請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30447
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳英璋 | |
dc.contributor.author | Shih-Yang Lo | en |
dc.contributor.author | 羅時揚 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T02:03:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2007-07-16 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-16 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-03 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 于文正(1990)。「壓力知覺、因應策略與個人憂鬱程度」。(未發表之碩士論文)台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
王瑪麗(1985)。「人際問題解決訓練對國中女生人際問題解決能力、態度與人際適應的影響」。(未發表之碩士論文)台北:國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所。 吳芳萍(1996)。「認知行為取向團體輔導對國小高攻擊性兒童輔導效果之研究」。(未發表之碩士論文)屏東:國立屏東師範學院初等教育學系。 吳英璋(2007)。研擬學生壓力調適及心理健康促進之因應策略。教育部研究計畫。 吳英璋,陳淑惠(2003)。整合型計畫:災後心理反應歷程與心理處置歷程之長期追蹤研究-總計畫暨子計畫(II)兒童與青少年震災後心理反應長期追蹤研究。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC91-2625-Z-002-030)。 吳英璋,陳淑惠(2006)。整合型計畫:災後心理反應歷程與心理處置之長期追蹤研究-子計畫(I):兒童與青少年災後心理反應長期追蹤研究:震災、水災、SARS 等災後心理反應的比較研究。行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC91-2625-Z-002-017)。 曾瑞雲(1999)。「人際問題解決輔導方案對國小學生人際問題解決態度與社會適應之效果研究」。(未發表之碩士論文)台北:臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所。 劉英台(1986)。「國中生人際問題解決態度與相關變項之關係暨『人際問題解決小團體輔導方案』效果研究」。(未發表之碩士論文)台北:國立臺灣師範大學輔導研究所。 潘玫伶(2003)。「人際問題解決能力訓練課程對國小高年級社會適應欠佳學生影響之研究」。(未發表之碩士論文)嘉義:國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所。 Arnett, J. J. (1999). Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered. American Psychologist,54, 317-326. Bulter, L., & Meichenbaum, D. (1981). The assessment of interpersonal problem-solving skill. In P. C. Kendall & S.D. Hollon (Eds.), Assessment strategies for cognitive-behavioral interventions. New York: Academic Press. Dye, H. A. (1968). Fundamental group procedures for school counselors. Hougton Mifflin Company. Duckworth, D. H. (1983). Evaluation of a programme for increasing the effectiveness of personal problem-solving. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 119-127. D'Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 107-126. D'Zurilla, T. J., & Maydeu-Olivares, A. (1995). Conceptual and methodological issues in social problem-solving assessment. Behavior Therapy, 26, 409-432. D’Zurilla, T.J., & Nezu, A.M. (1982). Social problem solving in adults. In P.C. Kendall (Ed.), Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy. (Vol. 1, pp. 201-274). New York: Academic Press. D'Zurilla, T.J., & Nezu, A.M. (1999). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention(2nd ed.,). New York: Springer. D’Zurilla, T.J., & Nezu, A.M. (2001). Problem-solving therapies. In K.S. Dobson(ed.), Handbook of cognitive-behavioral therapies( 2nd ed.,) New York: Guilford Press. Erwin, P. G. (1994). Effectiveness of social skills training with children: A meta-analytic study. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 7, 305-310. Erwin, P. G., Firth, K., & Purves, D. G.. (2004). Task Characteristics and Performance in Interpersonal Cognitive Problem Solving. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary & Applied, 138, 185-191. Fischler, G. L., & Kendall, P. C. (1988). Social cognitive problem solving and childhood adjustment: Qualitative and topological analyses. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 12, 133-153. Frauenknecht, M., & Black, D. R. (1995). Social Problem-Solving Inventory for Adolescents (SPSI-A): Development and preliminary psychometric evaluation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 522-539. Freedman, B. J., Rosenthal, L., Donahoe, C. P., Schlundt, D. G., & McFall, R. M. (1978). A social-behavioral analysis of skill deficits in delinquent and nondelinquent adolescent boys. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 46, 1448-1462. Getter, H., & Nowinski, J. K. (1981). A free response test of interpersonal effectiveness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 301-308. Gladwin, T. (1967). Social Competence and Clinical Practice. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 30, 30-43. Goddard, P., & McFall, R. M. (1992). Decision-making skills and heterosocial competence in college women: An information-processing analysis. Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology, 11, 401-425. Goldstein, A. P., Glick, B., Reiner, S., Zimmerman, D., & Coultry, T. M. (1987) Aggression Replacement Training: A comprehensive intervention for aggressive youth. Champaign, IL, US: Research Press. Green, R., & Murray, E. (1973). Instigation to aggression as a function of self-disclosure and therat to self-esteem. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 40, 440-443. Heppner, P., & Petersen, C. H. (1982). The development and implications of a personal problem-solving inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 29, 66-75. Hokanson, J. E., Willers, K., & Koropsak, E. (1968). The modification of autonomic responses during aggressive interchange. Journal of Personality, 36, 386-404. Jaff, M. L. (1998). Adolescence. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Jaffee, W. B., & D'Zurilla, T. J. (2003). Adolescent problem solving, parent problem solving, and externalizing behavior in adolescents. Behavior Therapy, 34, 295-311. Jahoda, M. (1953). The meaning of psychological health. Social Casework, 34, 349-354. Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. Oxford, England: Basic Books. Jurich, S. A. (2004). The interpersonal problem solving measurement (IPSM): Reliability and validity of a measurement to assess interpersonal problem solving in adult offenders. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities & Social Sciences, 64(7-A), 2445. US: Univ Microfilms International. Kaufmann, H., & Feshbach, S. (1963). The influence of anti-aggressive communications upon the response to provocation. Journal of Personality, 31, 428-444. Krasnor, L. R., & Rubin, K. H. (1981). The assessment of social problem-solving skills in young children. In T. Merluzzi, C. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment. New York: Guilford Press. Kuperminc, G. P., & Allen, J. P. (2001). Social orientation: Problem behavior and motivations toward interpersonal problem solving among high risk adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 30, 597-622. Lange, A., & Jakubowski, P. (1976). Responsible assertive behavior. Champaign, Illinois: Research Press. McGuire, J. (2005). Social problem solving: basic concepts, research, and applications. In M. McMurran & J. McGuire(Eds.), Social problem solving and offending(pp. 3-29). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Meichenbaum, D. (1975). A self-instructional approach to stress management: A proposal for stress inoculation training. In C. Spielberger & I. Sarason(Eds.), Stress and Anxiety, Vol. 2. New York: Wiley. Mendonca, J. D., & Siess, T. F. (1976). Counseling for indecisiveness: Problem-solving and anxiety-management training. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 339-347. Moon, J. R., & Eisler, R. M. (1983). Anger control: An experimental comparison of three behavioral treatments. Behavior Therapy, 14, 493-505. Murphy, L. O. & Ross, S. M. (1987) Gender differences in the social problem-solving performance of adolescents. Sex Roles, 16, 251-264. Nezu, A. M. (2004). Problem solving and behavior therapy revisited. Behavior Therapy, 35, 1-33. Novaco, R. W. (1975). Anger control: The development and evaluation of an experimental treatment. Toronto: D. C. Health and Company. Novaco, R. W. (1977a). Stress inoculation: A cognitive therapy for anger and its application to a case of depression. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 45, 600-608. Novaco, R. W. (1977b). A stress inoculation approach to anger management in the training of law enforcement officers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 5, 327-346. Novaco, R. W. (1979). The cognitive regulation of anger and stress. In P.C. Kendall & S. D. Hollon (Eds.), cognitive-behavioral interventions theory, research, and procedures(pp. 241-285). London; Academic press. Platt, J. J., & Spivack, G. (1975). Unidimensionality of the Means-Ends Problem-Solving (MEPS) procedure. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 31, 15-16. Plienis, A. J., Hansen, D. J., Ford, F., Smith, S. Jr., Stark, L. J., & Kelly, J. A. (1987). Behavioral small group training to improve the social skills of emotionally-disordered adolescents. Behavior Therapy, 18, 17-32. Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1981). Teaching cognitive and social skills to high school students. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 49, 908-918. Spivack, G., & Shure, M. B. (1974). Social adjustment of young children: A cognitive approach to solving real-life problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Spivack, G., Platt, J.J., & Shure, M.B.(1976). The problem-solving approach to adjustment. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Wege, W., & Moeller, A. T. (1995). Effectiveness of a problem-solving training program. Psychological Reports, 76, 507-514. Zeman, J., & Shipman, K. (1997). Social-contextual influences on expectancies for managing anger and sadness: The transition from middle childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 33, 917-924. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30447 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究回顧心理學領域中的問題解決模式與相關訓練方法,設計包含基本認知能力、生氣控制與問題解決本身三部分訓練的「人際問題解決能力訓練課程」,並驗證(1)該課程對國中生人際問題解決能力的提升效果;(2)該課程對國中生學校適應狀況的提升效果;(3)性別對課程效果的影響。研究對象為某台北市立國中三年級學生,實驗組(n = 63)與控制組(n = 52)各兩班。採用準實驗設計,實驗組接受九堂的訓練課程,控制組則否。訓練效果分別以「人際問題解決能力題目」與「學生生活調查問卷」加以評量,並比較實驗組與控制組在課程前後的人際問題解決能力與學校適應狀況。結果顯示:(1)「人際問題解決能力課程」能顯著提升實驗組人際問題解決能力;(2)「人際問題解決能力課程」未能顯著提升實驗組學校適應狀況;(3)在訓練之前,實驗組女生的問題解決品質顯著優於男生,而經由「人際問題解決能力訓練課程」顯著提升的人際問題解決能力也有不同,但訓練前後的進步情況則無顯著差別。「人際問題解決能力課程」能顯著提升人際問題解決能力,但卻無法顯著提升學校適應狀況,可能是受到前測與再測時間過短、人際問題並非學生目前的主要壓力源、與課程未完整設計「問題定向反應」部分等的影響。未來應可就這三方面進行較完整的設計,用以進一步探討此項訓練課程的效能。不過以本研究的結果來看,仍可以建議著手推廣人際問題解決能力訓練的課程,來幫助於學生在未來遭遇人際問題時,能更有效的進行問題解決,以減少學生產生適應不佳的可能性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | After reviewing the problem-solving model and related training program in Psychology area, the Interpersonal Problem-Solving Training Program (IPSTP) was designed to improve adolescents’ basic cognitive abilities, abilities of anger-control, and problem-solving proper. This study aimed to exam three targets: 1) the extent to which the training program improves junior high school students’ interpersonal problem-solving competences; 2) the extent to which the training program improves junior high school students’ adaptation to the school; 3) the influence of gender on the effects of the training program.
The subjects were senior students from one of the junior high school students in Taipei and classified into Experiment group (n = 63) and Control group (n = 52). By using quasi-experiment design, the experiment group had to finish nine training courses whereas the control group had not to. “Interpersonal problem-solving capability questionnaire” and “Taiwan relationship inventory for child and adolescents” were to used to compare students’ competences of interpersonal problem-solving and adaptation to school in Experiment group and Control group before and after the training program. The main findings of the study were: 1. The IPSTP significantly improved the Experiment group’s interpersonal problem-solving competences. 2. The IPSTP did not significantly improve the Experiment group’s adaptation to school. 3. Before the training program, girls’ problem-solving qualities were significantly higher than boys’. After the training program, boys and girls’ interpersonal problem-solving competences were significantly improved in different ways, but the degrees of improvement did not attain to a significant level. IPSTP can significantly improve the interpersonal problem-solving competences, but can not significantly improve the adaptation to school. There might be three causes of this insignificancy: 1) the interval between test and retest was too short to allow the change happen; 2) the interpersonal problem was not the students’ main stressor; 3) the “orienting responses” were not designed in the training program. In the future we can overcome these three limitations and further to evaluate the validness of this training program. But according to our results, we can still recommend to popularize interpersonal problem-solving training to help students to solve social problems and adapt to school effectively. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T02:03:59Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R92227021-1.pdf: 817624 bytes, checksum: 2ec8501d6cc0eb61dcaf5813a0a33954 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………. 1
第一節 問題解決的理論模式…………………………………………. 1 第二節 情緒與生氣控制………………………………………………. 14 第三節 訓練原則與評估………………………………………………. 17 第四節 問題解決訓練相關研究………………………………………. 23 第五節 本研究的課程概念與設計原則………………………………. 25 第六節 研究目的與假設………………………………………………. 28 第二章 研究方法………………………………………………………. 31 第一節 研究對象………………………………………………………. 31 第二節 研究設計………………………………………………………. 31 第三節 研究程序………………………………………………………. 32 第四節 課程方案………………………………………………………. 32 第五節 研究工具………………………………………………………. 33 第三章 研究結果………………………………………………………. 39 第一節 研究假設之檢驗………………………………………………. 39 第二節 實驗組學生與小組帶領者的回饋資料分析…………………. 48 第四章 綜合討論………………………………………………………. 55 第一節 「人際問題解決能力訓練課程」的教學成效………………. 55 第二節 「人際問題解決能力訓練課程」提升學校適應狀況的成效. 57 第三節 「人際問題解決能力訓練課程」對不同性別的教學成效…. 59 第五章 本研究之應用可能性、研究限制與未來研究方向…………. 61 第一節 本研究之應用可能性…………………………………………. 61 第二節 研究限制………………………………………………………. 61 第三節 未來研究方向…………………………………………………. 63 參考文獻………………………………………………………………………... 65 附錄……………………………………………………………………………... 71 附錄一 課程方案………………………………………………………. 71 附錄二 學生生活調查問卷……………………………………………. 99 附錄三 人際問題解決能力題目正式問卷與計分方法………………. 103 附錄四 單元觀察紀錄表………………………………………………. 109 附錄五 單元回饋表……………………………………………………. 110 附錄六 總回饋表………………………………………………………. 112 附錄七 我覺得對我有幫助的單元有哪些……………………………. 113 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.title | 國中生問題解決方案之設計及其效果之探討 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Design and Effects of 'Problem-Solving Training Program' for Junior High School Students | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許文耀,雷庚玲 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 問題解決,人際問題解決,人際問題,生氣控制,學校適應, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | problem-solving,interpersonal problem-solving,interpersonal problem,anger control,school adaptation, | en |
dc.relation.page | 69 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-04 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 心理學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 798.46 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。