and L. C. Yang. 1998. Current situation and prospect of controlling fruit fly in Taiwan. pp. 1-8. In: Y. C. Liu and C. C. Chen, eds. The symposium of controlling fruit fly in Taiwan. 242 pp. (in Chinese) Chiu, H. T., and, Y. I. Chu. 1988. The male annihilation of oriental fruit fly on Lambay island. Chinese J. Entomol. 8: 81-94. (in Chinese) Chu, Y. I., and C. C. Chen. 1985. Non-economic host flora of Oriental fruit fly (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)). N.T.U. Plant pathol. Entomol. 12: 63-77. (in Chinese) Chu, Y. I., and H. T. Chiu. 1989. The re-establishment of Dacus dorsalis Hendel (Diptera: Trypetidae) after the eradication on Lambay Island. Chinese J. Entomol. 9: 217-230. (in Chinese) Cunningham, R. T. 1989. Male annihilation. pp. 345-351. In: A. S. Robinson and G. Hooper, eds. Fruit flies: their biology, natural enemies, and control. V. 3B. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Henderson, C. F., and E. W. Tilton. 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite. J. Econ. Entomol. 48: 157-161. Ho, K. Y., S. C. Hung, H. J. Lee, T. C. Hsu, and Y. I. Chu. 2004. Attracting effectiveness of fruit net-bags and Victor fly traps for the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae), at a Touliu guava orchard. Formosan Entomol. 24: 65-72. (in Chinsee) Hsieh, L. C., R. W. Lin, T. J. Cheng, W. J. Wu, C. J. Shih. 2002. The planning and practice of exercise regarding to new invading Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann). pp. 111-120. In: S. C. Wang, C. C. Ho, C. C. Chen, and W. H. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Insect Ecology and Fruit Fly Management. Plant Protec. Soc. R. O. C., Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Huang, L. H., M. C. Lin, and C. N. Chen. 2003. Estimation of the damage rate of guava fruits by Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on ovipositional punctures. Formosan Entomol. 23: 35-48. (in Chinese) Huang, L. H., W. Y. Su, and C. N. Chen. 1998. Relationship of population fluctuation of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) and damaged guava fruit. pp. 207-225. In: Y. C. Liu, and C. C. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium Taiwan Fruit Fly Control Tactics. Department of Entomology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Huang, L. H., W. Y. Su, C. N. Chen. 2002. Estimation of the rate of fruit damage by fruit flies and an assessment of the effectiveness of a control program. pp. 73-91. In: S. C. Wang, C. C. Ho, C. C. Chen, and W. H. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Insect Ecology and Fruit Fly Management. Plant Protec. Soc. R. O. C., Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Koyama, J., T. Teruya, and K. Tanaka. 1984. Eradication of the Oriental fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) from the Okinawa islands by a male annihilation method. J. Econ. Entomol. 77: 468-472. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Entomol. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240. Lindquist, D. A. 2000. Pest management strategies: area-wide and conventional. pp. 13-19. In: K. H. Tan, eds. Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Sinaran Bros., Sdn. Bhd. Penang, Malaysia. Liu, Y. C. 1981. The study of Oriental fruit fly in Taiwan. NCHU Entomol. 15: 243-270. (in Chinese) Mau, R. F. L., E. B. Jang, R. I. Vargas, C. Chan, M. Y. Chou, and J. S. Sugano. 2003. Implementation of a geographic information system with integrated control tactics for areawide fruit fly management. Plant Prot. Bull. Spec. Publ. New 5. pp. 23-33. In: C. C. Ho, C. C. Tzeng, L. M. Hsu, J. T. Yang, and S. C. Wang, eds. The Plant Protection Society of the Republic of China, Agricultural Research Institute. Taichung, Taiwan. Papadopoulos, N. T., B. I. Katsoyanos, N. A. Koulousis, J. Hendrichs, J. R. Carey, and R. R. Heath. 2001. Early detection and population monitoring of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in a mixed-fruit orchard in northern Greece. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 971-978. Seewooruthum, S. I., S. Permalloo, B. Gungah, A. R. Soonnoo, and M. Alleck. 2000. Eradication of an exotic fruit fly from Mauritius. pp. 389-393. In: K. H. Tan, ed. Area-Wide Control of Fruit Flies and Other Insect Pests. Sinaran Bros., Penang, Malaysia. Shelly, T. E. 2001. Lek size and female visitation in two species of tephrited fruit flies. Anim. Behav. 62: 33-40. Su, W. Y., C. N. Chen, E. Y. Cheng, and Y. B. Hwang. 2003. The geographical distribution and statistical forecasting of oriental fruit flies in Taiwan. pp. 67-110. In: C. C. Ho, C. C. Tzeng, L. M. Hsu, J. T. Yang, and S. C. Wang, eds. Proceeding of the Workshop on Plant Protection Management for Sustainable Development: Technology and New Dimension, held at the National Museum of Natural Science, Taichung. (in Chinese) Vargas, R. I., J. D. Stark, M. H. Kido, H. M. Ketter, and L. C. Whitehead. 2000. Methyl eugenol and cue-lure traps for suppression of male Oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii: effects of lure mixtures and weathering. J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 81-87. Wu, W. J., C. C. Chen, S. F. Shiao, Y. J. Dong, W. H. Tsai, Y. C. Hsu, S. J. Fang, amd H. C. Chou. 2002. Detection of quarantined fruit flies in Taiwan. pp. 41-55. In: S. C. Wang, C. C. Ho, C. C. Chen, and W. H. Chen, eds. Proceedings of the Symposium on Insect Ecology and Fruit Fly Management. Plant Protec. Soc. R. O. C., Taichung, Taiwan. (in Chinese) Yang, T. C. 2003. Efficacy on area-wide control of oriental fruit fly in Ilan county. Agric. Ext. Bull. Hualien District 46: 5-9. (in Chinese) Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, Taipei, Taiwan. Available at http://agrapp.coa.gov.tw:7001/agr-Sed/agrJsp/main_g.jsp http://www.hdais.gov.tw/06/06_2.html | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/32064 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本論文在宜蘭縣主要果樹栽培鄉鎮,包括頭城鎮、礁溪鄉、三星鄉、冬山鄉、員山鄉等地區進行,就現有東方果實蠅密度監測體系及政府推動果實蠅區域防治之架構下,以含毒甲基丁香油誘殺板及蛋白質水解物(Nu-Lure),調查果實蠅雌、雄蟲族群變動、果實受害率等,藉此評估區域防治之成效。此外,並收集農民意見及反應,以作為日後政府推動更大規模區域防治之參考。從果實蠅族群變動監測結果顯示,田間果實蠅雌、雄蟲族群變動有一致性,利用甲基丁香油捕獲雄蟲數 (X) 與 Nu-Lure 誘引劑所捕獲雌蟲數 (Y) 有顯著相關 (r = 0.74, p < 0.01),其迴歸方程式為 ln = 0.10 – 0.29lnX + 0.15lnX2 (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001)。清除非經濟寄主對果實蠅防治之效果評估,從捕獲蟲數而言,不論雌、雄蟲均降低 95% 以上。比較區域防治與非區域防治區之捕獲蟲數差異,結果顯示雖然區域防治區捕獲蟲數較低,但兩者間無顯著差異 (F = 4.7, df = 1.0, p = 0.08)。進一步整合各監測系統,評估區域防治效果時,亦得到類似的結果 (F = 3.4, df = 1.0, p = 0.07)。就果實受害率而言,在區域防治區內實施綜合防治之文旦園,文旦受害率僅4.4%;然在未實施綜合防治之廢蓮霧園,果實平均受害率卻高於90%。就綜合管理之文旦園其文旦受害率調查前一週 Nu-Lure 誘蟲器平均捕獲雌蟲數 (X) 與文旦之平均受害率 (Y) 之關係進行迴歸分析,結果為 = 1.12ln(lnX) + 1.61 (R2 = 1.0, p = 0.03)。2004 年各調查時間之 Nu-Lure 誘蟲器所捕獲雌蟲平均數 (X) 與蓮霧平均受害率 (Y) 之迴歸關係為 sin-1 = 0.07ln(lnX) + 1.37 (R2 = 1.0, p = 0.001)。上述關係式顯示具有極高的相關性,因此未來可利用果實蠅之捕獲蟲數,推測果實受害率,並進一步作為防治效果評估之利用。根據問卷調查結果,宜蘭地區農民普遍認為最有效的防治法為套袋 (53.2% 農民) 與清園 (60.6%)。此外,雖然農民普遍滿意共同防治的結果,有 61.6%的農民其噴藥次數並沒有因此而減少,顯示區域防治之成效仍需大力推廣。綜合而言,本研究指出,利用捕獲蟲數、果實受害率及農民問卷調查,可作為果實蠅區域防治之效果評估標準。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The improved McPhail traps baited with a poisoned methyl eugenol (ME) board or Nu-lure were used in the orchards to monitor the fruit fly population where the area-wide control fruit fly in major fruit production townships in Ilan was conduced. Meanwhile we investigated the damage rate of fruits in these area as well as farmers’ opinion about the area-wide control. The results showed that the male and female population of flies fluctuated synchronously. There was a high correlation between the number of male flies (X) captured by ME and the number of females (Y) captured by the Nu-Lure traps (r = 0.74, p < 0.01). Preliminary analysis revealed that these variables can be expressed as ln = 0.10 – 0.29lnX + 0.15lnX2 (R2 = 0.70, p < 0.001). Results showed that control efficiency reached 95% by 1 and 2 years after guava tree removal. Data analysis indicated that the male fly numbers between Dongshan and other township without area-wide control (AWC) since 2003 were not significantly different (F = 4.7, df = 1.0, p < 0.08). Similarly, the male fly numbers between major fruit production townships with AWC and other townships without AWC since 2003 were not significantly different (F = 3.4, df = 1.0, p = 0.07). The damage rate of pomelo orchards in Dongshan township was below 4.4%. However, the damage rate in abandoned wax apple orchards was higher than 90%. Preliminary analysis reveals that the number of females (X) captured by Nu-Lure trap and the average damage rate of pomelo (Y) can be expressed as = 1.12ln(lnX) + 1.61 (R2 = 1.0, p = 0.03). And, in 2004 the mean number of females (X) and the average damage rate of wax apple (Y) captured by Nu-Lure traps can be expressed as sin-1 = 0.07ln(lnX) + 1.37 (R2 = 1.0, p = 0.001). The validity of these equations needs further test in the future. According to the result of questionnaires, farmers considered that the most efficient methods to control fruit flies were bagging (53.2% farmers) and sanitation (60.6%). Though farmers generally satisfied with the result of area-wide control, the numbers of insecticide used were not reduced (61.6% farmers). | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:30:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-D84624103-1.pdf: 17679931 bytes, checksum: 6ff5e00d09dada9327ee3808c728ef6c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
中文摘要 英文摘要 目 次…………………………………………………………………i 表 次…………………………………………………………………v 圖 次………………………………………………………………vii 第一章 緒言……………………………………………………………1 第二章 清除非經濟作物對東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 族群管理之影響………………………………………………7 一、中文摘要…………………………………………………………8 二、英文摘要…………………………………………………………9 三、前言……………………………………………………………11 四、材料與方法………………………………………………………13 1. 試驗地點及果園栽培管理概況………………………………13 2. 東方果實蠅族群之監測………………………………………14 3. 統計分析與防治率計算………………………………………14 五、結果……………………………………………………………15 1. 東方果實蠅的族群變動………………………………………15 2. 清除非經濟作物對果園內果實蠅防治率之估算……………17 3. 不同誘引劑捕獲蟲數的相關性………………………………17 六、討論……………………………………………………………18 第三章 東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 區域防治效果評估……………………………………………………………30 一、中文摘要………………………………………………………31 二、英文摘要………………………………………………………33 三、前言……………………………………………………………35 四、材料與方法……………………………………………………36 1. 試驗地點及果園栽培管理概況………………………………36 2. 東方果實蠅族群之監測………………………………………38 3. 文旦及蓮霧受害率調查………………………………………38 4. 統計分析與防治率計算………………………………………40 五、結果……………………………………………………………40 1. 東方果實蠅的族群變動………………………………………40 2. 區域防治效果評估……………………………………………42 3. 文旦與蓮霧果實受害率………………………………………43 4. 不同誘引劑捕獲蟲數與果實受害率的相關性………………44 六、討論……………………………………………………………45 第四章 國中學生參與果實蠅族群變動監測可行性分析…………64 一、中文摘要………………………………………………………65 二、英文摘要………………………………………………………66 三、前言……………………………………………………………68 四、材料與方法……………………………………………………69 1. 建置網路………………………………………………………69 2. 疫情通報與資料上傳…………………………………………70 3. 宜蘭地區之學生培訓與工作規則……………………………70 4. 資料統計分析…………………………………………………71 五、結果與討論……………………………………………………71 第五章 果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 監測系統整合與區域防治效果評估………………………………………………78 一、中文摘要………………………………………………………79 二、英文摘要………………………………………………………80 三、前言……………………………………………………………82 四、材料與方法……………………………………………………83 1. 試驗地點及果園栽培管理概況………………………………83 2. 東方果實蠅族群之監測………………………………………84 3. 蓮霧受害率調查與統計分析…………………………………85 五、結果……………………………………………………………85 1. 東方果實蠅的族群變動………………………………………85 2. 整體區域防治效果評估………………………………………86 3. 蓮霧受害率調查………………………………………………87 六、討論……………………………………………………………88 第六章 果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 區域防治問卷訪談結果分析………………………………………………………95 一、中文摘要………………………………………………………96 二、英文摘要………………………………………………………97 三、前言……………………………………………………………98 四、材料與方法……………………………………………………98 五、結果與討論……………………………………………………99 第七章 總結…………………………………………………………125 引用文獻………………………………………………………………129 誌謝……………………………………………………………………137 附錄一 果實蠅共同防治工作問卷…………………………………139 附錄二 一般大眾對東方果實蠅之認識程度問卷…………………140 附錄三 『宜蘭地區東方果實蠅區域共同防治滿意度調查』問卷表……………………………………………………………141 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 利用族群變動與果實受害率評估宜蘭地區東方果實蠅 (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) 區域防治效果 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Evaluation of Efficacy on Area-wide Control of Oriental Fruit Fly (Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel)) in Ilan Area by Population Fluctuation and Fruit Damage Rate Assessments | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 博士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 朱耀沂,鄭允,陳健忠,張弘毅 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 東方果實蠅,區域防治,蛋白質水解物,甲基丁香油,捕獲蟲數,果實受害率, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Bactrocera dorsalis,area-wide control,protein hydrolysate,methyl eugenol,captured fly number,damage rate of fruits, | en |
dc.relation.page | 145 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-28 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 17.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。