請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31656完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷庚玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Chen Yeh | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 葉北辰 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:16:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-30 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 李明芝（1999）。「低年級學童言語攻擊傾向之相關因素」（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
洪儷瑜、涂春仁（1996）。Coie & Dodge社會計量地位分類公式之修正。「中國測驗學會測驗年刊」，43，103-114。 Andreou, E. (2001). Bully/victim problems and their association with coping behaviour in conflictual peer interactions among school-age children. Educational Psychology, 21, 59-66. Arsenio, W. F., & Lemerise, E. A. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence. Social Development, 10, 59-73. Bjorkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30, 177-188. Borg, M. G. (1998). The emotional reaction of school bullies and their victims. Educational Psychology, 18, 433-444. Burks, V. S., Laird, R. D., Dodge, K. A., Pettit, Gregory, S., & Bates, J. E. (1999). Knowledge structures, social information processing, and children's aggressive behavior. Social Development, 8, 220-236. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 67-283. Cillessen, A. H., Van IJzendoorn, H. W., Van Lieshout, C. F., & Hartup, W. W. (1992). Heterogeneity among peer-rejected boys: Subtypes and stabilities. Child Development, 63, 893-905. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557-570. Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., Terry, R., & Wright, V. (1991). The role of aggression in peer relations: An analysis of aggression episodes in boys’ play groups. Child Development, 62, 812-826. Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences,24, 123-130. Crick, N. R., Bigbee, M. A., & Howes, C. (1996). Gender differences in children’s normative beliefs about aggression: how do I hurt thee? Let me count the ways. Child Development, 67, 1003-1014. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74-101. Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993-1002. Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722. Crick, N. R., Grotpeter, J. K., & Bigbee, M. A. (2002). Relationally and physically aggressive children’s intent attributions and feelings of distress for relational and instrumental peer provocations. Child Development, 73, 1134-1142. Crick, N. R., & Ladd, G. W. (1993). Children's perceptions of their peer experiences: Attributions, loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Developmental Psychology, 29, 244-254. Crick, N. R., & Werner, N. R. (1998). Response decision processes in relational and overt aggression. Child Development, 69, 1630-1639. Derosier, M. E., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). Group social context and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 65, 1068-1079. Dodge, K. A. (1980). Social cognition and children’s aggressive behavior. Child Development, 51, 162-170. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146-1158. Dodge, K. A., Coie, J. D., Pettit, G. S., & Price, J. M. (1990). Peer status and aggression in boys’ groups: Development and contextual analyses. Child Development, 61, 1289-1309. Dodge, K. A., & Frame, C. L. (1982). Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. Child Development, 53, 620-635. Dodge, K. A., Lochman, J. E., Harnish, J. D., & Bates, J. D. (1997). Reactive and proactive aggression in school children and psychiatrically impared chronically assaultive youth. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 37-51. Dodge, K. A., Pettit, G. S., McClaskey, C. L., & Brown, M. M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51, 1-85. Dodge, K. A., & Price, J. M. (1994). On the relation between social information processing and socially competent behavior in early school-aged children. Child Development, 65, 1385-1397. Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R. (1998). Linkages between children's beliefs about the legitimacy of aggression and their behavior. Social Development, 7, 321-339. Fabes, R. A., Eisenberg, N., Smith, M. C., & Murphy, B. C. (1996). Getting angry at peers: Associations with liking of the provocateur. Child Development, 67, 942-956. Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1996). Preoccupied and avoidant coping during middle childhood. Child Development, 67, 1318-1328. Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G.. (1998). Victimization by peer: associations with children’s reports of mother-child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1076-1086. Gottman, J. M. (1986). The observation of social process. In J. M. Gottman & F. G. Parker(Eds.), Conversations of friends: Speculations on affective development (pp. 51-100). New York: Cambridge University Press. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587-538. Hymel, S. (1986). Interpretations of peer behavior: Affective bias in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 57, 431-445. Juvonen, J. (1992). Negative peer reactions from the perspective of the reactor. Journal of Educational Psychology,84,314-321. Kiesner, J., Dishion, T. J., & Poulin, F. (2001). A reinforcement model of conduct problems in children and adolescents: advances in theory and intervention. In J. Hill & B. Maughan(Eds.), Conduct disorders in childhood and adolescence (pp. 264-291). New York: Cambidge University Press. Mahady W., Melissa M., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2000). Emotional regulation and display in classroom victims of bullying: Characteristic expressions of affect, coping styles and relevant contextual factors. Social Development, 9, 226-245. Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224. Poulin, F., & Boivin, M. (2000). The role of proactive and reactive aggression in the formation and development of boys’ friendships. Developmental Psychology, 36, 233-240. Poulin, F., Cillessen, A. H. N., Hubbard, J. A., & Coie, J. D. (1997). Children's friends and behavioral similarity in two social contexts. Social Development, 6, 224-236. Ray, G. E., Norman, M. Sadowski, C. J., & Cohen, R. (1999). The role of evaluator-victim relationships in children's evaluations of peer provocation. Social Development, 8, 380-394. Rivers, I., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 20(5), 359-368. Russell, A., & Owens, L. (1999). Peer estimates of school-aged boys' and girls' aggression to same- and cross-sex targets. Social Development, 8, 364-379. Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28, 30-44. Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181-192. Schwartz, D., Chang L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates of victimization in Chinese children’s peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 37, 520-532. Selman, R. L., & Byrne, D. F. (1974). A structural-development analysis of levels of role taking in middle childhood. Child Development, 45, 803-806. Shantz, C. U. (1987). Conflicts between children. Child Development, 58, 283-305. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and 'theory of mind': A critique of the 'social skills deficit' view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117-127. Underwood, M. K., Coie, J. D., & Herbsman, C. R. (1992). Display rules of anger and aggression in school-age children. Child Development, 63, 366-380. Underwood, M. K., Galen, B. R., & Paquette, J. A. (2001). Top ten challenges for understanding gender and aggression in children: Why can't we all just get along? Social Development, 10, 248-266. Underwood, M. K., Hurley, J. C., Johanson, C. A., & Mosley, J. E. (1999). An experimental, observational investigation of children's responses to peer provocation: Developmental and gender differences in middle childhood. Child Development, 70, 1428-1446. Underwood, M. K., Schockner, A. E., & Hurley, J. C. (2001). Children's responses to same- and other-gender peers: An experimental investigation with 8-, 10-, and 12-year-olds. Developmental Psychology, 37, 362-372. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and Victimization in Elementary Schools: A Comparison of Bullies, Victims, Bully/Victims, and Uninvolved Preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672-682. Whitesell, N. R., & Harter, S. (1996). The interpersonal context of emotion: Anger with close friends and classmates. Child Development, 67, 1345-1359. Zakriski, A. L., & Coie, J. D. (1996). A comparison of aggressive-rejected and nonaggressive-rejected children's interpretations of self-directed and other-directed rejection. Child Development, 67, 1048-1070. Zeman, J., & Shipman, K. (1996). Children's expression of negative affect: Reasons and methods. Developmental Psychology, 32, 842-849. Zeman, J., & Shipman, K. (1997). Social-contextual influences on expectancies for managing anger and sadness: The transition from middle childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 33, 917-924. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31656 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 負向言語是國小學童間非常有效且常見的攻擊武器，然而，其所引起的後果存在著個別差異。本研究的目的即在探討國小學童面對不同喜歡程度的同儕對其施以負向言語挑釁時，在受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度上的發展趨勢；以及分別探究在主動攻擊、被動攻擊和被欺負三種不適應的同儕互動向度上分數高和低的國小學童，面對同儕施以負向言語時的受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度之差異。針對此主題，本研究假設有二：（1）高年級國小學童的受傷敏感度及易怒敏感度會低於中年級學童；（2）主動攻擊者受傷敏感度較低、易怒敏感度卻未較高，被動攻擊者易怒敏感度較高，被欺負者受傷敏感度較高、易怒敏感度卻較低。
本研究採團體施測，以班級為單位，總共有720位國小學童接受施測，其中四年級學童有11班，男189人，女166人；六年級學童亦有11班，男190人，女175人。施測分為兩階段：第一階段利用社會提名法，請國小學童選出班上最喜歡及最不喜歡的同學，並同時選出班上具主動攻擊、被動攻擊、被欺負傾向的同學。第二階段則偽裝為另一實驗，以第一階段所提名的最喜歡與最不喜歡的同學為個人實驗刺激，利用假想故事情境，測量當不同施話者（喜歡或不喜歡的同學）說出不同言語刺激（中性或負向）時，國小學童的易怒敏感度與受傷敏感度。全體受試者針對兩個依變項進行兩個「年齡（2）× 性別（2）× 施話者（2）× 言語內容（2）」之四因子變異數分析。而主動攻擊、被動攻擊和被欺負高/低分組的目標學童則分別針對兩個依變項進行兩個「組別（2）× 施話者（2）× 言語內容（2）」之三因子變異數分析。 結果發現，受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度都有隨著年齡降低的發展趨勢，而面對喜歡的人說負向言語受傷敏感度較高；面對不喜歡的人說負向言語則是易怒敏感度較高。主動攻擊傾向高的學童受傷敏感度較低，被欺負傾向高的學童受傷敏感度較高；但是被動攻擊學童易怒敏感度並沒有較高。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Verbal aggression occurs frequently in peer interaction among elementary school students. The purpose of the present research is to investigate, during late childhood, the age, sex, and individual differences of the vulnerability and inflammability in response to peer verbal aggression delivered either by liked or disliked classmates. Specifically, the present study is to compare the differences of vulnerability and inflammability to peer verbal aggression of those who score high or low on proactive aggression, reactive aggression, and victimization. Eleven classes of fourth graders (189 males and 166 females) and eleven classes of sixth graders (190 males and 175 females) in the Metropolitan Taipei area participated in the two-stage study. During the first stage, information about each subject’s liked and disliked classmates and the proactive aggressors, reactive aggressors, and victims in the class was collected through nomination technique. During the second stage, subjects read hypothetical scenarios about receiving verbal aggression or neutral verbal content from his/her liked or disliked classmate. Subjects were to rate their sadness, self-blame, anger, hostility, and distress if the scenarios really had happened. The scores of sadness and self-blame were combined to stand for the vulnerability index and the scores of anger and hostility were combined to stand for the inflammability index. Results demonstrated that six graders in general showed lower vulnerability and inflammability to verbal aggression than their fourth grade counterparts. Verbal aggression from a liked peer induced higher vulnerability. Verbal aggression from a disliked peer resultde in higher inflammability. Children with high proactive-aggression tendency experience lower vulnerability and children with high victimization tendency experience higher vulnerability upon hearing verbal aggression from peers. Contrary to the hypothesis of this study, children with high reactive-aggression tendency do not show higher inflammability in response to peer verbal aggression. The methodological and theoretical implications of the present findings were discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:16:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R89227014-1.pdf: 2462239 bytes, checksum: 7667dc581fa4487bd918e8b0a7922ad3 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
第一章 緒論 1 第一節 兒童面對負向言語的個別差異………………………………… 2 第二節 研究目的與研究假設…………………………………………… 12 第二章 研究方法 15 第一節 前置研究………………………………………………………… 15 第二節 研究對象………………………………………………………… 16 第三節 研究程序及工具………………………………………………… 16 第三章 研究結果 22 第一節 同儕提名結果…………………………………………………… 22 第二節 同儕互動故事情境之反應……………………………………… 23 第三節 受傷敏感度與易怒敏感度的年齡與性別差異………………… 25 第四節 特殊分類學童之個別差異……………………………………… 32 第四章 綜合討論 38 第一節 受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度於不同施話者和言語內容上的差異 38 第二節 受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度的發展趨勢………………………… 40 第三節 受傷敏感度和易怒敏感度在三類同儕互動不適應向度上的個別差異……………………………………………………………41 第四節 研究限制與未來研究展望………………………………………44 參考文獻 46 附錄 53 附錄一 前置研究學校申請書…………………………………………… 53 附錄二 學校申請書……………………………………………………… 54 附錄三 同儕提名問卷…………………………………………………… 55 附錄四 生活經驗量表…………………………………………………… 60 附錄五 五個題目之相關矩陣…………………………………………… 67 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 國小學童對同儕間負向言語之反應 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Children’s vulnerability and inflammability to peer’s verbal aggression | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林以正,林維能 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 負向言語,受傷敏感度,易怒敏感度,社會提名,主動攻擊,被動攻擊,被欺負,同儕關係,國小學童, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | proactive aggression,reactive aggression,victimization,verbal aggression,peer relationship,vulnerability,inflammability,late childhood,sociometrics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 67 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.4 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。