請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30035
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 石正人(Cheng-Jen Shih) | |
dc.contributor.author | Shi-Zhe Bao | en |
dc.contributor.author | 包士哲 | zh_TW |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-13T01:31:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-07-19 | |
dc.date.copyright | 2007-07-19 | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2007-07-13 | |
dc.identifier.citation | 柒、參考文獻
林宗岐、吳文哲。2003。台灣螞蟻相(膜翅目:蟻科),附亞科與屬檢索表。國立台灣博物館年刊 46: 5-69。 洪裕堂、林仁偉、楊景程、吳文哲、石正人、林宗岐。2005。利用餌劑防治入侵紅火蟻 (Solenopsis invicta) 試驗初探。台灣昆蟲 26: 57-67。 Amalin, D. M., J. E. Pena, R. Mcsorley, H. W. Browning, and J. H. Crane. 2001. Comparison of different sampling methods and effect of pesticide application on spider populations in lime orchards in south Florida. Environ. Entomol. 30: 1021-1027. Anderson, A. N. 1991. Sampling communities of ground-foraging ants: Pitfall catches compared with quadrat counts in an Australian tropical savanna. Aust. Ecol. 16: 273-279. Anderson, A. N. 1992. Regulation of “momentary” diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. Am. Nat. 140: 401-420. Bextine, B. R., and H. G. Thorvilson. 2002. Monitoring Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) foraging with peanut oil-baited, UV-reflective Beauveria bassiana alginate pellets. Southwest. Entomol. 27: 31-36. Camlitepe, Y., V. Aksoy, N. Uren, A. Yilmaz, and I. Becenen. 2005. An experimental analysis on the magnetic field sensitivity of the black-meadow ant Formica pratensis Retzius (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Biol. Hungarica 56: 215-224. Cassill, D. L., and W. R. Tschinkel. 1999. Regulation of diet in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. J. Insect Behav. 12: 307-328. Chen, J. 2007. Advancement on techniques for separation maintenance of the red imported fire ant colonies. Insect Sci. 14: 1-4. Collin, H. L., and A. M. A. Callcott. 1998. Fipronil: An ultra-low-dose bait toxicant for control of red imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Entomol. 81: 407-415. Cunningham, R. T. 1989. Male annihilation. pp. 345-351. In: A. S. Robinson, and G. Hooper, eds. Fruit Flies: Their Biology, Natural Enemies, and Control. V. 3B. Elsevier, Amsterdam. Deshazo, R. D., D. F. Williams, and E. S. Moak. 1999. Fire ant attacks on residents in health care facilities: A report of two cases. Ann. Inter. Med. 131: 424-429. Furman, B. D., and R. E. Gold. 2006. Determination of the most effective chemical form and concentration of indoxacarb, as well as the most appropriate grit size, for the use in AdvionTM. Sociobiology 48: 309-334. Glancey, B. M., R. K. Vander Meer, A. Glover, C. S. Lofgren, and S. B. Vinson. 1981. Filtration of microparticles from liquids ingested by the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insectes Sociaux 28: 395-401. Glunn, F. J., D. F. Howard, and W. R. Tschinkel. 1981. Food preference in colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Insectes Sociaux 12: 217-222. Harlan, T., and B. L. Green. 1999. Protecting electrical/electronic equipment from red imported fire ant damage. Final report published by College of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources, Texas Tech University. pp. 8-9. Hooper-Bùi, L. M., A. G. Appel, and M. K. Rust. 2002. Preference of food particle size among several urban ant species. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 1222-1228. Romero, H., and K. Jaffe. 1989. A comparison of methods for sampling ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in Savannas. Biotropica 21: 348-352. Ipser, R. M., M. A. Brinkman, W. A. Gardner, and H. B. Peeler. 2004. A survey of ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Georgia. Fla. Entomol. 87: 253-260. King, J. R., and S. D. Porter. 2005. Evaluation of sampling methods and species richness estimators for ants in upland ecosystems in Florida. Environ. Entomol. 34: 1566-1578. Markin, G. P., J. O’Neal, and J. Dillier. 1975. Foraging tunnels of the red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 48: 83-89. Millar, J. G., K. M. Daane, J. S. McElfresh, J. A. Moreira, R. Malakar-Kuenen, M. Guillen, and W. J. Bentley. 2002. Development and optimization of methods for using sex pheromone for monitoring the mealybug Planococcus ficus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in California vineyards. J. Econ. Entomol. 95: 706-714. Morrison, J. E., D. F. Williams, D. H. Oi, and K. N. Potter. 1997. Damage to dry crop seed by red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 90: 218-222. Oi, D. H., C. A. Watson, and D. F. Williams. 2004. Monitoring and management of red imported fire ants in a tropical fish farm. Fla. Entomol. 87: 522-527. Parker, W. E. 1996. The development of baiting techniques to detect wireworms (Agriotes spp., Coleoptera: Elateridae) in the field, and the relationship between bait-trap catches and wireworm damage to potato. Crop Protection 15: 521-527. Pedigo, L. P. 2006. Entomology and Pest Management. pp. 203-228. Porter, S. D. 1989. Effects of diet on the growth of laboratory fire ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicdae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 62: 288-291. Porter, S. D., and D. A. Savignano. 1990. Invasion of polygyne fire ants decimate native ants and disrupts arthropod communities. Ecology 71: 2095-2106. Porter, S. D., and W. R. Tschinkel. 1987. Foraging in Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicdae): Effects of weather and season. Environ. Entomol. 16: 802-808. Romero, H., and K. Jaffe. 1989. A comparison of methods for sampling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Savannas. Biotropica 21: 348-352. Sorensen, A. A., and S. B. Vinson. 1981. Quantitative food distribution studies within laboratory colonies of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insectes Sociaux 12: 129-160. Sorensen, A. A., J. T. Mirenda, and S. B. Vinson. 1981. Food exchange and distribution by three functional worker groups of the imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta Buren. Insectes Sociaux 28: 383-394. Sorensen, A. A., R. S. Kamas, and S. B. Vinson. 1983. The influence of oral secretions from larvae on levels of proteinases in colony members of Solenopsis invicta Buren (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J. Insect Physiol. 61: 712-714. Stein, M. B., H. G. Thorvilson, and J. W. Johnson. 1990. Seasonal changes in bait preference by red imported fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Entomol. 73: 117-123. Stephens, E. J., and J. E. Losey. 2004. Comparison of sticky cards, visual and sweeping sampling of Coccinellid populations in Alfalfa. Environ. Entomol. 33: 535-539. Taber, S. W. 2000. Fire Ants. Texas A&M. Press, Texas. 308 pp. Tschinkel, W. R. 2006. The Fire Ants. Belknap Press, Harvard. 752 pp. Tennant, L. W., and S. D. Porter. 1991. Comparison of diets of two fire ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): solid and liquid components. J. Entomol. Sci. 26: 450-465. Thomas, C. F. G., N. J. Brown, and D. A. Kendall. 2006. Carabid movement and vegetation density: Implications for interpreting pitfall trap data from split-field trails. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 113: 51-61. Topp, W., H. Kappes, J. Kulfan, and P. Zach. 2006. Distribution pattern of woodlice (Isopoda) and millipedes (Diplopoda) in four primeval forests of the Western Carpathians (Central Slovakia). Soil Biol. Biochem. 38: 43-50. Vander Meer, R. K., C. S. Lofgren, and J. A. Seawright. 1995. Specificity of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) phagostimulant response to carbohydrates. Fla. Entomol. 78: 144-154. Vogt, J. T., R. A. Grantham, and W. A. Smith. 2001. Prey of the red imported fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Oklahoma peanuts. Environ. Entomol. 30: 123-128. Vogt, J. T., J. T. Reed, and R. L. Brown. 2004. Temporal foraging activity of selected ant species in northern Mississippi during summer months. J. Entomol. Sci. 39: 444-452. Vogt, J. T., J. T. Reed, and R. L. Brown. 2005. Timing bait applications for control of imported fire ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Mississippi: Efficacy and effects on non-target ants. Int. J. Pest Manage. 51: 121-130. Vogt, J. T., R. A. Grantham, E. Corbett, S. A. Rice, and R. E. Wright. 2002. Dietary habits of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in four Oklahoma habitats. Environ. Entomol. 31: 47-53. Wang, C., J. Strazanac, and L. Butler. 2001. A comparison of pitfall traps with bait traps for studying leaf litter ant communities. J. Econ. Entomol. 94: 761-765. Wilson, E. O. 1962. Chemical communication among workers of the fire ant Solenopsis saevissima (Fr. Smith). Anim. Behav. 10: 34-64. Wilson, E. O. 1971. The Insect Societies. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 548 pp. | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/30035 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 中文摘要
台灣在 2003 年 10 月首度發現入侵紅火蟻 (Solenopsis invicta Buren,以下簡稱火蟻) 後,為了執行全面撲滅計畫,於 2004 年 11 月正式成立國家紅火蟻防治中心 (National Red Imported Fire Ant Control Center, NRIFACC)。火蟻防治成功之關鍵仰賴偵測與監測技術的開發與執行。透過偵測與監測所得結果,可以獲得許多有效資訊,例如火蟻的分布位置、受侵擾地區之範圍及防治成效等。但是,台灣溫暖、潮濕且多雨的天氣,不只不利於餌劑的撒佈,更妨礙偵測與監測工作。為此,本研究依據火蟻的覓食行為與食物內容為基礎,改良國家紅火蟻防治中心所採用之監視技術,包括偵測之餌站與長期監測之掉落式陷阱,期能減少時間與勞力的浪費,對火蟻防治工作有所助益。本研究設計一個容器內部塗上 Fluon® 的圓形容器,進行火蟻誘餌偏好試驗。誘餌偏好試驗包含誘餌初步之篩選、觀測時間的選擇、方向偏好、足跡費洛蒙的影響以及誘餌進階偏好試驗等。初步篩選 11 種曾被使用之誘餌在室內進行測試,並以洋芋片作為對照組。誘引效果最佳的 3 種誘餌依序為熱狗、蝦餅與洋芋片。利用這 3 種誘餌進行野外試驗,結果顯示,3 種誘餌對火蟻的誘引效果並無顯著差異 (F = 0.66, df = 2, P = 0.5209)。但是,在前 2 小時的觀察中,熱狗誘集到最多的火蟻,可能是熱狗在野外環境條件下,容易變乾並從第 3 小時開始降低誘引效用。監測工具開發上,本研究採用澳洲昆士蘭火蟻中心曾使用,結合誘餌與掉落式陷阱優點的掉落式陷阱 (B-Trap),與現行掉落式陷阱 (A-Trap) 進行比較。結果顯示,B-Trap 比 A-Trap 誘集到更多的火蟻,並且具有許多優點,例如防雨水、容易操作以及比 A-Trap 更具有可信度等。此外,為提升偵測餌站的效用,進行殺蟲劑的忌避性與具觸殺效用之劑量測試,再添加於誘餌中。分別測試 6 種殺蟲藥劑,每種藥劑至少測試 5 個不同之濃度。結果以去離子水稀釋 250-4000 倍的賽洛寧 (cyhalothrin) 乳劑不具忌避性,適合添加於餌站之誘餌上。 關鍵字:入侵紅火蟻、偵察、監測、餌站、掉落式陷阱 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract
The red imported fire ants (RIFA), Solenopsis invicta Buren, was discovered in Taiwan in October, 2003. In order to execute the eradication program on this invasive species, National Red Imported Fire Ant Control Center (NRIFACC) was established in November, 2004. The key point leading to a successful eradication program strongly relies on the detection and monitoring survey of RIFA that could tell us much useful information, such as distribution of RIFA, how large the infestation area is, and how successful the eradication program is. In addition, Taiwan’s weather condition is warm, humid and raining that is suitable for RIFA development, but not suitable for bait broadcasting and monitoring. That is why this study wanted to improve the sampling methods used by NRIFACC. Therefore, we attempted to improve sampling methods according to RIFAs’ foraging behavior and diet components. Because of the huge range of infested area in Taiwan, investigating of detection and monitoring needs fast and effective tools to avoid the wasting of labor and time. This study was decided to improve the bait trap and pitfall trap for detection and long term monitoring programs separately according to literature review. For detection, this study designed the equipment such as a round container coated with Fluon® for bait preference experiments. It contains the basic sifting of baits, duration of observation, influence of trace pheromone and directions, and test of baits preference. A total of 11 baits used to monitor RIFA in the previous studies were tested in the laboratory condition, and potato chips that was used for bait stations by NRIFACC were adapted as the control. The three most preferred baits in the laboratory conditions were hotdog, shrimp cookie, and potato chip. These three baits were tested in the field conditions, and then the data was analyzed. The results showed non-significant difference (F = 0.66, df = 2, P = 0.5209) among them. In addition, the three most preferred baits in field conditions were shrimp cookie, hotdog, and potato chip based on the numbers of RIFA foragers attracted in the bait stations. Based on the first two hours observations, hotdog expressed better attractiveness to foragers than the remaining two attractants. The most possible reason might be that hotdog began to dry and lost its efficacy from the third hour in the field conditions. For long term monitoring, new pitfall trap (B-Trap) which incorporate hotdog into pitfall trap was designed to compare with the other one (A-Trap) used in NRIFACC. B-Trap baited with hotdog attracted more RIFA foragers than A-Trap did. There were several advantages of B-trap such as prevents rain, easy to operate, and more reliable than A-Trap. Based on those findings, B-trap could be replaced to the common pitfall trap for long term monitoring. To improve the monitoring efficacy of bait station by applying insecticides, the repellent and knockdown dose of insecticides also were determined. Six insecticides were tested at least 5 concentrations separately. Cyhalothrin diluted with deionized water for 250 - 4000 times did not repel the RIFA and could knock down the fire ant. Therefore, it could be applied for monitoring purposes. Key words: Solenopsis invicta, Detection, Monitoring, Bait trap, Pitfall trap | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:31:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-96-R94632015-1.pdf: 1295734 bytes, checksum: 316db206465ee619e5110dfff6f9800f (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 錄
誌 謝 中文摘要 英文摘要 目 錄……………………………………………………………………………….i 表 次……………………………………………………………………………...iii 圖 次……………………………………………...................................................iv 附 錄……………………………………………....................................................v 壹、緒言………………………………………………………………………………..1 貳、往昔研究…………………………………………………………………….……3 一、節肢動物取樣方法…………………………….……………………….……3 二、地棲性螞蟻取樣方法……….………………………………………….……5 三、入侵紅火蟻的生物學……………………………………………..…………7 四、火蟻所造成的危害…………………………………………………………10 五、入侵紅火蟻取樣方法………………………………………………………11 六、我國火蟻偵測與監測方法…………………………………………………14 参、材料與方法…………………………………………….......................................16 一、火蟻採集與飼養……………………………………...................................16 (一) 採集…………………………………...……....................…………..16 (二) 蟻巢分離火蟻………………………...……....................…………..16 (三) 火蟻族群維持與飼養………………...……....................…………..17 二、火蟻誘餌篩選…………………………………...……...............................17 (一) 試驗容器設計……………………………...……..............................18 (二) 初步誘餌篩選試驗………………………………………………….18 (三) 觀測時間的選擇…………………………………………………….20 (四) 取食方向偏好比較試驗…………………………………………….21 (五) 足跡費洛蒙對取食活動的影響…………………………………….21 三、誘餌偏好性進階試驗……………………………………….......................21 四、火蟻餌站田野試驗………………………………………….......................22 (一) 誘餌偏好田野試驗………………………………………………….22 (二) 掉落式陷阱改良…………………………………………………….22 (三) 單向誘捕盒………………………………………………………….23 五、含毒誘餌之室內試驗……………………………………………………...24 肆、結果……………………………………………...................................................27 一、火蟻誘餌篩選…….…………………………………………..…………...27 (一) 初步誘餌篩選試驗………………………………………………….27 (二) 觀測時間的選擇試驗……………………………………………….27 (三) 取食方向偏好比較試驗…………………………………………….27 (四) 足跡費洛蒙對取食活動的影響…………………………………….28 二、誘餌偏好進階試驗…………………………………...…….......................28 三、火蟻餌站田野試驗………………………………………….......................28 (一) 誘餌偏好田野試驗………………………………………………….28 (二) 掉落式陷阱改良…………………………………………………….29 (三) 單向誘捕盒………………………………………………………….30 四、含毒誘餌之室內試驗……………………………………………………...30 伍、討論……………………………………………...................................................33 陸、結論……………………………………………....................................................40 柒、參考文獻……………………………………………...........................................41 表 次 表一 火蟻誘餌初步篩選試驗……………………………………………………..46 表二 火蟻之取食方向誘餌之偏好比較………………………………………..…47 表三 足跡費洛蒙對火蟻覓食活動力的影響……………………………………..48 表四 室內誘餌偏好進階試驗……………………………………………………..49 表五 熱狗、蝦餅與洋芋片田野誘捕試驗………………………………………..50 表六 A-Trap 與 B-Trap 取樣入侵紅火蟻覓食蟻的平均數量與管數比例….…51 表七 A-Trap 與 B-Trap 在高密度與低密度區域取樣入侵紅火蟻覓食蟻的平均數量與管數比例………………………………………………………………..52 表八 熱狗片浸泡在不同殺蟲劑的不同之稀釋濃度下,對火蟻之誘引效果……53 圖 次 圖一 滴定管滴水分離法移動與分離蟻巢步驟…………………………………..55 圖二 試驗容器示意圖……………………………………………………………..56 圖三 人工模擬蟻巢示意圖………………………………………………………..57 圖四 龍潭科學園區野外試驗區域衛星地圖與掉落式陷阱設置示意圖………..58 圖五 B-Trap 實物圖與示意圖…………………………………………………….59 圖六 A 型誘捕盒示意圖………………………………………………………….59 圖七 B 型誘捕盒示意圖………………………………………………………….59 圖八 含毒誘餌室內試驗設置圖…………………………………………………..60 圖九 24 小時觀察火蟻取食高峰之時間點………………………………………60 圖十 比較 A-Trap 與 B-Trap 在低密度與高密度區域取樣入侵紅火蟻的比例與數量分布圖…………………………………………………………………..61 附 錄 附錄一 Romero 和 Jaffe (1989) 設計之結合誘餌的掉落式陷阱………………62 附錄二 台北桃園新竹 200 m 偵測點數據………………………………………63 附錄三 三峽鎮偵測調查圖………………………………………………………..64 附錄四 11 種誘引食物的營養成分之比重………………………………..……..65 附錄五 5 種誘引食物的營養成分之比重………………………………………..66 | |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
dc.title | 入侵紅火蟻調查方法之改良 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Improvement of Methods for Detection and Monitoring Survey of Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta Buren | en |
dc.type | Thesis | |
dc.date.schoolyear | 95-2 | |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳文哲,楊平世,陳秋男,黃德昌 | |
dc.subject.keyword | 入侵紅火蟻,偵察,監測,餌站,掉落式陷阱, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Solenopsis invicta,Detection,Monitoring,Bait trap,Pitfall trap, | en |
dc.relation.page | 66 | |
dc.rights.note | 有償授權 | |
dc.date.accepted | 2007-07-17 | |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 昆蟲學研究所 | zh_TW |
顯示於系所單位: | 昆蟲學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-96-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.27 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。