Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 工學院
  3. 土木工程學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29979
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor蔡克銓(Keh-Chyuan Tsai)
dc.contributor.authorJui-Liang Linen
dc.contributor.author林瑞良zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T01:28:36Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-25
dc.date.copyright2007-07-25
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2007-07-13
dc.identifier.citation1. Anastassiadis, K., Athanatopoulou, A. and Makarios, T. (1998), “Equivalent static eccentricities in the simplified methods of seismic analysis of buildings”, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 14, 1-34.
2. Applied Technology Council, (1996), “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings”, Report ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California.
3. Bates, D.M. and Watts, D.G. (1988), “Nonlinear regression and its applications”, John A. Wiley & Sons, Inc.
4. Borzi, B., Calvi, G.M., Elnashai, A.S., Faccioli, E. and Bommer, J.J. (2001) “Inelastic spectra for displacement-based seismic design”, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21: 47-61.
5. Calvi, M, Kingsley, G.R. (1995), “Displacement-based seismic design of multi-degree-of-freedom bridge structures”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24: 1247-1266.
6. Chandler, A.M. and Duan, X.N. (1997), “Performance of asymmetric code-designed buildings for serviceability and ultimate limit states”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26: 715-735.
7. Chopra, A.K. (2001), Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall: New Jersey.
8. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004), “Inelastic deformation ratios for design and evaluations of structures: single-degree-of-freedom bilinear systems”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130 (9), 1309-1319.
9. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999), “Capacity-demand-diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum”, Earthquake Spectra, 15: 637-656.
10. Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K. (2002), “A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31: 561-582.
11. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2004), “A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 33: 903-927.
12. Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2004), “Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands”, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 20, No. 3, 757-778.
13. Cruz, E.F. and Cominetti, S. (2000), “Three-dimensional buildings subjected to bi-directional earthquakes. Validity of analysis considering uni-directional earthquakes”, Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
14. De-La-Colina, J. (1999), “Effects of torsion factors on simple non-linear systems using fully-bidirectional analysis”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 691-706.
15. De-La-Colina, J. (1999), “In-plane floor flexibility effects on torsionally unbalanced systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 1705-1715.
16. De-La-Colina, J., Almazan J.L. and Vial, I.J. (2005), “Torsional balance of plan-asymmetric structures with frictional dampers: analytical results”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 1089-1108.
17. De-la-Llera, J.C. and Chopra, A.K. (1996), “Inelastic behavior of asymmetric multistory buildings”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 122 (6), 597-606.
18. Duan, X.N. and Chandler, A.M. (1997), “An optimized procedure for seismic design of torsionally unbalanced structures”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26: 737-757.
19. Fajfar, P. (2000), “A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design”, Earthquake Spectra, 16: 573-592.
20. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997), “NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings”, Reports FEMA 273 (Guidelines) and 274 (Commentary), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
21. Garcia, O., Islas, A. and Ayala, A.G. (2004), “Effect of the in-plan distribution of strength on the non-linear seismic response of torsionally coupled buildings”, Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1-6, 2004.
22. Goel, R.K. (1996), “Seismic response of asymmetric systems: energy-based approach”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 123: 1444-1453.
23. Goel, R.K. (1998), “Effects of supplenmental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric-plan systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27: 125-141.
24. Goel, R.K. (2000), “Seismic behavior of asymmetric buildings with supplemental damping”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29: 461-480.
25. Goel, R.K. (2001), “Simplified analysis of asymmetric structures with supplemental damping”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30: 1399-1416.
26. Goel, R.K. and Booker, C.A. (2001), “Effects of supplemental viscous damping on inelastic seismic response of asymmetric systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 30: 411-430.
27. Hao, H and Duan, X.N. (1995), “Seismic response of asymmetric structures to multiple ground motions”, Journal of Structural Engineering, 121: 1557-1564.
28. Hernádez, J.J. and López, O.A. (2000), “Influence of bidirectional seismic motion on the response of asymmetric buildings”, Proceedings of 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, 2000.
29. Humar, J.L. and Kumar, P. (1999), “Effect of orthogonal inplane structural elements on inelastic torsional response”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 1071-1097.
30. Kawashima, K., MacRae, G.A. Hoshikuma, J. and Nagaya, K. (1998), “Residual displacement response spectrum”, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 124: 523-530.
31. Kilar, V. and Fajfar, P. (1997), “Simple push-over analysis of asymmetric buildings”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26: 233-249.
32. Kilar, V. and Fajfar, P. (2001), “On the applicability of pushover analysis to the seismic performance evaluation of asymmetric buildings”, European Earthquake Engineering, 20-31.
33. Kowalsky, M, Priestley M.J.N, McRae, G.A. (1995), “Displacement-based design of RC bridge columns in seismic regions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24: 1623-1643.
34. Lin, J.L. and Tsai, K.C. (2006), “Seismic analysis of bi-asymmetric building systems under bi-directional seismic ground motions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics (in review).
35. Lin, W.H., Chopra, A.K. (2001), “Understanding and predicting effects of supplemental viscous damping on seismic response of asymmetric one-story systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 30: 1475-1494.
36. Lin, W.H., Chopra, A.K. (2003), “Asymmetric one-story elastic systems with non-linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Simplified analysis and supplemental damping system design”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics , 32: 579-596.
37. MacRae, G.A. and Kawashima, K. (1997), “Post-earthquake residual displacements of bilinear oscillators”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26: 701-716.
38. Mahin, S.A. and Bertero, V.V. (1981), “An evaluation of inelastic seismic design spectra”, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 107: 1777-1795.
39. Mahin, S.A. and Lin, J. (1983), “Construction of inelastic response spectra for single-degree-of-freedom systems”, Report No. UCB/EERC-83/17, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
40. Marušić, D. and Fajfar, P. (2005), “On the inelastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings under bi-axial excitation”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 943-963.
41. Miranda, E. (1999), “Approximate lateral deformation demands in multi-story buildings subjected to earthquakes”, Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE, 125: 417-425.
42. Miranda, E. and Bertero, V.V. (1994), “Evaluation of strength reduction factors for earthquake-resistant design”, Earthquake Spectra, 10: 357-379.
43. Miranda, E. and Ruiz-Garcia, J. (2002), “Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31: 539-560.
44. Moehle, J.P. (1992), “Displacement-based design of RC structures subjected to earthquakes”, Earthquake Spectra, 8: 403-428.
45. Myslimaj, B. and Tso, W.K. (2002), “A strength distribution criterion for minimizing torsional response of asymmetric wall-type systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31: 99-120.
46. Myslimaj, B. and Tso, W.K. (2004), “Desirable strength distribution for asymmetric structures with strength-stiffness dependent elements”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 8, No. 2, 231-248.
47. Myslimaj, B. and Tso, W.K. (2005), “A design-oriented approach to strength distribution in single-story asymmetric systems with elements having strength-dependent stiffness”, Earthquake Spectra, 21 (1): 197-212.
48. Nassar, A.A. and Krawinkler, H. (1991), “Seismic demands for SDOF and MDOF systems”, Report No. 95, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
49. Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1973), “Seismic design criteria for nuclear reactor facilities”, Report No. 46, Building Practices for Disaster Mitigation, National Bureau of Standards, U.S. Department of Commerce, 209-236.
50. Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C., Priestley, M.J.N. (2002), “Residual deformations in the performance-seismic assessment of frame structures”, Research Report No. ROSE-2002/02, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic, Pavia, Italy.
51. Paulay, T. (1997a), “Displacement-based design approach to earthquake–induced torsion in ductile buildings”, Engineering Structures, vol. 19, 699-707.
52. Paulay, T. (1997b), “Are existing seismic torsion provisions achieving the design aims? ”, Earthquake Spectra, vol. 13, 259-279.
53. Paulay, T. (1998), “Torsional mechanisms in ductile building systems”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 27: 1101-1121.
54. Paulay, T. (2001), “Some design principles relevant to torsional phenomena in ductile buildings”, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 5, No. 3, 273-308.
55. Peruš, I. and Fajfar, P. (2005), “On the inelastic torsional response of single-story structures under bi-axial excitation”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 931-941.
56. Priestley M.J.N. (1996), “Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings”, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 29: 256-272.
57. Riddell, R. and Santa-Maria, H. (1999), “Inelastic response of one-story asymmetric-plan systems subjected to bi-directional earthquake motions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28: 273-285
58. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2005), “Performance-based assessment of existing structures accounting for residual displacements”, Report No. 153, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
59. Ruiz-Garcia, J. and Miranda, E. (2006), “Residual displacement ratios for assessment of existing structures”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 35: 315-336
60. Sommer, A. and Bachmann, H. (2005), “Seismic behavior of asymmetric RC wall buildings: principles and new deformation-based design method”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 101-124.
61. Stathopoulos, K.G. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2003), “Inelastic earthquake response of single-story asymmetric buildings: an assessment of simplified shear-beam models”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32: 1813-1831.
62. Stathopoulos, K.G. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2005), “Inelastic torsion of multistory buildings under earthquake excitations”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34: 1449-1465.
63. Tsai, K.C. and Lin, B.Z. (2003), “User manual for the platform and visualization of inelastic structural analysis of 3D systems PISA3D and VISA3D”, Report No. CEER/R92-04, Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, National Taiwan University.
64. Tsai, K.C., Weng, Y.T., Lin, M.L., Chen, C.H., Lai, J.W., Hsiao, P.C., Tsai, C.Y., Lin, C.H. and Lin, J.L. (2005), “Experimental performance of large scale seismic steel braced frames and shear walls”, JSSC Seminar, Kyoto University, July 22, 2005.
65. Tso, W.K. and Myslimaj, B. (2003), “A yield displacement distribution-based approach for strength assignment to lateral force-resisting elements having strength dependent stiffness”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 32, 2319-2351.
66. Tso, W.K. and Smith, R.S.H. (1999), “Re-evaluation of seismic torsional provisions”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 899-917.
67. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1992), “A procedure for determining consistent inelastic design spectra”, Proc. Workshop on Nonlinear Seismic Analysis of RC Structures, Bled, Slovenia.
68. Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1994), “Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23: 523-537.
69. Weng, Y.T., Lin, J.L. Tsai, C.Y. and Tsai, K.C. (2005), “Analytical assessment of a 2-story BRBF for full-scale 3D sub-structural pseudo-dynamic testing”, The First Internal Conference on Advances in Experimental Structural Engineering, July 19-21, 2005, Nagoya, Japan.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29979-
dc.description.abstract平面不對稱結構在受地震力作用時會同時產生平移與旋轉的變形,所以相較於對稱結構更容易因受震而產生破壞。除了繁雜與耗時的非線性動力歷時分析外,目前仍缺少一個有系統且簡化的分析方法來進行平面不對稱結構的受震反應分析。
在本研究中,針對單向不對稱與雙向不對稱結構的運動方程式分別推導出兩個及三個自由度的振態運動方程式,並依此建立兩個及三個自由度的振態桿狀模型。
經由數學證明可知此種多自由度的振態桿狀模型在彈性狀態只有一個子振態對振態反應有貢獻,且等於單自由度振態桿狀模型的反應;其餘的子振態則對振態反應毫無貢獻。故在彈性狀態下,多自由度的振態桿狀模型是完全相當於單自由度的振態桿狀模型,所不同的是前者提供了平移與旋轉在彈性的振態反應中所各自貢獻的比例。在非彈性狀態,振態平移與旋轉不再成比例變化,振態遲滯迴圈呈現分叉的特性,故在非彈性動力反應中平移與旋轉反應彼此會交互影響。多自由度的振態桿狀模型具有模擬此一特性的能力。藉由多自由度的振態桿狀模型可同時得到結構質量中心的平移與旋轉反應,故可求得結構角隅處的位移、速度與加速度反應。
在本研究中,利用兩個自由度的振態桿狀模型建立平移與旋轉的非彈性反應譜。比較兩個自由度與單自由度的振態桿狀模型所建立的非彈性反應譜,可確認後者僅是前者的一個特例。藉由改變多自由度的振態桿狀模型的參數,可觀察到非彈性反應譜變化的趨勢與範圍,有助於不對稱結構的設計並可應用於將來相關規範的修訂。
本研究提供了一個簡化但具有普遍性與系統化的不對稱結構分析方法,並對目前地震工程發展的主流性能設計法作出貢獻。作者希望將來能將此研究成果進一步擴展至以機率為核心的地震工程領域。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPlane-asymmetric structures that suffered from torsional and translational deformations are most vulnerable to seismic excitations. Instead of lengthy and complicated nonlinear response time history analysis, there is still void of a more systematic and simpler assessment method to deal with this type of structures. Thus, this research is conducted.
In this study, a more rational and informative multi-degree-of-freedom modal stick is derived for asymmetric structures from investigating the modal equation of motion representing the dynamic behavior of a single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) modal stick.
At elastic state, the proposed modal sticks are equivalent eventually to the conventional SDOF modal stick. In addition, they can provide the information about the quantities of translational and rotational displacements at the center of mass observed in each mode. Meanwhile, at inelastic state, they can simulate the bifurcation of hysteretic loops due to the non-proportionality of the translational and rotational deformations. Hence, the interaction of translational and rotational motion is captured. Moreover, in utilizing the proposed modal sticks, the rotational displacement, velocity and acceleration at center of mass are available and are required to acquire the corner responses of asymmetric structures.
Several translational and rotational inelastic response spectra are constructed based from the proposed modal stick. It illustrated further that the SDOF modal stick is just a special case of the proposed modal stick. By investigating the constructed spectra, the trends on the responses resulted from varying the parameters in the proposed sticks are more understood as compared with the responses in SDOF modal stick. And, this will be helpful to the design of asymmetric structures and can be considered for the revision of code in the future.
It is believed that this study will provide a systematic, generalized and simpler assessment method to deal with asymmetric structures. Alongside, the contributions on the art of performance-based earthquake engineering are achieved. It is hoped also to extend these researches to probabilistic-based earthquake engineering.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:28:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-96-D91521029-1.pdf: 4349691 bytes, checksum: 2f172ae62dc09bbb884f194f1ed2098e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007
en
dc.description.tableofcontentsAcknowledgments i
Abstract (in Chinese) ii
Abstract iii
List of Figures vi
List of Tables ix
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Motivation 1-1
1.2 Literature Review 1-1
1.2.1 Seismic Assessment of Asymmetric Building 1-1
1.2.2 Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering 1-4
1.3 Review of Modal Pushover Analysis Method 1-5
1.4 Needs of Improvements for UMRHA and MPA 1-9
1.5 Objectives 1-10
1.6 Outline 1-10
Chapter 2 Seismic Assessment for Uni-Axial Asymmetric Building Systems
2.1 Two Degrees of Freedom Modal Pushover Analysis Method 2-1
2.1.1 Bifurcating Characteristics of Pushover Curves for Uni-Axial Asymmetric Structures 2-1
2.1.2 Construction of the Two-Degree-of-Freedom Modal Sticks 2-3
2.2 Analytical Example 2-10
2.2.1 Selected Structural System, Ground Motion and Basic Assumptions 2-10
2.2.2 Seismic Response at elastic State 2-11
2.2.3 Seismic Response at Inelastic State 2-12
2.3 Summary 2-13
Chapter 3 Seismic Assessment for Bi-Directional Asymmetric Building Systems
3.1 Three Degrees of Freedom Modal Pushover Analysis Method 3-1
3.1.1 Bifurcating Characteristics of Pushover Curves for Bi-Directional Asymmetric Structures 3-4
3.1.2 Construction of the Three-Degree-of-Freedom Modal Sticks 3-6
3.2 Analytical Example 3-8
3.2.1 Selected Structural System, Ground Motion and Basic Assumptions 3-8
3.2.2 Seismic Response at elastic State 3-8
3.2.3 Seismic Response at Inelastic State 3-10
3.3 Summary 3-11
Chapter 4 Performance-Based Design of Uni-Axial Asymmetric Building Systems
4.1 Definition of Engineering Demand Parameters 4-1
4.2 Review of Previous Studies 4-3
4.3 Discussion of Parameters of 2DOF Modal Stick 4-4
4.4 Selection of Parameters in This Study 4-7
4.4.1 Earthquake Ground Motions 4-7
4.4.2 Hysteretic Models of Two-Degree-of-Freedom Modal Sticks 4-8
4.5 Statistical Results 4-8
4.5.1 Maximum Relative Displacement 4-9
4.5.2 Maximum Relative Velocity 4-10
4.5.3 Maximum Absolute Acceleration 4-10
4.5.4 Residual Displacement 4-11
4.6 Function Models to Estimate R-CRz-T and R-CR
4.7 Recommendations on Coefficient C1 of Coefficient Method in FEMA-273 4-12
4.8 Summary 4-13
Chapter 5 Summary and Conclusions
5.1 Summary and Relevant Findings 5-1
5.1.1 Bifurcation of Pushover Curves for Asymmetric Structures 5-1
5.1.2 Construction of Multi-Degree-of-Freedom Modal Sticks 5-1
5.1.3 Development of Seismic Assessment Method for Asymmetric Structures 5-2
5.1.4 Construction of Inelastic Response Spectra for Asymmetric Structures 5-2
5.2 Limitations 5-2
5.3 Suggested Research 5-2
List of References R-1
Appendix A Member Size of Prototype Two-Story Steel Building A-1
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject非線性動力分析zh_TW
dc.subject振態分析zh_TW
dc.subject振態桿狀模型zh_TW
dc.subject不對稱建築zh_TW
dc.subject偏心zh_TW
dc.subjecteccentricityen
dc.subjectmodal sticken
dc.subjectnonlinear dynamic analysisen
dc.subjectmodal analysisen
dc.subjectasymmetric buildingen
dc.title不對稱建築結構耐震性能分析zh_TW
dc.titleSeismic Assessment of Asymmetric Building Systemsen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear95-2
dc.description.degree博士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張國鎮(Kuo-Chun Chang),羅俊雄(Chin-Hsiung Loh),蔡益超(I-Chau Tsai),鄭蘩(Van Jeng),薛強(Qiang Xue)
dc.subject.keyword非線性動力分析,振態分析,振態桿狀模型,不對稱建築,偏心,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordnonlinear dynamic analysis,modal analysis,modal stick,asymmetric building,eccentricity,en
dc.relation.page162
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2007-07-17
dc.contributor.author-college工學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept土木工程學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:土木工程學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-96-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
4.25 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved