Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31963
Full metadata record
???org.dspace.app.webui.jsptag.ItemTag.dcfield??? | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 郭瑞祥(Ruey-Shan Guo) | |
dc.contributor.author | Wen-Ting Chen | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳玟婷 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:26:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-08-02 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-02 | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2011-07-29 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 中文
1. 巨大機械官方網站 http://www.giant-bicycles.com/zh-tw/ 2. 江逸之、張元祥(2004)。張維迎:台商要善用大陸資源。遠見雜誌,214,59-62。 3. 吳怡萱(2009)。十五年磨一劍 打進國際車廠供應鏈 汽車維修塑膠件龍頭東陽的轉型路。商業週刊,1130,68-72。 4. 吳修辰(2004)。大膽做 小聲說 鴻海品牌捲土重來 郭台成親自操盤,直搗華碩樁腳。商業周刊,864,50-52。 5. 吳修辰(2004)。如果我們要做就沒有對手!鴻海準接班人郭台成獨家專訪。商業周刊,853,36-40。 6. 呂國禎(2010)。達芙妮 年賣三千萬雙鞋。商業周刊,1182,116-119。 7. 呂國禎、陳泳翰(2010)。大陸瘋台灣-未來10年,只要加入台灣元素,就可以賣得比別人貴又好。商業周刊,1182,98-112。 8. 李登明(2009)。台商投資大陸佈局類型與分析-組織學習、資源基礎與折衷理論觀點。國立台灣大學商學研究所未出版之碩士論文。 9. 東陽實業官方網站 http://www.tyg.com.tw/ 10. 邱莉燕(2011)。小城靠口碑,讓八成女性穿上自家鞋。遠見雜誌,297,78-82。 11. 張戌誼、張殿文(2005)。五千億傳奇-郭台銘的鴻海帝國。台北市:天下雜誌。 12. 張戌誼、張殿文(2005)。五千億傳奇-郭台銘的鴻海帝國。台北市:天下雜誌。 13. 陳柏如(2009)。鄭寶堂談捷安特中國經驗。自行車市場快訊,125,46-48。 14. 陳柏如(2010)。劉湧昌談捷安特中國佈局。自行車市場快訊,131,68-70。 15. 曾仁傑(2009)。中國大陸內需消費市場商機。全球台商服務網。 16. 曾寶璐(2001)。自行車巨人十八家海外公司全部都賺錢!。商業周刊,703,136-137。 17. 湯明哲、魏上淩(2003)。台商對中國大陸投資佈局與產業群聚之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫。 18. 達芙妮官方網站 http://www.daphneholdings.com/ 19. 編輯部(2007)。專訪捷安特大中華區總經理劉湧昌。自行車市場快訊,113,47-49。 20. 鄭呈皇(2006)。精準掌握一萬二千種產品供需 東陽實業 電腦公式加上人腦變數。商業周刊,972,121-124。 21. 鴻海集團官方網站 http://www.foxconn.com.tw/ 22. 瞿宛文(2006)。台灣後起者能藉自有品牌升級嗎?。台灣社會研究季刊。 英文 1. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1993). “Strategic assets and organizational rent.” Strategic Management Journal 14(1): 33-46. 2. Barney, J. (1991). “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.” Journal of Management, Sage Publications, Ltd. 17: 99. 3. Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. (1988). “Organizing for worldwide effectiveness: The transnational solution.” California Management Review (Fall): 54-74. 4. Basile, R. , Castellani, D. and Zanfei, A. (2008). “Location choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of EU cohesion policy.” Journal of International Economics 74: 328-340. 5. Brush, T.H. and Maritan, C.A. (1999). ”The plant location decision in multinational manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis of international business and manufacturing strategy perspectives.” Production and Operations Management 8(2): 109-132. 6. Buckley, P. and Casson, M. (1976). “The Future of the Multinational Enterprise.” London, MacMillan. 7. Chandler, A. D. Jr. (1962). “Strategy and Structure.” MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 8. Chen G., Firth M., Gao D. N. and Rui O. M. (2006). “Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: Evidence from China” Journal of Corporate Finance 12(3): 424-448. 9. Chen, H. and Chen, T. J. (1998). “Foreign direct investment as a strategic linkage.” Thunderbird International Business Review 40(1): 13-30. 10. Cheng, S. (2007). “Structure of firm location choices: An examination of Japanese Greenfield investment in China.” Asian Economic Journal, Blackwell Publishing Limited. 21: 47-73. 11. Chu, W.W. (2009). “Can Taiwan’s second movers upgrade via branding?” Research Policy 38: 1054-1065. 12. Culem, C. G. (1988). “The locational determinants of direct investments among industrialized countries.” European Economic Review 32(4): 885-904. 13. Czinkota, Michael R., Rivoli Pietra and Iikka A. Ronkainen. (1991). “International Business” The Dryden Press, 2nd ed. 14. Dunning, J.H. (1993). “Multinational Enterprise and the Global Economy.” Addison Wesley: Reading, MA. 15. Egan, M.L. and Mody, A. (1992). “Buyer-seller links in export development.” World Development 20(3): 321-334. 16. Fabienne, B. B. (2005). “Agglomeration economies and location choice.” Economics of Transition 13(4): 605-628. 17. Ferdows, K. (1997). “Making the most of foreign factories.” Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publication Corp. 75: 73-88. 18. Filatotchev L., Strange R., Piesse J. and Lien. Y. C (2007). “FDI by firms from Newly Industrialized Economies in emerging markets: Corporate Governance, Entry Mode and Location” Journal of International Business Studies 38(4): 556-572. 19. Gallon, M. R. and Stillman, H. M. (1995). “Putting core competency thinking into practice.” Research Technology Management 38(3): 20. 20. Grant, R. M. (1991). “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation.” California Management Review 33(3): 114-135. 21. Hamel, G. and Prahalad, C. K. (1993).”Strategy as stretch and leverage.” Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Publication Corp. 71: 75-84. 22. He, C. (2002). “Information costs, agglomeration economies and the location of foreign direct investment in China.” Regional Studies 36(9): 1029-1036. 23. Hill, C. W. L., Hwang, P. and Kim, W. C. (1990). “An eclectic theory of the choice of international entry mode.” Strategic Management Journal 11(2): 117-128. 24. Hobday, M. (1995). “Innovation in East Asia: The challenge to Japan.” Edward Elgar. London. 25. Hone, A. (1974). “Multinational corporations and multinational buying groups: Their impact on the growth of Asia’s exports of manufactures-myths and realities.” World Development 2(2): 145-149. 26. Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M. and Wright, M. (2000). “Strategy in emerging economies.” The Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 249-267. 27. Hu, Y.-s. (1995). “The international transferability of the firm's advantages.” California Management Review 37: 73-88. 28. Isard, W. (1956). “Location and Space-Economy” MIT Press. 29. Kang , S.J. and Lee, H.S. (2007). “The determinants of location choice of South Korean FDI in China.” Japan and the World Economy 19: 441-460. 30. Luo, Y. (2000). “Dynamic capabilities in international expansion.” Journal of World Business, Elsevier Science Publishing Company, Inc. 35: 355. 31. Makadok, R. (2001). “Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation.” Strategic Management Journal 22: 387-401. 32. Mudambi R. and Mudambi S. M. (2002). ”Diversification and market entry choices in the context of foreign direct investment” International Business Review 11(1): 35-55. 33. Park B. and Lee K. (2003). “Comparative analysis of foreign direct investment in China firms from South Korea, Hong Kong, and the United States in Shandong province.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 8(1): 57-84. 34. Penrose, E.T. (1959). “The theory of the growth of the firm.” John Wiley and Sons. New York, NY. 35. Prahalad, C.K. and Doz, Y. L. (1987). “The Multinational Mission.” New York: Free Press. 36. Rumelt, R. P. (1974). “Strategy, structure, and economic performance.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 37. Smith, D. F. and Florida, R. (1994). “Agglomeration and industrial location: An econometric analysis of Japanese-affiliated manufacturing establishments in automotive-related industries.” Journal of Urban Economics 36(1): 23-41. 38. Stopford, J. M. and Wells, L. T. Jr. (1972). “Managing the Multinational Enterprise.” Basic Books, New York. 39. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.” Strategic Management Journal 18(7): 509-533. 40. Vernon, R. (1966). “International investment and international trade in the product cycle.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80(2): 190-207. 41. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180. 42. Wortzel, L.H. and Wortzel, H.V. (1981). “Export marketing strategies for NIC and LDC-based firms.” Columbia Journal of World Business (Spring): 51-60. 43. Yadong, L. (1998). “Industry attractiveness, firm competence, and international investment performance in a transitional economy.” Bulletin of Economic Research 50(1): 73. 44. Yiu, D.W., Lau, C.M. and Bruton, G.D. (2007). “International venturing by emerging economy firms: The effects of firm capabilities, home country networks, and corporate entrepreneurship.” Journal of International Business Studies 38(4): 519-540. 45. Zhao, H. and Zhu, G. (2000). “Location factors and country-of-origin differences: an empirical analysis of FDI in China.” Multinational Business Review, St. Louis University. 8: 60. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31963 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究根據過去對外投資的相關文獻與代工模式理論,發展出由「市場範疇」與「經營模式」組成的矩陣模型,藉由這兩個維度,將台商的佈局模式分成(一)世界工廠、(二)全球名牌、(三)當地品牌和(四)地區作坊四種類型;再搭配資源基礎理論、代工模式理論、折衷理論,提出由投資策略、經營策略與佈局策略三大構面。第一個構面,是從策略觀點和投資動機來分析公司的投資目的,而第二個構面以代工模式、核心能力來衡量企業的經營活動,最後一個構面,從
區位選擇和和分佈型態來探討執行層面的做法。此外,本研究透過個案研究的方式,驗證鴻海、巨大機械、達芙妮和東陽實業四家知名企業在每一個變數上的關鍵成功因素,以使分析架構更具實務上的參考價值。 研究結果顯示,世界工廠在投資策略方面,著重在全球整合的策略觀點,其前往大陸的投資動機主要是尋求資源與效率;在核心能力上需具備生產製造之能力,主要代工模式為ODM;而佈局策略的做法,應以成本和運輸導向作為區位選擇的條件,而其分佈型態為網絡群聚。全球名牌及當地品牌在投資策略上,也都具備地區回應的策略觀點,但前者是將大陸視為市場、效率的主要尋求動機,而後者的投資動機則只有尋求市場;在核心能力上皆應具備行銷服務的核心能力,而全球名牌又具備生產製造之核心能力,代工模式皆為OBM;在佈局策略的部分,全球名牌及當地品牌皆以運輸和市場導向來選擇地點,而分佈型態皆相同,製造生產面為點狀散佈,行銷服務面皆為棋布星羅。地區作坊在佈局策略的部分,適合地區回應的策略觀點,並以尋求市場和效率做為投資大陸的動機;在核心能力上要有研發設計及製造生產之能力,代工模式為ODM;而佈局策略,則以運輸、市場導向為選擇區位之主要因素,而分佈型態為網絡群聚。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the rapidly growth of Mainland China, foreign direct investment in China has become the main economic activity for Taiwanese manufacturing firms recently. In the past, Mainland China was often called “World Factory” due to the lower labor cost. But with the gradually growth of GDP increases and purchasing power increases, Mainland China is remarked to be a market with great potential. With revised focus on that, it’s a significant issue for Taiwanese manufacturing firms to learn how to choose the most appropriate strategy leading to competitive advantage and great profit.
According to foreign investment literature and international subcontracting theory, this study develops a matrix with two strategic dimensions: market scope and business model. From this two dimensions, the investment configuration of Taiwanese manufacturing firms can be categorized into four types: (1) World Factory, (2) Global Brand, (3) Local Label and (4) Regional Plant. Besides, based on resource-based and eclectic theory, this research proposes a strategic thinking consisting three constructs, which are “investment strategy”, “operation strategy” and “configuration strategy”. Investment strategy emphasizes on the analysis of enterprise’s investment purpose. Strategic viewpoint and investment motivation are selected as main criteria for the first construct. In the second construct, core competence is selected for evaluating integrated resource utilization efficiencies of firms and the business model is selected for explaining the firms’ operating activities. In the last construct, location choice and scattering feature are used to represent the practical conduct of the enterprise. This research uses the case study method to analyze the key successful factors of the four chosen enterprises in different criteria in order to make this framework more practical and useful. The research concludes that Taiwanese manufacturing firms are supposed to enhance their core competence within each business model while reconsidering their roles in each value chain with global thinking perspectives. Taiwanese manufacturing firms can select the locations prone to not only increase their operating effectiveness, but also to increase the probability of successful investment in China. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:26:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98741041-1.pdf: 8164564 bytes, checksum: 804fc24fefbe0e5b9088812b29791145 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 ⅰ
英文摘要 ⅱ 目錄 iv 圖表目錄 vi 第一章 、緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究目的 2 第三節 研究流程 3 第二章 、文獻探討 4 第一節 對外投資相關研究方向 4 第二節 相關理論 8 第三節 資源基礎理論 10 第三章 、研究架構與方法 13 第一節 研究架構 13 第二節 變數衡量 16 第三節 資料收集與分析 22 第四節 個案公司簡介 23 第四章 、研究結果 28 第一節 世界工廠-鴻海科技集團 28 第二節 全球名牌-巨大機械 33 第三節 當地品牌-達芙妮 38 第四節 地區作坊-東陽實業 44 第五節 綜合比較 49 第五章 、結論與建議 52 第一節 研究結論 52 第二節 研究貢獻 53 第三節 管理意涵 53 第四節 研究限制與未來研究方向 54 第六章 、參考文獻 56 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 以市場範疇暨經營模式之觀點探討製造業台商大陸佈局 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Foreign Direct Investment Configuration of Taiwanese
Manufacturing Corporations in China-The Market Scope & Business Model Perspectives | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 陳忠仁(Chung-Jen Chen) | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林博文,黃怡芬 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 對外直接投資,中國佈局,折衷理論,經營模式,資源基礎觀點, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Foreign Direct Investment,Investment in China,Resource-Based theory,Business Model,Eclectic Theory, | en |
dc.relation.page | 62 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2011-07-29 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | zh_TW |
Appears in Collections: | 商學研究所 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-100-1.pdf Restricted Access | 7.97 MB | Adobe PDF |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.