Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31788
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor林宗賢(Tzong-Shyan Lin)
dc.contributor.authorMeng-Sung Chenen
dc.contributor.author陳盟松zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T03:20:14Z-
dc.date.available2006-09-30
dc.date.copyright2006-07-31
dc.date.issued2006
dc.date.submitted2006-07-27
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻
林嘉興、張林仁、林信山. 1987. 檬果產期調節之研究. Ⅰ.藥劑處理抑制新梢營養生長及促進花芽萌芽試驗. 園藝作物產期調節研討會專集. 台中區農業改良場編印. p.107-117.
吳俊達. 1995. 乾旱逆境對檬果光合作用與枝梢生長之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
徐守全. 1996. 芒果花芽分化、抽梢頻率、著果數及枝梢營養關係之研究. 國立中興大學園藝學系碩士論文.
許仁宏、李國權.1982. 低照度對檬果營養生理的影響(1)--比葉重、葉綠素與含氮物質濃度的影響. 中華農學會報 119:43-50.
陳右人. 1988. 根溫對檬果開花之影響. 國立臺灣大學園藝學研究所博士論文.
陳右人、賴宏煇. 1985. 檬果樹體中碳水化合物之季節性變化. 中國園
藝 31:240-246.
賴宏煇、陳右人. 1984. 檬果開花前後樹體光合產物之運移與利用. 中
國園藝 30:180-186.
歐錫坤. 1980. 溫度對檬果新梢開花結果之影響. 中華農業研究 29:
301-308.
歐錫坤. 1982. 檬果開花期間溫度對枝條生育的影響. 中華農業研究
31:209-214.
Adam, C. S. 1986. Off-season flowering response of mango cultivars to potassium nitrate. Acta Hort. 175:277-280.
Bally, I. S. E.; Harris, M. and Whiley, A. W. 2000. Effect of water stress on flowering and yield of 'Kensington Pride' mango (Mangifera indica L.). Acta Hort. 509:277-281.
Blaikie, S. J.; Kulkarni, V. J. and Muller, W. J. 2004. Effects of morphactin and paclobutrazol flowering treatments on shoot and root phenology in mango cv. Kensington Pride. Scient. Hort. 101:51-68.
Bondad, N. D. and Linsangan, E. 1979. Flowering in mango induced with potassium nitrate. HortScience 14:527-528.
Chacko, E. K. 1991. Mango flowering--still an enigma!. Acta Hort. 291:12-21.
Chaikiattiyos, S.; Menzel, C. M. and Rasmussen, T. S. 1994. Floral induction in tropical fruit trees: effects of temperature and water supply. J. Hort. Sci. 69:397-415.
Chen, W. S. 1987. Endogenous growth substances in relation to shoot growth and flower bud development of mango. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112:360-363.
Coelho, E. F. and Borges, A. L. 2004. Irrigation and fertirrigation of mango. Acta Hort. 645:119-128.
Davenport, T. L. 2000. Processes influencing floral initiation and bloom: the role of phytohormones in a conceptual flowering model. HortTechnology 10:733-739.
Davenport, T. L. and Nunez-Elisea, R. 1991. Is endogenous ethylene involved in mango floral induction?. Acta Hort. 291:85-94.
Davenport, T. L.; Pearce, D. W. and Rood, S.B. 2001. Correlation of endogenous gibberellic acid with initiation of mango shoot growth. J. Plant Growth Regul. 20:308-315.
Fierro, C. A. and M. Ulloa. 1991. A developmental reference stage for flower induction response to potassium nitrate in mango. Acta Hort. 291:71-79.
Gregoriou, C. and Rajkumar, D. 1984. Effects of irrigation and mulching on shoot and root growth of avocado (Persea americana Mill.) and mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Hort. Sci. 59:109-117.
Hegele, M., N. Boonplod, F. Bangerth, D. Naphrom, A. Chattrakul, P. Sruamsiri, and P. Manochai. 2004. Changes in photosynthesis, IAA export from leaves and cytokinins in the xylem sap after girdling of young mango trees in combination with different growth regulators and their possible significance for flower induction. Acta Hort. 645:417-424.
Kulkarni, V. J. 1986. Graft-induced off-season flowering and fruiting in the mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Hort. Sci. 61:141-145.
Kulkarni, V. J. 1988. Further studies on graft-induced off-season flowering and fruiting in mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Hort. Sci. 63:361-367.
Kulkarni, V. J. 1991. Physiology of flowering in mango studied by grafting. Acta Hort. 291:95-104.
Kulkarni, V. J. 2004. The tri-factor hypothesis of flowering in mango. Acta Hort. 645:61-70.
Menzel, C. M., J. H. Oosthuizen, D. J. Roe, and V. J. Doogan. 1995. Water deficits at anthesis reduce CO 2 assimilation and yield of lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) trees Tree Physiol. 15:611—617.
Naphrom, D., P. Sruamsiri, M. Hegele, N. Boonplod, F. Bangerth, and P. Manochai. 2004. Hormonal changes in various tissues of mango trees during flower induction following cold temperatures. Acta Hort. 645:453-457.
Nunez-Elisea, R., T. L. Davenport, M. L. Caldeira. 1993. Bud initiation and morphogenesis in 'Tommy Atkins' mango as affected by temperature and triazole growth retardants. Acta Hort. 341:192-198.
Nunez-Elisea, R. and T. L. Davenport. 1995. Effect of leaf age, duration of cool temperature treatment, and photoperiod on bud dormancy release and floral initiation in mango. Scient. Hort. 62:63-73.
Nunez-Elisea, R., T. L. Davenport, M. L. Caldeira. 1996. Control of bud morphogenesis in mango (Mangifera indica L.) by girdling, defoliation and temperature modification. J. Hort. Sci. 71:25-39.
Nunez-Elisea, R. and T. L. Davenport. 1998. Gibberellin and temperature effects on dormancy release and shoot morphogenesis of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Scient. Hort. 77:11-21.
Paulas, D. and K. G. Shanmugavelu. 1988. Physiological and bio-chemical changes in the leaf tissues from quiescent to fruiting stages in mango. Acta Hort. 231:394-398.
Perez-Barraza, M. H., S. Salazar-Garcia and V. Vazquez-Valdivia. 2000. Delayed inflorescence bud initiation, a clue for the lack of response of the 'Tommy Atkins' mango to promoters of flowering. Acta Hort. 509:567-572.
Pongsomboon, W., S. Subhadrabandhu and R. A. Stephenson. 1997. Some aspects of the ecophysiology of flowering intensity of mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Nam Dok Mai in a semi-tropical monsoon Asian climate. Scient. Hort. 70:45-56.
Rameshwar, A. 1989. Mango flowering--stress induced. Acta Hort. 231:433-439.
Rossetto, C. J.; Bortoletto, N.; Castro, J. V.; Carvalho, C. R. L and T. Igue. 2004. Response of mango varieties to paclobutrazol. Acta Hort. 645:233-237.
Sanchez-Sanches, E.; Cabrera-Carbajal, F.; Padilla-Valenzuela, I.; Samaniego Russo, J.A. and Aboytia-Mendivil, R. 2004. Gibberellic acid effect on sprouting and nutritional balance of young trees of 'Keitt' mango at the Mayo Valley, Sonora. Acta Hort. 645:447-452.
Stern, R. A., A. Naor, N. Bar, S. Gazit, and B. Bravdo. 2003. Xylem-sap zeatin-riboside and dihydrozeatin-riboside levels in relation to plant and soil water status and flowering in ‘Mauritius’ lychee Scientia Hort. 98:285–291.
Werner, H. 1993. Influence of paclobutrazol on growth and leaf nutrient content of mango (cv. Blanco). Acta Hort. 341:225-231.
Whiley, A. W., T. S. Rasmussen, J. B. Saranah, and B. N. Wolstenholme. 1989. Effect of temperature on growth, dry matter production and starch accumulation in ten mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars. J. Hort. Sci. 64:753-765.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31788-
dc.description.abstract摘 要
臺灣地區7-10月為愛文檬果枝梢抽出、葉片發育時期,同時亦是颱風盛行季節,一旦有颱風侵襲檬果產區時,常導致檬果葉片大量掉落,影響該季的花序形成。因此本論文在探討葉片數與花序形成之相關性及田間鋪設Tyvek® 對花序形成時間的影響。所有參試的枝條都是抽過二次梢、完全成熟的枝條,以除葉及在離枝條頂芽30至40公分處環狀剝皮來控制葉片數。2003年12月27日處理的實驗顯示所有參試組別(留存20、 15、 10、 5及1片葉)翌年花序形成比率沒有顯著差異(皆高於75%)。考慮花序分化的時間點,2004年以10月9日、11月6日、11月20日與12月5日四個時間點進行處理(留存15、10、5及0片葉)。在留存0片葉中,11月20日前處理花序形成比率均為0%,其餘葉片數處理花序形成均為100%。在12月5日時,各種葉片數處理均可形成花序。2005年於10、11及12月中旬,各枝條分別留存10、5(二次梢)、5(一次梢)、3、1與0片葉,在玉井與枋山地區,除留存0片葉無法形成花序外,其餘葉片數處理有56-100%的花序形成比率。在芽體萌動後,隨葉片數減少,花序長度與品質有下降的趨勢。此外,在花序誘導期間枝條抽萌新梢,亦不利花序形成。連續三年的試驗結果顯示一片成熟的葉片足以誘導愛文檬果花序分化,不成熟的葉片則會抑制花序分化;花序品質與葉片數有關。在地面舖設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,可降低土壤表面溫度,並減少地表溫度日變化的劇烈變動。減少樹冠外層的葉綠素含量及提高葉綠素a/b值,並降低玉井地區檬果的午間葉片水勢,但對於愛文檬果的光合作用能力、開花時間與形成比率並無顯著差異。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAbstract
The shoot flushing and leaf development of ‘Irwin’ mango are occurred from July to October in Taiwan. During this period of time shoots are often suffered from typhoon attack, which lead to defoliation and thus resulted in a decrease of inflorescence formation percentage of that year. Therefore, the presented study was first to understand the relationship between leaf number and inflorescence formation in ‘Irwin’ mango, and then to evaluate the effect on inflorescence formation in ‘Irwin’ mango by modifying the microclimate in the field by Tyvek®, a rainproof ground coverage. All the shoots selected were fully matured and flushed twice, and leaf number was controlled by removing leaves and girdling at the position about 30 to 40 cm away from the shoot apex. Result of the first experiment on Dec. 27, 2003, indicated that all the treatment (20, 15, 10, 5, and 1 leaf retained) showed no significant difference in the percentage of inflorescence formation in the next spring (all > 75%). Considering the timing of floral initiation, four sets of similar experiment (15, 10, 5, and 0 leaf retained) were conducted in 2004 according to the timing of treatment; i.e. Oct. 9, Nov. 6, Nov. 20, and Dec. 5. On the leafless shoots, no any inflorescence formation was observed while treated before Nov. 20, whereas those of other treatments were 100%. All leaf-retaining treatments treated on Dec. 5 showed 100% inflorescence formation. In experiment of Oct., Nov., and mid-December in 2005, the leaf-retaining was 10, 5 (in second flush), 5 (in first flush), 3, 1, or 0 leaves conducted at two locations, Fang-Shan and Yu-Jing. In the treatments of retaining one or more leaves, the percentage of inflorescence formation was 56-100%; whereas, 0% of inflorescence formation was observed as no leaf retained. The length and quality of inflorescence tended to be decreased in decrement with leaf number. Moreover, shoot flushing closed to the timing of inflorescence initiation were disadvantageous to inflorescence formation. Upon the continuous three years’ study, the effect of leaf on inflorescence formation has been concluded that one matured leaf may sufficient for inflorescence initiation and the development and quality of inflorescence may depends on leaf number and shoot maturity. Covering furrow surface with Tyvek® could reduce the surface soil temperature and its diurnal fluctuation. A decrease of chlorophyll content and an increase of chlorophyll a/b ratio were observed in the leaves of the outward canopy. In Yu-Jing, Tyvek® also lowered the leaf water potential in the midday. However, Tyvek® had no effects on photosynthetic ability, blossom timing, and the percentage of inflorescence formation in ‘Irwin’ mango.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:20:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-95-R93628102-1.pdf: 1108566 bytes, checksum: 60b1eed3cdb5f4c904e06603a2531bc0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2006
en
dc.description.tableofcontents目 錄
摘 要 1
Abstract 2
緒 言 4
前人研究 7
一、檬果之生長與發育 7
二、檬果花芽分化與影響開花之因子 8
三、檬果花期調節的方法 12
第一章、葉片數對愛文檬果花序形成之影響 13
1.1前言 14
1.2 材料與方法 16
1.3結果 20
1.4討論 22
1.5結論 32
1.6圖表 33
第二章、地面防雨覆蓋對愛文檬果開花調節的影響 46
2.1前言 47
2.2材料與方法 49
2.3結果 52
2.4討論 54
2.5結論 58
2.6 圖表 59
參考文獻 68
附錄 73
圖目錄
圖1-1. 單一枝條與枝組環狀剝皮的位置 33
圖1-2. 留存不同葉片數處理 33
圖1-3. 各種葉片數處理最後頂芽形成花序或葉梢的情形 33
圖1-4. 愛文檬果頂芽發育階段變化 34
圖1-5. 留存不同梢次及葉片數之處理 34
圖1-6. 愛文檬果分別於單一枝條與枝組留存不同葉片數,並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其花芽發育階段變化情形(2003年12月27日) 35
圖1-7. 在不同時期於愛文檬果單一枝條留存不同葉片數,並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂芽形成花序與葉梢的百分率(台南玉井地區) 36
圖1-8. 在不同時期於愛文檬果單一枝條留存不同葉片數,並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其花芽發育之階段變化(台南玉井地區) 37
圖1-9. 在不同時期於愛文檬果單一枝條留存不同葉片數,並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂芽萌生花序及葉梢所需之天數(台南玉井地區) 38
圖1-10. 不同時期於愛文檬果單一枝條分別留存不同葉片數,並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其花芽發育之階段變化(屏東枋山:A:10月14日、B:11月19日、C:12月16日;台南玉井:D:10月15日、E:11月18日、F:12月17日) 39
圖1-11. 不同時期將愛文檬果單一枝條分別留存不同葉片數,並於枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂芽萌生花序及葉梢所需之天數 40
圖1-12. 於愛文檬果冬季抽出第三次梢、葉片呈黃綠色時,留存不同葉齡的葉片數並在枝條基部進行環剝後,其花芽發育之階段變化(2004年1月1日) 41
圖1-13. 於愛文檬果冬季抽出第三次梢、葉片呈黃綠色時,留存不同葉齡的葉片數並在枝條基部進行環剝後,形成葉梢或花序所需天數 42
圖2-1. Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層試驗(台南玉井地區) 59
圖2-2. Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層試驗(屏東枋山地區) 59
圖2-3. 屏東枋山地區,愛文檬果果園在地面覆蓋Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,土壤表面與土面下15cm之樹冠及行間之溫度日變化(2005年10月15日至11月18日) 60
圖2-4. 愛文檬果果園於地面覆蓋Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,土壤表面與土面下30cm之溫度日變化(台南玉井) 61
圖2-5. 屏東枋山地區,愛文檬果園地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,葉片水勢的變化情形(08:00-14:00) 62
圖2-6. 台南玉井地區,愛文檬果園地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,葉片水勢的變化情形(08:00-14:00) 62
圖2-7. 愛文檬果抽出二次梢葉片呈黃綠色時,於地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,各時期花序形成比率 63
圖2-8. 愛文檬果抽出二次梢葉片呈黃綠色時,於地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,其花芽的發育階段變化情形 64

表標題
表1-1. 2003年12月27日分別於愛文檬果單一枝條與枝組留存不同葉片數,並於枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂芽花序形成比率(台南玉井地區) 43
表1-2. 2005年10、11及12月在愛文檬果單一枝條分別留存不同葉片數,並於枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂梢形成花序之比率 43
表1-3. 2005年10、11及12月將愛文檬果單一枝條分別留存不同葉片數,並於枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂梢萌出花序所需天數 44
表1-4. 2005年10、11及12月將愛文檬果單一枝條分別留存不同葉片數,並於枝條基部進行環剝後,其頂梢形成花序之平均長度(公分) 44
表1-5. 2005年10、11、12月玉井與枋山地區愛文檬果留存不同葉片數試驗,抽萌的花序中形成帶葉花序的百分比 45
表1-6. 2004年1月1日於愛文檬果冬季抽出第三次梢、葉片呈黃綠色時,留存不同葉齡的葉片數並於枝條基部進行環剝後,對其頂梢花序形成比率之影響(台南玉井地區) 45
表2-1. 地面覆蓋Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,土壤表面與土面下15cm(枋山)及土面下30cm(玉井)之平均溫度 65
表2-2.玉井與枋山地區Tyvek®試驗樹冠內外層葉片之葉綠素含量(2005) 65
表2-3. 地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,對枋山與玉井地區愛文檬果淨光合作用速率(Pn)、氣孔導度(gs)、葉肉細胞間隙二氧化碳濃度(Ci)、蒸散速率(Tr)、蒸汽壓差(VPD)與水分利用速率(WUE)的影響(2005/12/02、12/03) 66
表2-4.玉井及枋山地區地面鋪設Tyvek®畦面覆蓋層後,愛文檬果抽萌新梢的枝條數目、百分比與新抽萌枝梢後期形成花序數和百分比 67
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject檬果zh_TW
dc.subject除葉zh_TW
dc.subject環狀剝皮zh_TW
dc.subject花序形成zh_TW
dc.subjectmangoen
dc.subjectleaf removalen
dc.subjectgirdlingen
dc.subjectinflorescence formationen
dc.title葉片數與地面防雨覆蓋對愛文檬果花序形成之影響zh_TW
dc.titleEffect of Leaf Number and Tyvek® Mulch on Inflorescence
Formation of ‘Irwin’ Mango (Mangifera indica L.)
en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear94-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李金龍(Ching-Lung Lee),顏昌瑞(Chung-Ruey Yen),張龍生(Loong-Sheng Chang),楊雯如(Wen-Ju Yang)
dc.subject.keyword檬果,花序形成,環狀剝皮,除葉,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordmango,inflorescence formation,girdling,leaf removal,en
dc.relation.page70
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2006-07-30
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-95-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.08 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved