請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31639完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 吳玲玲 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kelly W. Y. Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 黃瑋瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:16:26Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-08-01 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-08-01 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | A.M., S., McKibbin, C., Zeiss, A. M., Gallagher-Thompson, D., & Bandura, A. (2002). The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy: reliability and validity studies. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57B(1), 74-86.
Akerlof, G. A. (1970). The market for 'lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics(84), 488-500. Alba, J., Lynch, J., Weitz, B., Janiszewski, C., Lutz, R., Sawyer, A., et al. (1997). Interactive Home Shopping: Consumer, Retailer, and Manufacturer Incentives to Participate in Electronic Marketplacec. Journal of Marketing, 61, 38-53. Ariely, D. (1999). Controlling information flow: on the importance of control in decision-making and the value of information. , Working paper. Ariely, D. (2000). Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision-making and Preferences. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 233-248. Bandura, A. (1978). The Self System in Reciprocal Determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344-358. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of Cognitive Processes Through Perceived Self-Efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25(5), 729-735. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy (Vol. 4). New York: Academic Press. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman. Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. UK:Blackwell: Oxford. Bandura, A. (2002). Growing primacy of human agency in adaption and change in the electronic era. . European Psychologist, 7 2-16 Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. Bandura, A., Reese, L., & Adams, N. E. (1982). Microanalysis of action and frear arousal as a function of different levels of perceived self-efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5-21. Barbeite, F. G., & Weiss, E. M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an internet sample: testing measurement equivalence of existing measures and development of new scales. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2004), 1-15. Baroudi, J., Olson, M. H., & Ives, B. (1986). An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction. Communications of ACM, 29(3), 232-238. Beach, L. (1993). Broadening the definition of decision-making: the role of prechoice screening of options. Psychological Science, 4(4), 215-220. Berghel, H. (1997). Cyberspace 2000: Dealing with Information Overload. Communications of ACM, 40(2), 19-24. Bettman, J., & Michael, A. Z. (1979). Information format and choice take effects in decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(2), 144-153. Burger, J. M. (1989). Negative reactions to increases in perceived personal control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 246-256. Cervone, D., & Peake, P. K. (1986). Anchoring, efficacy, and action: The influence of judgmental heuristics on self-efficacy judgments and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 492-501. Chang, A. (2005). The effects of consumer-interface technology on purchasing deferral and decision satisfaction: Shippensburg University. Choo, C. W., Detlor, B., & Turnbull, D. (1999). Information seeking on the web-an integrated model of browsing and searching. Paper presented at the 1999 ASIS Annual Meeting, Contributed Paper. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (2001). Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly(June 1995), 189-211. Evans, G. W., Shapiro, D. H., & Lewis, M. A. (1993). Specifying dysfunctional mismatches between different control dimensions. British Journal of Psychology, 84, 255-273. Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 12(3), 472-485. H, B., & O'Connor, A. (1996). Validation of client decision-making instruments in the context of psychiatry. Canadian Journal of Nursing Rearch, 28, 13-27. Hansen, F. (1972). Consumer choice behavior: a cognitive theory. New York: Free Press. Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (1985). Structuring Computer-Mediated Communication Systems to Avoid Information Overload. Communications of ACM, 28(7), 680-689. Hoque, A. Y., & Lohse, G. L. (1999). An information search cost perspective for designing interfaces for electronic commerce. Journal Of Marketing Research, 36, 387-394. Huffman, C., & Houston, M. J. (1993). Goal-oriented experiences and the development of knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(September, 1993), 190-206. Huffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1999). Building consumer trust online. Communications of ACM, 42(4), 80-85. Jacobsen, M. J. (2006). User manuel-Decision self-efficacy. University of Ottawa: Ottawa Health Decision Centre at the Ottawa Health Research Institute. Jacoby, J., Chestnut, R. W., Weigl, K. C., & Fischer, W. (1976). Prepurchase information aquisition: description of a process methodology, research paradigm, and a pilot investigation, In: Andersson, B. B (ed.). Advances in consumer research, 3(Chicago, IL: Association for Consumer Research), 321-327. Jacoby, J., Jaccard, J. J., Juss, A., Troutman, T. U., & Mazursky, D. (1987). New Directions in Behaviroal Process Research: Implications for Social Psychology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23(March), 146-175. Klayman, J. (1988). Cue discovery in probabilistic environments: Uncertainty and experimentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14(2), 317-330. Krueger, N. F. J., & Dickson, P. R. (1993). Self-efficacy and perceptions of opportunities and threats. Psychological Reports, 72, 1235-1240. Krueger, N. F. J., & Dickson, P. R. (1994). How believing in ourselves increases risk taking: Perceived self-efficacy and opportunity recognition. Decision Sciences, 25, 385-400. Latham, G. P., & Fraync, C. A. (1989). Self-management training for increasing job attendance:a follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416. McFarland, R. G., Dalsem, S. V., & Sheu, C. (2004). Developing interactive advertising strategies on the internet as a function of consumer knowledge, ability, and infolvement. Int. J. Internet Marketing and Advertising, 1(3, 2004), 300-315. McQuitty, S., Finn, A., & Wiley, J. B. (2000). Systematically varying consumer satisfaction and its implications for product choice [Electronic Version]. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10 from http://www.amsreview.org/articles/mcquitty10-2000.pdf. Miller, S. M. (1979). Controllability and human stress: Method, evidence and theory. Behavior Research and Therapy, 17, 287-304. Miller, S. M. (1980). Why having control reduces stress: If I can stop the roller coaster, I don't want to get off. New York: Academic Press. Moorthy, S., Ratchford, B. T., & Talukdar, D. (1997). Consumer information search revisited: theory and empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(March 1997263-277). Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., & Despontin, M. (2003). The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information & Management, 41, 543-560. Muylle, S., Moenaert, R., & Despontin, M. (2004). The conceptualization and empirical validation of web site user satisfaction. Information & Management, 41, 543-560. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision-making: an information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 366-387. Payne, J. W., bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The Addaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(135-146). Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The Effect of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes: An Information-Processing View. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(January), 81-92. Richardson, B. L., Wuillemin, D. B., & Kintosh, G. M. (1981). Can passive touch be better than active touch? A comparison of active and passive tactile maze learning. British Journal of Psychology, 72(3), 353-362. Shapiro, D. H., & Schwartz, C. E. (1996). Controlling Ourselves, Controlling Our World. American Psychologist, 51(12), 1213-1230. Snipes, R. L., LaTour, M. S., & Bliss, S. J. (1999). A Model of the Effects of Self-Efficacy on the Perceived Ethicality and Performance of Fear Appeals in Advertising. Journal of Business Ethics, 19(1999), 273-285. Steffen, A. M., McKibin, C., Zeiss, A. M., Gallagher-Thompson, D., & Bandura, A. (2002). The Revisited Scale for Caregiving Self-Efficacy: Reliability and Validity Studies. Journal of Gerontology: PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 57B(1), 74-86. Whyte, G., Saks, A. M., & Hook, S. (1997). When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(1997), 415-432. Wright, P. L. (1973). The Cognitive Process Mediating Acceptance of Advertising. Journal Of Marketing Research, 9(1), 53-62. Wright, P. L., & Barbour, F. (1997). Phased Decision Strategies: Sequels to an Initial Screening. TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, 6, 91-109. Wu, L. L., & Lin, J. Y. (in press). The quality of consumers' decision-making in the environment of E-commerce. Psychology & Marketing. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31639 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | With the universalized use of the Internet in today’s society, E-commerce is now not only an alternative for business ventures but a must-do for companies who wishes to bridge physical and time gaps and reaching out to all the potential consumers. It is thus crucial for E-commerce practitioners to know how to present the right information to the right consumers with the technological powers provided in the E-commerce environment. The purpose of this study is to see how different levels of information control can exert different impacts on consumers of different characteristics, in this case, consumers with different levels of decision self-efficacy, and to understand how to leverage the two factors in order to maximize consumer’s decision-making quality and decision satisfaction.
In this study, it is hypothesized that the degree of information control should match with consumers’ level of decision self-efficacy in order for the e-commerce mechanisms to reach maximum effectiveness and improve consumer’s decision-making quality and satisfaction. Self-efficacy refers to “an individual’s belief about his or her ability to control a specific area” (Shapiro, 1215). Thus we believe consumers with high self-efficacy would expect higher degree of informational control in order to satisfy their needs for control. On the other hand, consumers with low self-efficacy feel they are less capable of controlling decision making tasks and thus should be matched with lower degree of information control in order to prevent anxiety and discomfort throughout the information search and decision making process. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:16:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R93725052-1.pdf: 271272 bytes, checksum: 5654a253701039eb392dcb93a8dedeb1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Contents
1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Objective 2 2. Literature Review 4 2.1. Consumer’s decision-making process 4 2.2. Match Theory, Self-Efficacy, and Information Control 5 2.3. Hypothesis 14 3. Methodology 16 3.1. Experimental Design and Subjects 16 3.1.1. Information Control 17 3.1.2. Decision self-efficacy 18 3.1.3. Decision-making quality 20 3.1.4. Decision Satisfaction 20 3.1.5. Information seeking behavior 21 3.2 Subjects 22 3.3 Materials 22 3.3.1. Knowledge test 22 3.3.2. Instruction for decision self-efficacy manipulation 23 3.3.3. Decision scenarios 23 3.3.4. Attribute evaluation form 23 3.3.5. Alternative-by-attribute matrix and video-taped decision making process 24 3.3.6. Questionnaires 25 3.4. Experimental Procedure 25 3.5. Analysis Method 27 4. Result and Discussion 28 4.1 Decision Self-Efficacy 28 4.2 Information Seeking Patterns 29 4.2.1. The frequency of total clicks 29 4.2.2. The frequency of random clicks 30 4.2.3. The frequency of continuous clicks 31 4.3. Decision Satisfaction 32 4.3.1. The effect of decision self-efficacy 33 4.3.2. The interactive effect of information control and decision self-efficacy 33 4.4. Decision-Making Quality 35 4.4.2. The interactive effect of information control and decision self-efficacy 37 5. Conclusion, Managerial Implications, Limitations 39 References 42 Appendix A Scenarios 46 Appendix B Two-Version Instructions for High and Low Self-Efficacy 50 Appendix C Questionnaires 52 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 自我勝任感 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 資訊控制度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策滿意度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策品質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | self-efficacy | en |
| dc.subject | Information control | en |
| dc.subject | decision satisfaction | en |
| dc.subject | decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | decision self-efficacy | en |
| dc.title | 資訊控制度及自我勝任感在網路消費環境下對消費者決策品質與滿意度的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of Information Control and Self-efficacy on Consumer’s Decision Making Quality and Satisfaction in an E-Commerce Environment | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃明蕙,曹承礎 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 資訊控制度,自我勝任感,決策品質,決策滿意度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Information control,self-efficacy,decision self-efficacy,decision-making,decision satisfaction, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 55 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-07-31 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 資訊管理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 資訊管理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 264.91 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。