請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31425完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張顯達(Hintat Cheung) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsin-Yi Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林欣誼 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T03:12:52Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2006-09-23 | |
| dc.date.copyright | 2006-09-12 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2006-09-05 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | References
Adams, Karen and Nancy Frances Conklin. (1973). Toward a theory of natural classification. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 1-10. Ahrens, K. (1994). Classifier production in normals and aphasics. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 22, 202-247. Backscheider, A. G., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). Children's understanding of homonyms. Journal of Child Language, 22, 107-127. Barner, D & Snedeker J. (2005) Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition, 97, 41–66. Barner, D., & Snedeker, J. (2006). Children's early understanding of mass-count syntax: individuation, lexical content, and the number asymmetry hypothesis. Language Learning and Development, 2, 163-194. Bloom, P. (1999). The role of semantics in solving the bootstrapping problem. In Jackendoff, R., Bloom, P., Wynn, K. (Eds.), Language, Logic, and Concepts: Essays in Memory of John Macnamara. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Callanan, M. A., & Sabbagh, M. A. (2004). Multiple labels for objects in conversations with young children: Parents' language and children's developing expectations about word meanings. Developmental Psychology, 40, 746-763 Chao, Yuen Ren. (1968). A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press. Carpenter, Kathie. (1991). Later rather than sooner: Extralinguistic categories in the acquisition of Thai classifiers. Journal of Child Language, 18, 93-113. Cheng, Lisa L. S. & Rint Sybesma. (1998). Yi-wan tang, Yi-ge tang: Classifiers and Massifiers. Tsing-Hua Journal of Chinese Studies 28.3, 385-412. Cheng, Lisa L. S. and Rint Sybesma. (1999). Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 509–542. Chien, Yu-Chin, Barbara Lust & Chi-Pang Chiang (2003). Chinese children's comprehension of Count-Classifiers and Mass-Classifiers. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 12, 91-120. Clark, E. V. (1977). Universal categories: On the semantics of classifiers and children's early word meanings. In A. Juilland (Ed.), Linguistic Studies Offered to Joseph Greenberg. 449-462. Saratoga, CA: Anma Libri. Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language 15, 317-335. Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417-431. Clark, E. V. (1997). Conceptual perspective and lexical choice in acquisition. Cognition, 64, 1-37. Clark, E. V. (1998) Word choice and conceptual perspective. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen: Mededelingen van de Afdeling Letterkunde, Nieuwe Reeks, Deel 61, No. 11, 5-18. Clark, E. V. (2003). First Language Acquisition. Uk: Cambridge U Press. Clark, E. V., & Grossman, J. B. (1998). Pragmatic directions and children's word learning. Journal of child language, 25, 1-18. Erbaugh, M. S. (1984). 'Scissors, paper, stone:' perceptual foundations of noun classifier systems. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 23, 41-49. Erbaugh, M. (1986). Taking stock: The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children. In Colette Craig (Eds.): Typological Studies in Language: Noun Classes and Categorization, Vol.7, 399-436. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Philadelphia. Fang, Fu-xi (1985). An experiment on the use of classifiers by 4- to 6-year olds. Acta-Psychologica-Sinica, 17, 384-392. Gordon, P. (1985). Evaluating the semantic categories hypothesis: the case of the mass/count distinction. Cognition, 20, 209–242. Gordon, P. (1988). Mass/count category acquisition: Distributional distinctions in children’s speech. Journal of Child Language, 15, 109-128. Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Cole, P. and J.L. Morgan (Eds.). Syntax and semantics. Vol. 3. Speech acts. NY: Academic Press. Cited in Clark, E. V. (1990). On the pragmatics of contrast. Journal of Child Language 17, 417-431. Hu, Qian (1993). The Acquisition of Chinese Classifiers by Young Mandarin-speaking Children. Unpublished ductoral dissertation, Boston University. Huang, C., & Ahrens, K. (2003). Individuals, kinds and events: Classifier coercion of nouns. Language Sciences, 25, 353-373. Imai, M. & Gentner, D. (1997). A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence. Cognition, 62, 169-200. Kohn, A. S., & Landau, B. (1990). A partial solution to the homonym problem: Parents' linguistic input to young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 19, 71-89. Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Fuctional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press. Li, Wendan (2000). The pragmatic function of numeral-classifiers in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1113-1133. Loke, Kit-ken. (1994). Is ge merely a ‘general classifier’? Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 29, 35-50. Markman, E. M., Wasow, J. L., & Hansen, M. B. (2003). Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 241-275. Myers, James. (2000). Rules vs. analogy in Mandarin classifier selection. Language and Linguistics, 1, 187-209. Ninio, A. & Snow, C. (1999). The development of pragmatics: Learning to use language appropriately. In T. K. Bhatia & W. C. Ritchie (Eds.). Handbook of Language Acquisition, 347-383. New York: Academic Press. Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MIT Press. Savage, S. L., & Au, T. K. (1996). What word learners do when input contradicts the mutual exclusivity assumption. Child Development, 67, 3120-3134. Soja. N. N., Carey, S., & Spelke, E. S. (1991). Ontological categories guide young children's. inductions of word meaning : Object terms and substance terms . Cognition, 38, 179-211. Tai, James H-Y and Lianqing Wang. (1990). A semantic study of the classifier tiao. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 25, 35-56. Tai, James H-Y. (1992). Variation in classifier systems across Chinese dialects: towards a cognition-based semantic approach. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, Vol.1: Chinese Dialects, 587-608. Tien, YM, Tzeng, OJL, & Hung, DL. (2002). Semantic and cognitive basis of Chinese classifiers: A functional approach. Language and Linguistics 3, 101-132. Tomasello, M. (2001). Perceiving intentions and learning words in the second year of life. In Melissa Bowerman and Stephen C. Levinson (Eds.). Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, 132–158. Cambridge: CUP. Uchida, Nobuko & Mutsumi Imai (1999). Heuristics in learning classifiers: The acquisition of the classifier system and its implications for the nature of lexical acquisition. Japanese Psychological Research, 41, 50-69. Waxman, S. R., & Hatch, T. (1992). Beyond the basics: Preschool children label objects flexibly at multiple hierarchical levels. Journal of Child Language, 19, 153-166. Yamamoto, Kasumi and Frank Keil (2000). The acquisition of Japanese numeral clasifiers: Linkage between grammatical forms and conceptual categories. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 9, 379-409. Zubin, David A., and Mitsuaki Shimojo. 1993. How ‘general’ are general classifiers? with special reference to ko and tsu in Japanese. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 19, 490-502. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/31425 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本篇論文旨在探討情境與先備語言知識對於兒童量詞使用的影響。論文實驗受測者為30位四歲兒童、30位六歲兒童及15位成人，其母語皆為中文。實驗依名詞熟悉度分為兩組，第一組實驗由舊有名詞組成，第二組實驗則為創新名詞。除此之外，測試材料依目標名詞特性進一步細分：其一包含個體(individuals)，其二包含個體與集合之間的轉換(a shift from individuals to collections of individuals)。經由結果分析顯示，受測者的量詞使用同時受到情境與先備語言知識影響，然而在名詞的個體與集合轉換同時作用下，來自情境與先備語言知識的影響將會減弱。
本篇研究相信受測者的量詞使用結果驗證Clark (1997, 1998, 2003) 所提出的Multiple-perspective theory。在情境轉變時，受測者使用不同量詞標記他們所選擇的觀點(perspective)，而觀點的選擇根源於情境資訊及名詞中的不同語意層次。除此之外，名詞的可數(count)與不可數(mass)亦可能左右量詞選擇。本篇研究結果強調情境在兒童字彙學習中的重要地位。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The present study aims to examine the influence of contextual variances and prior linguistic knowledge on children’s classifier use. 30 4-year-olds (Age 4), 30 6-year-olds (Age 6), and 15 adults participated in the two tasks of this investigation. All these participants spoke Mandarin as their first language. The two tasks comprised story telling and question answering. The stories were made up to present contexts, and questions were designed to elicit participants’ classifier use. Two sets of materials contained in the tasks, in which one involved a shift from individuals to collections of individuals, and the other not. This individual-collection shift brought differences in the perceptual properties and in the functions of objects, which could influence participants’ classifier choices. The target nouns in these two tasks were divided into familiar ones in Task 1 and novel ones in Task 2. Each of these objects was assigned to two stories, intending to provide different contextual information, and trigger different classifier-noun sequences. From these tasks, participants’ classifier usage for both familiar and unfamiliar nouns under different contexts was obtained. The results showed that both contextual variances and unfamiliarity with objects could affect participants’ classifier use in all the three age groups. However, when the individual-collection shift was involved, the influence from contexts and unfamiliarity with objects was reduced.
Participants’ change of classifiers relate to their cognitive perspectives on objects. Clark (1997, 1998, 2003) claims that different contexts will activate speakers’ different perspectives, which are marked by word-choice. In this research, participants use different classifiers to present their chosen perspectives on objects in different contexts. Our findings further suggest that these perspectives are determined based on contextual information and multiple levels of nouns. Moreover, the contrast between individuals and collections which indicates a mass-count distinction should be also a crucial factor in classifier choices. According to these findings, this thesis supports Clark’s (1997, 1998, 2003) Multiple-perspective theory, and emphasizes the significance of contexts in word learning. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T03:12:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-95-R92142008-1.pdf: 1398156 bytes, checksum: 464d34be439cf98618e6788c61150046 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
List of Tables iii List of Figures iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose 5 1.3 Organization 6 Chapter 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 The Chinese classifier system 7 2.2 Acquisition of classifiers 15 2.2.1 The functions of classifiers 15 2.2.2 The selections of classifiers 18 2.2.3 Multiple perspective theory 21 Chapter 3 Task Ⅰ: Task on Children’s Classifier Selection for Familiar Nouns 24 3.1 Subjects 24 3.2 Materials 25 3.3 Procedure 29 3.4 Scoring 31 3.5 Results 32 3.5.1 The score on Precision 32 3.5.2 Classifier change of Children groups and Adult group 33 3.5.3 Classifier change of Age 4 and Age 6 35 3.5.4 The relation between classifier change and the nouns 37 3.5.5 Classifier change selections of adult and children groups 39 3.5.6 Summary 42 Chapter 4 Task Ⅱ: Task on Children’s Classifier Selection for Novel Nouns 43 4.1 Subjects 43 4.2 Materials 43 4.3 Procedure 45 4.4 Scoring 48 4.5 Results 48 4.5.1 The score on Precision 48 4.5.2 Classifier change of children groups and adult group 49 4.5.3 Classifier change of Age 4 and Age 6 50 4.5.4 Summary 51 4.6 The relation between familiarity of objects and Classifier change 52 4.7 Between Task 1 and Task 2 under each set 53 Chapter 5 General Discussion 56 5.1 The relation between contexts and classifier selection 56 5.1.1 Set 1: Classifier change without perceptual reinforcement 56 5.1.2 Set 2: Classifier change with perceptual reinforcement 60 5.1.2.1 Classifiers and measure words 62 5.1.2.2 Mass-count distinction 64 5.2 The influence of prior linguistic knowledge on classifier selection 67 5.3 The using of the general classifier ge 70 Chapter 6 Conclusion 73 References 78 Appendices 83 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | 情境 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 量詞 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 字彙學習 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 語言習得 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | classifier | en |
| dc.subject | language acquisition | en |
| dc.subject | word learning | en |
| dc.subject | perspective | en |
| dc.subject | context | en |
| dc.title | 情境、觀點與兒童量詞使用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Contexts, Perspectives, and Children’s Use of Classifiers | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 94-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張鑑如,安可思(Kathleen Ahrens) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 情境,觀點,量詞,字彙學習,語言習得, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | context,perspective,classifier,word learning,language acquisition, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 91 | |
| dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2006-09-05 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 語言學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 語言學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-95-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.37 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。