Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 理學院
  3. 心理學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29516
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor吳瑞屯
dc.contributor.authorTzu-Nien Tsungen
dc.contributor.author叢孜年zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-13T01:09:10Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-27
dc.date.copyright2007-07-27
dc.date.issued2007
dc.date.submitted2007-07-23
dc.identifier.citation石瑞儀(1986)。「文字閱讀中,『字形—字音』關係對字彙接觸歷程的影響」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
周有光(1978)。現代漢字中聲旁的表音功能問題。「中國語文」, 3, 172-177。
周泰立(1993)。「中文字彙、詞彙的接觸歷程與頻率效果分析」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立台灣大學心理學研究所。
林宜平(1983)。「漢字『形』『音』『義』的比對:一個語音轉錄的字彙接觸模式。」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
吳瑞屯、周泰立、劉英茂. (1994). 中文字詞處理過程裡的頻率效果分析. In H.-W. Chang, J.-T. Huang, C.-W. Hue & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Advances in the study of Chinese language processing. Taipei, Taiwan: Departemt of National Taiwan University.
吳瑞屯、陳欣進(2000)。中文辨識與唸字作業中字音字義促發效果的比較分析。「中華心理學刊」,42(1),45-86。
吳瑞屯、劉英茂(1987)。「常用中文字詞與音節的出現次數計算」。行政院國家科學委員會研究計劃報告,計劃編號:NSC75-0301-H002-24。
連韻文(1985)。「中文唸字歷程的探討:聲旁的語音觸發效果」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
劉英茂、蘇友瑞、陳紹慶(2001)。「漢字聲旁的表音功能」。高雄:復文圖書出版社。
謝娜敏(1982)。「中文『字』與『詞』的閱讀與語音轉錄」(未發表之碩士論文)。台北:國立臺灣大學心理學研究所。
蘇友瑞(1999)。「漢字的發音歷程」(未發表之博士論文)。嘉義:國立中正大學心理學研究所。
Baron, J. (1973). Phonemic stage not necessary for reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 241-246.
Becker, C. A. (1976). The Allocation of Attention During Visual Word Recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 556-566.
Berent, I. (1997). Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: Regularity effects are not necessary evidence for assembly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1727-1742.
Berent, I., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A rose is a REEZ: The two-cycles model of phonology assembly in reading English. Psychological Review, 102, 146-184.
Berent, I., & Van Orden, G. C. (2000). Homophone dominance modulates the phonemic-masking effect. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 133-167.
Besner, D., Dennis, I., & Davelaar, E. (1985). Reading without phonology? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 37A, 477-491.
Borowsky, R., & Besner, D. (1993). Visual word recognition: A multistage activation model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19, 813-840.
Brysbaert, M., & Praet, C. (1992). Reading isolated words: No evidence for automatic incorporation of the phonetic code. Psychological Research, 54, 91-102.
Chen, H.-C., & Shu, H. (2001). Lexical activation during the recognition of Chinese characters: Evidence against early phonological activation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 511-518.
Cheng, C.-M. (1992). Lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from automatic activation of phonological information. In H.-C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 67-91). North-Holland: England.
Cheng, C. M., & Shih, S. I. (1988). The nature of lexical access in Chinese: Evidence from experiments on visual and phonological priming in lexical judgment. In I. M. Liu, H. C. Chen & M. J. Chen (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of the Chinese language (pp. 1-44). Hong Kong: Asian Research Service.
Chou T.L., Marslen-Wilson W, & Patterson, K (2003). Regularity and Consistency Effects in Lexical Decision for Chinese Characters. Cambridge University. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Chua, F. K. (1999). Phonological recoding in Chinese logograph recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 876-891.
Coltheart, M. (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Strategies of information processing (pp. 151-216). London: Academic Press.
Coltheart, M. (1997). Reading comprehension is not exclusively reliant upon phonological representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 167-175.
Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489-507.
Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
Davelaar, E., Coltheart, M., Besner, D., & Jonasson, J. T. (1978). Phonological recoding and lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 6, 391-402.
Davis, C., Castles, A., & Iakovidis, E. (1998). Masked homophone and pseudohomophone priming in adults and children. Language and Cognitive Processes,13, 625-651.
Drieghe, D., & Brysbaert, M. (2002). Strategic effects in associative priming with words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 951-961.
Fang, S. P., Horng, R. Y., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H. S. R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11-21). Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong Press.
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1992). Phonology and orthography in visual word recognition: Evidence from masked non-word priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 45A, 353-372.
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1994). Effects of orthography are independent of phonology in masked form priming. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47A, 365-382.
Ferrand, L., & Grainger, J. (1996). List context effects on masked phonological priming in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 515-519.
Flores d'Arcais, G. B., Saito, H., & Kawakami, M. (1995). Phonological and semantic activation in reading kanji characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 34-42.
Forster, K. I., & Bednall, E. S. (1976). Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53-61.
Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680-698.
Forster, K. I., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 39A, 211-251.
Forster, K. I., Mohan, K., & Hector, J. (2003). The mechanics of masked priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 3-37). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Frost, R. (1995). Phonological computation and missing vowels: Mapping lexical involvement in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 398-408.
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
Frost, R., Ahissar, M., Gotesman, R., & Tayeb, S. (2003). Are phonological effects fragile? The effect of luminance and exposure duration on form priming and phonological priming. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 346-378.
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992a). Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: Evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 58-68.
Frost, R., & Bentin, S. (1992b). Reading consonants and guessing vowels: Visual word recognition in Hebrew orthography. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 1927-1944). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Frost, R., & Yogev, O. (2001). Orthographic and phonological computation in visual word recognition: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 524-530.
Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
Gronau, N., & Frost, R. (1997). Prelexical phonologic computation in a deep orthography: Evidence from backward masking in Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 107-112.
Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662-720.
Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. (1998). The effects of word frequency for Japanese Kana and Kanji words in naming and lexical decision: Can the dual-route model save the lexical-selection account? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1431-1453.
Holyk, G. G., & Pexman, P. M. (2004). The elusive nature of early phonological priming effects: are there individual differences? Brain and Language, 90, 353-367.
Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93-107). England: North-Holland.
Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2001). Loss of rapid phonological recoding in reading Hanja, the logographic script of Korean. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 785-790.
Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2002). Using Korean to investigate phonological priming effects without the influence of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 569-591.
Kim, J., Taft, M., & Davis, C. (2004). Orthographic-phonological links in the lexicon: When lexical and sublexical information conflict. Reading and Writing, 17, 187-218.
Kleiman, G. M. (1975). Speech recoding in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 323-339.
Leck, K., Weekes, B., & Chen, M. (1995). Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: Evidence from Chinese readers. Memory and Cognition, 23, 468-476.
Lesch, M. F., & Pollatsek, A. (1993). Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 285-294.
Liu, I.-M., Chen, S.-C., & Sue, I.-R. (2003). Regularity and Consistency Effects in Chinese Character Naming. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 29-46.
Liu, I.-M., Wu, J.-T., & Chou, T.-L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59, 149-168.
Lukatela, G., Eaton, T., Lee, C., & Turvey, M. (2001). Does visual word identification involve a subphonemic level? Cognition, 78, B41-B52.
Lukatela, G., Frost, S. J., & Turvey, M. (1998). Phonological priming by masked nonword primes in the lexical decision task. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 666-683.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. (1990). Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology. Memory and Cognition, 18, 128-152.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. (1994a). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: I. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 107-128.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. (1994b). Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 2. Evidence from phonological priming by homophones and pseudohomophones. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 331-353.
Lukatela, G., & Turvey, M. (2000). An evaluation of the two-cycles model of phonology assembly. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 183-207.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognition, 8, 1-71.
McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
Meyer, D. E., Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Ruddy, M. G. (1974). Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition. Memory and Cognition, 2, 309-321.
Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165-178.
Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93-136.
Perfetti, C. A., Bell, L. C., & Delaney, S. M. (1988). Automatic (prelexical) phonetic activation in silent word reading: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 59-70.
Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: some implications of research on chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43-59.
Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101-118.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological processes in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 633-643.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995a). The universal word identification reflex. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory,33, 159-189.
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995b). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24-33.
Perfetti, C. A., Zhang, S., & Berent, I. (1992). Reading in English and Chinese: Evidence for a 'universal' phonological principle. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds), Orthography, morphology, and meaning (pp. 227-248). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Pexman, P. M., Lupker, S. J., & Jared, D. (2001). Homophone effects in lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 139-156.
Plaut, D., McClelland, J., Seidenberg, M., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in Quasi-Regular Doamins. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97-145.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999a). Lexical and nonlexical phonological priming in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 461-481.
Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1999b). Serial and strategic effects in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 482-503.
Rubenstein, H., Lewis, S., & Rumelhart, M. (1971). Evidence for phonemic recoding in visual word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 645-657.
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60-94.
Sakuma, N., Sasanuma, S., Tatsumi, I. F., & Masaki, S. (1998). Orthography and phonology in reading Japanese kanji words: Evidence from the semantic decision task with homophones. Memory and Cognition, 26, 75-87.
Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems. Cognition, 19, 1-30.
Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
Shen, D., & Forster, K. I. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 429-459.
Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition , 76, B1-B11.
Taft, M. (1994). Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203-224.
Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D.-l. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43-54.
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1997). Visual Chinese character recognition: Does phonological information mediate access to meaning? Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 41-57.
Tan, L.-H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10, 165-200.
Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Phonological and associative inhibition in the early stages of English word identification: Evidence from backward masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 59-69.
Taylor, I. (1997). Psycholinguistic reasons for keeping Chinese characters in Korean and Japanese. In J. H.-w. Hsiao (Ed.), Cognitive Processing of Chinese and Related Asian Languages (pp. 299-319). Hong Kong: The Chinese University press.
Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory and Cognition,15, 181-198.
Van Orden, G. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (1994). Interdependence of form and function in cognitive systems explains perception of printed words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1269-1291.
Van Orden, G. C., Johnston, J. C., & Hale, B. L. (1988). Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 371-386.
Van Orden, G. C., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488-522.
Van Orden, G. C., Stone, G. O., Garlington, K. L., Markson, L. R., Pinnt, G. S., Simonfy, C. M., & Bricgetto T. (1992). 'Assembled' phonology and reading: A case study in how theoretical perspective shapes empirical investigation. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 249-292). Oxford, England: North-Holland.
Weekes, B., Chen, M., & Lin, Y. B. (1998). Differential effects of phonological priming on Chinese character recognition. Reading and Writin, 10, 201-222.
Wu, J.-T., & Chou, T. L. (2000). The comparison of relative effects of semantic, homophonic, and graphic priming on Chinese character recognition and naming. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 34-41.
Wu, J.-T., & Liu, I.-M. (1997). Phonological Activation in Pronouncing Characters. In H.-C. Chen (Ed.), Cognitive processing of Chinese and related Asian languages (pp. 47-64). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press,.
Wydell, T. N., Patterson, K. E., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). Phonologically mediated access to meaning for Kanji: Is a rows still a rose in Japanese Kanji? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 491-514.
Xu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A.(1999). Nonstrategic subjective threshold effects in phonemic masking. Memory and Cognition, 27, 26-36.
Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. C. (1999). The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 838-857.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999a). Phonology, orthography, and semantic activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 41, 579-606.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999b). The nature of sublexical processing in reading Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 819-837.
Zhou, X., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2000). The relative time course of semantic and phonological activation in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1245-1265.
Zhou, X., Shu, H., Bi, Y., & Shi, D. (1999). Is there phonologically mediated access to lexical semantics in reading Chinese? In J. Wang, A. W. Inhoff, & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 135-172). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/29516-
dc.description.abstract語音於文字辨識中所扮演的角色一直為爭論議題之一。強勢語音理論認為語音為辨識中重要的角色,辨識需經由文字符號轉換為語音後進而接觸字彙表徵,語音於辨識中自動激發處理且於早期即開始影響辨識歷程;弱勢語音理論則是認為語音僅為辨識中次要的角色,其影響僅於辨識較晚期才開始產生,且於低頻字中才會展現顯著影響。本研究使用漢字形音分離特性,排除字形影響,利用如同Zhou與Marslen-Wilson(1999a)操弄規則一致性方式並與強勢語音理論對其之預期試圖檢驗強勢語音理論對漢字的適用性。實驗中使用漢字為刺激材料,以50毫秒促發時距分別於實驗一、二中使用前項遮蔽之促發程序字彙判斷作業以及念字作業,同時操弄目標字規則性以及促發字類型,觀察在目標字與促發字的組合狀況下同音促發效果的可能性。結果顯示在字彙辨識作業中同音促發效果僅於目標字為規則字且促發字為規則一致字時得到顯著助益效果,而念字作業則是於目標字為不規則且促發字為不規則不一致的狀況下呈現顯著的負向同音促發效果,其餘狀況皆無。研究結果均與強勢語音理論主張進行比較,並提出一個可能的反應模型來解釋這樣的結果。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAt 50 ms stimulus onset asynchrony, two forward-masked phonological priming experiments were conducted to examine whether the strong phonological theory is suited to the Chinese character recognition. Target regularity, phonological priming, and the prime types (regular-high consistent, irregular-low consistent) were included into manipulation. Results showed that the target responses were facilitated by a homophone prime only when the target was regular and the prime was regular-high consistent in lexical decision task (Experiment 1), and were inhibited only when the target was irregular and the prime was irregular-low consistent in naming task (Experiment 2). The results contradicted the strong phonological theory’s prediction. A possible alternative to account for these two experiements’ results was proposed.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-06-13T01:09:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-96-R94227102-1.pdf: 636299 bytes, checksum: 19171f6179d81400e6f76ba85e44bd6a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2007
en
dc.description.tableofcontents緒論 1
早期西方有關文字辨識的理論 2
語音於辨識中之角色-語音轉錄 5
強勢語音理論 8
弱勢語音理論 13
語音複雜性 19
以漢字再探語音效果 22
漢字之強勢語音理論 23
漢字之弱勢語音理論 27
漢字之語音複雜性 30
語音促發效果:所有的同音字效果均相同? 35
研究目的 39
實驗一 40
方法 42
結果 46
討論 49
實驗二 52
方法 52
結果 53
討論 55
綜合討論 59
強勢語音理論適用於漢字? 59
同音字群密度 64
一致性效果之計算 65
結論 66
未來研究方向 66
參考文獻 67
附錄 78
附錄一:實驗一、二中目標字刺激項目各項統計值 78
附錄二:實驗一、二實驗刺激項目各情況促發字控制變項
相關屬性的平均值與標準差(括號內) 82
附錄三:實驗一、二實驗刺激項目各情況平均正確反應時
間值與標準差(括號內) 83
附錄四:實驗一字彙辨識作業中正確反應時間之變異數分析簡表 91
附錄五:實驗二念字作業中正確反應時間之變異數分析簡表 92
附錄六:實驗一字彙辨識作業刪除實驗二不分析項目後正確反應
時間之變異數分析簡表 93
附錄七:實驗一、二所使用的填充刺激 94
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.subject一致性zh_TW
dc.subject漢字zh_TW
dc.subject文字辨識zh_TW
dc.subject強勢語音理論zh_TW
dc.subject弱勢語音理論zh_TW
dc.subject唸名zh_TW
dc.subject字彙判斷zh_TW
dc.subject同音促發效果zh_TW
dc.subject規則性zh_TW
dc.subjectnamingen
dc.subjectword recognitionen
dc.subjectstrong phonological theoryen
dc.subjectweak phonological theoryen
dc.subjectlexical decisionen
dc.subjectconsistencyen
dc.subjectregularityen
dc.subjectmasked phonological priming effecten
dc.subjectChinese characteren
dc.title探討漢字辨識中不同規則一致狀況下語音促發的可能性zh_TW
dc.titleWhen Does Masked Phonological Priming Effect Influence Chinese Character Recognition?en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear95-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee劉英茂,周泰立
dc.subject.keyword漢字,文字辨識,強勢語音理論,弱勢語音理論,唸名,字彙判斷,同音促發效果,規則性,一致性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordChinese character,word recognition,strong phonological theory,weak phonological theory,naming,lexical decision,masked phonological priming effect,regularity,consistency,en
dc.relation.page94
dc.rights.note有償授權
dc.date.accepted2007-07-23
dc.contributor.author-college理學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept心理學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:心理學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-96-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
621.39 kBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved