請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30746
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 江宜樺 | |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-I Lee | en |
dc.contributor.author | 李豫宜 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:14:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-05-18 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-05-18 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-05-15 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 一、托克維爾著作
AR:The Old Régime and the French Revolution.《舊制度與大革命》,馮棠譯,香港:牛津大學出版社,1994。 DA:Democracy in America.《論美國的民主》,董果良譯,北京:商務印書館,2002。 JA:Journey to America. Trans. George Lawrence. Ed. J. P. Mayer. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1971. MP:Memoir on Pauperism. Trans. Seymour Dresher. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee, 1997. SL:Selected Letters on Politics and Society. Ed. Roger Boesche; trans. James Toupin and Roger Boesche. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985. The Old Régime and the French Revolution. Trans. Alan S. Kahan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998. Democracy in America. Eds. Harvey C. Mansfield & Delba Winthrop. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000. 二、中文著作 丘昌泰,1987,〈美國民主的觀察家:托克維爾﹝Alexis de Tocqueville﹞(1805-1859)――評介其對美國自由與平等理念的觀察〉《思與言》25(1): 85-99。 江宜樺,2001,《自由民主的理路》,台北:聯經。 李丁讚等著,2004,《公共領域在台灣:困境與契機》,台北:桂冠圖書。 吳乃德,〈搜尋民主公民——社團參與的理論與實際〉收入《公共領域在台灣:困境與契機》。台北:桂冠圖書,2004年。頁177-214。 錢永祥,2001,《縱欲與虛無之上:現代情境裡的政治倫理》,台北:聯經。 Aron, Raymond著,葛智強等譯,2000,《社會學主要思潮》,北京市:華夏出版社。譯自Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books. Montesquieu著,張雁深譯,1998,《論法的精神》,台北市:台灣商務。 三、英文著作 Allen, Barbara. 2005. Tocqueville, Covenant, and the Democratic Revolution: Harmonizing Earth with Heaven. Lanham: Lexington Books. Aron, Raymond. 1968-1970. Main Currents in Sociological Thought. Trans. Richard Howard and Helen Weaver. Garden City, N.Y.: Anchor Books. Baier, Annette C. 1993. “How Can Individualists Share Responsibility?” Political Theory 21(2): 228-48. Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press. Bellah, Robert. .. [et al.], eds. 1996. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press. Berger, Peter L. & Richard John Neuhaus. 1996. To Empower People: from State to Civil Society. Edited by Michael Novak. Washington, D.C.: AEI Press. Berkowitz, Peter. 1996. “The Art of Association.” New Republic 24: 44-49. Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Liberty, eds. Henry Hardy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bloemraad, Irene. 2005. “The Limits of de Tocqueville: How Government Facilitates Organisational Capacity in Newcomer Communities.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31(5): 865-887. Bloom, Alan. 1987. The Closing of the American Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster. Boesche, Roger. 1980. “The Prison: Tocqueville’s Model for Despotism.” The Western Political Quarterly 33(4): 550-563. -----. 1983. “Why Could Tocqueville Predict so Well?” Political Theory 11(1): 79-103. -----. 1987. The Strange Liberalism of Alexis de Tocqueville. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. -----. 1996. Theories of Tyranny: from Plato to Arendt. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press. -----. 2005. “The Dark Side of Tocqueville: On War and Emoire.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 737-752. Boyd, Richard. 2004. Uncivil Society: the Perils of Pluralism and the Making of Modern Liberalism. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Clinton, W. David. 2003. Tocqueville, Lieber, and Bagehot: Liberalism Confronts the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Cohen, Jean L. & Andrew Arato. 1994. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1994. Copp, David, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer, eds. 1993. The Idea of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Craiutu, Aurelian. 1999. “Tocqueville and the Political Thought of the French Doctrinaires (Guizot, Royer-Collard, R’emusat).” History of Political Thought 20(2): 456-493. Deneen, Patrick J. 2005. Democratic Faith. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Dionne, E.J., ed. 1998. Community Works: the Revival of Civil Society in America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Drescher, Seymour. 1964. “Tocqueville’s Two Democraties.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 25(2): 201-216. -----. 1964. Tocqueville and England. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. -----. 1968. Dilemmas of Democracy: Tocqueville and Modernization. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Drolet, Michael. 2003. Tocqueville, Democracy and Social Reform. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Edwards, Bob, Michael W. Foley, & Mario Diani, eds. 2001. Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. Frohnen, Bruce. 1993. Virtue and the Promise of Conservatism: the Legacy of Burke and Tocqueville. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas. Fukuyama, Francis. 1992. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press. Furet, François. 1981. Interpreting the French Revolution. Trans, E. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Galston, William. 2000. “Civil Society and the ‘Art of Association’.” Journal of Democracy 11(1): 64-70. Gannett, Robert T. Jr. 2003. Tocqueville Unveiled: the Historian and his Sources for The Old Regime and the Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. -----. 2005. “Tocqueville and Local Government Distinguishing Democracy’s Second Track.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 721-736. Gans, Herbert J. .. [et al.], eds. 1979. On the Making of Americans: Essays in Honor of David Riesman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Goldberg, Chad A. 2001. “Social Citizenship and a Reconstructed Tocqueville.” American Sociological Review 66: 289-315. Hadari, Saguiv A. 1989. Theory in Practice: Tocqueville's New Science of Politics. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Hamilton, Alexander, James Madison and John Jay. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York : Bantam. Hereth, Michael. 1986. Alexis de Tocqueville: Threats to Freedom in Democracy. Translated by George Bogardus. Durham: Duke University Press. Hirschman, Alberto O. 1970. Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Holmes, Stephen. 1993. “Tocqueville and Democracy.” In The Idea of Democracy, eds. David Copp, Jean Hampton, & John E. Roemer. New York: Cambridge University Press, 23-63. Janara, Laura. 2002. Democracy Growing Up: Authority, Autonomy, and Passion in Tocqueville's Democracy in America. Albany: State University of New York Press. Jacobitti, Suzanne D. 1991. “Individualism & Political Community: Arendt & Tocqueville on the Current Debate in Liberalism.” Polity 23(4): 585-604. Jardin, André. 1988. Alexis de Tocqueville: A Biography. Trans. Lydia Davis & Robert Hemenway. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux. Kahan, Alan S. 1985. “Tocqueville’s Two Revolutions.” Journal of the History of Ideas 46(4): 585-596. -----. 1992. Aristocratic Liberalism: the Social Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press. Kelly, George Armstrong. 1992. The Humane Comedy: Constant, Tocqueville, and French Liberalism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Klein, H. K. 1999. “Tocqueville in Cyberspace: Using the Internet for Citizen Associations.” The Information Society 15(4): 213-220. LaCapra, Dominick. 2000. History and Reading: Tocqueville, Foucault, French Studies. Toronto; Buffalo: University of Toronto Press. Lamberti, Jean-Claude. 1989. Tocqueville and the Two Democracies. Trans. Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Lawler, Peter Augustine, ed. 2004. Democracy and its Friendly Critics: Tocqueville and Political Life Today. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books. Ledeen, Michael Arthur. 2000. Tocqueville on American Character: why Tocqueville’s Brilliant Exploration of the American Spirit is as Vital and Important Today as it was Nearly Two Hundred Years Ago. New York: St. Martin's Press. Levy, Jonah D. 1999. Tocqueville’s Revenge: State, Society, and Economy in Contemporary France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Macfarlane, Alan. 2000. The Riddle of the Modern World: of Liberty, Wealth and Equality. New York: St. Martin's Press. Maguire, Matthew W. 2006. The Conversion of Imagination: from Pascal through Rousseau to Tocqueville. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Manent, Pierre. 1996. Tocqueville and the Nature of Democracy. Trans. John Waggoner. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. Mayer, J. P. 1966. Alexis de Tocqueville: a Biographical Study in Political Science. Gloucester, Mass.: Peter Smith. McLean, Scott L., David A. Schultz, & Manfred B. Steger, eds. 2002. Social Capital: Critical Perspectives on Community and “Bowling Alone”. New York; London: New York University Press. Mélonio, Francoise. 1998. Tocqueville and the French. Trans. Beth G. Raps. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. Mitchell, Harvey. 1996. Individual Choice and the Structures of History: Alexis de Tocqueville as Historian Reappraised. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press. -----. 2002. America after Tocqueville: Democracy against Difference. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mitchell, Joshua. 1995. The Fragility of Freedom: Tocqueville on Religion, Democracy, and the American Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Nisbet, Robert A. 1976. “Many Tocquevilles.” American Scholar 46: 59-75. -----. 2002. Conservatism: Dream and Reality. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Nolla, Eduardo. 1992. Liberty, Equality, Democracy. New York: New York University Press. Offe, Claus. 2005. Reflections on America: Tocoqueville, Weber and Adorno in the United States. Malden, MA: Polity. Ossewaarde, M. R. R. 2004. Tocqueville's Moral and Political Thought: New Liberalism. London; New York: Routledge. Pierson, George Wilson. 1996. Tocqueville in America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: the Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Poggi, Gianfranco. 1972. Images of Society: Essays on the Sociological Theories of Tocqueville, Marx, and Durkheim. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Polanyi, Karl. 1957. The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon. Pope, Whitney. 1986. Alexis de Tocqueville: His Social and Political Theory. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage. Putnam, Robert D. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. -----. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65-78. -----. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America.” PS: Political Science and Politics 28(4): 664-683. -----. 2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. -----. 2003. Better Together: Restoring the American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Reinhardt, Mark. 1997. The Art of Being Free: Taking Liberties with Tocqueville, Marx, and Arendt. Ithaca, NY; London: Cornell University Press. Richter, Melvin. 1970. “The Use of Theory: Tocqueville’s Adaptation of Montesquieu.” In Essays in Theory and History: an Approach to the Social Sciences, ed. Melvin Richter. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. -----. 1982. “Toward a Concept of Political Legitimacy.” Political Theory 10: 185-214. -----. 2004. “Tocqueville and French Nineteen-Century Conceptualizations of the Two Bonapartes and Their Empires.” In Dictatorship in History and Theory: Bonapartism, Caesarism, and Totalitarianism, eds. Peter Baehr & Melvin Richter. New York: Cambridge University Press. Rosenblum, Nancy L. & Robert C. Post, eds. 2002. Civil Society and Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sabl, Andrew. 2002. “Community Organizing as Tocquevillean Politics: The Art, Practices, and Ethos of Association.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 1-19. Satz, Debra. 1993. “Tocqueville, commerce, and Democracy,” in David Copp, Jean Hampton, and John E. Roemer, eds., The Idea of Democracy, 64-70 Schleifer, James T. 2000(1980). The Making of Tocqueville’s Democracy in America. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Shiner, L.E. 1988. The Secret Mirror: Literary form and History in Tocqueville’s Recollections. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Siedentop, Larry. 1994. Tocqueville. New York: Oxford University Press. Skocpol, Theda & Morris P. Fiorina, eds. 1999. Civic Engagement in American Democracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Skocpol, Theda. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: a Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. -----. 1996. “The Tocqueville Problem: Civic Engagement in America Democracy.” Social Science History 21(4): 455-479. Smith, Bruce James. 1985. Politics & Remembrance: Republican Themes in Machiavelli, Burke, and Tocqueville. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Smith, Dennis. 1990. Capitalist Democracy on Trial: the Transatlantic Debate from Tocqueville to the Present. London; New York: Routledge. Tilton, T. A. 1979. “Alexis de Tocqueville and the Political and the Political Sociology of Liberalism.” Comparative Social Research 2: 263-287. Villa, Dana. 2005. “Hegel, Tocqueville, and Individualism.” The Review of Politics 67(4): 659-686. Weir, Margaret & Marshall Ganz. 1997. “Reconnecting People and Politics.” In The New Majority: toward a Popular Progressive Politics, eds. Stanley B. Greenberg and Theda Skocpol. New Haven: Yale University Press. Welch, Cheryl. 2001. De Tocqueville. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. -----. 2003. “Colonial Violence and the Rhetoric of Evasion: Tocqueville on Algeria.” Political Theory 31(2): 235-264. -----, ed. 2006. The Cambridge Companion to Tocqueville. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, James Boyd., ed. 2006. How Should We Talk About Religion? : Perspectives, Contexts, Particularities. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press. Wolin, Sheldon. 1961. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. -----. 2001. Tocqueville between Two Worlds: the Making of a Political and Theoretical Life. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Zetterbaum, Marvin. 1967. Tocqueville and the Problem of Democracy. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. -----. 1964. “Tocqueville: Neutrality and the Use of History.” The American Political Science Review 58(3): 611-621. Zunz, Olivier & Alan S. Kahan, eds. 2002. The Tocqueville Reader: a Life in Letters and Politics. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30746 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 國家與個人的關係向來是難解的問題。隨著政府公權力的滲透性越來越強,個人如何在其中保全自由與獨立性?本論文藉由托克維爾的民主理論,嘗試從不同的角度來關照民主的內涵與自由的意義。
本文在緒論中簡略介紹托克維爾的生平與思想背景後,第二章將先藉由托克維爾對於「民主」的理解與敘述,從政治、經濟、文化等各種角度大略描繪出美國民主社會的形象,並藉由它來展示一個新生的民主國家,所具有的優點,與其背後的隱憂,包括極端的個人主義、多數專制、中央集權等概念。第三章開始,本論文將焦點集中在中央集權與民主專制上。美國與法國儘管在歷史記憶、社會風氣都有所不同,卻都可能因為民主制度本身的傾向而走向中央集權。要避免這種傾向,托克維爾認為需從「民情」著手。本文第四章的目標在於分析公民結社與民情之間的關係,特別是公民結社負有改造民情的任務,而在此同時民情卻是公民結社得否活躍的基礎,究竟熟先熟後?美國與法國社會內部與歷史背景的差異,恰巧為這個問題提供了討論空間。結論部分將就此延伸,討論結社活動在現代社會可能遇到的挑戰或轉型的機會,藉由托克維爾理論,尋求建立公民社會、保障民主自由的希望。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:14:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R93322002-1.pdf: 825952 bytes, checksum: 69e648d27f24b43cd6dd75e0d2b6a945 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 ……………………………………………… i
誌謝 ……………………………………………… ii 中文摘要 ……………………………………………… iii 英文摘要 ……………………………………………… iv 第一章 緒論 ……………………………………………… 1 第一節 前言 ……………………………………………… 1 第二節 托克維爾生平 …………………………………… 5 第三節 文獻回顧與研究途徑 ……………………………8 第四節 章節安排 ………………………………………… 14 第二章 站在民主自由與民主專制的十字路口 ………………17 第一節 民主社會的面貌 ………………………………… 19 第二節 民主的變質 ……………………………………… 29 第三節 民主社會中的個人:走向奴役之路? ………… 40 第三章 中央集權的建立與新專制的誕生 ………………… 45 第一節 法國革命後的民主難題 ………………………… 47 第二節 中央集權:屹立於舊制度的灰燼之上 ………… 50 第三節 民主制度與中央集權 …………………………… 57 第四節 無可避免的中央集權? ………………………… 64 第四章 自由的維繫:公民結社與民情的形塑 ………………71 第一節 政治自由的內涵 ………………………………… 72 第二節 公民結社:追求自由的技藝 …………………… 80 第三節 結社習慣與民情的養成 ………………………… 89 第五章 走出孤島:現代公民結社的發展 ……………………99 第一節 尋求政府與公民社會的平衡點 ………………… 101 第二節 公民結社的新挑戰 ……………………………… 107 結論 ……………………………………………… 111 參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 115 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 托克維爾中央集權與公民結社關係 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Tocqueville on Centralization and Civil Association | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王遠義,蕭高彥 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 托克維爾,中央集權,公民結社,民主,自由,公民社會, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Tocqueville,centralization,civil association,democracy,freedom,civil society, | en |
dc.relation.page | 126 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-05-15 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 政治學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 806.59 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。